Should the Government Pay? Caregiver Views of Government Responsibility and Feelings of Stigma About Financial Support

Abstract

Financial support strategies to assist informal caregivers of the elderly have been implemented and/or experimented with in several states. Little is known about how receptive caregiving families are to receiving financial support from the government to assist with in-home care, particularly whether they feel stigmatized. Few existing programs have assessed caregivers' views. In examining caregivers' reactions to receiving means-tested financial assistance, it is important to assess whether they consider support of the disabled a government responsibility as well as a possible stigma. Caregivers (N = 155) of disabled veterans aged 65 and older who receive Veterans' Administration disability allowances (Aid and Attendance) were surveyed. Results indicate that caregivers feel the government is primarily responsible for supporting the long-term disabled who are cared for at home. For the most part, these caregivers did not feel stigmatized or uncomfortable receiving means-tested government assistance to support in-home care. An important implication of this study is that financial support can be a workable component of an integrated service delivery system to support informal caregiving.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alston, J. , & Dean, K. (1972). Socioeconomic factors associated with attitudes toward welfare recipients and the causes of poverty. Social Service Review, 46, 13-23.

Biegel, D. , Morycz, R. , Schulz, R. , & Shore, B. (1986). Family elder care incentive policies (Final Report to the Pennsylvania Department of Aging. Pittsburgh, PA : University of Pittsburgh Center for Social and Urban Research.

Feagin, J.R. (1972). America's welfare stereotypes. Social Science Quarterly, 52, 921-933.

Florida Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services. (1982). An evaluation of Florida's Home Care for the Elderly and Adult Foster Home Programs. Tallahassee, FL: Office of the Inspector General, Office of Evaluation .

Garfinkel, I. (Ed.). (1982). Income-tested transfer programs: The case for and against. New York: Academic Press.

Handler, J. , & Hollingsworth, E. (1969). Stigma, privacy, and other attitudes of welfare recipients. Standford Law Review , 22, 1-19.

Horowitz, A. , & Shindelman, L.W. (1983). Social and economic incentives for family caregivers. Health Care Financing Review, 5, 25-33.

Kallen, D. , & Miller, D. (1971). Public attitudes toward welfare. Social Work, 16(3), 83-90.

Kamerman, S. , & Kahn, A. (1987). Universalism and income-testing in family policy: New perspectives on an old debate. Social Work, 32, 277-280.

10.

Kerlinger, F.N. (1973). Foundations of behavioral research (2nd ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

11.

Linsk, N. , Osterbusch, S. , Keigher, S. , & Simon- Rusinowitz, L. (1986). Paid family caregiving: A policy option for community long-term care. Final report submitted to the Illinois Association of Family Service Agencies, Chicago, IL.

12.

Montgomery, R.J. , & Hatch, L. (1986). The feasibility of volunteers and families forming a partnership for caregiving. In T. Brubaker (Ed.), Families and long-term care. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

13.

Murphy, C. , Michigan Department of Social Services, & Keigher, S. (1989, March). Michigan clients' and caregivers' perceptions of a family reimbursement program. Paper presented at Family Care: Research and Policy Agendas for the 1990's, College of Nursing, Michigan State University, College of Nursing, Lansing , MI.

14.

Ozawa, M.N. (1978). Impact of SSI on the aged and disabled poor. Social Work Research & Abstracts, 14, 3-10.

15.

Ozawa, M.N. (1981). The fading issue of stigma attached to income support programs for the elderly: A study. Journal of Gerontological Social Work, 3, 51-63.

16.

Ozawa, M.N. (1982). SSI recipients in Mississippi and California: A comparative study. Journal of Social Service Research, 6, 31-45.

17.

Piktialis, D. , & Mac Adam, M. (1984). Experiments and demonstrations in sharing and coordination. In T. Wetle & J. Rowe (Eds.), Older veterans: Linking VA and community resources. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

18.

Rainwater, L. (1982). Stigma in income-tested programs. In I. Garfinkel (Ed.), Income-tested transfer programs: The case for and against. New York: Academic Press.

19.

Simon-Rusinowitz, L. (1987, November). Government participation in long-term care of the elderly. Paper presented at the meeting of the Gerontological Society of America, Washington, DC.

20.

State of Maine. (1983). Home-based care: A report to the Maine State Legislature. Augusta, ME: Department of Human Services, Bureau of Maine's Elderly.

21.

Sussman, M.B. (1977). Incentives and family environments for the elderly (Final report to the Administration on Aging. Washington, DC: Administration on Aging.

22.

Sussman, M.B. (1979). Social and economic supports and family environments for the elderly (Final report to the Administration on Aging. Washington, DC: Administration on Aging.

23.

U.S. Veterans Administration. (1984). Caring for the older veteran. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

24.

Wetle, T. , & Evans, L. (1984). Serving the family of the elderly veteran. In T. Wetle & J. Rowe (Eds.), Older veterans: Linking VA and community resources. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

25.

Whitfield, S. , & Krompholz, B. (1981). Report to the general assembly on the Family Support Demonstration Program. Baltimore, MD: State of Maryland Office on Aging.

26.

Williamson, J.B. (1974). Beliefs about the welfare poor. Sociology and Social Research, 58, 163-175.

27.

Yankelovich, Skelly , & White, Inc. (1986). Caregivers of patients with dementia (Contract report prepared for the Office of Technology Assessment . Washington, DC: Office of Technology Assessment.