A Cross-Lagged Panel Analysis of Social Participation in the Relationship Between Functional Limitations and Cognitive Functioning: Evidence From CHARLS
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online April, 2025
A Cross-Lagged Panel Analysis of Social Participation in the Relationship Between Functional Limitations and Cognitive Functioning: Evidence From CHARLS
Functional limitations refer to the dependency to perform activities of daily living. Increasing evidence has demonstrated a bidirectional association between functional limitations and cognitive functioning, although the exact mechanism remains unclear. This study investigated whether social participation bidirectionally mediates the association between functional limitations and cognitive decline. We analyzed a sample of 16,385 middle-aged and older adults (aged over 50 years) using longitudinal data from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS; Waves 1–4). We utilized a cross-lagged panel model to examine the bidirectional mediation of social participation between functional limitations and cognitive functioning over a span of eight years. The results indicated that social participation bidirectionally and partially mediated the relationship between the onset of functional limitations and cognitive decline, indicating that social participation may play an important role in mitigating the disablement process.
BrandtJ.SpencerM.FolsteinM. F. (1988). The telephone Interview for cognitive status. Neuropsychiatry, Neuropsychology, & Behavioral Neurology, 1(2), 111–117.
3.
BrownR. T.Diaz-RamirezL. G.BoscardinW. J.LeeS. J.WilliamsB. A.SteinmanM. A. (2019). Association of functional impairment in middle age with hospitalization, nursing home admission, and death. JAMA Internal Medicine, 179(5), 668–675. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.0008
4.
BurdickD. J.RosenblattA.SamusQ. M.SteeleC.BakerA.HarperM.MayerL.BrandtJ.RabinsP.LyketsosC. G. (2005). Predictors of functional impairment in residents of assisted-living facilities: The Maryland assisted living study. The Journals of Gerontology. Series A, Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences, 60(2), 258–264. https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/60.2.258
5.
ChanS. C. Y.AuA. M. L.LaiS. M. K. (2020). The detrimental impacts of negative age stereotypes on the episodic memory of older adults: Does social participation moderate the effects?BMC Geriatrics, 20(1), 452. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-020-01833-z
6.
ChenH.MuiA. C. (2014). Factorial validity of the center for epidemiologic studies depression scale short form in older population in China. International Psychogeriatrics, 26(1), 49–57. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1041610213001701
CrimminsE. M.KimJ. K.LangaK. M.WeirD. R. (2011). Assessment of cognition using surveys and neuropsychological assessment: The health and retirement study and the aging, demographics, and memory study. The Journals of Gerontology: Serie Bibliographique, 66B(suppl_1), i162. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbr048
9.
DombrowskyT. A. (2017). Relationship between engagement and level of functional status in older adults. SAGE Open Med, 5, Article 2050312117727998. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050312117727998
10.
EvansI. E. M.LlewellynD. J.MatthewsF. E.WoodsR. T.BrayneC.ClareL.on behalf of theC.-W. r. t. (2018). Social isolation, cognitive reserve, and cognition in healthy older people. PLoS One, 13(8), Article e0201008. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0201008
11.
FariasS. T.LauK.HarveyD.DennyK. G.BarbaC.MeffordA. N. (2017). Early functional limitations in cognitively normal older adults predict diagnostic conversion to mild cognitive impairment. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 65(6), 1152–1158. https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.14835
12.
FernándezI.García-MolláA.OliverA.SansóN.TomásJ. M. (2023). The role of social and intellectual activity participation in older adults’ cognitive function. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 107, Article 104891. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archger.2022.104891
13.
FingermanK. L.NgY. T.HuoM.BirdittK. S.CharlesS. T.ZaritS. (2021). Functional limitations, social integration, and daily activities in late life. Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 76(10), 1937–1947. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbab014
14.
HuD.WuY.ZhuJ.ZhuY.ChenJ. (2021). Age-related disease burden in China, 1997–2017: Findings from the global burden of disease study. Frontiers in Public Health, 9, Article 638704. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2021.638704
15.
HuY.LeiX.SmithJ. P.ZhaoY. (2012). Effects of social activities on cognitive functions: Evidence from CHARLS. In SmithJ. P.MajmundarM. (Eds.), Aging in Asia: Findings from new and emerging data initiatives (p. 12). National Academies Press. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK109224/
16.
HwangY.MassimoL.AryalS.HodgsonN. A. (2022). The relationship between social isolation and anxiety in people with cognitive impairment in the United States. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 37(2), Article 5679. https://doi.org/10.1002/gps.5679
17.
IBM Corp. (2022). IBM SPSS statistics for windows, version 29.0. IBM Corp.
18.
JakobsenJ. C.GluudC.WetterslevJ.WinkelP. (2017). When and how should multiple imputation be used for handling missing data in randomised clinical trials – a practical guide with flowcharts. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 17(1), 162. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-017-0442-1
19.
JamiesonJ. P.HarkinsS. G. (2012). Distinguishing between the effects of stereotype priming and stereotype threat on math performance. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 15(3), 291–304. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430211417833
20.
JohanssonE.JonssonF.RapoE.LundgrenA. S.HörnstenÅ.NilssonI. (2021). Let’s try social prescribing in Sweden (SPiS) - an interventional project targeting loneliness among older adults using a model for integrated care: A research protocol. International Journal of Integrated Care, 21(2), 33. https://doi.org/10.5334/ijic.5609
21.
KatzS.FordA. B.MoskowitzR. W.JacksonB. A.JaffeM. W. (1963). Studies of illness in the aged: The index of ADL: A standardized measure of biological and psychosocial function. JAMA, 185(12), 914–919. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1963.03060120024016
22.
KlineR. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). Guilford Press.
23.
KuiperJ. S.ZuidersmaM.Oude VoshaarR. C.ZuidemaS. U.van den HeuvelE. R.StolkR. P.SmidtN. (2015). Social relationships and risk of dementia: A systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal cohort studies. Ageing Research Reviews, 22, 39–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arr.2015.04.006
24.
LawtonM. P.BrodyE. M. (1969). Assessment of older people: Self-maintaining and instrumental activities of daily living. The Gerontologist, 9(3), 179–186.
25.
LestariS. K.de LunaX.ErikssonM.MalmbergG.NgN. (2021). A longitudinal study on social support, social participation, and older Europeans’ Quality of life. SSM - Population Health, 13, Article 100747. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmph.2021.100747
26.
LewinsohnP. M.SeeleyJ. R.RobertsR. E.AllenN. B. (1997). Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) as a screening instrument for depression among community-residing older adults. Psychology and Aging, 12(2), 277–287. https://doi.org/10.1037//0882-7974.12.2.277
27.
LiC.JiangS.LiN.ZhangQ. (2018). Influence of social participation on life satisfaction and depression among Chinese elderly: Social support as a mediator. Journal of Community Psychology, 46(3), 345–355. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcop.21944
28.
LinS. L. (2023). Functional disability among middle-aged and older adults in China: The intersecting roles of ethnicity, social class, and urban/rural residency. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 96(3), 350–375. https://doi.org/10.1177/00914150221092129
29.
LittleR. J. A. (1988). A test of missing completely at random for multivariate data with missing values. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 83(404), 1198–1202. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1988.10478722
30.
LupienS. J.McEwenB. S.GunnarM. R.HeimC. (2009). Effects of stress throughout the lifespan on the brain, behaviour and cognition. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 10(6), 434–445. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn2639
31.
MartinP.PoonL. W.LeeG.ObhiH. K.KallianpurK. J.WillcoxB.MasakiK. (2023). A 13-year time-lagged description of general cognitive and functional abilities in older men: A cross-lagged panel model. Journal of Aging and Health, 35(5-6), 335–344. https://doi.org/10.1177/08982643221130381
32.
McArdleJ. J.FisherG. G.KadlecK. M. (2007). Latent variable analyses of age trends of cognition in the Health and Retirement Study, 1992-2004. Psychology and Aging, 22(3), 525–545. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.22.3.525
33.
MengQ.WangH.StraussJ.LangaK. M.ChenX.WangM.QuQ.ChenW.KuangW.ZhangN.LiT.WangY.ZhaoY. (2019). Validation of neuropsychological tests for the China health and retirement longitudinal study harmonized cognitive assessment protocol. International Psychogeriatrics, 31(12), 1709–1719. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1041610219000693
34.
MenhasR.YangL.Danish NisarR. (2023). Community-based social healthcare practices in China for healthy aging: A social prescription perspective analysis. Frontiers in Public Health, 11, Article 1252157. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1252157
35.
MortimerJ. A.DingD.BorensteinA. R.DeCarliC.GuoQ.WuY.ZhaoQ.ChuS. (2012). Changes in brain volume and cognition in a randomized trial of exercise and social interaction in a community-based sample of non-demented Chinese elders. Journal of Alzheimers Disease, 30(4), 757–766. https://doi.org/10.3233/jad-2012-120079
36.
MuthénL. K.MuthénB. O. (2017). Mplus: Statistical analysis with latent variables: User’s guide (version 8). Muthén & Muthén.
OrthU.ClarkD. A.DonnellanM. B.RobinsR. W. (2021). Testing prospective effects in longitudinal research: Comparing seven competing cross-lagged models. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 120(4), 1013–1034. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000358
39.
PaivaA. F.CunhaC.VossG.Delerue MatosA. (2023). The interrelationship between social connectedness and social engagement and its relation with cognition: A study using SHARE data. Ageing and Society, 43(8), 1735–1753. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X2100129X
40.
PaquetC.WhiteheadJ.ShahR.AdamsA. M.DooleyD.SprengR. N.AunioA. L.DubéL. (2023). Social prescription interventions addressing social isolation and loneliness in older adults: Meta-review integrating on-the-ground resources. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 25, Article e40213. https://doi.org/10.2196/40213
41.
PearlinL. I.SkaffM. M. (1996). Stress and the life course: A paradigmatic alliance. The Gerontologist, 36(2), 239–247. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/36.2.239
42.
RadloffL. S. (1977). The CES-D scale: A self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1(3), 385–401. https://doi.org/10.1177/014662167700100306
43.
RossoA. L.TaylorJ. A.TabbL. P.MichaelY. L. (2013). Mobility, disability, and social engagement in older adults. Journal of Aging and Health, 25(4), 617–637. https://doi.org/10.1177/0898264313482489
44.
RotenbergS.MaeirA.DawsonD. R. (2020). Changes in activity participation among older adults with subjective cognitive decline or objective cognitive deficits. Frontiers in Neurology, 10, Article 1393. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2019.01393
45.
RoyallD. R.PalmerR.ChiodoL. K.PolkM. J. (2004). Declining executive control in normal aging predicts change in functional status: The freedom house study. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 52(3), 346–352. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2004.52104.x
46.
RubinD. B. (1987). Multiple imputation for nonresponse in surveys. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
47.
Sánchez PalaciosC.Trianes TorresM. V.Blanca MenaM. J. (2009). Negative aging stereotypes and their relation with psychosocial variables in the elderly population. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 48(3), 385–390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archger.2008.03.007
48.
SeemanT. E.McEwenB. S. (1996). Impact of social environment characteristics on neuroendocrine regulation. Psychosomatic Medicine, 58(5), 459–471. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006842-199609000-00008
49.
SpectorW. D.FleishmanJ. A. (1998). Combining activities of daily living with instrumental activities of daily living to measure functional disability. The Journals of Gerontology: Serie Bibliographique, 53B(1), S46–S57. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/53B.1.S46
50.
SunQ.JiangN.LuN.LouV. W. Q. (2022). Bidirectional relationship between cognitive function and loss hierarchy of activities of daily living among older adults with disabilities in urban China: A cross-lagged analysis. BMJ Open, 12(9), Article e057211. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057211
51.
TomiokaK.KurumataniN.HosoiH. (2016). Relationship of having hobbies and a purpose in life with mortality, activities of daily living, and instrumental activities of daily living among community-dwelling elderly adults. Journal of Epidemiology, 26(7), 361–370. https://doi.org/10.2188/jea.JE20150153
WhitmerR. A.GundersonE. P.Barrett-ConnorE.QuesenberryC. P.Jr.YaffeK. (2005). Obesity in middle age and future risk of dementia: A 27 year longitudinal population based study. BMJ, 330(7504), 1360. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.38446.466238.E0
54.
WróblewskaI.ZborowskaI.DąbekA.SusłoR.WróblewskaZ.DrobnikJ. (2018). Health status, health behaviors, and the ability to perform everyday activities in Poles aged &Amp;ge;65 Years staying in their home environment. Clinical Interventions in Aging, 2018(13), 355–363. https://doi.org/10.2147/cia.s152456
55.
XieB.MaC. (2021). Effect of social participation on the development of physical frailty: Do type, frequency and diversity matter?Maturitas, 151, 48–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.maturitas.2021.06.015
56.
YangR.WangH.EdelmanL. S.TracyE. L.DemirisG.SwardK. A.DonaldsonG. W. (2020). Loneliness as a mediator of the impact of social isolation on cognitive functioning of Chinese older adults. Age Ageing, 49(4), 599–604. https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afaa020.
57.
ZhaoY.HuY.SmithJ.P.StraussJ.YangG. (2014). Cohort profile: The China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS). International Journal of Epidemiology, 43(1), 61–68. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dys203
