Attorneys’ Self-Reported Perspectives and Criteria for Requesting Competency Evaluations in Criminal Defense Cases

Abstract

It is hypothesized that attorneys with more experience and attorneys with a more favorable opinion of the usefulness of competency to stand trial evaluations will adopt a more paternalistic approach in the application and use of competency evaluation. The criteria by which attorneys adopting the paternalistic approach decide to have certain defendants evaluated for their competency to stand trial is focused more on the client’s best interests, such as mental welfare, rather than strictly on case outcome, or the least restrictive measures. This study surveys criminal defense attorneys in a large, urban, North Texas county as to which decisional approach, paternalism or pure advocacy, they follow. The study finds that attorneys with a more favorable opinion of the usefulness of competency evaluations express a greater degree of support of the use of both paternalistic and pure-advocacy items as solitary criteria for seeking a competency evaluation.

Keywords

competency incompetency forensic evaluation

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bonnie, R. J. (1992). The competence of criminal defendants: A theoretical reformulation. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 10, 291-316.

Bonnie, R. J. (1993). The competence of criminal defendants: Beyond Dusky and Drope. University of Miami Law Review, 47, 539-601.

Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Dusky v. United States, 362 U.S. 402 (1960).

Garwin, A. (1995). Questioning competence: Mentally incapacitated clients still can tell their lawyers what to do. American Bar Association Journal, 81, 84.

Golding, S. L. , Roesch, R. , & Schreiber, J. (1984). Assessment and conceptualization of competency to stand trial. Law and Human Behavior, 8(3/4), 321-334.

Grisso, T. (1987). The economic and scientific future of forensic psychological assessment. American Psychologist, 42(9), 831-839.

Grisso, T. , Cocozza, J. T. , Steadman, H. J. , Fisher, W. H. , & Greer, A. (1994). The organization of pretrial forensic evaluation services. Law and Human Behavior, 18(4), 377-393.

Heller, M. S. , Traylor, W. H. , Ehrlich, S. M. , & Lester, D. (1983). Competent and incompetent defendants referred to a court psychiatric clinic: A clinical comparison. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 28(2), 415-422.

10.

Nicholson, R. A. , & Kugler, K. E. (1991). Competent and incompetent criminal defendants: A quantitative review of comparative research. Psychological Bulletin, 109(3), 355-370.

11.

Nicholson, R. A. , Robertson, H. C. , Johnson, W. G. , & Jensen, G. (1988). A comparison of instruments for assessing competency to stand trial. Law and Human Behavior, 12(3), 313-321.

12.

Nottingham, E. J. , & Mattson, R. E. (1981). A validation study of the competency screening test. Law and Human Behavior, 5(3), 329-335.

13.

Petrella, R. C. , & Poythress, N. G., Jr. (1983). The quality of forensic evaluations: An interdisciplinary study. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 51(1), 79-85.

14.

Poythress, N. G. , Bonnie, R. J. , Hoge, S. K. , Monahan, J. , & Oberlander, L. B. (1994). Client abilities to assist counsel and make decisions in criminal cases. Law and Human Behavior, 18(4), 437-452.

15.

Roesch, R. , & Golding, S. L. (1980). Competency to stand trial. Champaign: University of Illinois Press.

16.

Rosenfeld, B. , & Ritchie, K. (1998). Competence to stand trial: Clinician reliability and the role of offense severity. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 43(1), 151-157.

17.

Texas Board of Law Examiners . (n.d.). Texas bar exam statistics since February 1997. Retrieved October 23, 2005, from http://www.ble.state.tx.us/Stats/main_stats.htm

18.

Texas Supreme Court . (2003). Rules governing admission to the Bar of Texas: Adopted by the Supreme Court of Texas. Austin: Texas Board of Law Examiners. Retrieved October 23, 2005, from http://www.ble.state.tx.us/Rules/rulebook.pdf

19.

Warren, J. L. , Fitch, W. L. , Dietz, P. E. , & Rosenfeld, B. D. (1991). Criminal offense, psychiatric diagnosis, and psycholegal opinion: An analysis of 894 pretrial referrals. Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 19(1), 63-70.

20.

Warren, J. I. , Rosenfeld, B. , & Fitch, W. L. (1994). Beyond competence and sanity: The influence of pretrial evaluation on case disposition. Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 22(3), 379-388.