Digital exclusion is characterized as a complex, multidimensional issue that involves multiple influencing factors. There is currently no consensus on the concept of digital exclusion due to inconsistencies and lack of conceptual clarification across the literature. This study aimed to clarify the conceptual definition of digital exclusion among older adults through a scoping review and concept analysis. The review followed Walker and Avant’s concept analysis methodology and Arksey and O’Malley’s five-stage framework, and used thematic analysis to synthesize three key attributes, antecedents and consequences of digital exclusion across individual, intermediary, and societal dimensions, respectively. Based on these findings, a conceptual definition of digital exclusion was developed. Such exclusion restricts their digital participation and consequently exacerbates existing health and social inequities. In the future, structural reforms including equitable infrastructure allocation and age-inclusive policy frameworks are necessary to prevent digital exclusion of older adults.
AdamczykM.BetlejA. (2021). Social determinants of digital exclusion in an ageing society. The case of Poland. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 8(3), 122–135. https://doi.org/10.9770/jesi.2021.8.3
2.
AmerS. A.Abd-EllatifE. E.HughesP.Al-EnaziH. M. G.AlHasanA.AmerM. A.AlruhaimiA. F.ElsayedM. (2022). Emotional contagion scale and mental health status during the first wave of COVID-19 pandemic, national assessment. Clinical Practice and Epidemiology in Mental Health: CP & EMH, 18, Article e174501792208200. https://doi.org/10.2174/17450179-v18-e2208200
3.
AnrijsS.MarienI.De MarezL.PonnetK. (2023). Excluded from essential internet services: Examining associations between digital exclusion, socio-economic resources and internet resources. Technology in Society, 73, Article 102211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2023.102211
4.
AnrijsS.PonnetK.De MarezL. (2020). Development and psychometric properties of the digital difficulties scale (DDS): An instrument to measure who is disadvantaged to fulfill basic needs by experiencing difficulties in using a smartphone or computer. PLoS One, 15(5), Article e0233891. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0233891
5.
AntonioM. G.PetrovskayaO. (2019). Towards developing an health equity conceptual framework. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, 257, 24–30. https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-951-5-24
6.
ArkseyH.O'MalleyL. (2005). Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(1), 19–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/1364557032000119616
7.
BadrJ.MotulskyA.DenisJ. L. (2024). Digital health technologies and inequalities: A scoping review of potential impacts and policy recommendations. Health Policy, 146, Article 105122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2024.105122
8.
BuchertU.KemppainenL.OlakiviA.WredeS.KouvonenA. (2022). Is digitalisation of public health and social welfare services reinforcing social exclusion? The case of Russian-speaking older migrants in Finland. Critical Social Policy, 43(3), 375–400. https://doi.org/10.1177/02610183221105035
9.
BunyanS.CollinsA. (2013). Digital exclusion despite digital accessibility: Empirical evidence from an English city. Tijdschrift Voor Economische En Sociale Geografie, 104(5), 588–603. https://doi.org/10.1111/tesg.12047
10.
ChangJ. E.LaiA. Y.GuptaA.NguyenA. M.BerryC. A.ShelleyD. R. (2021). Rapid transition to telehealth and the digital divide: Implications for primary care access and equity in a Post-COVID era. The Milbank Quarterly, 99(2), 340–368. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0009.12509
CrnicT. O. (2013). Slovenians offline: Class and cultural aspects of digital exclusion. Sociologicky Casopis-Czech Sociological Review, 49(6), 927–949. https://doi.org/10.13060/00380288.2013.49.6.03
13.
DuanS.ChenD.WangJ.ParamboorM. S.XiaZ.XuW.HanK.ZhuT.JiangX. (2024). Digital exclusion and cognitive function in elderly populations in developing countries: Insights derived from 2 longitudinal cohort studies. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 26, Article e56636. https://doi.org/10.2196/56636
14.
EkohP. C.GeorgeE. O.EzulikeC. D. (2021). Digital and physical social exclusion of older people in rural Nigeria in the time of COVID-19. Journal of Gerontological Social Work, 64(6), 629–642. https://doi.org/10.1080/01634372.2021.1907496
FanZ.ZhangN. (2022). Disconnected citizens in the social media age: Unpacking the effects of digital exclusion on satisfaction with democracy in Europe. Information Technology & People, 35(5), 1652–1673. https://doi.org/10.1108/itp-05-2020-0357
17.
GallistlV.RohnerR.HenglL.KollandF. (2021). Doing digital exclusion – Technology practices of older internet non-users. Journal of Aging Studies, 59, Article 100973. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaging.2021.100973
18.
GallistlV.RohnerR.SeifertA.WankaA. (2020). Configuring the older non-user: Between research, policy and practice of digital exclusion. Social Inclusion, 8(2), 233–243. https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v8i2.2607
19.
GariboldiM. I.ChenM.WeiY.XuS.GaleaG.LeeS. (2023). Towards digital healthy ageing: The case of agatha and priorities moving forward. The Lancet Regional Health. Western Pacific, 35, Article 100649. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lanwpc.2022.100649
20.
GeH.LiJ.HuH.FengT.WuX. (2025). Digital exclusion in older adults: A scoping review. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 168, Article 105082. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2025.105082
21.
GoldmanS.DeloreE.FleshS.LangerD.Mazor-KarsentyT. (2023). Digital exclusion and COVID-19: Does communication technology correlate with wellbeing?Physical & Occupational Therapy in Geriatrics, 41(1), 143–158. https://doi.org/10.1080/02703181.2022.2095073
GreerB.RobothamD.SimblettS.CurtisH.GriffithsH.WykesT. (2019). Digital exclusion among mental health service users: Qualitative investigation. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 21(1), Article e11696. https://doi.org/10.2196/11696
24.
HailemariamT.AtnafuA.GezieL. D.KaasbøllJ. J.KleinJ.TilahunB. (2023). Individual and contextual level enablers and barriers determining electronic community health information system implementation in northwest Ethiopia. BMC Health Services Research, 23(1), 644. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-023-09629-8
25.
HeC.LiA.LiD.YuJ. (2022). Does digital inclusive finance mitigate the negative effect of climate variation on rural residents' income growth in China?International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(14), 8280. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19148280
26.
HelsperE. J.ReisdorfB. C. (2013). A quantitative examination of explanations for reasons for internet nonuse. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 16(2), 94–99. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2012.0257
27.
HiderS.MullerS.GrayL.ManningF.BrooksM.HeiningD.MenonA.PackhamJ.RaghuvanshiS.RoddyE.RyanS.ScottI.PaskinsZ. (2022). Digital exclusion as a potential cause of inequalities in access to care: A survey in people with inflammatory rheumatic diseases. Rheumatology Advances in Practice, 7(1), rkac109. https://doi.org/10.1093/rap/rkac109
28.
HolmbergC.GremyrA.KarlssonV.AsztélyK. (2022). Digitally excluded in a highly digitalized country: An investigation of Swedish outpatients with psychotic disorders and functional impairments. The European Journal of Psychiatry, 36(3), 217–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpsy.2022.04.005
29.
HurdN. M.YoungA. S. (2023). Introduction to the special issue: Advancing racial justice in clinical child and adolescent psychology. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology: The Official Journal for the Society of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, American Psychological Association, Division 53, 52(3), 311–327. https://doi.org/10.1080/15374416.2023.2202255
30.
KhanM. F.GhazalT. M.SaidR. A.FatimaA.AbbasS.KhanM. A.IssaG. F.AhmadM.KhanM. A. (2021). An IoMT-Enabled smart healthcare model to monitor elderly people using machine learning technique. Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience, 2021, Article 2487759. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/2487759
31.
KuangY.YuJ. (2024). Digital exclusion among rural older adults in western china: formation mechanisms and mitigation strategies. The Journal of Humanities, 4(4), 109–118. https://doi.org/10.15895/j.cnki.rwzz.2024.04.008
32.
KwiatkowskaE. M.Skórzewska-AmbergM. (2019). Digitalisation of healthcare and the problem of digital exclusion. Journal of Management and Business Administration. Central Europe, 27(2), 48–63. https://doi.org/10.7206/jmba.ce.2450-7814.252
33.
LimA.MernerB.IyerS.McCulloughM. (2025). Evaluation of temporomandibular disorder self-management apps in Australia: A systematic review to inform clinical use. International Journal for Quality in Health Care: Journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care, 37(2), mzaf024. https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzaf024
34.
LiuX.WangX.ZhangH.PeiM.LiN. (2023). Relationship between digital exclusion and cognitive impairment in Chinese adults. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, 15, Article 1194348. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2023.1194348
35.
LuW. (2024). The impact of internet usage on the mental health of older adults in China: Empirical analysis from a multi-dimensional perspective. Frontiers in Public Health, 12, Article 1460558. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2024.1460558
36.
LuX.YaoY.JinY. (2022). Digital exclusion and functional dependence in older people: Findings from five longitudinal cohort studies. EClinicalMedicine, 54, Article 101708. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101708
37.
LuX.YaoY.JinY. (2023). Corrigendum to “Digital exclusion and functional dependence in older people: findings from five longitudinal cohort studies”. ClinicalMedicine, 54(101708), S2589537022004382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.102239
38.
MannheimI.KöttlH. (2024). Ageism and (successful) digital engagement: A proposed theoretical model. The Gerontologist, 64(9), gnae078. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnae078
39.
McCallT.AsuzuK.OladeleC. R.LeungT. I.WangK. H. (2022). A socio-ecological approach to addressing digital redlining in the United States: A call to action for health equity. Frontiers in Digital Health, 4, Article 897250. https://doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2022.897250
40.
MengX.WangX.NisarU.SunS.DingX. (2023). Mechanisms and heterogeneity in the construction of network infrastructure to help rural households bridge the digital divide. Scientific Reports, 13(1), Article 19283. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-46650-7
41.
MubarakF.SuomiR. (2022). Elderly forgotten? Digital exclusion in the information age and the rising grey digital divide. Inquiry: A Journal of Medical Care Organization, Provision and Financing, 59, Article 469580221096272. https://doi.org/10.1177/00469580221096272
42.
NeedhamC.JacobsJ.ZorbasC.AlstonL.SchumacherT.FraserP.HortaA.JohnstoneM.CreightonD.KoschelA.BrownL. J.WilliamsA.CoatesJ.VerekerG.VargasC.StrugnellC.Forrester-BowlingT.BoltonK. A.AllenderS. (2025). A human-centred Co-Design framework for developing a web-based platform to engage with rural Australian communities: Addressing the complex issue of healthy food access. The Australian Journal of Rural Health, 33(2), Article e70028. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajr.70028
43.
PaimreM.VirkusS.OsulaK. (2024). How technology, health information seeking, and socioeconomic factors are associated with coronavirus disease 2019 vaccination readiness in estonians over 50 years?Health Education & Behavior: The Official Publication of the Society for Public Health Education, 51(4), 502–511. https://doi.org/10.1177/10901981241249972
44.
ParkY.ChangS. J. (2024). The impact of ageism experiences on social participation among community-dwelling older adults: Exploring the moderating role of digital literacy. Geriatric Nursing (New York, N.Y.), 59, 372–378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gerinurse.2024.07.029
45.
PerskiO.ShortC. E. (2021). Acceptability of digital health interventions: Embracing the complexity. Translational Behavioral Medicine, 11(7), 1473–1480. https://doi.org/10.1093/tbm/ibab048
46.
Salzmann-EriksonM. (2023). Digital inclusion: A mixed-method study of user behavior and content on Twitter. Digital Health, 9, Article 20552076231211277. https://doi.org/10.1177/20552076231211277
47.
SeifertA. (2020). The digital exclusion of older adults during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Gerontological Social Work, 63(6-7), 674–676. https://doi.org/10.1080/01634372.2020.1764687
48.
SeifertA.CottenS. R.XieB. (2021). A double burden of exclusion? Digital and social exclusion of older adults in times of COVID-19. The Journals of Gerontology. Series B, Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 76(3), e99–e103. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbaa098
49.
SeifertA.HoferM.RösselJ. (2018). Older adults’ perceived sense of social exclusion from the digital world. Educational Gerontology, 44(12), 775–785. https://doi.org/10.1080/03601277.2019.1574415
50.
ShenF.FangY. (2023). Research on the strategic choice to protect the rights of “digitally disadvantaged groups” in rural areas: Based on the change from “digital exclusion” to “digital empowerment”. Journal of Management, 36(06), 125–136. https://doi.org/10.19808/j.cnki.41-1408/F.2023.0058
51.
ShorthoseM. F.CarterB.LaidlawJ.WattsN.WensleyS.SrivastavaS.JoughinA.ThormanE.MitchellC.EvansR.BraudeP. (2024). A multicentre cross-sectional observational study to determine the effect of living with frailty on digital exclusion from video consultations: (Access-VIGIL). Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, 25(4), 676–682. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2023.08.028
52.
StathiA.WithallJ.ThompsonJ. L.DavisM. G.GrayS.De KoningJ.ParkhurstG.LloydL.GreavesC.LaventureR.FoxK. R. (2020). Feasibility trial evaluation of a peer volunteering active aging intervention: ACE (Active, connected, engaged). The Gerontologist, 60(3), 571–582. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnz003
53.
TetriB.JuujärviS. (2022). Self-efficacy, internet self-efficacy, and proxy efficacy as predictors of the use of digital social and health care services among mental health service users in Finland: A cross-sectional study. Psychology Research and Behavior Management, 15, 291–303. https://doi.org/10.2147/prbm.S340867
54.
TriccoA. C.LillieE.ZarinW.O'BrienK. K.ColquhounH.LevacD.MoherD.PetersM. D. J.HorsleyT.WeeksL.HempelS.AklE. A.ChangC.McGowanJ.StewartL.HartlingL.AldcroftA.WilsonM. G.GarrittyC.StrausS. E. (2018). PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and explanation. Annals of Internal Medicine, 169(7), 467–473. https://doi.org/10.7326/m18-0850
55.
UenoA.DennisC.DafoulasG. A. (2023). Digital exclusion and relative digital deprivation: Exploring factors and moderators of internet non-use in the UK. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 197, Article 122935. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122935
56.
Van DeursenA. J. (2020). Digital inequality during a pandemic: Quantitative study of differences in COVID-19-Related internet uses and outcomes among the general population. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 22(8), Article e20073. https://doi.org/10.2196/20073
57.
VargasC.WhelanJ.BrimblecombeJ.AllenderS. (2022). Co-creation, co-design, co-production for public health - A perspective on definition and distinctions. Public Health Research & Practice, 32(2), 3222211. https://doi.org/10.17061/phrp3222211
58.
WalkerL. O.AvantK. C. (2005). Strategies for theory construction in nursing. Pearson/Prentice Hall. ISBN 9780131191266.
59.
WangJ.LuX.NgaiS. B. C.XieL.LiuX.YaoY.JinY. (2025). Digital exclusion and depressive symptoms among older people: Findings from five aging cohort studies across 24 countries. Health Data Science, 5, 0218. https://doi.org/10.34133/hds.0218
60.
WangN.ZhouS.LiuZ.HanY. (2024). Perceptions and satisfaction with the use of digital medical services in urban older adults of China: Mixed methods study. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 26, Article e48654. https://doi.org/10.2196/48654
61.
WangY.WuZ.DuanL.LiuS.ChenR.SunT.WangJ.ZhouJ.WangH.HuangP. (2024). Digital exclusion and cognitive impairment in older people: Findings from five longitudinal studies. BMC Geriatrics, 24(1), 406. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-024-05026-w
62.
WenX.TianB. (2024). How does digital integration influence the mental health of low-income populations?Healthcare (Basel), 12(24), 2593. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare12242593
63.
Wilson-MenzfeldG.ErfaniG.Young-MurphyL.CharltonW.De LucaH.BrittainK.StevenA. (2024). Identifying and understanding digital exclusion: a mixed-methods study [Article; Early Access]. Behaviour & Information Technology, 44(8), 1649–1666. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929x.2024.2368087
64.
WongA. K. C.LeeJ. H. T.ZhaoY.LuQ.YangS.HuiV. C. C. (2025). Exploring older adults' perspectives and acceptance of AI-Driven health technologies: Qualitative study. JMIR Aging, 8, Article e66778. https://doi.org/10.2196/66778
65.
WoodwardE. N.SinghR. S.Ndebele-NgwenyaP.Melgar CastilloA.DicksonK. S.KirchnerJ. E. (2021). A more practical guide to incorporating health equity domains in implementation determinant frameworks. Implementation Science Communications, 2(1), 61. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43058-021-00146-5
YangJ.DuP. (2021). Gender, capital endowment and digital exclusion of older people in China. Ageing and Society, 41(11), 2502–2526. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0144686x20000434
68.
YangX.JuG. (2024). Factors and theoretical explanation of digital exclusion for older adults. Chinese Journal of Applied Psychology, 30(05), 387–399. https://doi.org/10.20058/j.cnki.CJAP.023084
69.
YuanH.HuangQ. (2024). The key causes of digital exclusion behavior of the disadvantaged groups in digital integration. Population and Society, 40(04), 54–66. https://doi.org/10.14132/j.2095-7963.2024.04.005
70.
YuanH.HuangQ. (2025). The key influencing factors of digital exclusion of the digital vulnerable groups and policy optimization: perspective of theory-policy coordination degree. Study of Practical Experience, 48(01), 104–113. https://doi.org/10.16353/j.cnki.1000-7490.2025.01.011
71.
ZhangC.MohamadE.AzlanA. A.WuA.MaY.QiY. (2025). Social media and eHealth literacy among older adults: Systematic literature review. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 27, Article e66058. https://doi.org/10.2196/66058
72.
ZhangY.FengD.WangY.YaoB.DengY. (2024). Can intergenerational relationships mitigate digital exclusion among China’s elderly population?Applied Economics, 57(56), 9623–9643. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2024.2422638
73.
ZhangZ.YangL.CaoH. (2025). (In press). Effect of inter-generational living arrangement and digital exclusion on unmet healthcare needs among older adults: Findings from two national cohort studies. Online ahead of print. Journal of Clinical Nursing. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.17638
74.
ZhengY. (2024). From digital exclusion to digital inclusion: the practical sticking points and solutions for safeguarding the rights of digital vulnerable groups in rural areas. Rural Science and Technology, 15(10), 20–23. https://doi.org/10.19345/j.cnki.1674-7909.2024.10.004
75.
ZhuR.YuX.KreverR. (2024). The double burden: The digital exclusion and identity crisis of elderly patients in rural China. Media and Communication, 12, 8106. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.8106
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
