The aim of this study was to investigate the possibility of measuring methane emission fluxes, using surface methane concentration and gauge pressure, by analyzing the influence of gauge pressure on the methane emission flux and the surface methane concentration, as well as the correlation between the methane emission flux and surface methane concentrations. The surface methane concentration was measured using a laser methane detector. Our results show a positive linear relationship between the surface methane concentration and the methane emission flux. Furthermore, the methane emission flux showed a positive linear relationship with the gauge pressure; this implies that when the surface methane concentration and the surface gauge pressure are measured simultaneously, the methane emission flux can be calculated using Darcy’s law. A decrease in the vertical permeability was observed when the gauge pressure was increased, because reducing the vertical permeability may lead to a reduced landfill gas emission to the atmosphere, and landfill gas would be accumulated inside the landfill. Finally, this method is simple and can allow for a greater number of measurements during a relatively shorter period. Thus, it provides a better representation of the significant space and time variations in methane emission fluxes.
BellaCDTrapaniDDVivianiG (2011) Evaluation of methane emissions from Palermo municipal landfill: Comparison between field measurements and models. Waste Management31: 1820–1826.
2.
BoeckxPCleemputOVVillaralvoI (1996) Methane emission from a landfill and the methane oxidizing capacity of its covering soil. Soil Biology & Biochemistry28: 1397–1405.
3.
CardelliniCChiodiniGFrondiniF. (2003) Accumulation chamber measurements of methane fluxes: application to volcanic-geothermal areas landfills. Applied Geochemistry18: 45–54.
4.
ChagundaMGGRossDRobertsDJ (2009) On the use of a laser methane detector in dairy cows. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture68: 157–160.
5.
ChenYCChenKSWuCH (2003) Numerical simulation of gas flow around a passive vent in a sanitary landfill. Journal of Hazardous Materials100: 39–52.
6.
ChristophersenMKjeldsenP (2001) Lateral gas transport in soil adjacent to an old landfill: factors governing gas migration. Waste Management & Research19: 579–594.
7.
CzepielPMShorterJHMosherB. (2003) The influence of atmospheric pressure on landfill methane emissions. Waste Management23: 593–598.
8.
FécilBHérouxMGuyC (2003) Development of a method for the measurement of net methane emissions from MSW landfills, Sardinia 2003. In: Proceedings of ninth international waste management and landfill symposium, 1–5 October, Sardinia, Italy.
9.
FranzidisJPHérouxMNastevM. (2008) Lateral migration and offsite surface emission of landfill gas at City of Montreal Landfill Site. Waste Management & Research26: 121–131.
10.
FredenslundAMScheutzCKjeldsenP (2010) Tracer method to measure landfill gas emissions from leachate collection systems. Waste Management30: 2146–2152.
11.
GebertJGroengroeftA (2006) Passive landfill gas emission – Influence of atmospheric pressure and implications for the operation of methane-oxidising biofilters. Waste Management26: 245–251.
12.
GeorgakiISoupiosPSakkasN. (2008) Evaluating the use of electrical resistivity imaging technique for improving CH4 and CO2 emission rate estimations in landfills. Science of the Total Environment389: 522–531.
13.
GovindanSSAgamuthuP (2014) Quantification of landfill methane using modified Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’s waste model and error function analysis. Waste Management & Research32: 1005–1014.
14.
HérouxMGuyCMilletteD (2010) A statistical model for landfill surface emissions. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association60: 219–228.
15.
JerezAADiaz-RoblesLAVergara-FernándezAO (2013) Generation and dispersion model of gaseous emissions from sanitary landfills, Electronic Journal of Energy & Environment1: 9–24.
16.
JonesHANedwellDB (1990) Soil atmosphere concentration profiles and methane emission rates in the restoration covers above landfill sites: equipment and preliminary results. Waste Management and Research8: 21–31.
17.
LanerDFellnerJBrunnerPH (2012) Site-specific criteria for the completion of landfill aftercare. Waste Management & Research30: 88–99.
18.
LiuCNChenRHChenKS (2006) Unsaturated consolidation theory for the prediction of long-term municipal solid waste landfill settlement. Waste Management & Research24: 80–91.
19.
LjungbergSÅMeijerJERosqvistH. (2009) Detection and Quantification of Methane Leakage from Landfills. Svenskt Gastekniskt Center, ISRN SGC-R-204-SE, Report SGC 204.
20.
McBainMCWarlandJSMcBrideRA. (2005) Micrometeorological measurements of N2O and CH4 emissions from a municipal solid waste landfill. Waste Management & Research23: 409–419.
21.
NastevMTherrienRLefebvreR. (2001) Gas production and migration in landfills and geological materials. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology52: 187–211.
22.
ParkJKLeeWJBanJK. (2015) Estimation of CH4 oxidation efficiency in an interim landfill cover soil using CO2/CH4 ratios. Environmental Engineering Research20: 191–197.
23.
PirkleRJWyattDELooneyBB (1993) The effect of barometric pumping on the migration of volatile organic compounds from the vadose zone into the atmosphere. In: National symposium on measuring and interpreting VOCs in soils – State of the art and research needs, Nevada, USA, 12–14January.
24.
PoulsenTGMøldrupP (2006) Evaluating effects of wind-induced pressure fluctuations on soil-atmosphere gas exchange at a landfill using stochastic modelling. Waste Management & Research24: 473–481.
25.
PoulsenTGChristophersenMMoldrupP. (2003) Relating landfill gas emissions to atmospheric pressure using numerical modelling and state-space analysis. Waste Management & Research21: 356–366.
26.
SharpJMFuLCortezP. (1994) An electronic minipermeameter for use in the field and laboratory. Ground Water32: 41–46.
27.
ScheutzCKjeldsenPBognerJ. (2009) Microbial methane oxidation processes and technologies for mitigation of landfill gas emission. Waste Management & Research27: 409–455.
28.
SormunenKLaurilaTRintalaJ (2013) Determination of waste decay rate for a large Finnish landfill by calibrating methane generation models on the basis of methane recovery and emissions. Waste Management & Research31: 979–985.
29.
SpringerDSLoaicigaHACullenSJ. (1998) Air permeability of porous materials under controlled laboratory conditions. Ground Water36: 558–565.
30.
StachowitzWHEnderFMatternM (2013) Methane detection at the surface of landfill sites and biogas plants, Sardinia 2013. In: Proceedings of fourteenth international waste management and landfill symposium, Sardinia, Italy, 1–5 October.
31.
TanikawaNFurichiTIshiiK. (2004) Development of a convenient method for monitoring of methane in ambient air at landfill sites using a portable open path analyzer, APLAS 2004. In: Proceedings of third Asia-Pacific landfill symposium, Kitakyushu, Japan, 27–29 October.
32.
TrapaniDBellaGDVivianiG (2013) Uncontrolled methane emissions from a MSW landfill surface: Influence of landfill features and side slopes. Waste Management33: 2108–2115.
33.
WangyaoKYamadaMEndoK. (2010) Methane generation rate constant in tropical landfill. Journal of Sustainable Energy & Environment1: 181–184.
34.
XiYXiongH (2013) Numerical simulation of landfill gas pressure distribution in landfills. Waste Management & Research31: 1140–1147.
35.
XuLLinXAmenJ. (2014) Impact of changes in barometric pressure on landfill methane emission. Global Biogeochemical Cycles28: 679–695.
36.
ZhuHLetzelMOReiserM. (2013) A new approach to estimation of methane emission rates from landfills. Waste Management33: 2713–2719.
