The prosecution of intimate partner violence is thought to be infrequent, as is the rate at which those prosecutions result in a criminal conviction. The paucity of prosecutorial and court response to intimate partner violence is considered one of the inadequacies of the justice system, an indicator of society's inattentiveness to violence against women, and another reason to question the criminal justice system's ability to successfully address violence between intimate partners. Our review of 135 English language studies leads us to challenge the widely accepted notion that prosecution and conviction for this offense are infrequent. There is great variability in the reported rates of prosecution and conviction for intimate partner violence. These studies report that, on average, about one third of the reported offenses and more than three fifths of arrests result in the filing of charges; more than half of all prosecutions result in a criminal conviction.
Albonetti, C.A. (1986). Criminality, prosecutorial screening, and uncertainty: Toward a theory of discretionary decision making in felony case proceedings . Criminology, 24, 623-644.
2.
American Bar Association. (1980). Standards for criminal justice (2nd ed., Vol. 1). Boston: Little, Brown.
3.
Ames, L.J. (2001). The domestic abuse reduction team: Clinton County, New York (Final report submitted to the National Institute of Justice, p. 93). Plattsburg, PA: PlattsburgState University.
4.
Ames, L.J., & Dunham, K.T. (2002). Asymptotic justice: Probation as a criminal justice response to intimate partner violence. Violence Against Women , 8(1), 6-34.
5.
Archer, C., DuPree, C., Miller, N., Spence, D., & Uekert, B. (2002). National evaluation of the grants to encourage arrest policies program (Final report submitted to the National Institute of Justice, p. 152). Alexandria, VA: Institute for Law and Justice.
6.
Belknap, J., & Graham, D.L. (2000, June). Factors related to domestic violence court dispositions in a large urban area: The role of victim/witness reluctance and other variables (Final report submitted to the National Institute of Justice, p. 258). Cincinnati, OH: University of Cincinnati.
7.
Belknap, J., & Sullivan, C.M. (2002, October 22). Longitudinal study of battered women in the system: The victims'and decision-makers' perceptions (Final report submitted to the National Institute of Justice, p. 100). Boulder: University of Colorado.
8.
Berk, R.A., Rauma, D., Loseke, D.R., & Berk, S.F. (1982). Throwing the cops back out: The decline of a local program to make the criminal justice system more responsive to incidents of domestic violence. Social Science Research, 11, 245-279.
9.
Blari, S. (1979). Making the legal system work for battered women . In D. M. Moore (Ed.), Battered women (pp. 101-118). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
10.
Blowers, A.N., & Hartman, J.L. (2004, November 10). A preliminary examination of the Mecklenburg County domestic violence court final report. Charlotte: Department of Criminal Justice, University of North Carolina at Charlotte.
11.
Brown, G.A. (2004). Gender as a factor in the response of the law-enforcement system to violence against partners. Sexuality and Culture , 8, 3-139.
12.
Burris, C.A., & Jaffe, P. (1983, July). Wife abuse as a crime: The impact of police laying charges. Canadian Journal of Criminology, 25, 309-318.
13.
Buzawa, E.S., & Buzawa, C.G. (1990). Domestic violence: The criminal justice response . Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
14.
Buzawa, E., Hotaling, G.T., Klein, A., & Byrne, J. (1999). Response to domestic violence in a pro-active court setting (Final report submitted to the National Institute of Justice, p. 251). Lowell: University of Massachusetts -Lowell.
15.
Carlson, C., & Nidey, F.J. (1995, January). Mandatory penalties, victim cooperation, and the judicial processing of domestic abuse assault cases. Crime & Delinquency, 41(1), 132-149.
16.
Chalk, R. A., & King, P. A. (Eds.). (1998). Violence in families: Assessing prevention and treatment programs. Washington, DC: National Academy of Science.
17.
Cole, G.F. (1993). Performance measures for trial courts, prosecution and public defense. In Performance measures for the criminal justice system (pp. 87-108). Discussion paper from the BJS-Princeton University Project. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics.
18.
Commission on Trial Court Performance Standards. (1997). Trial court performance standards with commentary (p. 59). Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Assistance.
19.
Cook, D., Burton, M., Robinson, A., & Vallely, C. (2004, March). Evaluation of specialist domestic violence courts/Fast track system (p. 213). London: The Crown Prosecution Services.
20.
Cramer, E.P. (1999). Variables that predict verdicts in domestic violence cases. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 14, 1137-1150.
21.
Cretney, A., & Davis, G. (1997, May). Prosecuting domestic assault: Victims failing courts or courts failing victims? Howard Journal, 36, 146-157.
22.
Croker, D. (2005, February). Regulating intimacy: Judicial discourse in cases of wife assault (1970 to 2000). Violence Against Women, 11, 197-226.
23.
Crowell, N. A., & Burgess, A. W. (Eds.). (1996). Understanding violence against women. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences.
24.
Daly, K., & Bouhours, B. (2008, May). Rape and attrition in the legal process: A comparative analysis of five countries. Paper presented at the Law and Society Association, Montreal , Quebec, Canada.
25.
Davis, R.C. (1983). Victim/witness noncooperation: A second look at a persistent phenomenon. Journal of Criminal Justice, 11, 287-299.
Dawson, M. (2004, March). Rethinking the boundaries of intimacy at the end of the century: The role of victim-defendant relationship in criminal justice decisionmaking over time. Law and Society Review, 38(1), 105-138.
28.
Dinovitzer, R., & Dawson, M. (2007). Family-based justice in the sentencing of domestic violence. British Journal of Criminology, 47, 655-670.
29.
Dobash, R.E., & Dobash, R.P. (1979). Violence against wives: A case against the patriarchy . NewYork: Free Press.
30.
Douglas, H. (2007, August). Not a crime like any other: Sentencing breaches of domestic violence protection orders. Criminal Law Journal, 31, 220-233.
31.
Dunford, F.W. (1990, December). System-initiated warrants for suspects of misdemeanor domestic assault: A pilot study. Justice Quarterly , 7, 631-653.
32.
Dunford, F.W., Huizinga, D., & Elliott, D.S. (1990, May). The role of arrest in domestic assault: The Omaha police experiment. Criminology, 28, 183-206.
33.
Durose, M.R., Harlow, C., Langan, P., Motivans, M., Rantala, R., & Smith, E. (2005). Family violence statistics. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics.
34.
Dutton, D.G. (1987). The criminal justice response to wife assault . Law and Human Behavior, 11, 189-206.
35.
Eckberg, D.A., & Podkopacz, M.R. (2002). Domestic violence court: Case processing update and recidivism analysis (Fourth Judicial District of the State of Minnesota, p. 26). Hennepin County, MN: Hennepin County District Court Research Division.
36.
Elliott, D.S. (1989). Criminal justice procedures in family violence crimes. In L. Ohlin & M. Tonry (Eds.), Family violence: Crime and justice, a review of research (Vol. 11, pp. 427-480). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
37.
Fagan, J.A. (1989). Cessation of family violence: Deterrence and dissuasion . In L. Ohlin & M. Tonry (Eds.), Family violence: Crime and justice, a review of research (Vol. 11, pp. 377-425). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
38.
Fagan, J.A. (1996). The criminalization of domestic violence: Promises and limits. Washington, DC: Office for Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice.
39.
Felson, R.B., & Pare, P.-P. (2005). The reporting of domestic violence and sexual assault by nonstrangers to the police (Final report submitted to the National Institute of Justice, p. 42). Washington, DC: Department of Justice.
40.
Felson, R.B., & Pare, P.-P. (2007, September). Does the criminal justice system treat domestic violence and sexual assault offenders leniently? Justice Quarterly, 24, 435-459.
41.
Ferraro, K.J., & Boychuk, T. (1992). The court's response to interpersonal violence . In E. Buzawa & C. Buzawa (Eds.), Domestic violence: The changing criminal justice response (pp. 209-225). Westport, CT: Auburn House.
42.
Field, M.H., & Field, H.F. (1973). Marital violence and the criminal process: Neither justice nor peace. Social Service Review, 47, 221-240.
43.
Finn, M.A. (2003). Effects of victims'experiences with prosecutors on victim empowerment and re-occurrence of intimate partner violence (Final report submitted to the National Institute of Justice, p. 118). Atlanta: Georgia State University.
Fleury, R.E. (2002, February). Missing voices: Patterns of battered women's satisfaction with the criminal legal system. Violence Against Women, 8, 181-205.
46.
Ford, D.A. (1983, October). Wife battery and criminal justice: A study of victim decision making. Family Relations, 32, 463-475.
47.
Ford, D.A. (1991). Prosecution as a victim power source: A note on empowering women in violent conjugal relationships. Law and Society Review, 25, 313-334.
48.
Ford, D.A., & Breall, S. (2003). Violence against women: Synthesis of research for prosecutors (p. 34). Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice .
49.
Ford, D.A., & Regoli, M.J. (1993). The Indianapolis domestic violence prosecution experiment (Final report submitted to the National Institute of Justice, p. 80). Indianapolis: Indiana University .
50.
Forst, B., Lucianovic, J., & Cox, S.J. (1977). What happens after arrest? A court perspective of police operations in the District of Columbia (p. 116). Washington, DC: Institute of Law and Social Research.
51.
Friday, P.C., Lord, V.B., Exum, M.L., & Hartman, J.L. (2006). Evaluating the impact of a specialized domestic violence police unit (Final report submitted to the National Institute of Justice, p. 66). Charlotte: University of North Carolina at Charlotte.
52.
Frisch, L.A., Mackey, M.I., Hall, D., & Worden, A.P. (2001, January). Family protection and domestic violence: Intervention Act of 1994: Evaluation of the mandatory arrest provisions (p. 109). Albany : New York State Division of Criminal Justice Services .
53.
Gamache, D.J., Edleson, J.L., & Schock, M.D. (1988). Coordinated police, judicial and social service response to women battering: A multiple-baseline evaluation across three communities . In G. T. Hotaling, D. Finkelhor, J. T. Kirkpatrick , & M. A. Straus (Eds.), Coping with family violence: Research and policy perspectives (pp. 193-209). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
54.
Garner, J.H. (2005, August). What does "the prosecution" of domestic violence mean? Criminology and Public Policy, 4, 567-573.
55.
Gavin, C., & Puffett, N. (2005). Criminal domestic violence case processing: A case study of the five boroughs of New York City (p. 71). Submitted to the New York State Division of Criminal Justice Services and the Office on Violence Against Women, U.S. Department of Justice. New York: Center for Court Innovations.
56.
Gee, P.W. (1983, Spring). Ensuring police protection for battered women: The Scott v. Hart suit. Women and Violence, 8, 554-567.
57.
Gewitz, A., Weidner, R.R., Miller, H., & Zehn, K. (2006, April). Domestic violence cases involving children: Effects of an evidence-based prosecution approach. Violence and Victims, 21, 213-229.
58.
Grace, S. (1995). Policing domestic violence in the 1990s (Home Office Research and Planning Unit Research Study 139, p. 75). London: HMSO.
59.
Greenwood, P.W., Wildhorn, S., Poggio, E.C., Strumwasser, M.J., & De Leon, P. (1973). Prosecution of adult felony defendants in Los Angeles County: A policy perspective (p. 156). Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
60.
Gross, M., Cramer, E.P., Forte, J., Kunkel, T., & Moriarty, L.J. (2000). The impact of sentencing options on recidivism among domestic violence offenders: A case study. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 24, 301-312.
61.
Gwinn, C.G., & O'Dell, A. (1993). Stopping the violence: The role of the police officer and the prosecutor. Western State Law Review, 20, 1501-1521.
62.
Hanmer, J., Griffiths, S., & Jerwood, D. (1999). Arresting evidence: Domestic violence and repeat victimization (Policing and Reducing Crime Unit, Research, Development and Statistics Directorate No. Police Research Series Paper 104, p. 63). London: Great Britain Home Office.
63.
Hartley, C., & Frohmann, L. (2003, August). Cook County Target Abuser Call (TAC): An evaluation of a specialized domestic violence court (Final report submitted to the National Institute of Justice, p. 161). Iowa City : University of Iowa.
64.
Hartman, J.L., & Belknap, J. (2003). Beyond the gatekeepers: Court professionals' self-reported attitudes about and experiences with misdemeanor domestic violence cases. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 30, 349-373.
65.
Henning, K., & Feder, L. (2005). Criminal prosecution of domestic violence offenses: An investigation of factors predictive of court outcome. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 32, 612-642.
66.
Hester, M., Hamner, J., Coulson, S., Morahan, M., & Razak, A. (2003). Domestic violence: Making it through the criminal justice system. Sunderland, UK: International Center for the Study of Violence and Abuse.
67.
Hester, M., & Westmarland, N. (2005). Tackling domestic violence: Effective interventions and approaches (p. 152). London: Home Office .
68.
Hilton, N.Z., Harris, G.T., Rice, M.E., Lang, C., Cormier, C.A., & Lines, K.J. (2004, September). A brief actuarial assessment for the prediction of wife assault recidivism: The Ontario domestic assault risk assessment . Psychological Assessment, 16, 267-275.
69.
Hirschel, D., Buzawa, E., Pattavira, A., Faggiani, D., & Reuland, M. (2007, April). Explaining the prevalence, context, and consequences of dual arrest in intimate partner cases (Final report submitted to the National Institute of Justice, p. 201). Lowell: University of Massachusetts.
70.
Hirschel, D., & Hutchison, I. (2001). The relative effects of offense, offender and victim variables on the decision to prosecute domestic violence cases. Violence Against Women, 7(1), 46-59.
71.
Hirschel, J.D., Hutchison, I.W., Dean, C.W., Kelley, J.J., & Pesackis, C.E. (1991). Charlotte spouse assault replication project (Final report submitted to the National Institute of Justice, p. 165). Charlotte: University of North Carolina at Charlotte.
72.
HM Crown Prosecution Service Inspectorate, & HM Inspectorate of Constabulary. (2004). Violence at home (A joint thematic inspection of the investigation and prosecution of cases involving domestic violence, p. 134). London: Author.
73.
Jacoby, J.E. (1975). Issues in pre-trial screening (Final report submitted to the National Institute of Justice, p. 48). Washington, DC: Bureau of Social Science Research.
74.
Jaffe, P., & Burris, C.A. (1981). The response of the criminal justice system to wife abuse. Ottawa, Ontario: Solicitor General of Canada.
75.
Jaffe, P.G., Hastings, B., Reitzel, D., & Austin, G.W. (1993). The impact of police laying charges. In N. Z. Hilton (Ed.), Legal responses to wife assault: Current trends and evaluation (pp. 62-95). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
76.
Jaffe, P., Wolfe, D.A., Telford, A., & Austin, G. (1986). The impact of police charges in incidents of wife abuse. Journal of Family Violence, 1(1), 37-49.
77.
Jolin, A., Feyerherm, W., Fountain, R., & Friedman, S. (1998, May). Beyond arrest: The Portland Oregon domestic violence experiment (Final report submitted to the National Institute of Justice, p. 194). Portland, OR: Portland State University.
78.
Jordan, C.E. (2004). Intimate partner violence and the justice system: An examination of the interface. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 19, 1412-1434.
79.
Keilitz, S.L., Hannaford, P.L., & Efkeman, H.S. (1997). Civil protection orders: The benefits and limitations for victims of domestic violence (Final report, NCJ 172223, p. 112). Williamsburg, VA: National Center for State Courts .
80.
Keilitz, S., Jones, A.M., & Ostrom, B.J. (1999, April). Tracking and understanding family violence caseloads. Caseload Highlights, 5(2), 1-6.
81.
Kelley, P., & O'Brien, P. (1994, October 14). The Boston Police Department domestic violence research project (Final report submitted to the National Institute of Justice, p. 372). Boston: Boston Police Department.
82.
Kelly, L., Bindel, J., & Burton, S. (1999). Domestic violence matters: An evaluation of a development project (Research findings No. 91). London: Home Office.
83.
Kelly, M., & Levy, E. (2002, March). Making the "system" work in the Baltimore criminal justice system: An evaluation of early disposition court. Philadelphia: Center for Applied Research .
84.
Kingsnorth, R. (2006). Intimate partner violence: Predictors of recidivism in a sample of arrestess. Violence Against Women, 12, 917-935.
85.
Kingsnorth, R.F., & MacIntosh, R.C. (2007, September). Intimate partner violence: The role of suspect gender in prosecutorial decision-making. Justice Quarterly, 24, 460-496.
86.
Kingsnorth, R.F., MacIntosh, R.C., Berdahl, T., Blades, C., & Rossi, S. (2001). Domestic violence: The role of interracial dyads in criminal court processing. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 17, 123-141.
87.
Kingsnorth, R.F., MacIntosh, R., & Sutherland, S. (2002). Criminal charge or probation violation? Prosecutorial discretion and implications for research in criminal court processing. Criminology, 40, 577.
88.
Klein, A.R. (2004). The criminal justice response to domestic violence (p. 230). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/ Thomas Learning.
89.
Lerman, L.G. (1981). Prosecution of spouse abuse: Innovations in the criminal justice response (p. 227). Washington, DC: Center for Women Policy Studies.
90.
Lyon, E., & Mace, P.G. (1991). Family violence and the courts: Implementing a comprehensive new law. In D. D. Knudsen & J. L. Miller (Eds.), Abused and battered: Social and legal responses to family violence (pp. 167-180). New York: Aldine De Gruyter.
91.
Marsland, L., Plecas, D., & Segger, T. (2001). Reticence and re-assault among victims of domestic violence in a pro-charge jurisdiction (p. 37). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
92.
Martin, D. (1976). Battered wives. San Francisco : Glide.
93.
Martin, M.E. (1994). Mandatory arrest for domestic violence: The court's response. Criminal Justice Review, 19, 212-227.
94.
Maryland Network Against Domestic Violence. ( 2003). Pro-prosecution initiative evaluation (Final report to the Governor's Office of Crime Control & Prevention, p. 11). Bowie, MD: Maryland Network Against Domestic Violence.
95.
Maxwell, C.D., Garner, J.H., & Fagan, J.A. (2002). The preventive effects of arrest on intimate partner violence: Research, policy and theory. Criminology and Public Policy, 2(1), 51-80.
96.
McDermott, M.J., Garofalo, J., Barrick, K., & Kelley, J. (2003). Responding to domestic violence in Southern Illinois (Final report submitted to the National Institute of Justice, p. 187). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University .
97.
McLeod, M. (1983). Victim noncooperation in the prosecution of domestic assault. Criminology, 21, 395-416.
98.
Miller, F.W. (1970). Prosecution: The decision to charge a suspect with a crime. Boston: Little, Brown .
99.
Miller, N. (2000). Shelby County, Tennessee, arrest policies project: A process evaluation (Report submitted to the National Institute of Justice, p. 19). Alexandria, VA: Institute for Law and Justice.
100.
Mills, L.G. (1998, September). Mandatory arrest and prosecution policies for domestic violence. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 25, 306-318.
101.
Mills, L.G. (2003). Insult to injury: Rethinking our response to intimate abuse. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
102.
Mouzos, J., & Makkai, T. (2004). Women's experiences of male violence: Findings from the Australian component of the International Violence Against Women Survey (IVAWS) (p. 143). Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology .
103.
Muller, K., & Dutton, D.G. (1982). A Vancouver court's response to domestic assault (Cited in Dutton 1987). Vancouver, Canada: University of British Columbia, School of Social Work.
104.
Newmark, L., Rempel, M., Diffily, K., & Kane, K.M. (2001). Specialized felony domestic violence courts: Lessons on implementation and impacts from the Kings County experience (Report submitted to the Center for Court Innovations and the National Institute of Justice, p. 145). Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.
105.
Ogrodnik, L. (2006). Family violence in Canada: A statistical profile 2006 (p. 78). Ottawa, Ontario: Statistics Canada.
106.
Orchowsky, S.J. (1999). Evaluation of a coordinated community response to domestic violence: The Alexandria domestic violence intervention project (Final report submitted to the National Institute of Justice, p. 143). Richmond, VA: Applied Research Associates.
107.
O'Sullivan, C.S., Davis, R.C., Farole, D.J., Jr., & Rempel, M. (2007). A comparison of two prosecution policies in cases of intimate partner violence: Mandatory case filing vs. following the victim's lead (p. 125). New York: Safe Haven.
108.
Palmer, J. (1999). Sentencing in the context of domestic violence: A review of the literature and the analysis of dispositional data (p. 29). Vancouver , Canada: British Columbia Institute Against Domestic Violence.
109.
Parnas, R.I. (1967). Police response to domestic violence. Wisconsin Law Review, 31, 914-960.
110.
Parnas, R.I. (1969). The response of some relevant community resources to intra-family violence. Indiana Law Journal, 44, 159-181.
111.
Parnas, R.I. (1970). Judicial response to intra-family violence. Minnesota Law Review, 54, 585-645.
112.
Parnas, R. (1971). Police discretion and diversion of incidents of intra-family violence. Law and Contemporary Problems, 36, 539-565.
113.
Paterson, E.J. (1979). How the legal system responds to battered women . In D. M. Moore (Ed.), Battered women (pp. 79-100). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
114.
Patterson, J. (2003, June). Spousal violence. In H. Johnson & K. A. Coin (Eds.), Family violence in Canada: A statistical profile 2003 (pp. 4-20). Ottawa, Ontario: Statistics Canada, Minister of Industry .
115.
Pennell, S., & Burke, C. (2002, May). Centralized response to domestic violence: San Diego sheriff (p. 77). San Diego, CA: San Diego Association of Governments .
116.
Pennell, S., Burke, C., & Mulmat, D. (2000, March). Violence against women in San Diego (p. 111). San Diego, CA: San Diego Association of Governments.
117.
Peterson, R.R. (2002, July). Cross-borough differences in the processing of domestic violence cases in New York City criminal courts (p. 89). New York: New York City Criminal Justice Agency.
118.
Peterson, R.R. (2003, December). Combating domestic violence in New York City, 2001 (Research Brief No. 4, p. 8). New York: New York City Criminal Justice Agency.
119.
Peterson, R.R. (2004, November). The impact of Manhattan's specialized domestic violence court (p. 91). New York: New York City Criminal Justice Agency.
120.
Peterson, R.R., Caligiure, R., & Linen-Reed, B. (2003). Combating domestic violence in New York City: A study of DV cases in the criminal courts (p. 33). New York: New York City Criminal Justice Agency.
121.
Phillips, C., & Brown, D. (1998). Entry into the criminal justice system: A survey of police arrests and their outcomes (p. 250). London: Home Office Research and Statistics Directorate.
122.
Pleck, E. (1987). Domestic tyranny: The making of American social policy against family violence from colonial times to the present. New York: Oxford University Press.
123.
Quarm, D., & Schwartz, M.D. (1985). Domestic violence in criminal court. Women and Politics, 4(3), 29-46.
124.
Ransbottom, S., Stein, D., & Libertun, G. (2006). Boulder county domestic abuse prevention project year end statistical report: January-December 2005 (p. 27). Boulder, CO: Boulder County Domestic Abuse Prevention Project.
125.
Rauma, D. (1984). Going for the gold: Prosecutorial decision-making in cases of wife assault. Social Science Research, 13, 321-251.
126.
Rebovich, D.J. (1996). Prosecution response to domestic violence: Results of a survey of large jurisdictions. In E. S. Buzawa & C. G. Buzawa (Eds.), Do arrests and restraining orders work? (pp. 176-191). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
127.
Robinson, A.L. (2003, May 8). The Cardiff women's safety unit: A multi-agency approach to domestic violence (p. 88). Cardiff, UK: School of Social Science, Cardiff University .
128.
Rosenthal, R. (1979). The "file drawer problem" and tolerance for null results. Psychological Bulletin, 85, 185-193.
129.
Rosenthal, R. (1990). Replication in behavior research. In J. W. Neuliep (Ed.), Replication research in the social science (pp. 1-30). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
130.
Roy, M. (1977). Battered women: A psychosociological study of domestic violence. New York: Van Nostrand.
131.
Ryan, R.M., & Petrzelka, P. (2003, October). Protective order enforcement team (POET) evaluation (Final report submitted to the National Institute of Justice, p. 266). Des Moines, IA: Crime Victim Assistance Division, Iowa Department of Justice.
132.
Salazar, L.F., Emshoff, J.G., Baker, C.K., & Crowley, T. (2007, October). Examining the behavior of a system: An outcome evaluation of a coordinated community response to domestic violence . Journal of Family Violence, 22, 631-641.
133.
Schmidt, J.D., & Steury, E.H. (1989). Prosecutorial discretion in filing charges in domestic violence cases. Criminology, 27, 487-510.
134.
Schulman, M.A. (1979, July). A survey of spousal abuse against women in Kentucky (Louis Harris and Associates conducted study for the Kentucky Commission on Women, p. 88). Washington, DC: Law Enforcement Assistance Administration.
135.
Seith, C. (2005). (Un)organized responses to domestic violence: Challenges and changes in Switzerland. In W. Smeenk & M. Malsch (Eds.), Family violence and police response: Learning from research, policy, and practice in European countries (pp. 165-189). Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
136.
Sherman, L.W. (1992). Policing domestic violence: Experiments and dilemmas . New York: Free Press.
137.
Sherman, L.W. (2000, Fall). Domestic violence and restorative justice: Answering key questions. Virginia Journal of Social Policy and the Law, 8, 263.
138.
Sherman, L.W., & Berk, R.A. (1984). The specific deterrent effects of arrest for domestic assault. American Sociological Review, 49, 261-272.
139.
Smith, B.E., Davis, R.C., Nickles, L.B., & Davies, H.J. (2001, March). Evaluation of efforts to implement no-drop policies: Two central values in conflict (Final report submitted to the National Institute of Justice, p. 91). Washington, DC: American Bar Association.
140.
Smithey, M., Green, S.E., & Giacomazzi, A.L. (2000, November). A collaborative effort and the effectiveness of law enforcement training toward resolving domestic violence (Final report submitted to the National Institute of Justice, p. 163). El Paso: University of Texas at El Paso.
141.
Stark, E. (2004). Insults, injury, and injustice. Violence Against Women, 10, 1302-1330.
142.
Steinman, M. (1988). Evaluating a system-wide response to domestic abuse: Some initial findings. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 4, 172-186.
143.
Steinman, M. (1991). Coordinated criminal justice interventions and recidivism among batterers. In M. Steinman (Ed.), Woman battering: Policy responses (pp. 221-236). Cincinnati, OH: Anderson.
144.
Steketee, M.W., Levey, L.S., & Keilitz, S.L. (2000, June 30). Implementing an integrated domestic violence court: Systematic change in the District of Columbia (Report to the State Justice Institute, p. 156). Williamsburg, VA: National Center for State Courts.
145.
Stroshine, M.S., & Robinson, A.L. (2003). The decision to end an abusive relationship. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 30(1), 97-117.
146.
Taylor, N. (2006, June 2). Analysis of family violence incidents July 2003-June 2004 (Australian Federal Police, Report for ACT Policing). Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology .
147.
Thoennes, N. (2007, March). Integrated approaches to manage multi-case families in the justice system (p. 155). Denver, CO: Center for Police Research.
148.
Tjaden, P., & Thoennes, N. (2000a). Prevalence and consequences of male-to-female and female-to-male partner violence as measured by the national violence against women survey. Violence Against Women, 6, 142-161.
149.
Tjaden, P., & Thoennes, N. (2000b, July). Extent, nature and consequences of intimate partner violence: Findings from the National Violence Against Women Survey (p. 69). Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
150.
Tolman, R.M., & Weisz, A. (1995, October). Coordinated community intervention for domestic violence: The effects of arrest and prosecution on recidivism of woman abuse perpetrators. Crime & Delinquency, 41, 481-495.
151.
Toon, R., Hart, B., Welch, N., Coronado, N., & Hunting, D. (2005). Layers of meaning: Domestic violence and law enforcement attitudes in Arizona (p. 72). Phoenix: Morrison Institute for Public Policy, Arizona State University.
152.
Trainor, C., Lambert, M., & Dauvergne, M. (2002). Spousal violence. In C. Trainor (Ed.), Family violence in Canada: A statistical profile 2002 (pp. 6-25). Ottawa, Ontario: Canadian Center for Justice Statistics.
153.
Turley, E., & Haas, S.M. (2004). West Virginia STOP Violence Against Women Project evaluation (p. 34). Charleston, WV: Criminal Justice Statistical Analysis Center.
154.
Uchida, C.D., Putnam, C.A., Mastrofski, J., Solomon, S., & Dawson, D. (2001, June). Evaluating a multidisciplinary response to domestic violence: The DIVERT program in Colorado Springs (Final report submitted to the National Institute of Justice, p. 13). Silver Spring, MD: 21st Century Solutions.
155.
Uekert, B.K., Miller, N., DuPree, C., Spence, D., & Archer, C. (2001). Evaluation of the STOP Violence Against Women Grant Program: Law enforcement and prosecution components (p. 136). Alexandria, VA: Institute for Law and Justice.
156.
United States Commission on Civil Rights. ( 1982). Under the rule of thumb: Battered women and the administration of justice (p. 100). Washington, DC: U.S. Commission on Civil Rights.
157.
Urbis Keys Young. (2001). Evaluation of the ACT Family Violence Intervention Program phase II final report (p. 144). Canberra , Australia: ACT Department of Justice and Community Safety.
158.
Ursel, J. (1994). The Winnipeg family violence court. Juristat, 14(12), 1-16.
159.
Ursel, J. (2003). Using the justice system in Winnipeg. In H. Johnson & K. Au Coin (Eds.), Family violence in Canada: A statistical profile 2003 (pp. 54-56). Ottawa, Ontario: Canadian Minister of Industry.
160.
Vallely, C., Robison, A., Burton, M., & Tregidga, J. (2005, June). Evaluation of domestic violence pilot sites at Caerphilly (Gwent) and Croydon 2004/05 (DV Project Team, Equality and Diversity Unit). London: Crown Prosecution Service.
161.
Ventura, L.A., & Davis, G. (2005, February). Domestic violence: Court case conviction and recidivism. Violence Against Women, 11, 255-277.
162.
Vera Institute of Justice. (1977, January). Felony arrest: Their prosecution and disposition in New York City's courts (p. 149). New York: Vera Institute of Justice.
163.
Walby, S., & Allen, J. (2004). Domestic violence, sexual assault and stalking: Findings from the British Crime Survey (p. 146). London: Home Office Research, Development and Statistics Directorate.
164.
Walker, L.E. (1979). The battered women. New York : Harper & Row.
165.
Walsh, D., & Poole, A. (Eds.). (1983). A dictionary of criminology . London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
166.
Wasoff, F. (1982). Legal protection from wifebeating: The prosecution of domestic assaults by Scottish prosecutors and criminal courts. International Journal of Sociology of the Law, 10, 187-204.
167.
Weisburd, D., Waring, E., & Chayet, E.F. (2001). White-collar crime and criminal careers. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press .
168.
Weisz, A., Canales-Portalatin, D., & Nahan, N. (2001, January). An evaluation of victim advocacy within a team approach (Final report submitted to the National Institute of Justice) . Detroit, MI: Wayne State University .
169.
Williams, K.M. (1976). The Effects of victim characteristics on the disposition of violent crimes. In W. F. McDonald (Ed.), Criminal justice and the victim (pp. 177-213). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
170.
Wilson, D., & Klein, A. (2006). A longitudinal study of a cohort of batterers arraigned in a Massachusetts District Court 1995-2004 (Final report submitted to the National Institute of Justice, p. 67). Cambridge, MA: BOTEC Analysis Corporation.
171.
Wooldredge, J.D. (2002). Examining the (ir)relevance of aggregation bias for multilevel studies of neighborhood and crime with an example of comparing census tracts to official neighborhoods in Cincinnati. Criminology , 40, 681-709.
172.
Wooldredge, J.D., & Thistlethwaite, A. (2002, March). Reconsidering domestic violence recidivism: Conditioned effects of legal controls by individual and aggregate levels of stakes in conformity. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 18(1), 45-70.
173.
Wooldredge, J.D., & Thistlethwaite, A. (2005, January). Court dispositions and rearrest for intimate assaults. Crime & Delinquency , 51, 75-102.
174.
Woolery, M. (2004). Domestic violence in Wisconsin: An overview of criminal justice training issues (p. 44). Madison, WI: Center for Public Policy and the Status of Women, Robert M. LaFollette School of Public Affairs.
175.
Worden, A.P. (2000). The changing boundaries of the criminal justice system: Redefining the problem and the response in domestic violence. In C. M. Friel (Ed.), Criminal justice 2000, Boundary changes in criminal justice organization (Vol. 2, pp. 215-266). Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
176.
Worden, A.P. (2001). Models of community coordination in partner violence cases: A multi-site comparative analysis (Final report submitted to the National Institute of Justice, p. 199). Albany, NY: University at Albany.
177.
Wordes, M. (2000, February 29). Creating a structured decision-making model for police intervention in intimate partner violence. Oakland, CA: National Council on Crime and Delinquency .
Yearwood, D.L., & Lubitz, R.L. (1999). Domestic violence in North Carolina: Utilizing court data for policy formulation. Justice Research and Policy , 1(1), 51-66.
180.
Zeisel, H. (1981). The disposition of felony arrests. American Bar Association Research Journal, 6, 407-462.
181.
Zimring, F.E. (1989). Towards a jurisprudence of family violence. In L. Ohlin & M. Tonry (Eds.), Family violence (Vol. 11, pp. 547-569). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
182.
Zorza, J. (1992, Spring). The criminal law of misdemeanor domestic violence. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 83(1), 46-72.
183.
Zorza, J. (1994, Summer). Must we stop arresting batterers?: Analysis and policy implications of new police domestic violence studies. New England Law Review, 28, 929-990.
184.
Violence Against Women Act of 1994, 103d Cong., 2d sess. ยง 4001 (1994).
