Abstract
Engaging in leisure activities that are cognitively simulating and enjoyable may be protective against cognitive decline in older adults; yet, few studies have examined this topic. We used two waves of data from the Population Study of Chinese Elderly and ran mixed-effects regression models to examine the relationship between baseline art activity attendance (including attending museum, musical arts, or both) and change in cognitive function (global, episodic memory, working memory, and executive function) among 2,703 older U.S. Chinese adults. We found that compared with older adults who did not attend any art activities, those who reported attending both art activities experienced a slower rate of change in episodic memory (estimate = −0.07; SE = 0.03; p = .01) and executive function (estimate = −0.06; SE = .03; p = .04). Our study findings point to the importance of attending art-based culture events among U.S. Chinese older adults.
Introduction
Participation in leisure activities is an important part of well-being for older adults. Leisure activities can be defined as, “uncoerced activity undertaken during free time where such activity is something people want to do and, at a personally satisfying level using their abilities and resources, they succeed in doing” (Stebbins, 2005, p. 350). Leisure activities can include participating in physical, cognitive, or social activities (Blasko et al., 2014). Older adults who frequently engage in leisure activities are less likely to report feeling depressed (Chao, 2016; Lu, 2011) and lonely (Teh & Tey, 2019). Decreased participation in leisure activities has been linked to lower level of cognition and faster rates of cognitive decline (Iwasa et al., 2012; D. Kim et al., 2017). Furthermore, increased participation in leisure activities has been associated with lower risk of dementia (Sanders & Verghese, 2007; Sörman et al., 2014; Verghese et al., 2003).
Attending visual and musical arts is a common form of leisure activity among older adults which is attributed to their overall well-being and psychological health. For example, increased art attendance in older adults has been found to be associated with lower rates of depression (Cross et al., 2012), mortality (Fancourt & Steptoe, 2019), and frailty (Rogers & Fancourt, 2020). Furthermore, sustained art attendance in adulthood has been associated with increased overall well-being among older adults (Tymoszuk et al., 2019) as well as improved self-reported health (Johannson et al., 2001). However, there is a paucity of research examining the relationship between participation in the specific forms of art and cognitive outcomes in older adults. Recent research suggests that engaging in art activities that are cognitively simulating, culturally appropriate, and enjoyable may lower the risk of dementia in older adults. For example, in one study using the data from the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing, Fancourt and colleagues have shown that participants who visited museums every few months or more were less likely to be diagnosed with dementia over the next 10 years (Fancourt et al., 2018). In a recent study of 200 Swiss community-dwelling older adults, the researchers found that compared with adults who never played a musical instrument, those who played a musical instrument showed a significant improvement in their cognition over a 12-month period (Mansky et al., 2020). In a cross-sectional study of 1,399 racially and ethnically diverse cohort of older adults in the United States, a higher level of leisure activity participation (which included going to cultural events) was associated with better cognition across cognitive domains and varied by race/ethnicity (Peterson et al., 2020). Attending art activities that are cognitively simulating and enjoyable may be protective against cognitive decline in older adults; yet, few studies have examined this topic. Previous studies clustered leisure activities according to the assumed level of cognitive effort and social interaction, which is often arbitrary because several activities, such as music, may contain elements of social interaction while requiring cognitive effort at the same time. In addition, previous studies have examined the effect of art attendance on overall cognition with very few studies examining the impact of art activities on specific cognitive domains. Examining the impact of attending art activities across specific cognitive domains is important given the rates of decline across multiple cognitive domains vary according to the nature of cognitive impairment (Albert et al., 2011).
Older Chinese adults are the fastest and largest growing group of older Asian Americans in the United States with approximately 14.3% of 4.4 million Chinese Americans being over the age of 65 (U.S. Census Bureau, 2018). Previous studies have reported relatively low levels of participation in leisure activities among U.S. Chinese older adults (Dong, Li, & Simon, 2014). The most common leisure activities among this population included watching TV and reading (Dong, Li, & Simon, 2014). Participation in activities across the lifespan may have protective effects against cognitive decline in older Chinese adults. For instance, late-life active participation in intellectual activities among older Chinese adults was associated with lower risk of incident dementia (Lee et al., 2018) and lower incidence of global cognitive decline (Leung et al., 2011). Furthermore, older Chinese adults who frequently participated in intrapersonal and interpersonal cognitive leisure activities had a lower risk of cognitive impairment (Qiu et al., 2019). Recent evidence points to the importance of mid-life and late-life protective factors against cognitive decline among older Chinese adults.
There are several possible mechanisms that could account for the protective effect of art attendance and cognition in older adults. The cognitive reserve theory outlines factors—such as higher levels of education, occupational complexity, and engagement in physical, cognitive, and social activities—that may increase cognitive reserve, making older adults less susceptible to the underlying Alzheimer’s disease (AD) pathology (Stern, 2002, 2012; Stern et al., 1999). For example, older adults with higher levels of education were less likely to show progression to mild cognitive impairment/dementia even with the presence of cortical thinning in AD-vulnerable brain regions (Pettigrew et al., 2017). Alternatively, older adults who engage in art activities may have personality traits that include empathy, compassion, and openness to experience and diverse perspectives. For instance, being open to experiences is correlated with higher activity levels and, in turn, better cognitive performance in older adults in select cognitive domains, such as reading ability (Hogan et al., 2012). Another possible explanation of the effect is that participation in the arts is often a multisensory experience that may increase brain plasticity. For example, music training, which often requires a coordinated effort and communication between different areas of the brain and the hemispheres, may increase older adults’ brain plasticity and protect against age-related cognitive decline (Sutcliffe et al., 2020). Older adults who visit a museum may engage in curator tours or read the history information associated with the piece of art. When attending a musical event, older adults may read the program book and learn new information about the piece of music or the performer. In turn, these activities may bolster adult learning and provide opportunities for personal growth and self-expression, thus enhancing brain plasticity.
The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between baseline frequency of attending art activities (including visiting museums, attending concerts, or both) and rates of change in global cognitive function and across three cognitive domains (i.e., episodic memory, working memory, and executive function) in the 2-year follow-up among 2,713 older Chinese adults aged 60+ in the United States enrolled in the Population Study of Chinese Elderly (PINE) study. The purpose of this study was to compare the rate of change in cognitive function between older adults who never attended art activities with those who only attended one form of art activity and those who attended both art activities.
Method
Study Design
We used two waves of data from the Population Study of Chinese Elderly (PINE) (Dong, Wong, & Simon, 2014; Dong et al., 2017). The PINE study is a population-based epidemiological study of U.S. Chinese older adults in the Chicago area. The baseline data was collected between 2011 and 2013 using in-home interviews. The interviews for the second wave were completed between 2013 and 2015. Details of the description of the PINE data collection can be found elsewhere (Dong, Wong, & Simon, 2014). Out of 3,159 respondents at baseline, 2,713 finished both waves of the study. Compared with those who participated in Wave 2, those who did not complete Wave 2 assessments were older, more cognitively impaired according to the global cognition scores and were more physically impaired. The Institutional Review Board of the Rush University Medical Center approved the study.
Measures
Art attendance
The independent variable of art attendance included frequency of museum and musical art attendance. The two questions were selected from the Social Engagement Scale (Dong, Li, & Simon, 2014). During the interview, participants were asked in the past 5 years how many times they have “Visited a museum” and “Attended a concert, play, or a musical.” Participants’ responses were coded using a 4-point scale (0 = never, 1 = 1 to 2 times, 2 = 3 to 9 times, 3 = 10 to 19 times, and 4 = 20 or more times). For the purpose of this study, we created a new variable of art attendance with four categories: “Never attending any art activities,” “Attending museums only,” “Attending musical activities only,” and “Attending both museums and musical activities” since 69.9% and 74.4% of older adults at baseline reported never attending museums or musical arts, respectively (Dong, Li, & Simon, 2014).
Rate of change in cognitive function
For dependent variable, we examined rates of change across four cognitive function tests, which measured executive function, episodic memory, and working memory (Chang & Dong, 2014; Li et al., 2017). Executive function was measured using the Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT). This 11-item test examined rapid perceptual comparisons of numbers and symptoms in 90 s (Smith & Services, 2002). The composite score of the East Boston Memory Test (Immediate and Delayed Recall of brief stories) was used to measure episodic memory (Wechsler, 1987). Working memory was assessed using the Digit Span Backwards (Wechsler, 1987). We also used a previously constructed measure of global cognition, which included five cognitive tests (SDMT, East Boston Memory Test Immediate and Delayed Recall, Digit Span Backwards, and Mini-Mental State Examination) (Chang & Dong, 2014). We created composite scores by transforming participants’ scores on individual cognitive function tests to a z score based on the mean and standard deviation of the distribution of the scores of all respondents. We then averaged z scores across all cognitive tests. We measured time as the difference between Wave 2 and baseline participant interviews. The mean was 1.92 years (SD = 0.3; range = 1.8–3.7 years) (Li et al., 2017).
Covariates
We selected covariates previously shown to be associated with activities participation (Dong, Li, & Simon, 2014) and cognition in this population of Chinese older adults (Li et al., 2017). Sociodemographic variables included age (years and centered at 72), sex (male: 0; female: 1), education (years), annual personal income (≤$9,999 or >$10,000), marital status (not married: 0; married: 1), living arrangement (includes number of household members), number of children, language preference (English/Mandarin: 0; Cantonese/Taishanese: 1) (Dong & Jiang, 2018), years in the United States, and years in the community. Health-related variables included general health (poor or fair: 0; good or very good: 1), change in health compared to 1 year ago (worsened or same: 0; improved: 1), physical function (total score on the Katz Activities of Daily Living measure) (Katz & Akpom, 1976), depressive symptoms (total score on the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 [PHQ-9]) (Yeung et al., 2008), medical comorbidities (count of chronic conditions that a participant told he or she has by a doctor, nurse, or a therapist), and smoking status with never smoked as a reference category (current smoker or former smoker). In addition, we controlled for baseline global cognition given the variation in cognitive function among participants at baseline.
Analysis
We used descriptive chi-square statistics to examine any differences in sociodemographic and health-related variables between participants who never attended each activity, attended only one activity, or attended both activities at least once. We examined the relationship between baseline art attendance and rates of change in cognitive function (global cognition, executive function, episodic memory, and working memory) using mixed-effect regression models. We used both fixed and random effects. In Model 1, we tested the main effect of time. In Model 2, we examined the main effect of art attendance adjusting for time, baseline art attendance, and Baseline Art Attendance × Time. In Model 3, we added sociodemographic variables. In Model 4, we included additional health-related variables. The analyses were completed using SAS software v.9.2 (SAS Institute Inc, Cary, NC, USA).
Results
The sample size for descriptive purposes in Table 1 included 2,703 older adults after list-wise deletion of missing data for the independent variable. At baseline, 381 (14.1%) out of 2,703 participants reported attending museums, while 247 out of 2,703 (9.1%) reported attending a concert, play, or a musical. When examining the combined art attendance, 440 out of 2,703 (16.3%) reported attending both art activities. There were statistically significant differences between participants who attended both art activities and those who did not for the following variables: age, education, annual income, number of children, language preference, years in the United States, years in community, smoking status, overall health status, health status change, physical function, and depression (Table 1).
Baseline Characteristics and Their Association With Attending Museums or Musical Arts (N = 2,703).
Next, we examined the relationship between baseline art attendance and cognitive function, presented in Tables 2 through 5. Adjusting for all sociodemographic and health-related variables, compared with participants who did not attend any art activities, participants who attended musicals (Table 2 Model 4; estimatemusical = 0.13, SE = 0.04; p = .001) or attended both art activities (Table 2 Model 4; estimateboth = 0.16, SE = 0.03; p = .00) had higher levels of global cognition at baseline. Adjusting for all sociodemographic and health-related variables, compared with participants who did not attend any art activities, participants who attended museums had higher levels of episodic memory at baseline (Table 3 Model 4; estimatemuseum = 0.07, standard error [SE] = 0.03; p = .007). There was no association between art attendance in cognitive domains of working speed and executive function (Tables 4 and 5).
Association Between Baseline Art Attendance and Changes in Global Cognition, Estimated From Mixed-Effects Models.
Association between Baseline Art Attendance and Changes in Episodic Memory, Estimated from Mixed-Effects Models.
Association Between Baseline Art Attendance and Changes in Working Speed, Estimated from Mixed-Effects Models.
Association Between Baseline Art Attendance and Changes in Executive Function, Estimated From Mixed-Effects Models.
When we examined the relationship between baseline art activities and rates of change in cognitive function, we found that compared with older adults who did not attend any art activities, those who reported attending both art activities experienced a 0.07 standard score unit reduction in the rate of change in episodic memory (Table 3, Model 4, estimateboth = −0.07; SE = 0.03; p = .01) and a 0.06 standard score unit reduction in the rate of change in executive function (Table 5, Model 4, estimateboth = −0.06; SE = 0.03; p = .04). We found no relationship between attending individual art activities and rates of change in cognitive function.
Discussion
In our study, we found that older Chinese Americans who reported attending art activities had higher levels of cognitive function at baseline and art attendance was associated with slower rates of change in cognitive function. Specifically, compared with older adults who never attended art activities, participants who reported attending art activities at least once in the past 5 years had higher levels of global cognition and episodic memory at baseline. In addition, compared with older adults who never attended art activities, those who reported attending both art activities experienced a reduction in the rate of change in episodic memory and executive function. These results point to the importance of art attendance and its relationship to rates of change in cognition among older Chinese Americans.
Our study findings are in line with previous work highlighting the relationship between attending museums and changes in cognition among older adults. For example, Fancourt et al. (2018) found a lowered risk of dementia occurrence for older adults (N = 3,911) who attended museums every few months or more often. In addition, later study by Fancourt and Steptoe (2019) reported findings on the protective effect of art attendance (which included attending museums, art galleries, exhibitions, the theater, concert, or the opera) on longevity in older adults (N = 6,710). The relationship between attending museums and reduction in the rates of cognitive change may be partially explained by positive subjective experiences of older adults who attended museums. For instance, older adults with early-stage dementia reported several benefits of participating in the art, such as cognitive stimulation, social connections, and positive self-esteem (Flatt et al., 2015). While these qualitative findings are associated with a structured art engagement program modeled after New York’s “Meet Me at MoMA,” the leisure activity question in our study asked a broad question about museum attendance, which is a multimodal activity. Multimodal activities such as attending museums may engage individuals cognitively, physically, and socially. Similar to attending a concert, attending a museum requires older adults to leave their home and go outside, decreasing the frequency of sedentary behaviors. Our study provides empirical evidence of the association between attending art activities and reduction in the rates of cognitive function change for older Chinese Americans.
Other leisure activities have also been found to be associated with rates of change in cognition among Chinese older adults. For example, longitudinal research on Chinese older adults found late-life intellectual and social leisure activities were associated with slower cognitive decline (Leung et al., 2011; Wang et al., 2013). In addition, older Chinese adults with higher rates of participation in intrapersonal and interpersonal cognitive leisure activities (Qiu et al., 2019) and overall leisure activities (Zhu et al., 2017) had lower risk of cognitive impairment. Taken together, previous studies suggest a positive association between leisure activities and cognitive function in older Chinese adults.
In our study, we found that baseline art attendance was associated with select cognitive domains. In our study, combined art attendance was associated with a reduction in the rate of change in episodic memory. Decline in episodic memory (i.e., the ability to learn and recall new material) in older adults often precede the onset of dementia by several years (Albert et al., 2011). Therefore, any lifestyle factor that is associated with a slower change in episodic memory should be viewed as an important part of everyday life for older adults. In addition, visual arts engagement can promote self-esteem and improve emotional well-being (S. Kim, 2013). Higher self-esteem and improved emotional well-being may be associated with better cognitive outcomes in older adults.
In our study, attending visual and musical arts was associated with a reduction in the rate of change in a non-memory domain—executive function. Executive function is often referred to a complex set of behaviors responsible for a response to novel situations (Lezak, 2004). Similar art-making activities have been associated with cognitive benefits in executive function. For example, singing and/or playing a musical instrument by itself (Mansens et al., 2017) or categorized as a mental activity (Wang et al., 2013) was associated with better executive function. When attending a musical performance, participants engage their senses of vision and hearing. In addition, musical stimuli are often filled with emotions. These emotions can mirror one’s own emotions or bring a listener to experience a different emotion. In addition, those who liked listening to music may have been more likely to engage in other cognitive, physical, and social activities and, therefore, exhibited slower rate of cognitive decline (Kaufmann et al., 2018). Furthermore, older adults who liked listening to music may have been more likely to engage in activities, such as singing or playing a musical instrument either in their childhood/adolescence or mid-life. In addition, older adults who may have been more open to experience were more likely to participate in stimulating activities in early and mid-life (Ihle et al., 2016).
Our study has several limitations. First, the social engagement scale contains self-report items asking participants to recall attendance at these activities in the past 5 years which may be subject to recall bias. In addition, the phrasing of the survey questions makes it harder to distinguish cognitive changes between older adults who attended one play over the past 5 years versus those who had attended many plays, musicals, or concerts over the same period. Second, we were not able to examine the impact of participatory arts, which may have a larger effect of cognition given the increased cognitive demands of participatory arts as opposed to attending art activities. Furthermore, information on participants’ occupation was not available in the data; thus, we were not able to assess whether participants worked in an art-related occupation during their adulthood, which would have made them more likely to attend art activities. Third, the average follow-up of 2 years may not have been long enough to detect additional cognitive domain changes in our sample. Fourth, there are many unmeasured factors in this secondary analysis that could have contributed to older Chinese Americans attending art activities, such as early life family socioeconomic status, growing up in a family environment which valued art, family members’ art-related hobbies, occupation, and availability of transportation. Despite these limitations, our study brings forth important policy and research implications.
Our study findings point to the potential importance of attending art-based culture events among U.S. Chinese older adults. Policies aimed at maintaining funding for art activities for older adults are greatly needed. Doing so will ensure that these activities are available for this high-risk rapidly growing population. In addition, high-quality safe transportation is needed to allow older Chinese Americans to attend these activities.
Our study highlighted important directions for future research. Future research should assess the timing and the monthly frequency of art attendance and the individual impact of timing and the frequency on cognition in this population. Future studies should also examine the specific mechanism of the effect of arts on cognitive function. In addition, future studies should include a longer follow-up period between observation to obtain changes in cognition that are more meaningful clinically.
Footnotes
Declaration of Conflicting Interests
The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
IRB Protocol/Human Subjects
The Institutional Review Board of the Rush University Medical Center approved all study procedures (IRB protocol number 10090203).
Funding
The authors disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health (grant number F32 AG060630). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.
