Effective integration of technology within mathematics problem solving/response to instruction (PS/RTI) for students with/at risk for identification of learning disabilities (LD) is the focus of this article. The discussion is situated within the current context of mathematics PS/RTI, the literature base relative to technology integration in mathematics for students with LD, and emerging 21st-century technologies. Limitations of the research base are identified, and suggestions for the future are provided. Next, a systematic framework for integration of technology in mathematics PS/RTI is introduced that incorporates consideration of (a) effective mathematics instructional practice within mathematics PS/RTI, and (b) the nature of the mathematics content and student learning barriers and strengths. Ways in which technology can enhance effective mathematics practices for students with LD are suggested, and implications for research, development, and practice are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AllsoppD. H. (1997). Using classwide peer tutoring to teach beginning algebra problem solving skills in heterogeneous classrooms. Remedial and Special Education, 16 (6), 367–379.
2.
AllsoppD. H.Alvarez McHattonP.RayS.N.E.FarmerJ. (2010). Mathematics RTI: A problem solving approach to creating an effective model. Horsham, PA: LRP Publications.
3.
AllsoppD. H.KygerM. M.LovinL. (2007). Teaching mathematics meaningfully: Solutions for reaching struggling learners. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes Publishing, Co.
4.
BakerS.GerstenR.LeeD. (2002). A synthesis of empirical research on teaching mathematics to low-achieving students. Elementary School Journal10, 51–73.
5.
Beirne-SmithM. (1991). Peer tutoring in arithmetic for children with LD. Exceptional Children, 57, 330–337.
6.
BottgeB. A.HeinrichsM.MehtaZ. D.HungY. H. (2001). Weighing the benefits of anchored instruction for students with disabilities in general education classes. Journal of Special Education, 35 (4), 186–200.
7.
BottgeB. A.HeinrichsM.MehtaZ. D.RuedaE.HungY.DannekerJ. (2004). Teaching mathematical problem solving to middle school students in math, technology education, and special education classrooms. RMLE Online: Research in Middle Level Education, 27(1), 1–17.
8.
BrophyJ.GoodT. L. (1986). Teacher behavior and student achievement. In WittrockM. C. (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 328–375). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
9.
CalhounM. B.FuchsL. S. (2003). The effects of peer-assisted learning strategies and curriculum-based measurement on the mathematics performance of secondary students with disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 24, 235–245.
10.
CihakD. F.BowlinT. (2009). Using video modeling via handheld computers to improve geometry skills for high school students with LD. Journal of Special Education Technology, 24 (4), 17–29.
11.
GerstenR.BeckmannS.ClarkeB.FoegenA.MarshL.StarJ. R.WitzelB. (2009). Assisting students struggling with mathematics: Response to intervention (RtI) for elementary and middle schools. A practice guide (NCEE 2009–4060). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved July 20, 2010, from http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/pdf/practiceguides/rti_math_pg_042109.pdf.
12.
HasselbringT. S. (2001). A possible future of special education technology. Journal of Special Education Technology, 16 (4), 19–26.
13.
HofstetterF. T. (2001). The future's future: Implications of emerging technology for special education program planning. Journal of Special Education Technology, 16 (4), 7–13.
14.
IvesB. (2007). Graphic organizers applied to secondary algebra instruction for students with learning disorders. LD Research & Practice, 22, 109–117.
15.
LembkeE.SteckerP. (2007). Curriculum-based measurement in mathematics: An evidence-based formative assessment procedure. Portsmouth, NH: RMC Research Corporation, Center on Instruction.
16.
MillerD.BrownA.RobinsonL. (2002). Widgets on the web: Using computer-based learning tools. Teaching Exceptional Children, 35 (2), 24–28.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2006). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
19.
Newman-GoncharR.ClarkeB.GerstenR. (2009). A summary of nine key studies: Multi-tier intervention and response to interventions for students struggling in mathematics. Portsmouth, NH: RMC Research Corporation, Center on Instruction. Retrieved July 20, 2010, from http://www.centeroninstruction.org/resources.cfm?category=math.
20.
SteckerP. M.FuchsL. S.FuchsD. (2005). Using curriculum-based measurement to improve student achievement: Review of research. Psychology in the Schools, 42, 795–820.
21.
WoodwardJ.MontagueM. (2002). Meeting the challenge of mathematics reform for students with LD. Journal of Special Education, 36 (2), 89–101.
22.
WoodwardJ.RiethH. (1997). A historical review of technology research in special education. Review of Educational Research, 67 (4), 503–536.
