Synchronous Walking Enhanced Younger Adults’ Sentiments Toward Older Adults

Abstract

Younger adults often hold negative perceptions toward older adults, which can compromise intergenerational relationships. This study examines interpersonal synchrony as a potential intervening venue. Past research shows that synchronous activities enhance positive interactions among same-generation individuals. We extend the investigation to young-old dyads. Adopting a pre-test and post-test design, this study examined whether synchronous walking improves younger adults’ sentiments toward older partners regarding perceived self-other merging, connectedness, general liking, and impression. Participants (N = 51; 64.7% female) were paired with an older adult, randomly assigned to synchronous, asynchronous, or no walking conditions. After walking, dyads had a conversation. Results indicated that synchronous walking (vs. asynchronous or no walking conditions) significantly improved all aspects of younger adults’ sentiments toward their older partners. Having conversations enhanced connectedness and impressions, but synchronous walking outweighed conversing for strengthening self-other merging. This study sheds light on interventions for improving intergenerational relationships, cultivating an age-friendly society.

Keywords

ageism age-friendly society intergenerational relations interpersonal synchrony perception

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aron

E. N.

Smollan

(1992). Inclusion of other in the self scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(4), 596–612. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.63.4.596

Atherton

Sebanz

Cross

(2019). Imagine all the synchrony: The effects of actual and imagined synchronous walking on attitudes towards marginalised groups. PLoS One, 14(5), Article e0216585. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0220264

Byrne

D. E.

(1971). The attraction paradigm. Ademic Press.

Caprara

G. V.

Steca

Zelli

Capanna

(2005). A new scale for measuring adults’ prosocialness. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 21(2), 77–89. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759.21.2.77

Cheng

Kato

Saunders

J. A.

Tseng

C. H.

(2020). Paired walkers with better first impression synchronize better. PLoS One, 15(2), Article e0227880. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0227880

Cirelli

L. K.

Einarson

K. M.

Trainor

L. J.

(2014). Interpersonal synchrony increases prosocial behavior in infants. Developmental Science, 17(6), 1003–1011. https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12193

Drury

Hutchison

Abrams

(2016). Direct and extended intergenerational contact and young people's attitudes towards older adults. British Journal of Social Psychology, 55(3), 522–543. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12146

Hove

M. J.

(2008). Shared circuits, shared time, and interpersonal synchrony. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 31(1), 29–30. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X07003202

Hove

M. J.

Risen

J. L.

(2009). It’s all in the timing: Interpersonal synchrony increases affiliation. Social Cognition, 27(6), 949–960. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2009.27.6.949

10.

Hurley

(2008). The shared circuits model (SCM): How control, mirroring, and simulation can enable imitation, deliberation, and mindreading. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 31(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X07003123

11.

Hutchison

Fox

Laas

A. M.

Matharu

Urzi

(2010). Anxiety, outcome expectancies, and young people’s willingness to engage in contact with the elderly. Educational Gerontology, 36(10-11), 1008–1021. https://doi.org/10.1080/03601271003723586

12.

Jolliffe

Farrington

D. P.

(2006). Development and validation of the basic empathy scale. Journal of Adolescence, 29(4), 589–611. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2005.08.010

13.

Kato

Kitagawa

Kimura

Takano

Takagi

Hirose

Kashino

(2020). Walking and talking independently predict interpersonal impressions. Acta Psychologica, 210, 103172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2020.103172

14.

Kornadt

A. E.

Rothermund

(2011). Contexts of aging: Assessing evaluative age stereotypes in different life domains. Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 66(5), 547–556. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbr036

15.

Launay

Dean

R. T.

Bailes

(2013). Synchronization can influence trust following virtual interaction. Experimental Psychology, 60(1), 53–63. https://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169/a000173

16.

Lumsden

Miles

L. K.

Richardson

M. J.

Smith

C. A.

Macrae

C. N.

(2012). Who syncs? Social motives and interpersonal coordination. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(3), 746–751. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2011.12.007

17.

Mogan

Fischer

Bulbulia

J. A.

(2017). To be in synchrony or not? A meta-analysis of synchrony’s effects on behavior, perception, cognition and affect. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 72, 13–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2017.03.009

18.

North

M. S.

Fiske

S. T.

(2012). An inconvenienced youth? Ageism and its potential intergenerational roots. Psychological Bulletin, 138(5), 982–997. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027843

19.

Novembre

Ticini

L. F.

Schütz-Bosbach

Keller

P. E.

(2012). Distinguishing self and other in joint action. Evidence from a musical paradigm. Cerebral Cortex, 22(12), 2894–2903. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhr364

20.

Paladino

M.-P.

Mazzurega

Pavani

Schubert

T. W.

(2010). Synchronous multisensory stimulation blurs self-other boundaries. Psychological Science, 21(9), 1202–1207. https://doi.org/10.1177/095679761037923

21.

Rabinowitch

T.-C.

Knafo-Noam

(2015). Synchronous rhythmic interaction enhances children’s perceived similarity and closeness towards each other. PLoS One, 10(4), Article e0120878. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0120878

22.

Reddish

Bulbulia

Fischer

(2014). Does synchrony promote generalized prosociality? Religion, Brain & Behavior, 4(1), 3–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/2153599X.2013.764545

23.

Reddish

Fischer

Bulbulia

(2013). Let’s dance together: Synchrony, shared intentionality and cooperation. PLoS One, 8(8), Article e71182. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0071182

24.

Reddish

Tong

E. M. W.

Jong

Lanman

J. A.

Whitehouse

(2016). Collective synchrony increases prosociality towards non-performers and outgroup members. British Journal of Social Psychology, 55(4), 722–738. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12165

25.

Rennung

Göritz

A. S.

(2016). Prosocial consequences of interpersonal synchrony. Zeitschrift fur Psychologie, 224(3), 168–189. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000252

26.

Smith

E. R.

(2008). Social relationships and groups: New insights on embodied and distributed cognition. Cognitive Systems Research, 9(1-2), 24–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogsys.2007.06.011

27.

Suberry

Bodner

(2024). The impact of synchronized dyadic dance on social bonding and intergroup closeness. Innovation in Aging, 8(S1), 187–188. https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igae098.0606

28.

Tognoli

Lagarde

DeGuzman

G. C.

Kelso

J. S.

(2007). The phi complex as a neuromarker of human social coordination. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 104(19), 8190–8195. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0611453104

29.

Twele

A. C.

Mondloch

C. J.

(2022). The dimensions underlying first impressions of older adult faces are similar, but not identical, for young and older adult perceivers. British Journal of Psychology, 113(4), 1009–1032. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12568

30.

Valdesolo

DeSteno

(2011). Synchrony and the social tuning of compassion. Emotion, 11(2), 262–266. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021302

31.

Wiltermuth

S. S.

Heath

(2009). Synchrony and cooperation. Psychological Science, 20(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02253.x

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.11 MB