Over the last half century in the United States, we have seen the criminal system become increasingly aggressive in its response to violence against intimate partners. Although policies have been implemented to encourage arrest, police continue to maintain discretion over whether or whom to arrest in cases of intimate partner violence (IPV). Using data from three national data sets, we examined the contributions of incident, agency, and community factors on the police arrest decisions, independently considering atypical cases of women arrested and dual arrest. The findings from this study reveal that incident factors account for the majority of the variance in arrest for single arrest cases, more so than factors associated with the particular police agency or the community in which the alleged crime occurred. The frequency of dual arrest is affected more by community factors. The findings from this study can be used to guide police training and local policies as well as to inform legislation designed to prevent variance in arrest based on sociodemographic and other extralegal factors.
Bachman, R., & Coker, A. ( 1995). Police involvement in domestic violence: The interactive effects of victim injury, offender’s history of violence, and race. Violence and Victims, 10, 91-106.
2.
Battered Women’s Justice Project. Retrieved May 21, 2007, from http://data.ipharos.com/bwjp/documents/primary_aggressor_statutes.pdf .
3.
Belknap, J. ( 1995). Law enforcement officers’ attitudes about appropriate responses to woman battering. International Review of Victimology , 4, 47-62.
4.
Berk, S., & Loseke, D.R. ( 1980/1981). ‘‘Handling’’ family violence: Situational determinants of police arrest in domestic disturbance . Law and Society, 15, 317-346.
5.
Black, D. ( 1980). The manners and customs of the police. New York: Academic Press.
6.
Brown, S. ( 1984). Police responses to wife beating: Neglect of a crime of violence. Journal of Criminal Justice, 12, 277-288.
7.
Browning, C.R. ( 2004). The span of collective efficacy: Extending social disorganization theory to partner violence. Journal of Marriage and Family , 64, 833-850.
8.
Bureau of Justice Statistics. (2008). Law Enforcement Management and Administrative Statistics (LEMAS): 2000 Sample Survey of Law Enforcement Agencies (Codebook). Washington, DC: US Department of Justice.
9.
Busch, A.L., & Rosenberg, M.S. (2004). Comparing women and men arrested for domestic violence: A preliminary report. Journal of Family Violence, 19, 49-57.
10.
Buzawa, E.S., & Austin, T. ( 1993). Determining police response to domestic violence victims . American Behavioral Scientist, 36, 610-618.
11.
Chaney, C.K., & Saltzstein, G.H. (1998). Democratic control and bureaucratic responsiveness: The police and domestic violence. American Journal of Political Science, 42, 745-768.
DeLeon-Granados, W., Wells, W., & Binsbacher, R. (2006). Arresting developments: Trends in female arrests for domestic violence and proposed explanations. Violence Against Women, 12, 355-371.
14.
Durose, M.R., Harlow, C.W., Langan, P.A., Motivans, M., Rantala, R.R., & Smith, E.L. ( 2005). Family violence statistics. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics .
15.
Eitle, D. ( 2005). The influence of mandatory arrest policies, police organizational characteristics, and situational variables on the probability of arrest in domestic violence cases. Crime & Delinquency, 51, 573-597.
16.
Fagan, J. ( 1996, January). The criminalization of domestic violence: Promises and limits. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
Finn, M.A., Blackwell, B.S., Stalans, L.J., Studdard, S., & Dugan, L. ( 2004). Dual arrest decisions in domestic violence cases: The influence of departmental policies. Crime and Delinquency , 50, 565-589.
19.
Gardiner, J.C., Luo, Z., & Roman, L.A. ( 2009). Fixed effects, random effects and GEE: What are the differences . Stat Med, 28, 221-239.
20.
Hall, D.L. ( 2005). Domestic violence arrest decision making: The role of suspect availability in the arrest decision. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 32, 390-411.
21.
He, N., Zhao, J., & Lovrich, N. ( 2005). Community policing: A preliminary assessment of environmental impact with panel data on program implementation in U.S. cities. Crime and Delinquency51, 295-317.
22.
Heise, D.R. ( 1972). Employing nominal variables, induced variables, and block variables in path analysis. Sociological Methods and Research , 1, 147-173.
23.
Henning, K., & Feder, L. ( 2004). A comparison of men and women arrested for domestic violence: Who presents the greater threat? Journal of Family Violence , 19, 69-80.
24.
Hickman, M.J., & Reaves, B.A. ( 2003). Local police departments, 2000. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics.
25.
Jones, D.A., & Belknap, J. ( 1999). Police responses to battering in a progressive proarrest jurisdiction. Justice Quarterly, 16, 249-273.
26.
Kane, R. ( 1999). Patterns of arrest in domestic violence encounters: Identifying a police-decision making model. Journal of Criminal Justice . 27, 65-79.
27.
Langworthy, R. ( 1986). The structure of police organizations. New York, NY: Praeger.
28.
Logan, T.K., Walker, R., & Leukefeld, C. ( 2001). Rural, urban influenced, and urban differences among domestic violence arrestees. Journal of Interpersonal Violence , 16, 266-283.
29.
Maguire, E. ( 2003). Organizational structure in American police agencies . Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
30.
Martin, M.E. ( 1997). Double your trouble: Dual arrest in family violence. Journal of Family Violence, 12, 139-157.
31.
Miller, S.L. ( 2001). The paradox of women arrested for domestic violence: Criminal justice professionals and service providers respond. Violence Against Women, 7, 1339-1376.
32.
Mills, L.G. ( 1998). Mandatory arrest and prosecution policies for domestic violence: A critical literature review and the case for more research to test victim empowerment approaches. Criminal Justice & Behavior , 25, 306-318.
33.
Morabito, M.S. ( 2010). Understanding community policing as an innovation: Patterns of adoption. Crime and Delinquency, 56, 564-587.
34.
Pattavina, A., Buzawa, E., Hirschel, D., & Faggiani, D. ( 2007). Policy, place, and perpetrators: Using NIBRS to explain arrest practices in intimate partner violence. Justice Research and Policy, 9, 31-51.
35.
Perkins, E., Cordner, G., & Scarborough, K. (1999). Police handling of people with mental illness In G. Gaines & G. Cordner (Eds.), Policing perspectives: An anthology. Los Angeles, CA: Roxbury.
36.
Reuland, M., Schaefer Morabito, M., Preston, C., & Cheney, J. ( 2006). Police-community partnerships to address domestic violence . Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice Office of Community Oriented Policing Services.
37.
Robinson, A., & Chandek, M. ( 2000). The domestic violence arrest decision: Demographic, attitudinal and situational variables. Crime & Delinquency, 46, 18-37.
38.
Smith, D. ( 1987). Police response to interpersonal violence: Defining the parameters of legal control. Social Forces, 65, 767-782.
39.
Sun, I.Y. ( 2007). Policing domestic violence: Does officer gender matter ? Journal of Criminal Justice, 35, 581-595.
40.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Health Resources and Services Administration, Bureau of Health Professionals. (2004). Area resource file, 2003. Rockville, MD: Author.
41.
U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics.Law Enforcement Management and Administrative Statistics, 2000 [Computer file]. (2008). Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research [producer and distributor].
42.
U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics.Law Enforcement Management and Administrative Statistics, 2003 [Computer file]. (2006). Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research [producer and distributor].
43.
U.S. Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Investigation.National Incident-Based Reporting System, 2003 [Computer file]. (2006). Ann Arbor, MI : Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research [producer and distributor].
44.
Wilson, J. ( 1968). Varieties of police behavior. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
45.
Worden, R.E., & Pollitz, A.A. ( 1984). Police arrests in domestic disturbances. Law & Society Review, 18, 105-119.
