A new anisotropic visco-hyperelastic constitutive model has been developed to predict the time-dependent deformation response of flexible, knitted fabric-reinforced elastomer composites. These composites exhibit a time-dependent response due to the viscoelastic behavior of the elastomer, while the anisotropic reinforcement effect is attributed to the knitted fabrics. The proposed modeling approach features an invariant-based strain energy density function that incorporates the architecture of knitted fabrics and the hyper-viscoelastic behavior of elastomers. In this study, the elastomer is considered as a viscous neo-Hookean material, and the knitted fabrics are modeled as cords with negligible stiffness in bending. The proposed material model is implemented in commercial Finite Element Analysis (FEA) software, Abaqus (version 2017), through a user-defined material subroutine, UMAT. This approach enables the determination of the constitutive behavior of the composite based on the constituent elastomer, fiber properties, and fabric architectures. The proposed model is verified through a discrete 3D FEA model, in which the elastomer and fabric reinforcement are modeled explicitly. The approach is further validated through physical testing including uniaxial tension, torsion, and three-point bending. Since the proposed strain energy-based constitutive model can predict the deformation response of knitted fabric-reinforced elastomer composites based on the fabric architecture, it can be employed as an efficient modeling tool to aid the design of knitting pattern for target mechanical properties.
LeongKHFalzonPJBannisterMK, et al.An investigation of the mechanical performance of weft-knit Milano-rib glass/epoxy composites. Compos Sci Technol1998; 58(2): 239–251. DOI: 10.1016/S0266-3538(97)00128-0
2.
HuaGChanggengSJianguoM, et al.Study on theoretical model of burst pressure of fiber reinforced arc-shaped rubber hose with good balance performance. Polym Polym Compos2020; 29: 919–930. DOI: 10.1177/0967391120949488
3.
YangXDYangCSpintzykS, et al.Carbon fiber reinforced PEEK composites based on 3d-printing technology for orthopedic and dental applications. Jcm2019; 8(2): 240. DOI: 10.3390/jcm8020240
4.
SarkarCSahuSKSinhaA, et al. “Facile synthesis of carbon fiber reinforced polymer-hydroxyapatite ternary composite: a mechanically strong bioactive bone graft,” Mater Sci Eng C2019; 97: 388–396. DOI: 10.1016/j.msec.2018.12.064
5.
VallittuPK. An overview of development and status of fiber-reinforced composites as dental and medical biomaterials. Acta Biomaterialia Odontologica Scandinavica2018; 4(1): 44–55. DOI: 10.1080/23337931.2018.1457445.
6.
JooSJYuMHJeonEB, et al.In situ fabrication of copper electrodes on carbon-fiber-reinforced polymer (CFRP) for damage monitoring by printing and flash light sintering. Compos Sci Technol2017; 142: 189–197. DOI: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2017.02.011
7.
CostaNJCantarellaGVogtC, et al.Oxide thin-film electronics on carbon fiber reinforced polymer composite. IEEE Electron Device Lett2017; 38(8): 1043–1046. DOI: 10.1109/LED.2017.2720258
8.
LeongKHRamakrishnaSHuangZM, et al.The potential of knitting for engineering composites-a review. Compos Appl Sci Manuf2000; 31(3): 197–220. DOI: 10.1016/S1359-835X(99)00067-6
9.
SavciSCuriskisJIPailthorpeMT. A study of the deformation of weft-knit preforms for advanced composite structures Part 2: the resultant composite. Compos Sci Technol2000; 60(10): 1943–1951. DOI: 10.1016/S0266-3538(00)00078-6
10.
BhattacharyyaMDBhattacharyyaD. Simulating the deformation mechanisms of knitted fabric composites. Compos Appl Sci Manuf2006; 37(11): 1897–1915. DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2005.12.029
11.
RosenZBWRosenBW. The elastic moduli of fiber-reinforced materials. J Appl Mech1964; 31(2): 223–232. DOI: 10.1115/1.3629590
12.
LoRMKHLoKH. Solutions for effective shear properties in three phase sphere and cylinder models. J Mech Phys Solid1979; 27(4): 315–330. DOI: 10.1016/0022-5096(79)90032-2
13.
TanakaTKTanakaK. Average stress in matrix and average elastic energy of materials with misfitting inclusions. Acta Metall1973; 21(5): 571–574. DOI: 10.1016/0001-6160(73)90064-3
14.
HeinrichCAldridgeMWinemanAS, et al.The influence of the representative volume element (RVE) size on the homogenized response of cured fiber composites. Model Simulat Mater Sci Eng2012; 20(7): 075007. DOI: 10.1088/0965-0393/20/7/075007
15.
WaasDAMWaasAM. A micromechanics based multiscale model for nonlinear composites. Acta Mech2014; 225(4): 1391–1417. DOI: 10.1007/s00707-013-1057-1
16.
ZhangDWaasAMYenC-F. Progressive damage and failure response of hybrid 3D textile composites subjected to flexural loading, part II: Mechanics based multiscale computational modeling of progressive damage and failure. Int J Solid Struct2015; 75-76(76): 321–335. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2015.06.033
17.
ZhangWDZhangD. A micromechanics-based processing model for predicting residual stress in fiber-reinforced polymer matrix composites. Compos Struct2018; 204: 153–166. DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.07.016
18.
ZhangWDZhangD. Improved prediction of residual stress induced warpage in thermoset composites using a multiscale thermo-viscoelastic processing model. Compos Appl Sci Manuf2019; 126: 105575. DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2019.105575
19.
VaidyaCTRSVaidyaRS. Prediction of composite properties from a representative volume element. Compos Sci Technol1996; 56(2): 171–179. DOI: 10.1016/0266-3538(95)00141-7
20.
AboudiJ. Mechanics of composite materials: a unified micromechanical approach. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2013.
21.
PinedaEJBednarcykBAWaasAM, et al.Progressive failure of a unidirectional fiber-reinforced composite using the method of cells: Discretization objective computational results. Int J Solid Struct2013; 50(9): 1203–1216. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2012.12.003
22.
YuW. A unified theory for constitutive modeling of composites. J Mech Mater Struct2016; 11(4): 379–411. DOI: 10.2140/jomms.2016.11.379
23.
HuangZM, True stress theory of matrix in a composite: a topical review, Materials202316(2): 774. DOI: 10.3390/ma16020774
24.
HuangZM. A unified micromechanical model for the mechanical properties of two constituent composite materials. Part IV: rubber-elastic behavior. J Thermoplast Compos Mater2000; 13(2): 119–139. DOI: 10.1177/089270570001300203
25.
HuangZMRamakrishnaRTayAOA. a micromechanical approach to the tensile strength of a knitted fabric composite. J Compos Mater1999; 33(19): 1758–1791. DOI: 10.1177/002199839903301901
26.
HuangZMRamakrishnaSTayAAO. Modeling the stress/strain behavior of a knitted fabric-reinforced elastomer composite. Compos Sci Technol2000; 60(5): 671–691. DOI: 10.1016/S0266-3538(99)00164-5
27.
PengXGuoGZhaoN. An anisotropic hyperelastic constitutive model with shear interaction for cord-rubber composites. Compos Sci Technol2013; 78: 69–74. DOI: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2013.02.005
28.
GuoZYZYMoranB. An anisotropic hyperelastic constitutive model with fiber-matrix shear interaction for the human annulus fibrosus. J Biomech Eng2006; 73: 815–824. DOI: 10.1115/1.2069987
29.
PenceHTJPenceTJ. .Swelling of an internally pressurized nonlinearly elastic tube with fiber reinforcing. Int J Solid Struct200744: 4009–4029. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2006.11.006
30.
FereidoonnezhadBNaghdabadiRArghavaniJ. A hyperelastic constitutive model for fiber-reinforced rubber-like materials. Int J Eng Sci2013; 71: 36–44. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijengsci.2013.06.001
31.
NolanDRGowerALDestradeM, et al.A robust anisotropic hyperelastic formulation for the modelling of soft tissue. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater2014; 39: 48–60. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2014.06.016
32.
YangHYaoXFKeYC, et al.Constitutive behaviors and mechanical characterizations of fabric reinforced rubber composites. Compos Struct2016; 152: 117–123. DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.05.021
33.
ChebbiEWaliMDammakF. An anisotropic hyperelastic constitutive model for short glass fiber-reinforced polyamide. Int J Eng Sci2016; 106: 262–272. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijengsci.2016.07.003
34.
ChatterjeeAChahareNRKondaiahP, et al.Role of fiber orientations in the mechanics of bioinspired fiber-reinforced elastomers. Soft Robot2021; 8(6): 640–650. DOI: 10.1089/soro.2019.0191
35.
WaasNAMWaasAM. Nonlinear, finite deformation, finite element analysis. Z Angew Math Phys2016; 67(3): 35. DOI: 10.1007/s00033-016-0623-5
36.
LiYYLiY. A review on the mechanical property evaluation and optimization design of fabric rubber composite structure. Composites Part C: Open Access2022; 8: 100289. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcomc.2022.100289
37.
GaoJYangXLiuJ. Assessment of hyperelastic constitutive models for chopped aramid fibre-reinforced rubber composites. Plast, Rubber Compos2020; 49(8): 329–341. DOI: 10.1080/14658011.2020.1747160
38.
DongYYaoXYanH, et al.Macro- and mesoscopic mechanical properties of complex fabric rubber composite under different temperatures. Compos Struct2019; 230(Dec): 111510. DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.111510
39.
HolzapfelGA. Nonlinear solid mechanics: a continuum approach for engineering science. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley, 2001.
40.
LeeBSBLeeJChoS, et al.A comparison among Neo-Hookean model, Mooney-Rivlin model, and ogden model for chloroprene rubber. Int J Precis Eng Manuf2012; 13(5): 759–764. DOI: 10.1007/s12541-012-0099-y
41.
VerronGEVerronE. Comparison of hyperelastic models for rubber-like materials. Rubber Chem Technol2006; 79(5): 835–858. DOI: 10.5254/1.3547969
42.
ZhangRDZhangD. A textile architecture-based hyperelastic model for rubbers reinforced by knitted fabrics. Acta Mech2019; 230(3): 953–964. DOI: 10.1007/s00707-018-2276-2
43.
GaoJYangXHuangLH. Numerical prediction of mechanical properties of rubber composites reinforced by aramid fiber under large deformation. Compos Struct2018; 201: 29–37. DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.05.132
44.
YeFWangH. A simple Python code for computing effective properties of 2D and 3D representative volume element under periodic boundary conditions. 2017. DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.1703.03930
45.
PlachyRScheinerSLuczynskiKW, et al.Compressibility of unvulcanized natural and EPDM rubber: New experimental protocol and data evaluation in the framework of large strain elasticity theory. Polymer2017; 123: 334–344. DOI: 10.1016/j.polymer.2017.06.061
46.
KarthikKRajamaniDManimaranA, et al.Evaluation of tensile properties on Glass/Carbon/Kevlar fiber reinforced hybrid composites. Mater Today Proc2021; 39. Elsevier Ltd: 1655–1660. DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.06.049
