The environmental impact of an extended property close source-separation system for solid household waste (i.e. a systems for collection of recyclables from domestic properties) is investigated in a residential area in southern Sweden. Since 2001, households have been able to source-separate waste into six fractions of dry recyclables and food waste sorting. The current system was evaluated using the EASEWASTE life cycle assessment tool. Current status is compared with an ideal scenario in which households display perfect source-separation behaviour and a scenario without any material recycling. Results show that current recycling provides substantial environmental benefits compared to a non-recycling alternative. The environmental benefit varies greatly between recyclable fractions, and the recyclables currently most frequently source-separated by households are often not the most beneficial from an environmental perspective. With optimal source-separation of all recyclables, the current net contribution to global warming could be changed to a net-avoidance while current avoidance of nutrient enrichment, acidification and photochemical ozone formation could be doubled. Sensitivity analyses show that thetype of energy substituted by incineration of non-recycled waste, as well as energy used in recycling processes and in the production of materials substituted by waste recycling, is of high relevance for the attained results.
BernstadAla Cour JansenJAspegrenH (2009) Local strategies for an efficient management of solid household waste – the full-scale Augustenborg experiment. In Proceedings from Twelfth International Waste Management and Landfill Symposium5–9 October 2009. S. Margherita di Pula, Sardinia, Italy.
3.
BorgshedJLeanderJRönnquistE-MSteinwallP (2003) Systems Analysis of Waste Treatment in the Kalmar RegionCarl Bro Energy Consultancy (in Swedish). Kalmar, Sweden.
4.
BörjessonPBerglundM (2003) Environmental Analysis of Biogas Systems. Report 45. Lund University, Sweden: Department for Environment and Energy, Faculty of Engineering (in Swedish).
5.
Carlsson A-S (2002) Screening and Evaluation of Plastic Recycling in a Systems Perspective. IVL B1418. (in Swedish). Stockholm, Sweden.
6.
County of Scania (2008) Climate Strategy for Scania – How do we Decrease Emissions of Green House Gases? (in Swedish). Scania, Sweden.
7.
Dahlén, L. (2008). Household Waste Collection – Factors and Variations. Doctoral Thesis. 2008:33. Luleå Technical University. Department of Civil, Mining and Environmental Engineering. Division of Waste Science and Technology.
8.
Danish EPA (2005) Environmental and Socioeconomic Evaluation of Methods for Management of Flue Gas Cleaning Products. Danish EPA (in Danish). Copenhagen, Denmark.
9.
EDIP, E2TW-11. Electricity Production (DK), 2001, Coal, Energy Quality, kWh.
10.
EDIP, E2TW-25. Electricity Production (DK), 2001, Wind Power, kWh.
11.
Effektiv (2009) EFFem environmental impact calculator. Retrieved from www.effektiv.org (accessed December 2009).
12.
EgglestonSBuendiaLMiwaKNgaraTTanabeK (eds.) (2006). IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories. A report prepared by the Task Force on National Greenhouse Gas Inventories of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Hayama, Japan: Institute for Global Environmental Strategies, 2006. Retrieved from http://www.ipcc-nggip.iges.or.jp/public/2006gl/index.htm (accessed December 2009).
13.
EkvallT (2000) A market-based approach to allocation at open-loop recycling. Resources, Conservation and Recycling29: 91–109.
14.
EkvallTFinnvedenG (2000) The application of life cycle assessment to integrated solid waste managenet Part 2 – Perspectives on energy and material recovery from paper. Transactions of the Institution of Chemical Engineering78(Part B): 288–296.
15.
Ekvall T, Ljunggren-Söderman M, Rydberg T and Stenmarck Å (2006) Background Data for Evaluation of Producer Responsibility Ordinance on Packaging. IVL for Swedish Environmental Protection Agency. Stockholm, Sweden.
16.
EkvallTAssefaGBjörklundAErikssonOFinnvedenG (2007) What life-cycle assessment does and does not do in assessments of waste management. Waste Management27: 989–996.
17.
ErikssonOCarlsson ReichMFrostellBBjörklundAAssefaGSundqvistJ-O (2005) Municipal solid waste managementfrom a systems perspective. Journal of Cleaner Production13: 241–252.
18.
ErikssonOFinnvedenGEkvallTBjörklundA (2007) Life cycle assessment of fuels for district heating: A comparison of waste incineration, biomass- and natural gas incineration. Energy Policy35: 1346–1362.
19.
Frees, N., Søes Hansen, M., Mørck Ottosen, L., Tønning, K. and Wenzel, H. ( 2005) Environmental aspects of recycling of paper and cardboard: update of the knowledge (in Danish) Miljøprojekt Nr. 1057. Miljøstyrelsen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
20.
FruergaardTAstrupTEkvallT (2009) Energy use and recovery in waste management and implications for accounting of greenhouse gases and global warming contributions. Waste Management and Research27: 724–737.
21.
HageO (2006) The Swedish producer responsibility for paper packaging: an effective waste management policy?Resources, Conservation and Recycling51: 314–344.
22.
IAI (2007). Life Cycle Assessment of Aluminium: Inventory Data for the Worldwide Primary Aluminium Industry, 2005, updated September 2007. Retrieved from www.world-aluminium.org (accessed December 2009).
23.
IPPC (2001) Reference Document on Best Available Techniques in the Glass Manufacturing Industry. European Commission, Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control (IPPC), December, 2001. Brussels, Belgium.
24.
ISO (1997) ISO 14040 Environmental Management – Life Cycle Assessment – Principles and Framework. International Standard Organization. Retrieved from www.iso.org Geneva, Switzerland. (accessed December 2009).
25.
ISO (2000) ISO Draft International Standard 14042 Environmental Management – Life Cycle Assessment – Life Cycle Impact Assessment. International Standard Organization. Geneva, Switzerland. Retrieved from www.iso.org (accessed December 2009).
26.
ISO (2006) ISO 14040. Environmental Management. Life Cycle Assessment – Principles and Framework. International Standard Organization. Geneva, Switzerland. Retrieved from www.iso.org (accessed December 2009).
Johansson, C. (2008). Supervisor at Karpalund Biogasplant, Kristianstad, Sweden. Personal communication, November, 2008.
29.
KirkebyJBirgisdottirHLund HansenTChristensenTHSingh BhanderGHauschildM (2006) Environmental assessment of solid waste systems and technologies: EASEWASTE. Waste Management and Research24: 3–15.
30.
Kromann L, Madsen AS, Schmidt JH and Mathiesen BV (2004) Food Waste from Industrial Kitchen. Food Waste from Large-scale Catering Establishments (in Danish).
31.
Krutwagen B (2009) PRIOR: a CO2 footprint tool for municipality solid waste management. Conference paper presented at ISWA yearly congress, Lisbon, 2009.
32.
la Cour Jansen J, Christensen TH, Davidsson Å, Lund Hansen T, Jönsson H and Kirkeby J (2007) Biowaste – Decision Support Tool for Collection and Treatment of Source-sorted Organic Municipal Solid Waste. Copenhagen: Nordic Council of Ministers, TemaNord 2007: 602.
33.
Larsen, A.W., Merrild, H. and Christensen, T. H (2009). Recycling of glass: accounting of greenhouse gases and global warming contributions. Waste Management and Research, 27: 754–762.
34.
Lindahl M, Rydh CJ and Tingström J (2002) A Tutorial on Life-cycle Assessment. Kalmar University: Faculty for Technology.
35.
Lindfors L-G, Christiansen K, Hoffmann L, Virtanen Y, Juntilla V, Hanssen OJ, et al. (1995) Nordic Guidelines on Life-Cycle Assessment. Nord 1995:20. Copenhagen: Nordic Council of Ministers.
36.
Lindgren, M., Pettersson, O., Hansson, P.A. and Norèn, O (2002). Enginge load pattern and engine exhaust gas emissions from off-road vehicles and methods to reduce fuel consumption and engine exhaust gas emissions. Report Agriculture and Industry 308, Swedish Institute of Agricultural and Enviornmental Engineering, (JTI), Uppsala, Sweden.
37.
Lood B (2009) Stora Enso, Hyltebruk, Sweden. Personal communication.
38.
Mathiesen vadMMünsterMFruergaardT (2009) Uncertainties related to the identification of the marginal energy technology in consequential life cycle assessments. Journal of Cleaner Production17: 1331–1338.
39.
MattssonCHBergP-EOClarksonPA (2003) The +development of systems for property close collection of recyclables: experiences from Sweden and England. Resources, Conservation and Recycling38: 39–57.
40.
McDougall FR, White P, Francke M and Hindle P (2001) Integrated Solid Waste Management – A Lifecycle Inventory, 2nd edition. London, UK: Procter & Gamble, Blackwell Science Ltd.
41.
MerrildHDamgaardAChristensenTH (2008) Life cycle assessment of waste paper management: The importance of technology data and system boundaries in assessing recycling and incineration. Resources, Conservation & Recycling52: 1391–1398.
42.
OVAKO BAR (2007) Environmental Report 2007. OVAKO BAR AB, Smedjebacken, Sweden.
43.
Petersen, C. and Domela, I. (2003). Composition of household waste and home composting (in Danish). Environmental Project, 868, Danish EPA, Copenhagen, Denmark.
44.
RebitzerGEkvallTFrischknechtRHunkelerDNorrisGRydbergT (2004) Life cycle assessment Part 1: Framework, goal and scope definition, inventory analysis, and applications. Environmental International30: 701–720.
45.
Reforsk (2001). Karakterisering av avfallsflöden från svenska hushåll [Characterization of waste flows from Swedish households]. Reforsk FoU report, 155. (in Swedish). Stockholm/Helsingborg, Sweden.
46.
RiberCChristensenTH (2006a) Method for fractional solid waste sampling and chemical analysis. International Journal of Environmental Analytical Chemistry87: 321–336.
47.
Riber C and Christensen TH (2006b) Måling af tungmetaller i dansk dagrenovation og småt brændbart. Danish EPA, Miljøprojekt nr. 1085 (in Danish). Copenhagen, Denmark.
48.
RigamontiLGrossoMSunseriMC (2009) Influence of assumptions about selection and recycling efficiencies on the LCA of integrated waste management systems. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment14: 411–419.
SahlinJKnutssonDEkvallT (2004) Effects of planned expansion of waste incineration in the Swedish district heating systems. Resources, Conservation and Recycling41: 279–292.
Schmidt A and Strömberg K (2006) Genanvendelse i LCA – systemudvidelse [Recycling in LCA – system expansions] Danish EPA, Miljønyt nr. 81. (in Danish). Copenhagen, Denmark.
53.
SFS (1994a) SFS 1994:1205, Ordinance. on Producer Responsibility for Waste Paper. Swedish Code of Statutes (in Swedish).
54.
SFS (1994b) SFS 1994:1235, Ordinance on Producer Responsibility for Packaging Materials. Swedish Code of Statutes (in Swedish).
55.
SFS (2001) Swedish Landfill Directive. Swedish Code of Statutes 2001:512. (in Swedish).
56.
SGC (2008) Emissions at incineration of fossil gas in heavy vehicles (10ton). Svenskt Gascentrum, web page www.sgc.se Accessed.
57.
SGÅ (2008) Environmental Report 2008. Svensk Glasåtervinning AB. (accessed December 2009).
58.
Sköldberg H, Unger T and Olofsson M (2006) Marginal Electricity and Environmental Evaluation of Electricity. SFS (in Swedish). Elforsk rapport 06:52 (in Swedish). Stockholm, Sweden.
59.
SSAB (2009). Sustainability Report 2009. Retrieved from www.ssab.com (accessed December 2009).
Stora Enso, Fiskebybruk (2007) Environmental Report 2007. SFS (in Swedish).Stora Enso AB, Fiskebybruk, Sweden.
62.
Stora Enso, Hyltebruk (2008) Environmental Report 2008. Stora Enso, Hyltebruk, Sweden.
63.
Stora Enso, Skogshall Mill (2007) Environmental Report 2007. Stora Enso, Skogshall Mill, Skogshall, Sweden.
64.
Stranddorf HK, Hoffmann L and Schmidt A (2005) Update on Impact Categories, Normalisation and Weighting in LCA – Selected EDIP97–data. FORCE Technology Environmental Project. Danish EPA, Copenhagen, Denmark.
65.
Sundqvist J-O, Baky A, Björklund A, Carlsson M, Eriksson O, Frostell B, et al. (1999) Systems Analysis of Energy Utilization of Waste – Evaluation of Energy, Environment and Economy. IVL Swedish Environmental Institute (in Swedish).
66.
Swedish Energy Agency (2009) The Energy Situation 2008. Swedish Energy Agency (in Swedish).
Sysav (2009). Sysav Envirnomental Report, 2009. Retrieved from www.sysav.se (accessed January 2010).
69.
Sävenesverket (2008) Environmental Report Göteborg Energi AB. Gothemburg, Sweden.
70.
Tillman, A.M., Ekvall, T. and Baumann, H. (1994). Choice of system boundaries in life cycle assessment. Journal of Cleaner Production 2: 21–29.
71.
Tyskeng S and Finnveden G (2007) Energy and Environmental differences between Material Recycling and Energy Utilization of Waste – a Literature Review. Stockholm: KTH, TRITA-INFRA-FMS 2007:11. (in Swedish).
72.
Udo de Haes, H. A., O. Jolliet, G. Finnveden, M. Hauschild, W. Krewitt, and R. Müller-Wenk (1999a). Best available practice regarding impact categories and category indicators in Life Cycle Impact Assessment, background document for the second working group on Life Cycle Impact Assessment of SETAC-Europe. Part 1. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 4: 66–74.
73.
Udo de Haes, H. A., O. Jolliet, G. Finnveden, M. Hauschild, W. Krewitt, and R. Müller-Wenk (1999b). Best available practice regarding impact categories and category indicators in Life Cycle Impact Assessment, background document for the second working group on Life Cycle Impact Assessment of SETAC-Europe. Part 2. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 4: 167–174.
74.
Uppenberg S, Almemark M, Brandel M, Lindfors L-G, Marcus H-O and Stripple H (2001) Environmental Factbook for Fuel Part 1, Main Report. Stockholm: IVL Swedish Environmental Institute, Report B 1334A-2 (in Swedish).
75.
Volvo (2003) Emission Data from Volvo Lastvagnar AB, Lorry with 40 ton Loading Capacity. Volvo Lastvagnar AB, Gothemburg, Sweden.
76.
WhitePFranckeMHindleP (1995) Integrated Solid Waste Management – A Lifecycle Inventory. London: Chapman and Hall.
