Influence of L1 Orthography on Spelling English Words by Bilingual Children: A Natural Experiment Comparing Syllabic,Phonological,and Morphosyllabic First Languages
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online August, 2010
Influence of L1 Orthography on Spelling English Words by Bilingual Children: A Natural Experiment Comparing Syllabic,Phonological,and Morphosyllabic First Languages
This study examined the influence of first language (L1) orthography on bilingual children's spelling performance in their second language (L2), English. The subtests of spelling and letter-word identification from the Woodcock Proficiency Battery were administered to a sample of 285 six-year-olds in Singapore. All children received literacy instruction in English through the “look-say” method. Analyses of covariance showed a statistically significant effect of L1 on conventional spelling but not on phonological spelling, controlling for reading proficiency. The Chinese (morphosyllabic) group not only scored higher than the Malay (alphabetic) and Tamil (syllabic) groups overall, but also made more real-word substitution and transposition errors. The results are discussed in terms of the influence of L1 orthographic depth on spelling, and how learning disability specialists can utilize the information while evaluating the spelling/literacy skills of English L2 learners.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AaronP. G.JoshiR. M. (2006). Learning to spell from print and learning to spell from speech: A study of spelling of children who speak Tamil, a Dravidian language. In JoshiR. M.AaronP. G. (Eds.), Handbook of orthography and literacy (pp. 551–568). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
2.
ArulmaniS. N. (2003). Reading difficulties in Indian languages. In GoulandrisN. (Ed.), Dyslexia in different languages (pp. 235–253). London: Whurr.
3.
AugustD.ShanahanT. (Eds.). (2006). Developing literacy in second-language learners: Report of the National Literacy Panel on Language-Minority Children and Youth. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
4.
EhriL. C. (1997). Learning to read and learning to spell are one and the same, almost. In PerfettiC. A.RiebenL.FayolM. (Eds.), Learning to spell: Research, theory and practice across languages (pp. 237–269). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
5.
HanleyJ. R. (2005). Learning to read in Chinese. In HulmeC.SnowlingM. J. (Eds.), The science of reading: A handbook (pp. 272–289). Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing.
6.
HoC. S.-H.BryantP. (1999). Different visual skills are important in learning to read English and Chinese. Educational and Child Psychology, 16, 4–14.
7.
JoshiR. M.HoienT.FengX.ChengappaR.Boulware-GoodenR. (2006). Learning to spell by ear and by eye: A cross-linguistic comparison. In JoshiR. M.AaronP. G. (Eds.), Handbook of orthography and literacy (pp. 569–577). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
8.
JoshiR. M.TreimanR.CarrekerS.MoatsL. (2008). How words cast their spell: Spelling is an integral part of learning the language, not a matter of memorization. American Educator, 32 (4), 6–16, 42–43.
9.
KatzL.FrostR. (1992). The reading process is different for different orthographies: The orthographic depth hypothesis. In FosterR.KatzL. (Eds.), Orthography, phonology, morphology, and meaning (pp. 67–84). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
10.
LandedK. (2006). Reading acquisition in different orthographies: Evidence from direct comparisons. In JoshiR. M.AaronP. G. (Eds.), Handbook of orthography and literacy (pp. 513–530). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
11.
LukG.BialystokE. (2005). How iconic are Chinese characters?Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 8, 79–83.
12.
MoatsL. C. (1995). Spelling: Development, disability, and instruction. Baltimore: York Press.
13.
PerfettiC. A.HartL. (2002). The lexical quality hypothesis. In VehoevenL.ElbroC.ReitsmaP. (Eds.), Precursors of functional literacy (pp. 189–213). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
14.
PerfettiC. A.ZhangS. (1995). Very early phonological activation in Chinese reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory and Cognition, 21, 24–33.
15.
LiowS. J. Rickard (1999). Reading skill development in bilingual Singaporean children. In HarrisM.HatanoG. (Eds.), A cross-linguistic perspective on learning to read (pp. 196–213). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
16.
LiowS. J. RickardLauL. H.-S. (2006). The development of bilingual children's early spelling in English. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 868–878.
17.
RuedaR.WindmuellerM. P. (2006). English language learners, LD, and overrepresentation: A multiple-level analysis. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 39, 99–107.
18.
ShankweilerD.LundquistE.DreyerL. G.DickinsonD. D. (1996). Reading and spelling difficulties in high school students: Causes and consequences. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 8, 267–294.
TreimanR. (1993). Beginning to spell: A study of first-grade children. New York: Oxford University Press.
21.
WangM.GevaE. (2003). Spelling performance of Chinese children using English as a second language: Lexical and visual-orthographic processes. Applied Psycholinguistics, 24, 1–25.
22.
WangM.KodaK.PerfettiC. A. (2003). Alphabetic and non-alphabetic L1 effects in English word identification: A comparison of Korean and Chinese English L2 learners. Cognition, 87, 129–149.
23.
WoodcockR. W. (1991). Woodcock Language Proficiency Battery-Revised. Itasca, IL: Riverside Publishing.
24.
YinL.AndersonR. C.ZhuJ. (2007). Stages in Chinese children's reading of English words. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 852–866.
