Evaluating the Use of ChatGPT in Preservice Special Education Courses for Creating Instructional Handouts on Disabilities

Abstract

This pilot study explored how preservice teachers (PSTs) use generative artificial intelligence (AI) to create disability reference handouts by comparing a ChatGPT group to a traditional search group. Thirty preservice general and special educators enrolled in an introductory special education course at a Midwestern U.S. university were assigned to one of two conditions. Handouts were evaluated with a rubric aligned to a widely used textbook, assessing definitions, characteristics, instructional challenges, and strategies. ChatGPT handouts were at least as accurate as traditional ones. Participants reported positive experiences using AI. Findings suggest that AI can support PSTs’ knowledge acquisition, warranting further study of specialized AI in preservice education.

Keywords

generative artificial intelligence AI special education preservice education

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alvarez

N. L.

Carrión

Z. C.

Barres

D. G.

(2020). Predicting Computer Engineering students’ dropout in Cuban Higher Education with pre-enrollment and early performance data. JOTSE, 10(2), 241–258.

Aslan

Alanoğlu

Karabatak

(2025). Enhancing 21st-century teaching competencies: The key role of digital literacy in connecting pre-service teachers’ TPACK. Information Development, 02666669251315841.

Assaf

James

Danforth

(2021). The politics of the hero’s journey: A narratology of American special education textbooks. Disability Studies Quarterly, 41(2). https://doi.org/10.18061/dsq.v41i2.6984

Bae

Hur

Park

Choi

G. W.

Moon

(2024). Pre-service teachers’ dual perspectives on generative AI: Benefits, challenges, and integration into their teaching and learning. Online Learning, 28(3), 131–156. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v28i3.4357

BCS, The Chartered Institute for IT. (2024, December). Secondary school teachers and AI. https://www.bcs.org/media/11kcvxvn/bcs-ai-paper-december-2024.pdf

Bernard

Aladé

(2024). Exploring the reliability of ChatGPT in special education content delivery. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 32(1), 45–66.

Byrd

D. R.

Alexander

(2020). Investigating special education teachers’ knowledge and skills: Preparing general teacher preparation for professional development. Journal of Pedagogical Research, 4(2), 72–82.

CAST. (2018). Universal design for learning guidelines (Version 2.2). http://udlguidelines.cast.org

Center for Innovation, Design, and Digital Learning. (2024). Inclusive intelligence: The impact of AI on education for all learners. https://ciddl.org/inclusive-intelligence-the-impact-of-ai-on-education-for-all-learners/

10.

Chounta

I. A.

Bardone

Raudsep

Pedaste

(2022). Exploring teachers’ perceptions of artificial intelligence as a tool to support their practice in Estonian K-12 education. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 32(3), 725–755. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-021-00276-2

11.

Clausen

A. M.

Anderson

Spooner

Walker

V. L.

Hujar

(2023). Preparing general education teachers to include students with extensive support needs: An analysis of “SPSTD 101” courses. Teacher Education and Special Education, 46(2), 146–161. https://doi.org/10.1177/08884064221102941

12.

Cook

B. G.

McClain

Corr

Waterfield

D. A.

Welker

N. P.

Fleming

J. I.

Wilson

S. E.

Therrien

W. J.

(2025). Pushing past the paywall: Accessing open peer-reviewed research. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 58(1), 54–62.

13.

Cruz-Jesus

Castelli

Oliveira

Mendes

Nunes

Sa-Velho

Rosa-Loura

(2020). Using artificial intelligence methods to assess academic achievement in public high schools of a European Union country. Heliyon, 6(6), Article e04081. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04081

14.

Curtis

A. C.

Keeler

(2023). Sample size planning in quantitative nursing research. AJN: The American Journal of Nursing, 123(11), 42–46. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.NAJ.0000994363.30867.b7

15.

Dieker

L. A.

Kennedy

M. J.

Smith

Vasquez

III Rock

Thomas

(2014). Use of technology in the preparation of pre-service teachers. Gainesville: Collaboration for Effective Educator, Development, Accountability, and Reform (CEEDAR) Center. Retrieved August 13 2023, from http://ceedar.education.ufl.edu/tools/innovation-configurations/

16.

Dieker

Kennedy

Vasquez

Rock

(2024). Innovation Configuration Use of Technology in the Preparation of Pre-and In-Service Teachers. https://ceedar.education.ufl.edu/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/Tech-IC_Final_5.28.24.pdf

17.

Dilek

Baran

Aleman

(2025). AI literacy in teacher education: Empowering educators through critical co-discovery. Journal of Teacher Education, 76(3), 294–311. https://doi.org/10.1177/00224871251325083

18.

Division for Early Childhood. (2016). DEC recommended practices with examples. http://www.dec-sped.org/recommendedpractices

19.

Donath

J. L.

Lüke

Graf

Tran

U. S.

Götz

(2023). Does professional development effectively support the implementation of inclusive education? A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 35(1), 30.

20.

Ehlert

Souvignier

(2024). Mind the gap: How teachers’ professional development preferences relate to scientific recommendations. SAGE Open, 14(3), Article 276172. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440241276172

21.

Fangwi

M. L.

Fedelis

(2025). Explicit instruction a rudiment for the development of reading skills in learners with dyslexia in an inclusive primary schooling the Buea Municipality Cameroon. Ipho-journal of Advance Research in Education & Literature, 3(5), 18–37. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15601206

22.

García-Avilés

J. A.

(2020). Diffusion of innovation. The International Encyclopedia of Media Psychology, 1(8), 1–8.

23.

Gallup & Walton Family Foundation. (2025, June 18). Teaching for Tomorrow: Unlocking Six Weeks a Year With AI. Gallup. https://www.gallup.com/analytics/691922/walton-family-foundation-gallup-teachers-report.aspx

24.

Goldman

S. R.

Smith

S. J.

Carreon

(2025). Artificial intelligence to support writing outcomes for students with disabilities. Journal of Special Education Technology, 40, 418–426. https://doi.org/10.1177/01626434251326328

25.

Goldman

S. R.

Taylor

Carreon

Smith

S. J.

(2024). Using AI to support special education teacher workload. Journal of Special Education Technology, 39(3), 434–447. https://doi.org/10.1177/01626434241258694

26.

Graham

Collins

A. A.

Ciullo

S. P.

(2022). Special and general education teachers’ beliefs about writing and writing instruction. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 56, 163–179. https://doi.org/10.1177/00222194221092156

27.

Hur

J. W.

(2025). Fostering AI literacy: Overcoming concerns and nurturing confidence among preservice teachers. Information and Learning Sciences, 126(1/2), 56–74. https://doi.org/10.1108/ILS-05-2024-0081

28.

Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act, 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et seq. (2004).

29.

Karataş

Eriçok

Tanrikulu

(2025). Reshaping curriculum adaptation in the age of artificial intelligence: Mapping teachers’ AI-driven curriculum adaptation patterns. British Educational Research Journal, 51(1), 154–180. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.4057

30.

Karataş

Yüce

(2024). AI and the future of teaching: Preservice teachers’ reflections on the use of artificial intelligence in open and distributed learning. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 25(3), 304–325. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v25i3.7785

31.

Kent

A. M.

Giles

R. M.

(2017). Preservice teachers’ technology self-efficacy. Srate Journal, 26(1), 9–20.

32.

Kim

Y. S. G.

(2022). Co-occurrence of reading and writing difficulties: The application of the interactive dynamic literacy model. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 55(6), 447–464. https://doi.org/10.1177/00222194211051515

33.

Kramarski

Michalsky

(2014). Effect of a TPCK-SRL model on teachers’ pedagogical beliefs, self-efficacy, and technology-based lesson design. In Angeli

C. D.

Valanides

(Eds.), Technological pedagogical content knowledge: Exploring, developing, and assessing TPCK (pp. 89–112). Springer.

34.

Langreo

(2024a, January 8). Most teachers are not using AI. Here’s why. Education Week. https://www.edweek.org/technology/most-teachers-are-not-using-ai-heres-why/2024/01

35.

Langreo

(2024b, April 26). Should teachers disclose when they use AI? Education Week. https://www.edweek.org/technology/should-teachers-disclose-when-they-use-ai/2024/04

36.

Lin

(2024, May 15). A quarter of U.S. teachers say AI tools do more harm than good in K-12 education. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2024/05/15/a-quarter-of-u-s-teachers-say-ai-tools-do-more-harm-than-good-in-k-12-education/

37.

McLeskey

Barringer

M.-D.

Billingsley

Brownell

Jackson

Kennedy

Lewis

Maheady

Rodriguez

Scheeler

M. C.

Winn

Ziegler

(2017). High-leverage practices in special education. Council for Exceptional Children & CEEDAR Center.

38.

Mills

Ruiz

Lee

K. W.

Coenraad

Fusco

Roschelle

Weisgrau

(2024). AI literacy: A framework to understand, evaluate, and use emerging technology. https://digitallibrary.aivillage.org/library/ai-literacy-a-framework-to-understand-evaluate-and-use-emerging-technology.12

39.

Mishra

Koehler

M. J.

(2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054.

40.

Morciano

Llergo

J. M. A.

Zingoni

Bolívar

E. Y.

Taborri

Calabrò

(2024). Use of recommendation models to provide support to dyslexic students. Expert Systems with Applications, 249, Article 123738. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2024.123738

41.

Moreno

Montoro

Colon

(2019). Changes in teacher training within the TPACK model framework: A systematic review. Sustainability, 11(7), Article 1071870. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11071870

42.

Pallathadka

Wenda

Ramirez-Asís

Asís-López

Flores-Albornoz

Phasinam

(2021). Classification and prediction of student performance data using various machine learning algorithms. Materials Today: Proceedings, 73, 427–432.

43.

Panjwani-Charania

Zhai

(2023). AI for students with learning disabilities: A systematic review. Journal of Special Education Technology, 38(3), 362–375. https://doi.org/10.1177/01626434221100529

44.

Pierangelo

Giuliani

(2007). Special education eligibility: A step-by-step guide for educators. Corwin Press.

45.

Policar

Morgan-Bortone

(2024, June 12). Teachers are changing their minds about AI. Find out how. Study.com. https://teachinglicense.study.com/featured-insights/teachers-change-minds-about-AI.html

46.

Porayska-Pomsta

Holmes

Nemorin

(2023). The ethics of AI in education. In Looi

C. K.

Wadhwa

Hoppe

H. U.

(Eds.), Handbook of artificial intelligence in education (pp. 571–604). Edward Elgar.

47.

Rakap

(2024). Chatting with GPT: Enhancing individualized education program goal development for novice special education teachers. Journal of Special Education Technology, 39(3), 339–348. https://doi.org/10.1177/01626434231179927

48.

Rosenthal

Rosnow

R. L.

(2009). The volunteer subject. In Rosenthal

Rosnow

R. L.

(Eds.), Artifacts in behavioral research (pp. 48–92). Oxford University Press.

49.

Sawchuk

(2024, January 9). Most teachers are not using AI. Here’s why. Education Week. https://www.edweek.org/technology/most-teachers-are-not-using-ai-heres-why/2024/01

50.

Schwartz

(2023, June 22). Where teachers say professional development falls short. Education Week. https://www.edweek.org/leadership/where-teachers-say-professional-development-falls-short/2023/06

51.

Shulman

L. S.

(1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14.

52.

Silva

Flores

M. L. H.

Cramer

(2022). Inclusion census: How do inclusion rates in American public schools measure up? Perspectives on Urban Education, 20(1), 1–13.

53.

Smith

(2020, December 9). How teacher preparation programs can help all teachers better serve students with disabilities. Center for American Progress. https://www.americanprogress.org/article/teacher-preparation-programs-can-help-teachers-better-serve-students-disabilities/

54.

(2023). Delving into EFL teachers’ digital literacy and professional identity in the pandemic era: Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) framework. Heliyon, 9, Article e16361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16361

55.

Sukiman

Abd Aziz

(2021). Artificial intelligence as the key player in learning interventions: A mini-review among students with learning difficulties. International Journal of Technology Management and Information System, 3(2), 1–14.

56.

Tseng

J. J.

Chai

C. S.

Tan

Park

(2022). A critical review of research on technological pedagogical and content knowledge (TPACK) in language teaching. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 35(4), 948–971. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2020.1868531

57.

Turnbull

A. P.

Turnbull

H. R.

Wehmeyer

M. L.

Shogren

K. A.

(2014). Exceptional lives: Special education in today’s schools (8th ed.). Pearson.

58.

Turnbull

A. P.

Turnbull

H. R.

Wehmeyer

M. L.

Shogren

K. A.

(2020). Exceptional lives: Practice, progress, & dignity in today’s schools (9th ed.). Pearson.

59.

Unal

Hobe

(2025). Preservice teachers’ readiness for integrating AI in elementary classrooms. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 13(4), Article 7785. https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v13i4.7785

60.

Uygun

(2024). Teachers’ perspectives on artificial intelligence in education. Advances in Mobile Learning Educational Research, 4(1), 931–939. https://doi.org/10.25082/AMLER.2024.01.018

61.

Voithofer

Nelson

M. J.

(2021). Teacher educator technology integration preparation practices around TPACK in the United States. Journal of Teacher Education, 72(3), 314–328.

62.

Weiner

B. J.

Lewis

C. C.

Stanick

Powell

B. J.

Dorsey

C. N.

Clary

A. S.

Boynton

M. H.

Halko

(2017). Psychometric assessment of three newly developed implementation outcome measures. Implementation Science, 12, 1–12.

63.

Zaugg

(2024). Embracing innovation in education: Investigating the use and impact of artificial intelligent assistants among preservice teachers [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Utah State University.

64.

Zhang

Cui

Shi

(2023). Alleviating hallucinations of large language models through induced hallucinations. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2312.15710