Impact Fatigue of Short Glass Fiber Reinforced Polycarbonate

Abstract

The present study analyzes the impact properties of polycarbonate reinforced with 0, 20 and 30 wt% short glass fiber. The specimens were prepared under various injection molding conditions, such as filling time, melting temperature and mold temperature. Impact tests were performed with a Dynatup drop weight impact tester at different impact energies (1.2, 0.16, 0.12 and 0.095 J). The fracture mechanism was examined with a scanning electron microscopy. The results indicated that the specimen reinforced with 30 wt% short glass fiber showed the highest impact energy absorbed, together with the highest impact load in single impact. The absorbed energy of 30 wt% reinforced is approximately 15% higher than that of 20 wt% reinforced and about 10 times higher than that of unreinforced polycarbonate. The polycarbonate with 30 wt% short glass fiber reinforced has the highest impact number and accumulation energy in repeated impacts. The accumulation energy is approximately 15% higher than that of 20 wt% reinforced polycarbonate. The thicker the skin layer, the stronger the interfacial adhesion. The ranking of impact number and accumulation energy is in good agreement with the distributions of the skin layer thickness in repeated impacts. The splits and tearing mechanisms dominate the single impact fracture in unreinforced polycarbonate, while the fiber pull-out and fiber breakage are the major fracture mechanisms in repeated impacts for polycarbonate composites.

Keywords

impact fatigue polycarbonate/short glass fiber composites injection molding

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

1. Kenig, S. 1986. "Fiber Orientation Development in Molding of Polymer Composites," Polymer Composites, 7:50-55.

2. Cox, H. W. and C. C. Mentzer . 1986. "Injection Molding: The Effect of Fill Time on Properties," Polymer Engineering and Science, 26:488-498.

3. Hahn, H. T. , K. L. Jerina and P. Burrett . 1989. "Fiber Orientation and Fracture Morphology in Short Fiber-Reinforced Thermoplastic," Advances in Thermoplastic Matrix Composite Materials, ASTM STP 1044, pp. 183-198.

4. Karger-Kocsis, J. and K. Friedrich . 1987. "Microstructural Details and the Effect of Testing Conditions on the Fracture Toughness of Injection-Moulded Poly(phenylene-sulphide) Composites," Journal of Materials Science, 22:947-961.

5. Sanou, M. , B. Chung and C. Cohen . 1985. "Glass Fiber-Filled Thermoplastics II. Cavity Filling and Fiber Orientation in Injection Molding," Polymer Engineering and Science, 25:1008-1016.

6. Haskell, W. E., III , S. P. Petrie and R. W. Lewis . 1983. "Fracture Toughness of a Short-Fiber Reinforced Thermoplastic," Polymer Engineering and Science, 23:771-775.

7. Siegmann, A. , A. Buchman and S. Kenig . 1982. "Residual Stresses in Polymers III: The Influence of Injection-Molding Processes Conditions," Polymer Engineering and Science, 22: 560-568.

8. So, P. and L. J. Broutman . 1976. "Residual Stresses in Polymers and Their Effect on Mechanical Behavior," Polvmer Engineering and Science, 16:785-791.

9. Wippenbeck, P. 1990. "The Mould Filling Process-Technical Requirements and Findings," pp. 97-139.

10.

10. Fujiyama, M. and H. Awaya . 1977. "Mechanical Anisotropy in Injection-Molded Polypropylene," Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 21:3291-3309.

11.

11. Ramos, M. A. 1991. "Polypropylene/Low Density Polyethylene Blend Matrices, and Short Glass Fiber Based Composites III: Morphology and Fiber Orientation," Polymer Composites, 12:7-12.

12.

12. Singh, P. and M. R. Kamal . 1989. "The Effect of Processing Variables on Microstructures of Injection Molded Short Fiber Reinforced Polypropylene," Polymer Cotnposites, 10:344-351.

13.

13. Trotignon, J. P. and J. Verdu . 1987. "Skin-Core Structure-Fatigue Behavior Relationships for Injection-Molded Parts of Polypropylene. II. Morphology-Fatigue Behavior Relationships," Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 34:19-36.

14.

14. Lauke, B. 1990. "Theroretical Considerations of Toughness of Short-Fiber-Reinforced Thermoplastics," Polymer Plastic Technology Engineering, pp. 607-806.

15.

15. Hogg, P. J. 1987. "The Influence of Flow-Induced Anisotropy on the Impact Behavior of Injection-Moulded Short-Fibre Composites," Composites Science and Technology, 29:89-102.

16.

16. Lee, S. M. and P. Zahuta . 1991. "Instrumented Impact and Static Indentation of Composites:" Journal of Composite Materials, 25:205-222.

17.

17. Doong, J.-L. , S.-N. S. Lin and H. L. Marcus . 1992. "Residual Stress Effect on Impact Properties of Gr/Al Metal Matrix Composites," Journal of Materials Science, 27:1369-1374.

18.

18. Bigg, D. M. 1994. "The Impact Behavior of Thermoplastic Sheet Composites," Journal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites, 13:339-354.

19.

19. Hitchen, S. A. and S. L. Ogin . 1993. "Damage Accumulation During the Fatigue of an Injection Moulded Glass/Nylon Composite," Composite Science and Technology, 47:83-89.

20.

20. Karger-Kocsis, J. 1993. "Instrumented Impact Fracture and Related Failure Behavior in Short and Long-Glass-Fiber-Reinforced Polypropylene," Composites Science and Technology, 48:273-283.

21.

21. Zhou, G. and G. A. Davies . 1995. "Impact Response on Thick Glass Fiber Reinforced Polyester Laminates:' Int. J. Impact Engng., 16:357-374.

22.

22. Jang, B. Z. , L. C. Chen , C. Z. Wang , H. T. Lin and R. H. Zee . 1989. "Impact Resistance and Energy Absorption Mechanisms in Hybrid Composites," Composites Science and Technology, 34:305-385.

23.

23. Adams, G. C. 1987. "Impact Fatigue of Polymers Using an Instrumented Drop Tower Device," Instrumented Impact Testing of Plastics and Composite Materials, ASTM STP936, American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, pp. 281-301.

24.

24. Wyrick, D. A. and D. F. Adams . 1988. "Residual Strength of a Carbon/Epoxy Composite Material Subjected to Repeated Impact:' Journal of Composite Materials, 22:749-765.

25.

25. Jang, B. P. , C. T. Huang , C. Y. Hsieh , W. Kowbel and Z. Jang . 1991. "Repeated Impact Failure of Continuous Fiber Reinforced Thermoplastics and Thermoset Composites," Journal of Coinposite Materials, 25:1171-1203.

26.

26. Jang, B. P. , W. Kowbel and B. Z. Jang . 1992. "Impact Behavior and Impact Fatigue Testing of Polymer Composites:' Composites Science and Technology, 44:107-118.

27.

27. Stamhuis, J. E. 1988. "Mechanical Properties and Morphology of Polypropylene Composites. III. Short Glass Fiber Reinforced Elastomer Modified Polypropylene," Polymer Composites, 9:280-284.

28.

28. "Standard Test Methods for Impact Resistance of Plastics and Electrical Insulating Materials," Annual Book of ASTM Standards, D256-92, pp. 58-74.