Improper management of pig manure has resulted in environmental problems such as surface water eutrophication, ground water pollution, and greenhouse gas emissions. This study develops and compares 14 alternative manure management scenarios aiming at energy and nutrient extraction. The scenarios based on combinations of thermal pretreatment, anaerobic digestion, anaerobic co-digestion, liquid/solid separation, drying, incineration, and thermal gasification were compared with respect to their energy, nutrient and greenhouse gas balances. Both sole pig manure and pig manure mixed with other types of waste materials were considered. Data for the analyses were obtained from existing waste treatment facilities, experimental plants, laboratory measurements and literature. The assessment reveals that incineration combined with liquid/solid separation and drying of the solids is a promising management option yielding a high potential energy utilization rate and greenhouse gas savings. If maximum electricity production is desired, anaerobic digestion is advantageous as the biogas can be converted to electricity at high efficiency in a gas engine while allowing production of heat for operation of the digestion process. In conclusion, this study shows that the choice of technology has a strong influence on energy, nutrient and greenhouse gas balances. Thus, to get the most reliable results, it is important to consider the most representative (and up-to-date) technology combined with data representing the area or region in question.
Amon, Th., Amon, B., Kryvoruchko, V., Bodiroza, V., Pötsch, E. & Zollitsch, W. ( 2006) Optimising methane yield from anaerobic digestion of manure: effects of dairy systems and of glycerine supplementation. International Congress, 1293, 217-220.
2.
Angelidaki, I. & Ellegaard, L. ( 2003) Codigestion of manure and organic wastes in centralized biogas plants. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, 109, 95-105.
3.
ASAE (American Society of Agricultural Engineers) (ed.). (2003) ASAE D384. Manure production and characteristics . ASAE Standards2003, 682-685.
4.
Azam, Z-u-Z. ( 2007) Evaluation of solid manure fractions, corn silage and grass silage as co-substrates to increase biogas yield in a co-digestion biogas plant. Master’s thesis, Aalborg university, Denmark.
5.
Basset-Mens, C. & van der Werf, H.M.G. ( 2005) Scenario-based environmental assessment of farming systems: the case of pig production in France. Agriculture, Ecosystem and Environment, 105, 127- 144.
6.
Best, P. (ed.) (2008) Pig international world market review. Pig International, 38, 6-11.
Danish Meat Association. (2007) Danske slagterier statistics 2006 (Danish meat producer statistics 2006). The Danish Bacon and Meat Council, <http://www.danskeslagterier.dk/smmedia/DS_Indhold_UK_indd_pdf?mb_GUID=A3A8A0B4-E19F-41CF-896E-2F99AD82D6E2.pdf> (Accessed 13 October 2008).
9.
Danish Pig Production. (2007) Danish pig production annual report 2007. Danish Pig Production , <http://www.danishpigproduction.dk/Annual_reports/index.aspx?id=ca5c27e6-1cc3-414a-8b3a-eba11b740ff0> (Accessed 13 October 2008).
10.
DEA (Danish Energy Authority) (ed.). (2005 ) Technology data for electricity and heat generating plants . Energinet. <http://www.energinet.dk/NR/rdonlyres/4F6480DC-207B-41CF-8E54-BF0BA82926D7/0/Teknologikatalog050311.pdf> ; (Accessed 13 October 2008).
11.
Dong, H., Mangino, J., McAllister, T.A. et al. (2006) Emissions from livestock and manure management . In: Eggleston H.S., Buendia L., Miwa K., Ngara T. & Tanabe, K. (eds) 2006 IPCC Guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories. IGES, Japan, Vol. 4, pp. 1- 87.
12.
Edelmann, W., Baier, U. & Engeli, H. ( 2005) Environmental aspects of the anaerobic digestion of the organic fraction of municipal solid wastes and of solid agricultural wastes . Water Science and Technology, 52, 203-208.
13.
Haşimoğlu, C., Ciniviz, M., Özsert, İ., İçingür, Y., Parlak, A. & Salman, M.S. ( 2008) Performance characteristics of a low heat rejection diesel engine operating with biodiesel. Renewable Energy, 33, 1709- 1715.
Hülsbergen, K-J., Feil, B., Biermann, S., Rathke, G-W., Kalk, W-D. & Diepenbrock, W. ( 2001) A method of energy balancing in crop production and its application in a long-term fertilizer trial. Agriculture, Ecosystem and Environment, 86, 303-321.
16.
IPCC (International Panel on Climate Change). ( 2001) Climate change 2001: the scientific basis. Contribution of working group I to the third assessment report of the International Panel on Climate Change [Houghton, J.T., Ding, Y., Griggs, D.J., Noguer, M., van der Linden, P.J., Dai, X., Maskell, K. & Johnson, C.A. (eds)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 881.
17.
Jongbloed, A.W., Poulsen, H.D., Dourmad, J.Y.& van der Peet-Schwering, C.N.C. (1999) Environmental and legislative aspects of pig production in the Netherlands, France and Denmark. Livestock Production Science, 58, 243-249.
18.
Laboski, C.A.M. & Lamb, J.A. ( 2003) Changes in soil test phosphorus concentration after application of manure or fertilizer. Soil Science Society of America Journal , 67, 544-554.
19.
Maraseni, T.N. & Maroulis, J. ( 2008) Piggery: from environmental pollution to a climate change solution. Journal of Environmental Science and Health Part B, 43, 358-363.
20.
McKendry, P. ( 2002a) Energy production from biomass (part 2): conversion technologies . Bioresource Technology, 83, 47-54.
21.
McKendry, P. ( 2002b) Energy production from biomass (part 3): gasification technologies. Bioresource Technology, 83, 47-54.
22.
Melse, R.W. & Verdoes, N. ( 2005) Evaluation of four farm-scale systems for the treatment of liquid pig manure. Biosystems Engineering, 92, 47-57.
23.
Miles, T.R., Miles, A.R. & Bock, B.R. ( 2004) Demonstration of energy and nutrient recovery from animal manure. In: Proceedings of the 2nd World conference and technology exhibition on biomass for energy industry and climate protection, Rome, 10-14 May.
24.
Murto, M., Björnsson L. & Matiasson, B. ( 2004) Impact of food industrial waste on anaerobic co-digestion of sewage sludge and pig manure. Journal of Environmental Management, 70, 101-107.
25.
Møller, H.B., Hansen, J.D. & Sørensen, C.A.G. ( 2007a) Nutrient recovery by solid-liquid separation and methane productivity of solids. Transactions of the ASABE, 50, 193-200.
26.
Møller, H.B., Jensen, H.S., Tobiasen, L. & Hansen M.N. ( 2007b) Heavy metal and phosphorus content of fractions from manure treatment and incineration. Environmental Technology , 28, 1403-1418.
27.
Møller, H.B., Lund, I. & Sommer, S.G. ( 2000) Solid-liquid separation of livestock slurry: efficiency and cost. Bioresource Technology, 74, 223-229.
28.
Møller, H.B., Nielsen, A.M., Nakakubu R. & Olsen, H.J. ( 2007c) Process performance of biogas digesters incorporating pre-separated manure. Livestock Science, 112, 217-223.
29.
Møller, H.B., Sommer, S.G. & Ahring, B.K. ( 2004) Methane productivity of manure, straw and solid fractions of manure. Biomass and Bioenergy, 26, 485-495.
30.
Nielsen, L.H., Hjort-Gregersen, K., Thygesen, P. & Christensen, J. ( 2002) Samfundøkonomiske analyzer af biogasfællesanlæg med tekniske og selskabsøkonomiske baggrundsanalyser (Cost-benefit analysis of biogas plants). Report No.136. Frederikberg , Denmark, Fødevareøkonomisk Institut .
31.
Nielsen, O-K., Nielsen, M. & Illerup, J.B. ( 2007) Danish emission inventories for stationary combustion plants. Inventories until year 2004. Technical report no. 628. National Environmental Research Institute, University of Aarhus, Denmark, pp. 176.
32.
Pedersen, T.R. ( 2005) Gylleseparering - Kemira Miljø A/S. Dansk Landbrugsrådgivning, Landscentret, Denmark, pp. 125.
33.
Poulsen, T.G. & Hansen, J.A. ( 2003) Strategic environmental assessment of alternative sewage sludge management scenarios. Waste Management & Research , 21, 19-28.
34.
Poulsen, T.G. & Kuligowski, K. ( 2007) Energy potential of animal manure using alternative treatment scenarios. In: Sauhats, A. (ed.) Riga Technical University: Scientific Proceedings of the Riga Technical University, power and electrical engineering, energy systems and the environment, 11-13 October, pp. 47-52.
35.
Ptasinski, K.J., Prins, M.J. & Pierik, A. ( 2007) Exertic evaluation of biomass gasification. Energy, 32, 568-574.
36.
Raju, C.S. ( 2005) Thermo-chemical pre-treatment of dewatered pig manure and its effects on biogas production and potential. Master’s thesis, Aalborg University, Denmark, <www.aub.aau.dk> (Accessed 10 March, 2009).
37.
Reno-Nord. (2006) Grønt regnskab 2006 (Green account 2006). From Reno Nord, Publications (2007), <http://www.renonord.dk/Media/groent_regnskab_2006._den_02.05.2007.pdf> (Accessed 31 March 2008).
38.
Simonsen, N. ( 2008) Personal communication to Mr Simonsen, consulting engineer at Kruger, 21 February 2008.
39.
Stasta, P., Boran, J., Bebar, L., Stehlik, P. & Oral, J. ( 2006) Thermal processing of sewage sludge. Applied Thermal Engineering, 26, 1420-1426.
40.
Stolarek, P. & Ledakowicz, S. ( 2001) Thermal processing of sewage sludge by drying, pyrolysis, gasification and combustion. Water Science and Technology , 44, 333-339.
Sørensen, C.G., Jacobsen, B.H. & Sommer, S.G. ( 2003) An assessment tool applied to manure management systems using innovative technologies. Biosystems Engineering, 86, 315-325.
43.
Tafdrup, S. ( 1994) Centralized biogas plants combine agricultural and environmental benefits with energy production. Water Science and Technology , 30, 133-141.
44.
Van der Werf, H.M.G., Tzilivakis, J., Lewis, K. & Basset-Mens, C. ( 2007) Environmental impacts of farm scenarios according to five assessment methods. Agriculture, Ecosystem and Environment , 118, 327- 338.
45.
Van Lier, J.B., Tilche, A., Ahring, B.K. et al. (2001) New perspectives in anaerobic digestion. Water Science and Technology, 43, 1-18.
46.
Weiland, P. ( 2006) Biomass digestion in agriculture: a successful pathway for the energy production and waste treatment in Germany. Engineering in Life Sciences, 6, 302-309.
