Fatigue-resistant design of carbon/epoxy composites based on a failure tensor polynomial model by particle swarm optimization-sequential quadratic programming algorithm
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online November, 2025
Fatigue-resistant design of carbon/epoxy composites based on a failure tensor polynomial model by particle swarm optimization-sequential quadratic programming algorithm
This article introduces a design procedure to find the optimum fiber orientations of carbon/epoxy composite laminates for fatigue life advancement. The approach incorporates a fatigue failure tensor polynomial model and employs a hybrid algorithm, combining particle swarm optimization and sequential quadratic programming. Firstly, material properties of quasi-static and fatigue of the carbon/epoxy composites, fabricated by the vacuum-assisted resin transfer molding method, were determined to be used in the model. Various design problems involving two optimization scenarios were then solved using the hybrid algorithm. The algorithm’s performance was also evaluated by specific test problems, confirming its speed and robustness. The optimally fiber-oriented carbon/epoxy composite laminates having maximum fatigue lives were obtained for many critical in-plane cyclic loading cases. To validate the proposed design procedure, two optimum designs were experimentally verified under uniaxial loading conditions. The results indicated a good correlation between the estimated fatigue life of the optimally designed laminates and experimental data. This methodology offers a promising approach for the design of carbon/epoxy composite laminates with superior fatigue strength, particularly significant in specific industrial applications.
AzinanNKadarmanAHSidhuJSS. An overview of fatigue models for composite laminate materials. Mech Adv Mater Struct2022; 29(25): 4389–4411.
2.
LiuYMahadevanS. A unified multiaxial fatigue damage model for isotropic and anisotropic materials. Int J Fatigue2007; 29(2): 347–359.
3.
QuaresiminMSusmelLTaljeraR. Fatigue behaviour and life assessment of composite laminates under multiaxial loadings. Int J Fatigue2010; 32(1): 2–16.
4.
KennedyCRBradaighCMLeenSB. A multiaxial fatigue damage model for fibre reinforced polymer composites. Compos Struct2013; 106: 201–210.
5.
DongHLiZWangJ, et al.A new fatigue failure theory for multidirectional fiber-reinforced composite laminates with arbitrary stacking sequence. Int J Fatigue2016; 87: 294–300.
6.
MohammadiBFazlaliBSalimi-MajdD. Development of a continuum damage model for fatigue life prediction of laminated composite. Composites Part A2017; 93: 163–176.
7.
ZhouSWuX. Fatigue life prediction of composite laminates by fatigue master curves. J Mater Res Technol2019; 8(6): 6094–6105.
8.
HashinZRotemA. A fatigue failure criterion for fiber reinforced materials. J Compos Mater1973; 7(4): 448–464.
9.
RotemA. Fatigue failure of multidirectional laminate. AIAA J1979; 17(3): 271–277.
10.
SimsDFBrogdonVH. Fatigue behavior of composites under different loading modes. In: ReifsniderKLLauraitisKN (eds). Fatigue of filamentary materials. ASTM STP, 1977, vol 636, pp. 185–205.
11.
FawazZEllyinF. Fatigue failure model for fibre-reinforced materials under general loading conditions. J Compos Mater1994; 28(15): 1432–1451.
ShokriehMMTaheri-BehroozF. A unified fatigue life model for composite materials. Compos Struct2006; 75(1–4): 444–450.
14.
AdaliS. Optimisation of fiber reinforced composite laminates subject to fatigue loading. In: MarshallIH (ed). Composite Structures 3. Dordrecht: Springer, 1985, pp. 43–55.
15.
WalkerM. A method for optimally designing laminated plates subject to fatigue loads for minimum weight using a cumulative damage constraint. Compos Struct2000; 48(1–3): 213–218.
16.
ErtasAHSonmezFO. Design optimization of fiber-reinforced laminates for maximum fatigue life. J Compos Mater2014; 48(20): 2493–2503.
17.
MucAMuc-WierzgońM. Discrete optimization of composite structures under fatigue constraints. Compos Struct2015; 133: 834–839.
18.
DeveciHAArtemHS. On the estimation and optimization capabilities of the fatigue life prediction models in composite laminates. J Reinf Plast Comp2018; 37(21): 1304–1321.
19.
GüneşMDİmamoğlu KarabaşNDeveciHA, et al.Fatigue life prediction and optimization of GFRP composites based on Failure Tensor Polynomial in Fatigue model with exponential fitting approach. Proc Inst Mech Eng C J Mech Eng Sci2022; 236(19): 10290–10303.
20.
VictoireTAAJeyakumarAE. Hybrid PSO–SQP for economic dispatch with valve-point effect. Electr Power Syst Res2004; 71: 51–59.
21.
HongminLYigangHSunY. Detection of cardiac signal characteristic point using log-DomainWavelet transform circuits. Circ Syst Signal Pr2008; 27: 683–698.
22.
RichardsZD. Constrained particle swarm optimisation for sequential quadratic programming. Int J Model Identif Control2009; 8(4): 361–367.
23.
PlevrisVPapadrakakisM. A hybrid particle swarm—gradient algorithm for global structural optimization. Comput-Aided Civ Inf2011; 26: 48–68.
24.
ZhangYYaoFIuHHC, et al.Wind–thermal systems operation optimization considering emission problem. Int J Elec Power2015; 65: 238–245.
25.
RajabiFRezaieBRahmaniZ. A novel nonlinear model predictive control design based on a hybrid particle swarm optimization-sequential quadratic programming algorithm: application to an evaporator system. T I Meas Control2016; 38(1): 23–32.
26.
FakoorMZadehPMEskandariHM. Developing an optimal layout design of a satellite system by considering natural frequency and attitude control constraints. Aerosp Sci Technol2017; 71: 172–188.
27.
HuangYWangWHouB. A hybrid algorithm for mixed integer nonlinear programming in residential energy management. J Clean Prod2019; 226: 940–948.
28.
ZaretalabAHaghighiSSMansourS, et al.An integrated stochastic model to optimize the machining condition and tool maintenance policy in the multi-pass and multi-stage machining. Int J Comput Integr Manuf2020; 33(3): 211–228.
29.
CaoYQDengZXLiJ, et al.Multi-parameter optimization algorithm of frequency-dependent model for viscoelastic damping material. Adv Mat Res2010; 129–131: 416–420.
30.
ZadehPMMohagheghiM. An efficient Bi-level hybrid multi-objective reliability-based design optimization of composite structures. Compos Struct2022; 296: 115862.
31.
Optimization ToolboxTM. MATLAB computer software in version R2016b. Natick, Massachusetts, USA: The Mathworks, Inc., 2016.
32.
KennedyJEberhartRC. Particle swam optimization. In: Proc IEEE Inter Conf Neural Netw, 1995, pp. 1942–1948.
YogeswaranMPonnambalamSGTiwariMK. An efficient hybrid evolutionary heuristic using genetic algorithm and simulated annealing algorithm to solve machine loading problem in FMS. Int J Prod Res2009; 47(19): 5421–5448.
35.
AlarifiALiuZErenayFS, et al.Dynamic optimization of lurgi type methanol reactor using hybrid GA-GPS algorithm: the optimal shell temperature trajectory and carbon dioxide utilization. Ind Eng Chem Res2015; 55(5): 1164–1173.
36.
DeveciHAAydinLArtemHS. Buckling optimization of composite laminates using a hybrid algorithm under Puck failure criterion constraint. J Reinf Plast Compos2016; 35(16): 1233–1247.
37.
MATLAB. Global optimization toolbox user’s guide. In: MATLAB computer software in version R2016b. Natick, Massachusetts, USA: The Mathworks, Inc., 2016, pp. 384–395.
38.
RicheRLHaftkaRT. Optimization of laminate stacking sequence for buckling load maximization by genetic algorithm. AIAA J1993; 31(5): 951–956.
39.
SoremekunGGürdalZHaftkaRT, et al.Composite laminate design optimization by genetic algorithm with generalized elitist selection. Comput Struct; 79(2): 131–143.
40.
RaoARMArvindN. A scatter search algorithm for stacking sequence optimisation of laminate composites. Compos Struct2005; 70(4): 383–402.
41.
RaoARMArvindN. Optimal stacking sequence design of laminate composite structures using Tabu embedded simulated annealing. Struct Eng Mech2007; 25(2): 239–268.
42.
RaoARMLakshmiK. Optimal design of stiffened laminate composite cylinder using a hybrid SFL algorithm. J Compos Mater2012; 46(24): 3031–3055.
43.
RaoARM. Lay-up sequence design of laminate composite plates and a cylindrical skirt using ant colony optimization. Proc Inst Mech Eng G J Aerosp Eng2009; 223(1): 1–18.
44.
JonesRM. Mechanics of composite materials. Tokyo: McGraw-Hill, 1998.
