Measuring Reading Comprehension Processes of Students With and Without Reading Difficulties Through Eye Movement

Abstract

In this study, we examined the differences in reading comprehension processes between students with and without reading difficulties. A total of 72 third- and fourth-grade students in South Korea participated in the study; of these, 28 were identified as having reading difficulties and 44 were not. Multiple types of tasks were administered to evaluate the participants’ eye-movement behaviors, including reading different types of texts and answering questions. Nonparametric tests were conducted on the students’ responses, and the results indicated that students with reading difficulties fixated significantly longer and more frequently on both narrative and expository texts than those without such difficulties. Students without reading difficulties demonstrated significantly decreased reading comprehension processing times after a question-answering activity for all types of texts, whereas students with reading difficulties experienced decreased processing times only for a whole passage reading of narrative text. These results suggest that educators should be aware of differences in comprehension processes among students and develop differentiated instructional plans for students who struggle with reading.

Keywords

reading difficulties eye movement comprehension processes elementary school South Korea

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Beerwinkle

A. L.

Wijekumar

Walpole

Agius

(2018). An analysis of the ecological components within and text structure intervention. Reading and Writing, 31, 2041–2064. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-018-9870-5

Carlson

S. E.

Seipel

McMaster

(2014). Development of a new reading comprehension assessment: Identifying comprehension differences among readers. Learning and Individual Differences, 32, 40–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2014.03.003

Catts

H. W.

Nielsen

D. C.

Bridges

M. S.

Liu

Y. S.

(2016). Early identification of reading comprehension difficulties. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 49(5), 451–465. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219414556121

Cerdán

Vidal-Abarca

Martínez

Gilabert

Gil

(2009). Impact of question-answering tasks on search processes and reading comprehension. Learning and Instruction, 19(1), 13–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.12.003

Dahl

A. C.

Carlson

S. E.

Renken

McCarthy

K. S.

Reynolds

(2021). Materials matter: An exploration of text complexity and its effects on middle school readers’ comprehension processing. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 52(2), 702–716. https://doi.org/10.1044/2021_LSHSS-20-00117

Filderman

M. J.

Austin

C. R.

Boucher

A. N.

O’Donnell

Swanson

E. A.

(2022). A meta-analysis of the effects of reading comprehension interventions on the reading comprehension outcomes of struggling readers in third through 12th Grades. Exceptional Children, 88(2), 163–184. https://doi.org/10.1177/00144029211050860

Hall-Kenyon

K. M.

Black

(2010). Learning from expository texts: Classroom-based strategies for promoting comprehension and content knowledge in the elementary grades. Topics in Language Disorders, 30(4), 339–349. https://doi.org/10.1097/TLD.0b013e3181ff21ea

Hughes

C. A.

Morris

J. R.

Therrien

W. J.

Benson

S. K.

(2017). Explicit instruction: Historical and contemporary contexts. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 32(3), 140–148. https://doi.org/10.1111/ldrp.12142

Jian

Y. C.

(2017). Eye-movement patterns and reader characteristics of students with good and poor performance when reading scientific text with diagrams. Reading and Writing, 30(7), 1447–1472. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-017-9732-6

10.

Kaakinen

J. K.

Hyönä

. (2005). Perspective effects on expository text comprehension: Evidence from think-aloud protocols, eye-tracking, and recall. Discourse Processes, 40(3), 239–257. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326950dp4003_4

11.

Karlsson

van den Broek

Helder

Hickendorff

Koornneef

van Leijenhorst

(2018). Profiles of young readers: Evidence from thinking aloud while reading narrative and expository texts. Learning and Individual Differences, 67, 105–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2018.08.001

12.

Kim

Hwang

Yoo

(2014). Test of reading achievement and reading cognitive processes ability (RA-RCP). Hakjisa.

13.

Kim

(2017). A literature review of eye movements in reading of primary and secondary school students: Implications for practice in special education. The Korean Journal of Learning Disabilities, 14(3), 101–125.

14.

Kim

Yun

(2018). Investigating characteristics of poor readers in reading comprehension using tests of reading achievement and cognitive processes: A case study. The Korean Journal of Learning Disabilities, 15(2), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.47635/KJLD.2018.15.2.87

15.

Kintsch

(2005). Comprehension. In Paris

S. G.

Stahl

S. A.

(Eds.), Children’s reading comprehension and assessment (pp. 89–110). Routledge.

16.

Korea Learning Disabilities Association. (2013). Guidelines for the criteria and procedures for the identification of students with learning disabilities.

17.

J. T.

Tong

Irby

B. J.

Lara-Alecio

Rivera

(2024). The effects of four instructional strategies on English learners’ English reading comprehension: A meta-analysis. Language Teaching Research, 28(1), 231–252. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168821994133

18.

Magnabosco

Hauk

(2024). An eye on semantics: A study on the influence of concreteness and predictability on early fixation durations. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 39(3), 302–316. https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2023.2274558

19.

McMaster

K. L.

Espin

C. A.

van Den Broek

(2014). Making connections: Linking cognitive psychology and intervention research to improve comprehension of struggling readers. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 29(1), 17–24. https://doi.org/10.1111/ldrp.12026

20.

Mézière

D. C.

Reichle

E. D.

von der Malsburg

McArthur

(2023). Using eye-tracking measures to predict reading comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly, 58(3), 425–449. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.498

21.

Quinn

J. M.

Wagner

R. K.

Petscher

Roberts

Menzel

A. J.

Schatschneider

(2020). Differential codevelopment of vocabulary knowledge and reading comprehension for students with and without learning disabilities. Journal of Educational Psychology, 112(3), 608–627. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000382

22.

Rapp

D. N.

Broek

P. V. D.

McMaster

K. L.

Kendeou

Espin

C. A.

(2007). Higher-order comprehension processes in struggling readers: A perspective for research and intervention. Scientific Studies of Reading, 11(4), 289–312. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888430701530417

23.

Rayner

(1998). Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 372–422. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.124.3.372

24.

Rayner

Schotter

E. R.

Masson

M. E. J.

Potter

M. C.

Treiman

(2016). So much to read, so little time: How do we read, and can speed reading help? Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 17(1), 4–34. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100615623267

25.

Rayner

Slattery

T. J.

(2009). Eye movements and moment-to-moment comprehension processes in reading. In Wagner

R. K.

Schatschneider

Phythian-Sence

(Eds.), Beyond decoding: The behavioral and biological foundations of reading comprehension (pp. 27–45). The Guilford Press.

26.

Rayner

Slattery

T. J.

Drieghe

Liversedge

S. P.

(2011). Eye movements and word skipping during reading: Effects of word length and predictability. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 37(2), 514–528. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020990

27.

Reid

D. K.

(1996). Cognitive approaches to learning disabilities. PRO-ED.

28.

Sáenz

L. M.

Fuchs

L. S.

(2002). Examining the reading difficulty of secondary students with learning disabilities: Expository versus narrative text. Remedial and Special Education, 23(1), 31–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/074193250202300105

29.

Salmerón

Naumann

García

Fajardo

(2017). Scanning and deep processing of information in hypertext: An eye tracking and cued retrospective think-aloud study. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 33(3), 222–233. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12152

30.

Shanahan

(2008). Teaching disciplinary literacy to adolescents: Rethinking content-area literacy. Harvard Educational Review, 78(1), 40–59. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.78.1.v62444321p602101

31.

Swanson

H. L.

Alexander

J. E.

(1997). Cognitive processes as predictors of word recognition and reading comprehension in learning-disabled and skilled readers: Revisiting the specificity hypothesis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(1), 128–158. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.89.1.128

32.

Swanson

P. N.

De La Paz

(1998). Teaching effective comprehension strategies to students with learning and reading disabilities. Intervention in School and Clinic, 33(4), 209–218. https://doi.org/10.1177/105345129803300403

33.

Underwood

Hubbard

Wilkinson

(1990). Eye fixations predict reading comprehension: The relationships between reading skill, reading speed, and visual inspection. Language and Speech, 33(1), 69–81. https://doi.org/10.1177/002383099003300105

34.

van den Broek

Tzeng

Risden

Trabasso

Basche

. (2001). Inferential questioning: Effects on comprehension of narrative texts as a function of grade and timing. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(3), 521–529. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.93.3.521

35.

van den Broek

White

M. J.

Kendeou

Carlson

. (2009). Reading between the lines: Developmental and individual differences in cognitive processes in reading comprehension. In Wagner

Schatschneider

Plythian-Sence

(Eds.), Beyond decoding: The behavioral and biological foundations of reading comprehension (pp. 107–123). The Guilford Press.

36.

Vaughn

Gersten

Dimino

Taylor

M. J.

Newman-Gonchar

Krowka

Kieffer

M. J.

McKeown

Reed

Sanchez

St Martin

Wexler

Morgan

Yañez

Jayanthi

(2022). Providing reading interventions for students in Grades 4–9. National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. https://whatworks.ed.gov/

37.

Vaughn

Solís

Miciak

Taylor

W. P.

Fletcher

J. M.

(2016). Effects from a randomized control trial comparing researcher and school-implemented treatments with fourth graders with significant reading difficulties. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 9(Suppl. 1), 23–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/19345747.2015.1126386

38.

Wanzek

Wexler

Vaughn

Ciullo

(2010). Reading interventions for struggling readers in the upper elementary grades: A synthesis of 20 years of research. Reading and Writing, 23, 889–912. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9179-5

39.

Welsh

J. A.

Nix

R. L.

Blair

Bierman

K. L.

Nelson

K. E.

(2010). The development of cognitive skills and gains in academic school readiness for children from low-income families. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(1), 43–53. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016738

40.

White

S. J.

Rayner

Liversedge

S. P.

(2005). The influence of parafoveal word length and contextual constraint on fixation durations and word skipping in reading. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12(3), 466–471. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03193789

41.

Williams

J. P.

(2005). Instruction in reading comprehension for primary-grade students: A focus on text structure. The Journal of Special Education, 39(1), 6–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/00224669050390010201

42.

Williams

K. J.

Vaughn

(2020). Effects of an intensive reading intervention for ninth-grade English learners with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 43(3), 154–166. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731948719851745

43.

Yildirim

Yildiz

Ates

(2011). Is vocabulary a strong variable predicting reading comprehension and does the prediction degree of vocabulary vary according to text types. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 11(3), 1541–1547. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12513/1786