Evaluation of an Educational Intervention to Reduce Ageism and Enhance Inclusive Care Among Healthcare Providers: A Quasi-Experimental Study

Abstract

Background

Ageism in healthcare is harmful. Theory-based approaches (e.g., Positive Education about Aging and Contact Experiences [PEACE] model), suggest that combining education and meaningful contact can reduce ageist attitudes.

Objective

The present study evaluated a half-day educational intervention using lectures and animated videos to reduce healthcare providers’ ageist attitudes.

Methods

A single-group pre–post design used three lectures and three animated videos. Scores of Attitudes and Thoughts Toward Older People Scale (AT-TOPS) with pre–post changes were analyzed using paired t-tests with associated effect sizes to assess changes in age-related attitudes.

Results

Healthcare providers (n = 61) who completed the course showed significant improvements in AT-TOPS scores (t = 3.03, p = 0.004, d = 0.39). Item-level analyses indicated reduced ageist attitudes about older adults’ competence, productivity, family burden, and work suitability.

Conclusion

The findings suggested that the intervention produced immediate reductions in institutional and interpersonal ageist attitudes, highlighting short-term attitudinal shifts consistent with PEACE-based mechanisms rather than enduring behavioral change.

Keywords

ageism healthcare providers older adults educational intervention PEACE model

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Apriceno

Levy

S. R.

(2023). Systematic review and meta-analyses of effective programs for reducing ageism toward older adults. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 42(6), 1356–1375. https://doi.org/10.1177/07334648231165266

Becker

Wang

James

J. B.

Aguila

Berg

Fiske

S. T.

Börsch-Supan

Coile

C. C.

Gonzales

Moen

Neumark

(2022). Understanding the aging workforce: Defining a research agenda. Academy of Management Proceedings. National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.5465/ambpp.2022.17761symposium

Boyle

P. A.

Mottola

Innes

Bennett

D. A.

(2022). Degraded rationality and suboptimal decision-making in old age: A silent epidemic with major economic and public health implications. Public Policy and Aging Report, 32(2), 45–50. https://doi.org/10.1093/ppar/prac003

Chen

L.-K.

(2022). Gan-Dau healthy longevity plan: The community model for healthy aging. Aging Medicine and Healthcare, 13(3), 98–101. https://doi.org/10.33879/amh.133.2022.09088

Chen

Y. J.

Liu

C. H.

Yap

K. Y.

Liu

L. F.

Yang

Y. C.

Griffiths

M. D.

Hou

W. L.

Huang

C. H.

Lin

C. Y.

(2026). Development and psychometric evaluation of a measure to assess ageism using a socioecological model: Attitudes and Thoughts Toward Older People Scale (AT-TOPS). Current Psychology, 45(5), 515. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-026-09139-w

Fernández-Puerta

Caballero-Bonafé

de-Moya-Romero

J. R.

Martínez-Sabater

Valera-Lloris

(2024). Ageism and associated factors in healthcare workers: A systematic review. Nursing Reports, 14(4), 4039–4059. https://doi.org/10.3390/nursrep14040295

Janssen

L. M.

Flores

Cao

(2022). A north star for gerontology: Using the threshold concept framework to transform ageism education. The Gerontologist, 62(6), 797–802. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnab142

Keefe

(2023). Attitudes toward aging: Educational interventions for medical students. Innovation in Aging, 7(Suppl 1), 805. https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igad104.2599

Lackmann

Léger

P.-M.

Charland

Aubé

Talbot

(2021). The influence of video format on engagement and performance in online learning. Brain Sciences, 11(2), 128. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci11020128

10.

Levy

S. R.

(2018). Toward reducing ageism: PEACE (Positive Education About Aging and Contact Experiences) model. The Gerontologist, 58(2), 226–232. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnw116

11.

Levy

S. R.

Lytle

Monahan

Macdonald

Apriceno

(2021). Ageism-reduction programs. In Nordstrom

A. H.

Goodfriend

(Eds.), Innovative stigma and discrimination reduction programs across the world. Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003042464-12

12.

L. L. M.

Henn

O’Tuathaigh

Smith

(2024). Patient–healthcare provider communication and age-related hearing loss: A qualitative study of patients’ perspectives. Irish Journal of Medical Science, 193(1), 277–284. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-023-03432-4

13.

Lytle

(2024). Reducing ageism: Comparing the efficacy of videos, written information, and infographics as intervention mediums. Gerontology & Geriatrics Education, 46(1), 34–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701960.2024.2334739

14.

Mazza

(2024). Demographic demise? Taiwan's aging and shrinking population. Asia Policy, 19(2), 119–126. https://doi.org/10.1353/asp.2024.a927095

15.

Mendez

Lopez

Rodriguez-Quintanilla

Carrion

(2022). Ageist no more: Interprofessional training for undergraduate healthcare students. Geriatrics, 7(1), 17. https://doi.org/10.3390/geriatrics7010017

16.

Murphy

D. J.

Porter

M. M.

Mackenzie

C. S.

Chipperfield

J. G.

(2025). Development, feasibility, and acceptability of a process based intervention to decrease internalized ageism. Gerontology & Geriatrics Education, 46(1), 115–130. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701960.2024.2360395

17.

Nemiroff

(2022). We can do better: Addressing ageism against older adults in healthcare. Healthcare Management Forum, 35(2), 118–122. https://doi.org/10.1177/08404704221080882

18.

Ririe

C. J.

Guggenheimer

J. D.

Campbell

K. A.

(2021). Opportunities to strengthen aging curricula across the health professions. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 35(suppl 1), 33–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/13561820.2021.1981260

19.

Salinas-Rodríguez

Manrique-Espinoza

Torres Mussot

Montañez-Hernández

J. C.

(2020). Out-of-pocket healthcare expenditures in dependent older adults: Results from an economic evaluation study in Mexico. Frontiers in Public Health, 8, 329. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2020.00329

20.

Schumacher

Finn

(2024). Stigma and ageism in the geriatric education context: Using patient-centered care approaches. Innovation in Aging, 8(Supplement_1), 332. https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igae098.1083

21.

Stubbe

D. E.

(2021). Check your ageism at the door: Implicit bias in the care of older patients. Focus, 19(3), 322–324. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.focus.20210010

22.

Tao

MacAndrew

Dahlke

S. A.

Butler

J. I.

Rayner

J.-A.

Fetherstonhaugh

Parker

(2024). Educational interventions to improve student nurses’ knowledge, attitudes, or willingness to work with older people: A systematic review of quantitative findings. International Journal of Nursing Education Scholarship, 21(1), 20230110. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijnes-2023-0110

23.

Thalheimer

Cook

S. R.

(2002). How to calculate effect sizes from published research: A simplified methodology. Work-Learning Research.

24.

Van Vliet

L. M.

Hillen

M. A.

van der Wall

Plum

Bensing

J. M.

(2013). How to create and administer scripted video-vignettes in an experimental study on disclosure of a palliative breast cancer diagnosis. Patient Education and Counseling, 91(1), 56–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2012.10.017

25.

Vela

M. B.

Erondu

A. I.

Smith

N. A.

Peek

M. E.

Woodruff

J. N.

Chin

M. H.

(2022). Eliminating explicit and implicit biases in health care: Evidence and research needs. Annual Review of Public Health, 43(1), 477–501. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-052620-103528

26.

Yeung

W. J. J.

Lee

(2021). Aging in east Asia: New findings on retirement, health, and well-being. The Journals of Gerontology. Series B, Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 76(Suppl_2), S1–S3. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbab055