Virtual Healthcare for Older Adults With Preventable Chronic Conditions: A Meta-synthesis of Quality Aspects

Applications of study findings

• Our review suggests reducing technological complexities and improves digital literacy for successful implementation of virtual healthcare.

Introduction

Chronic disease is the primary reason for morbidity, mortality, utilization of health services, and the overall cost burden on healthcare systems across the world (Breadon et al., 2023; Islam and GBD 2019 Australia Collaborators, 2023; Wang, Liu et al., 2021). Lasting for at least 6 months, chronic conditions—such as cancer, heart disease, stroke, chronic lung disease, and diabetes—account for 74% of global deaths (Wang, Liu et al., 2021). Despite the complexity of causes and nature of such diseases, certain chronic conditions, like musculoskeletal conditions, cardiovascular diseases, diabetes, mental health, and neurological disorders, can be prevented (referred to as preventable chronic conditions throughout this article) through improved access to screening, treatment, and rehabilitation (Greenberg & Pi-Sunyer, 2019; Mas et al., 2018). Clinicians and the broader health system can provide healthcare services virtually to patients, nationally and internationally (Ferguson et al., 2021; Hutchings et al., 2021). Older adults with preventable chronic conditions (OAPCC) are a growing segment of this demographic (Greenberg & Pi-Sunyer, 2019; Mas et al., 2018). However, quality aspects of virtual healthcare (VHC) delivery for preventable chronic diseases have not yet been meaningfully investigated.

Virtual healthcare (VHC) describes remote interactions between patients and their healthcare providers, facilitated through various communication and information technologies to enhance patient care (Ferry et al., 2021; Liddy et al., 2022; Singer et al., 2022). According to the WHO (2021), VHC involves securely utilizing information and communication technologies to support health-related activities, encompassing service delivery, surveillance, education, and research. The multifaceted approach to VHC contains several components, such as live synchronous audio-video telemedicine, asynchronous store-and-forward care, electronic consultations, telephone visits, portal messaging, remote patient monitoring, pre-visit planning, interactive care plans, advanced care at home, and more, reflecting the rapidly evolving nature of this field (Demaerschalk et al., 2022; WHO, 2022). Additionally, VHC can be defined as a real-time video consultation with healthcare providers conducted over the Internet, a trend expected to continue to grow with the increasing use of mobile devices, rise of AI, and rising patient demand for convenient and immediate access to healthcare services (Gordon et al., 2017; Li et al., 2022).

While available international evidence presents a mixed outcome, many studies reported that VHC for chronic diseases can be as effective as, if not more effective than, traditional face-to-face care provided in a healthcare setting (Bajgain et al., 2023; Ferry et al., 2021). Clinical benefits identified in the research include improvements in heart failure symptoms, chronic respiratory symptoms, glycemic control in diabetes, blood pressure in hypertensive patients, quality of life, mental health, and reductions in deaths and hospitalizations (Demaerschalk et al., 2022; Ferguson et al., 2021; Li et al., 2022). Non-clinical benefits of virtual care include improved appointment attendance, increased patient knowledge and self-management, and patients feeling more supported (Gao et al., 2023). Frontline healthcare providers have recognized other non-clinical benefits including improved access to care, particularly for older adults with chronic conditions, who often face challenges related to mobility, transportation, and regular healthcare visits (Goldberg et al., 2022). For example, older adults have reported experiencing improved access to care, greater time efficiency, and enhanced self-management capabilities through telehealth initiatives (Savira et al., 2023). Telemonitoring and device utilization emerge as suitable options for interventions focused on self-management and monitoring, especially for older adults with chronic conditions (Savira et al., 2023). The research findings also underscore the potential benefits of virtual visits for older adults residing at home, enhancing social inclusion and medication compliance (Savira et al., 2023). Both users and clinicians have expressed satisfaction with virtual visits as a suitable means of delivering in-home care to older adults (Bajgain et al., 2023; Li et al., 2022).

OAPCC often require ongoing monitoring, medication management, and regular check-ups, which can be burdensome for older patients, family carers, and health systems (Mas et al., 2018). VHC presents an opportunity to address these challenges by providing a convenient and accessible means of delivering healthcare services and support (Savira et al., 2023). However, the adoption and successful implementation of VHC for OAPCC and their family carers are influenced by a range of factors. These factors—such as knowledge and willingness among patients and family carers, access to digital technologies, internet connection, and support to set up virtual visits—act as barriers that hinder the uptake of VHC or as facilitators that promote its adoption and use (Savira et al., 2023; Wang, Fu et al., 2021; Zaman et al., 2022). Programs based on a VHC delivery model use various approaches and have demonstrated varying levels of success, indicating that further research is necessary to better understand the most effective models for managing chronic diseases (Demaerschalk et al., 2023; Smithson et al., 2021).

Current scoping and systematic reviews have been constrained to identifying enablers and barriers to VHC delivery among older adults with chronic conditions (Savira et al., 2023; Wang, Fu et al., 2021; Zaman et al., 2022). Beyond this point; we aim to synthesize the quality aspects of VHC for OAPCC.

Review Questions

Our meta-synthesis aimed at understanding how quality measures are incorporated in designing and delivering VHC for OAPCC. The PICO framework was employed to formulate the review questions (Schardt et al., 2007).

P (Population) – Older adults with preventable chronic conditions

I (Intervention) – Virtual healthcare

C (Comparison) – not applicable

O (Outcomes) – Implementation: quality in service design and delivery; and Effectiveness: equity and satisfaction with care

Four main questions guided our meta-synthesis:

Q1: How do the studies describe the quality measures of VHC for OAPCC?

Theoretical framework

To answer the questions, we used the Virtual Care Quality Framework (VCQF) established by the Mayo Clinic, which explains how four quality measures, including functionality, equity, experience, and cost-effectiveness, shape the quality of VHC (Demaerschalk et al., 2023). This quality framework combines theoretical components of VHC advocated by the American Medical Association (AMA), the Institute for Health Care Improvement (IHCI), and the USA National Quality Framework (NQF) into a single framework underpinned by the essence of patient benefits (Table 1) (Demaerschalk et al., 2023).

OPEN IN VIEWER

Table 1.

Description of the VCQF.

Domain	Description
Functionality	Delves into and illustrates VHC’s clinical, operational, and technical facets, highlighting complexity and risk, care availability, and adherence to clinical processes.
Equity	Prioritizes accessibility and clinical outcomes, emphasizing accessibility to health services for diverse communities and addressing digital literacy issues.
Experiential	Encompasses the subjective experiences of patient and family experiences and clinician satisfaction with virtual care.
Economic	Focuses on the cost-effectiveness of VHC delivery.

This VCQF draws from established guidelines and advances a comprehensive understanding of the nuanced dynamics that may describe the implementation and effectiveness of VHC for OAPCC.

Methods and Materials

We conducted an interpretive integration of study findings, employing methods informed by qualitative research synthesis as outlined by the Centre for Reviews and Dissemination in 2009 (Tacconelli, 2010). Sandelowski and Barroso (2007) significantly contributed to this approach through their meta-synthesis methodology, advancing the analysis processes beyond previous qualitative and review approaches, including Spradley’s (1979) ethnography, Noblit and Hare’s (1988) meta-ethnography, Cooper’s (1982) systematic reviews, and Glass et al.’s (1981) meta-analysis. This evolution facilitated a systematic retrieval, deductive analysis, and interpretation of qualitative findings (Ludvigsen et al., 2016). The six steps of meta-synthesis outlined by Sandelowski and Barroso in 2006 were used for this review (Table 2).

OPEN IN VIEWER

Table 2.

The Six Steps of Our Meta-synthesis.

Step 1: Conceiving the synthesis	Review questions: Q1: what are the quality measures of virtual healthcare for older adults with preventable chronic conditions? Q2: How do older adults with preventable chronic conditions, their families, and healthcare providers perceive quality measures in virtual health services? Q3: what is the effectiveness of virtual healthcare, and in what specific contexts? Q4: How do these studies inform effective strategies for successful implementation to improve care at virtual platforms? The target phenomenon, “virtual healthcare quality,” was discussed in regular research team meetings, using clinical perspectives, health service concepts, and quality frameworks to decide on a theoretical framework that may guide the literature search and data extraction.
Step 2: Searching and retrieving literature	Major electronic databases were searched, and the citations were tracked. The citations were English-language, peer-reviewed articles published in journals between 2020 and 2023 with no country restrictions. The focus was on virtual healthcare interventions that improved accessibility and utilization of health services (Table 2). Articles should offer excerpts and analytical interpretations of the excerpts.
Phase 3: Appraising findings	The focus is on critical appraisal and evaluation of the individual articles (Table 3), followed by a comparative assessment of the articles reviewed.
Phase 4: Classifying findings	Identify common and recurring concepts from the articles. Extract data into Table 5 and synthesize it into Table 6, following the theoretical domains of the virtual care quality framework.
Phase 5: Synthesizing findings into meta-summaries	The focus was on constructing a coherent line of argument to facilitate the data extraction, separation, grouping, and abstraction of findings (Table 5). This process was informed by our specification of the themes: Functionality, equity, experience, and cost-effectiveness.
Phase 6: Synthesizing findings into a meta-synthesis	Offer new interpretations and experiments on the quality of virtual healthcare for older patients with preventable chronic conditions.

OPEN IN VIEWER

Table 3.

Search Strategy to Identify Papers for this Review (CINHAL).

Step	Search Term	Results
1.	Virtual heal*	59,483
2.	(MH “telemedicine”)	62,811
3.	S1 OR S2	66,683
4.	(“chronic* n2 (cardiovascular diseases OR heart disease OR stroke OR hypertension OR musculoskeletal conditions OR arthrit* OR diabetes OR mental health OR cognitive impairment)	101,481
5.	(“older* n2 (senior citizen OR elderly OR older people OR aged people)	149,392
6	(mh(aged+)	81,582
7.	S5 OR S6	149,992
8.	S3 AND S4 AND S7	1264
9.	Language: English	1091
10.	Date range 2020 onwards	778

Quality Appraisal

Two reviewers, MH and MP, independently scored articles for critical appraisal using the Mixed Method Appraisal Tool (MMAT) criteria since the studies were qualitative, mixed-methods, and quantitative with qualitative components. The MMAT scale spanned from 0, indicating no criteria met, to 5, indicating all criteria met, as detailed by Hong et al. in 2018, was used to assign numerical scores to the articles (Hong et al., 2018). A score was allocated out of 5 (0 - Unclear/No and 1: Yes). The scores from the reviewer pairs were then compared, and through a consensus-driven process, it was determined that the papers included in this review exhibited a quality level that ranged from moderate (with a score of 3) to high (with a score of 5), as illustrated in Table 4.

OPEN IN VIEWER

Table 4.

Mixed Method Appraisal Tool Scores for the Selected Studies.

No	Study Title	Type of Study	MMAT	Score
1	Barriers and enablers of older adults initiating a deprescribing conversation	Qualitative	1.1. Is the qualitative approach appropriate to answer the research question? Yes 1.2. Are the qualitative data collection methods adequate to address the research question? Yes 1.3. Are the findings adequately derived from the data? Yes 1.4. Is the interpretation of results sufficiently substantiated by data? Yes 1.5. Is there coherence between qualitative data sources, collection, analysis and interpretation? Yes	5
2	Attitudes of at-risk older adults about prevention of cardiovascular disease and dementia using eHealth	Qualitative	1.1. Is the qualitative approach appropriate to answer the research question? Yes 1.2. Are the qualitative data collection methods adequate to address the research question? Yes 1.3. Are the findings adequately derived from the data? Yes 1.4. Is the interpretation of results sufficiently substantiated by data? Yes 1.5. Is there coherence between qualitative data sources, collection, analysis, and interpretation? Yes	5
3	Opportunities to improve a mobile obesity wellness intervention for rural older adults with obesity	Qualitative	1.1. Is the qualitative approach appropriate to answer the research question? Yes 1.2. Are the qualitative data collection methods adequate to address the research question? Yes 1.3. Are the findings adequately derived from the data? Yes 1.4. Is the interpretation of results sufficiently substantiated by data? Yes 1.5. Is there coherence between qualitative data sources, collection, analysis, and interpretation? Yes	5
4	Feasibility and acceptability of a technology-based, rural weight management intervention in older adults with obesity	Quantitative intervention study with qualitative feedback	3.1. Are the participants representative of the target population? Yes 3.2. Are measurements appropriate regarding both the outcome and intervention (or exposure)? Yes 3.3. Are there complete outcome data? Yes 3.4. Are the confounders accounted for in the design and analysis? Yes 3.5. During the study period, is the intervention administered (or exposure occurred) as intended? Yes	5
5	A realist evaluation approach to explaining the role of context in the impact of a complex eHealth intervention for improving prevention of cardiovascular disease	Qualitative	1.1. Is the qualitative approach appropriate to answer the research question? Can’t say 1.2. Are the qualitative data collection methods adequate to address the research question? Yes 1.3. Are the findings adequately derived from the data? Yes 1.4. Is the interpretation of results sufficiently substantiated by data? Yes 1.5. Is there coherence between qualitative data sources, collection, analysis, and interpretation? Yes	4
6	Feasibility randomized controlled trial of a mind–body activity program for older adults with chronic pain and cognitive decline	Mixed methods	5.1. Is there an adequate rationale for using a mixed methods design to address the research question? Yes 5.2. Are the different components of the study effectively integrated to answer the research question? Yes 5.3. Are the outputs of the integration of qualitative and quantitative components adequately interpreted? Yes 5.4. Are divergences and inconsistencies between quantitative and qualitative results adequately addressed? Yes 5.5. Do the different components of the study adhere to the quality criteria of each tradition of the methods involved? Yes	5
7	Factors influencing barriers and facilitators to in home video telehealth for dementia management	Qualitative	1.1. Is the qualitative approach appropriate to answer the research question? Yes 1.2. Are the qualitative data collection methods adequate to address the research question? Yes 1.3. Are the findings adequately derived from the data? Yes 1.4. Is the interpretation of results sufficiently substantiated by data? Yes 1.5. Is there coherence between qualitative data sources, collection, analysis, and interpretation? Yes	5
8	Rapid integration of home telehealth visits amidst COVID-19: What do older adults need to succeed?	Mixed methods	5.1. Is there an adequate rationale for using a mixed methods design to address the research question? Yes 5.2. Are the different components of the study effectively integrated to answer the research question? Yes 5.3. Are the outputs of the integration of qualitative and quantitative components adequately interpreted? Yes 5.4. Are divergences and inconsistencies between quantitative and qualitative results adequately addressed? Yes 5.5. Do the different components of the study adhere to the quality criteria of each tradition of the methods involved? Yes	5
9	Avoiding God’s waiting room: lessons from the lived experiences of older people who use digital technology to support physical activity.	Qualitative	1.1. Is the qualitative approach appropriate to answer the research question? Yes 1.2. Are the qualitative data collection methods adequate to address the research question? Yes 1.3. Are the findings adequately derived from the data? Yes 1.4. Is the interpretation of results sufficiently substantiated by data? Yes 1.5. Is there coherence between qualitative data sources, collection, analysis, and interpretation? Yes	5
10	Converting a geriatrics clinic to virtual visits during COVID-19	Mixed methods	5.1. Is there an adequate rationale for using a mixed methods design to address the research question? Yes 5.2. Are the different components of the study effectively integrated to answer the research question? Yes 5.3. Are the outputs of the integration of qualitative and quantitative components adequately interpreted? Yes 5.4. Are divergences and inconsistencies between quantitative and qualitative results adequately addressed? Yes 5.5. Do the different components of the study adhere to the quality criteria of each tradition of the methods involved? Yes	5
11	Caregiver experience of tele-dementia care for older veterans	Qualitative	1.1. Is the qualitative approach appropriate to answer the research question? Yes 1.2. Are the qualitative data collection methods adequate to address the research question? Yes 1.3. Are the findings adequately derived from the data? Yes 1.4. Is the interpretation of results sufficiently substantiated by data? Yes 1.5. Is there coherence between qualitative data sources, collection, analysis, and interpretation? Yes	5
12	Tele-health care system for chronic disease management of middle-aged and older adults in remote areas	Quantitative with qualitative feedback comments	4.1. Is the sampling strategy relevant to address the research question? Can’t say 4.2. Is the sample representative of the target population? Yes 4.3. Are the measurements appropriate? Yes 4.4. Is the risk of non-response bias low? Yes 4.5. Is the statistical analysis appropriate to answer the research question? Can’t say	3
13	Older people and rural eHealth	Qualitative	1.1. Is the qualitative approach appropriate to answer the research question? Yes 1.2. Are the qualitative data collection methods adequate to address the research question? Can’t say 1.3. Are the findings adequately derived from the data? Yes 1.4. Is the interpretation of results sufficiently substantiated by data? Yes 1.5. Is there coherence between qualitative data sources, collection, analysis, and interpretation? Yes	4
14	A qualitative exploration of cardiovascular disease patients’ views and experiences with an eHealth cardiac rehabilitation intervention	Mixed methods	5.1. Is there an adequate rationale for using a mixed methods design to address the research question? Yes 5.2. Are the different components of the study effectively integrated to answer the research question? No 5.3. Are the outputs of the integration of qualitative and quantitative components adequately interpreted? Can’t say 5.4. Are divergences and inconsistencies between quantitative and qualitative results adequately addressed? Yes 5.5. Do the different components of the study adhere to the quality criteria of each tradition of the methods involved? Yes	3
15	Tele-Medicine based and self-administered interactive exercise program (tele-exergame) to improve cognition in older adults with mild cognitive impairment or dementia	Mixed methods	5.1. Is there an adequate rationale for using a mixed methods design to address the research question? No 5.2. Are the different components of the study effectively integrated to answer the research question? Yes 5.3. Are the outputs of the integration of qualitative and quantitative components adequately interpreted? Can’t say 5.4. Are divergences and inconsistencies between quantitative and qualitative results adequately addressed? Yes 5.5. Do the different components of the study adhere to the quality criteria of each tradition of the methods involved? Yes	3
16	Family caregivers’ experiences with telehealth during COVID-19	Qualitative	1.1. Is the qualitative approach appropriate to answer the research question? Yes 1.2. Are the qualitative data collection methods adequate to address the research question? Yes 1.3. Are the findings adequately derived from the data? Yes 1.4. Is the interpretation of results sufficiently substantiated by data? Can’t say 1.5. Is there coherence between qualitative data sources, collection, analysis, and interpretation? No	3
17	Development & evaluation of a tailored mobile health intervention	Intervention study, qualitative evaluation	1.1. Is the qualitative approach appropriate to answer the research question? Yes 1.2. Are the qualitative data collection methods adequate to address the research question? Yes 1.3. Are the findings adequately derived from the data? Yes 1.4. Is the interpretation of results sufficiently substantiated by data? Yes 1.5. Is there coherence between qualitative data sources, collection, analysis, and interpretation? Yes	5
18	Barriers and facilitators to virtual care in a geriatric medicine clinic	Qualitative	1.1. Is the qualitative approach appropriate to answer the research question? Yes 1.2. Are the qualitative data collection methods adequate to address the research question? Yes 1.3. Are the findings adequately derived from the data? Yes 1.4. Is the interpretation of results sufficiently substantiated by data? Yes 1.5. Is there coherence between qualitative data sources, collection, analysis, and interpretation? Yes	5
19	Dementia caregiver virtual support	Mixed methods	5.1. Is there an adequate rationale for using a mixed methods design to address the research question? Yes 5.2. Are the different components of the study effectively integrated to answer the research question? Yes 5.3. Are the outputs of the integration of qualitative and quantitative components adequately interpreted? Can’t say 5.4. Are divergences and inconsistencies between quantitative and qualitative results adequately addressed? Yes 5.5. Do the different components of the study adhere to the quality criteria of each tradition of the methods involved? Yes	4
20	Identifying opportunities, and motivation to enhance capabilities, influencing the development of a personalized digital health hub model of care for hip fractures	Mixed methods	5.1. Is there an adequate rationale for using a mixed methods design to address the research question? Yes 5.2. Are the different components of the study effectively integrated to answer the research question? Yes 5.3. Are the outputs of the integration of qualitative and quantitative components adequately interpreted? Yes 5.4. Are divergences and inconsistencies between quantitative and qualitative results adequately addressed? Yes 5.5. Do the different components of the study adhere to the quality criteria of each tradition of the methods involved? Yes	5
21	“In my age, we didn’t have the computers”: Using a complexity lens to understand uptake of diabetes eHealth innovations into primary care—A qualitative study	Qualitative	1.1. Is the qualitative approach appropriate to answer the research question? Yes 1.2. Are the qualitative data collection methods adequate to address the research question? Yes 1.3. Are the findings adequately derived from the data? Yes 1.4. Is the interpretation of results sufficiently substantiated by data? Yes 1.5. Is there coherence between qualitative data sources, collection, analysis, and interpretation? Yes	5

Data Extraction and Synthesis

Two reviewers, MH and SJ, read articles and recorded the extracted data separately into Excel spreadsheets, carefully cross-checking any discrepancies (See Supplemental File 2: Table 5 Summary of selected studies). The extracted data included study characteristics (author, year, country of origin, study objectives and design, and study participants) and VHC (type of interventions, experience with virtual care). Deductive-reflexive thematic data synthesis was applied since meta-synthesis is about classification and abstracting findings (Braun & Clarke, 2019, 2020). The second and third stage categories from targeted findings were independently identified by reviewers MH and SJ, and an abstract integration of themes and sub-themes was obtained via critical reflections on the VCQF (Demaerschalk et al., 2023). A matrix to display studies (identified by authors) against the concepts was developed (See Supplemental File 3: Table 6 Synthesis of study findings).

Identification of Effective Strategies and Solutions

Firstly, a comprehensive list of potential effective strategies and solutions was derived from the current evidence. Secondly, the compiled strategies were then further refined by removing overlapping strategies and grouping strategies into broader categories (See Supplemental File 4: Table 7 Recommendations). SP drafted the table and MH reviewed the table.

Results—Theoretical and Analytical Interpretations

Twenty-one articles were reviewed. The majority of the studies were conducted in the United States (n = 12), followed by Australia (n = 3), Canada (n = 2), Europe (n = 3), and Asia (n = 1). The study designs varied, with a mix of qualitative (n = 10), mixed methods (n = 9), and quantitative analyses with qualitative feedback (n = 2). A total of 1005 participants were involved in these studies, with a focus on older adults living with a range of preventable chronic conditions, including cardiovascular diseases, obesity, hypertension, chronic pain, diabetes, cognitive decline, and dementia. The interventions varied from generalized telehealth and eHealth platforms to more specific interventions like mobile health obesity wellness interventions, technology-based weight management programs, and sensor-based in-home exercise systems. Apart from detailing virtual health services’ origins, focuses, and designs, the meta-synthesis of stakeholders’ perceptions of VHC unveiled the following themes (Figure 1).OPEN IN VIEWER

Recommendations to Improve Virtual Health Care for OAPCC

Supplemental File 4 (Table 7) presents an overview of recommendations to improve VHC for OPACC. First, digital health literacy training should be developed to enhance patients’ ability to navigate VHC, with continuous education on symptom recognition, telehealth communication and confidence building. Personalization, such as integrating avatars and storytelling, can increase engagement, while reducing technological complexity through gaming and hands-on training. Family or professional support systems during VHC consultations are recommended to ensure patient comfort and assist with technology use. Clear protocols are necessary to determine when VHC is appropriate and when it is not, particularly for chronic care interventions. Rural-specific programs should be developed to increase access, equity, and social connectedness. Building trust with familiar healthcare providers and using non-verbal communication can enhance the effectiveness of virtual care. New models VHC are needed to address issues like medication management. Promoting the benefits of VHC—such as reduced travel time, optimized resource use, workforce efficiency, convenience, and lower infection risks—can help address equity issues and drive broader adoption. Ensuring access to digital devices for underserved populations and improving the quality of online information are also critical. Multidisciplinary VHC teams can provide comprehensive care, and insurance companies could consider supporting future multidisciplinary care VHC settings. Program designs should consider varying levels of patient motivation, health consciousness, digital literacy, and ensure logistical and practical issues such as scheduling times are clearly defined. A dedicated budget for telemedicine and remote monitoring can address workforce shortages and resource scarcity.

Discussion

Our meta-synthesis builds on the existing scoping reviews, which have illuminated the complex landscape of VHC for OAPCC (Gao et al., 2023; Savira et al., 2023). These scoping reviews identified multiple forces influencing the quality of virtual healthcare: (i) patients’ physical conditions; (ii) patient education/training for using technology; (iii) lack of motivation among health service providers; and (iv) staffing and legislation issues. We have expanded this exploration to focus on preventable chronic conditions and explored scenarios where older adults, their families, and healthcare providers respond to quality aspects of VAC. As expected, our review revealed that OAPCC often welcome technological advancement in health service delivery. However, the potential for VHC is tempered by the realities of the digital divide, necessitating targeted solutions to ensure equitable access, especially for those from rural or underprivileged backgrounds (Frydman et al., 2022). Resources and strategies available to them—not always evenly distributed—largely resemble “one-size-fits-all” measures that may not adequately address the challenges faced by this demographic. By applying the Mayo Clinic’s VCQF (Demaerschalk et al., 2023), we can better understand how to address these challenges and optimize VHC for OAPCC. Furthermore, the framework provided useful to translate the evidence into recommendations to improve virtual health care service design, delivery, and practical implementation for older people with chronic conditions. To our knowledge, this is the first study to do so.

The VCQF’s functionality domain examines VHC’s clinical, operational, and technical aspects (Demaerschalk et al., 2023). Our findings highlight that while telemedicine offers convenience, OAPCC often face technological barriers. Innovative solutions like the tele-Exergame system and personalized VHC, such as avatars, have shown promise in reducing these challenges (Chanpimol et al., 2020; Orta Portillo et al., 2023). However, ongoing support and training for patients and providers are essential to improve usage and effectiveness of virtual platforms (Haleem et al., 2021). The VCQF’s equity domain ensures that all patients have access to VHC, regardless of their socioeconomic status or geographic location (Demaerschalk et al., 2023). Our review found telemedicine has improved access to healthcare for rural and underserved populations by reducing travel burdens and addressing workforce shortages. However, disparities persist due to the digital divide, which requires targeted policies to enhance digital literacy and provide affordable technological solutions (Saeed & Masters, 2021). Addressing these inequities is important to ensure that VHC is accessible to all older adults including OAPCC.

The VCQF’s experiential domain encompasses the subjective experiences of patients, families, and clinicians (Demaerschalk et al., 2023). Our synthesis indicates high satisfaction among patients and providers due to the convenience and reduced risk of infections during the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond. However, concerns about the adequacy of virtual assessments for complex conditions and the need for more integrated and personalized care persist (Nene et al., 2023). Complex care requires a multidisciplinary approach, but barriers like independent insurance providers (Ailabouni et al., 2022; Batsis et al., 2020) and predominantly siloed structures in healthcare education and workplaces often carry over into virtual healthcare settings, hindering effective team-based collaboration. Continuous education and training for patients and providers are essential to improve confidence and engagement in VHC (Curran et al., 2023). Finally, cost-effectiveness evaluates the economic benefits of VHC. One study showed significant time savings for OAPCC, with telemedicine reducing an average of 166 minutes of travel time (Hawley et al., 2020). This not only alleviates the burden on patients but also enhances the efficiency of healthcare delivery. Additionally, VHC can reduce healthcare costs by preventing hospitalizations and enabling timely interventions (Demaerschalk et al., 2023; Snoswell et al., 2020).

VHC efficiently addresses care needs of OAPCC, capitalizing on the potential for early intervention and ongoing management (Clarke et al., 2017). Conditions such as prediabetes, early-stage hypertension, and hyperlipidemia often require continuous monitoring and lifestyle adjustments that can be significantly supported through virtual technologies (Fundoiano-Hershcovitz et al., 2022). By implementing telehealth solutions, healthcare providers can deliver preventive care that is both proactive and reactive to the nuances of these conditions.

VHC platforms offer a host of services that are essential for managing preventable conditions, starting with virtual screenings and assessments (Mehraeen et al., 2023). These tools enable collecting and analyzing health data without frequent physical visits, making regular monitoring achievable. For instance, mobile health apps can prompt patients to check their blood pressure and blood glucose levels, automatically transmitting data to their healthcare providers (Oh et al., 2022). This seamless exchange of information ensures that any necessary adjustments in medication or diet can be swiftly implemented, halting the progression of conditions that could otherwise lead to more severe health issues.

Furthermore, virtual platforms are pivotal in promoting personalized patient education and engagement, which are keys to the self-management of preventable conditions (Sawesi et al., 2016). Through virtual consultations, healthcare providers can provide tailored advice on diet, physical activity, and lifestyle changes specific to the individual’s health status and needs. This personalized approach not only boosts the effectiveness of preventive measures but also cultivates a deeper understanding and commitment on the part of the patient, leading to improved health outcomes (Gaffney & Hamiduzzaman, 2022). Additionally, VHC can extend to include specialized telerehabilitation for older adults who are managing the aftermath of events like strokes or surgical procedures related to their chronic conditions. These services provide patients access to physiotherapy and other rehabilitative sessions through video conferencing, enabling consistent, supervised recovery routines without the logistical challenges of travelling to healthcare facilities. By integrating these virtual services into the standard care protocols, healthcare systems can offer a more responsive and adaptable approach to preventing and managing chronic conditions in older adults (Savira et al., 2023). This model not only maximizes the efficiency of health service delivery but also aligns closely with the needs and lifestyles of the elderly population, ensuring that preventive care is accessible and practical.

For older adults, the distinction between general health services for chronic diseases and those designed for preventable chronic conditions is crucial in optimizing care and improving outcomes (Grover & Joshi, 2014). General health services often focus on managing symptoms and complications of established chronic diseases such as heart failure, advanced diabetes, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (Anekwe & Rahkovsky, 2018). These services typically emphasize medication management, routine monitoring, and acute exacerbations, reflecting a reactive approach to health complications arising from such conditions. In contrast, health services for preventable chronic conditions, such as prediabetes, early-stage hypertension, and osteoporosis, adopt a proactive strategy (Sadiq, 2023). These services prioritize early detection through regular screenings, preventive treatments, and comprehensive lifestyle interventions to halt disease progression. VHC platforms enhance this approach by facilitating continuous remote monitoring and personalized care plans, which can adjust treatments as needed before conditions worsen. This tailored approach aligns with the need for more frequent and specific interventions. It empowers older adults through self-management tools and educational resources that are integral to preventing the escalation of these conditions (Burton et al., 2022).

Screening and early detection form the cornerstone of managing preventable chronic conditions (Fragala et al., 2019). Virtual health services facilitate these processes through technologies that enable remote monitoring and data collection. For instance, wearable devices can track vital signs, blood sugar levels, and other physiological metrics critical for the early detection of diabetes and hypertension (Alhaddad et al., 2022). These devices can alert both the patient and healthcare provider to abnormalities that may indicate the onset or progression of a condition (Alhaddad et al., 2022). Virtual platforms can thus ensure timely intervention, turning screening from a periodic to a continuous process. This shift is crucial for older adults who benefit significantly from immediate healthcare regimen adjustments, potentially reducing the need for more intensive treatments.

Effective integration of VHC within standard healthcare protocols is essential. Policy frameworks must support this integration by providing adequate funding, training, and infrastructural investments to ensure that virtual services are as robust as traditional care approaches (Srivastava et al., 2023). Additionally, regulatory standards require updates to reflect the specific requirements of VHC, focusing on privacy, data security, interoperability of systems, and cross-jurisdictional practice and standardization. In addition, ongoing training for healthcare providers and healthcare students is crucial to use virtual health technologies effectively (Curran et al., 2023). This training should cover technical skills, patient engagement strategies, and the application of data analytics to personalize care (Sadiq, 2023). Furthermore, embedding virtual health care skills training and guidelines into medical programs and other health programs is essential to prepare the future health workforce (Pit et al., 2021). VHC should prioritize integration and patient-centered care, utilizing user-friendly technologies and providing flexible communication options.

Conclusions

This meta-synthesis has demonstrated that VHC holds transformative potential for managing preventable chronic conditions among older adults. By enhancing accessibility and allowing for timely interventions, virtual care can significantly reduce the burdens on both patients and healthcare systems. Effective implementation, however, requires supportive health policies that ensure virtual services are robust and sustainable. This includes updating regulatory standards to secure patient data and adapting reimbursement policies to promote the adoption of virtual care. Clinically, providers must be well-trained in VHC’s technical and patient engagement aspects to deliver effective, personalised care. Mayo Clinic’s Virtual Care Quality Framework can be used to move beyond problem description and provide scientific evidence to improve care and identify effective strategies for successful implementation. Future research should focus on long-term outcomes and the continuous improvement of VHC technologies. Ultimately, integrating virtual care into existing health frameworks can significantly improve the quality of life for older adults while making health systems more efficient and responsive.

Supplemental Material

Supplemental Material

Supplemental Material

Supplemental Material