Describing variability of MSW composition data with the log-logistic distribution

Abstract

Variations in solid waste composition data are necessary as inputs to solid waste planning, yet uncertainty exists regarding which probability distributions might be generally valuable to describe the variability. Twenty-two detailed analyses of solid waste from British Columbia, Canada, were fitted to distributions using the BestFit software. Alternative distributions were ranked based on three goodness-of-fit parameters and twelve waste fractions. The log-logistic distribution was found to be the most able to fit over the wide range of composition types considered. The results were demonstrated to be insensitive to the number of waste components or to the choice of a two- or three-parameter distribution. Although other distributions were able to better match the waste composition for individual waste types, the log-logistic distribution was demonstrated to fit, overall, a wide variety of waste composition types.

Keywords

Log-logistic distribution solid waste composition data analysis goodness-of-fit BestFit: wmr 1141—1

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ahmad, M.I. , Sinclair, C.D. & Werritty, A. (1998) Log-logistic flood frequency analysis. Journal of Hydrology, 98, 205-224.

Astm (1992) Standard Test Method for the Determination of the Composition of Unprocessed Municipal Solid Waste, D523 1-92. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, USA.

Calder, E.S. , Cortes, J.A. , Palma, J.L. & Luckett, R. (2005) Probabilistic analysis of rockfall frequencies during an andesite lava dome eruption: The Soufriere Hills Volcano, Montserrat Geophysical Research Letters, 32, L16309.

Devore, J. (2004) Probability and Statistics for Engineering and the Sciences, 6th edition. Thomson , Belmont, CA, USA.

Gilbert, R.O. (1987) Statistical Methods for Environmental Pollution Monitoring. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, NY, USA.

Gleaton, J.U. & Lynch, J.D. (2004) On the distribution of the breaking strain of a bundle of brittle elastic fibers. Advances in Applied Probability , 36, 98-115.

Gokhale, S. & Khare, M. (2005) A hybrid model for predicting carbon monoxide from vehicular exhausts in urban environments. Atmospheric Environment , 39, 4025-4040.

Johnson, N.L. , Kotz, S. & Balakrishnan, N. (1995) Continuous Univariate Distibutions, Volume 2, 2nd edn. J Wiley, New York, NY, USA.

Johnson, R.A. , Miller, I. & Freund, J. (2004) Miller and Freund's Probability and Statistics for Engineers, 7th edn. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA.

10.

Kooijman, S.A.L. M. (1987) Safety Factor for LC//5//0 values allowing for differences in sensitivity among species. Water Research, 21, 269- 276.

11.

Leroy, D. , Giovannoni, J.-M. & Maystre, L.-Y. (1992) Sampling method to determine a household waste composition variance. Waste Management and Research, 10, 3-12.

12.

McBean, E.A. & Rovers, F.A. (1998) Statistical Procedures for Analysis of Environmental Monitoring Data and Risk Assessment. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA.

13.

Palisade Corporation (2007) Best Fit 4.5, http://www.palisade.com.au/bestfit/ (accessed: 23 January 23 2008)

14.

Sfeir, H. , Reinhart, D.R. & McCauley-Bell, P.R. (1999) An evaluation of municipal solid waste composition bias sources. Journal of the Air and Waste Management Association, 49, 1096-1102.

15.

Sharma M. & E. McBean (2006) A methodology for solid waste characterization based on diminishing marginal returns. Waste Management, 27, 337-344.