Influence of silica–alumina support ratio on H 2 production and catalyst carbon deposition from the Ni-catalytic pyrolysis/reforming of waste tyres

Abstract

The influence of catalyst support alumina–silica in terms of different Al₂O₃ to SiO₂ mole ratios containing 20 wt.% Ni on the production of hydrogen and catalyst coke formation from the pyrolysis-catalysis of waste tyres is reported. A two-stage reactor system was used with pyrolysis of the tyres followed by catalytic reaction. There was only a small difference in the total gas yield and hydrogen yield by changing the Al₂O₃ to SiO₂ mole ratios in the Ni-Al₂O₃/SiO₂ catalyst. The 1:1 ratio of Al₂O₃:SiO₂ ratio produced the highest gas yield of 27.3 wt.% and a hydrogen production of 14.0 mmol g^-1_tyre. Catalyst coke formation decreased from 19.0 to 13.0 wt.% as the Al₂O₃:SiO₂ ratio was changed from 1:1 to 2:1, with more than 95% of the coke being filamentous-type carbon, a large proportion of which was multi-walled carbon nanotubes. Further experiments introduced steam to the second-stage reactor to investigate hydrogen production for the pyrolysis-catalytic steam reforming of the waste tyres using the 1:1 Al₂O₃/SiO₂ nickel catalyst. The introduction of steam produced a marked increase in total gas yield from ~27 wt. % to ~58 wt.%; in addition, hydrogen production was increased to 34.5 mmol g^-1 and there was a reduction in catalyst coke formation to 4.6 wt.%.

Keywords

Waste tyres pyrolysis catalyst hydrogen carbon nanotubes

Introduction

Waste tyre disposal represents a major worldwide problem. In 2014, 4.67 million tonnes of tyres were produced in Europe (ETRMA, 2015), eventually leading to a similar number of waste tyres arising annually to be managed. The current main treatment routes for waste tyres include fuel for cement kilns as a replacement for fossil fuels, recycling as rubber crumb for sports fields or playgrounds, retreading of part worn tyres, civil engineering applications and export (Williams, 2013). However, recently, there has been much interest in advanced thermal treatment technologies such as pyrolysis and gasification as a means of producing higher-value products from waste tyres. For example, the solid char product from pyrolysis of the tyres can be upgraded to produce high surface area activated carbons (Cunliffe and Williams, 1998; Nunes et al., 2011; Zabaniotou et al., 2004). In addition, the product oil and gas can be upgraded for the production of high-grade liquid fuels, hydrogen or aromatic chemicals (Leung and Wang, 2003; Williams, 2013; Williams and Brindle, 2003; Xiao et al., 2008; Zhang et al., 2015).

The production of hydrogen from waste tyres has been investigated by only a few research groups (Elbaba and Williams, 2012; Lerner et al., 2012). However, there is predicted to be high demand for hydrogen in the future to support the proposed hydrogen economy. Whilst hydrogen is currently mostly produced from fossil fuels, production of waste materials such as waste tyres would represent a novel route to recycle waste tyres. Alternative feedstocks for hydrogen production have included biomass, waste plastics and municipal solid waste (Wang et al., 2012; Wu and Williams, 2009a).

Catalysts are extensively used for increasing hydrogen yield from the steam reforming of hydrocarbon sources (Sutton et al., 2001; Wu and Williams, 2009a). Catalysts containing metals such as Ru, Pt and Rh have been shown to be effective for hydrogen production; however, nickel is a preferred metal due to its low cost (Sehested, 2006; Srinakruang et al., 2005). The type of support used to support the nickel will also influence the catalytic activity of the catalyst through the characteristics of surface area, porous structure and mechanical strength, and chemical interaction between the metal and catalyst. For example, Miyazawa et al. (2006) investigated the performance of nickel-based catalysts on various supports for the steam reforming of tars from biomass pyrolysis. The catalyst supports tested were Al₂O₃, ZrO₂, TiO₂, CeO₂ and Ni/MgO. It was reported that the production of hydrogen was influenced by the support material, with Ni/Al₂O₃, Ni/ZrO₂ and Ni/TiO₂ catalysts producing the largest hydrogen yields. The interaction between the nickel and the support was shown to influence the metal dispersion and the size of the metal particles, which in turn affected catalyst activity. Wu and Williams (2009a) reported on the use of Ni/Al₂O₃, Ni/MgO, Ni/CeO₂ and Ni/ZSM-5 catalysts with 10 wt.% nickel for the pyrolysis-catalytic steam reforming of waste plastics. The Ni/MgO catalyst produced the lowest yield of hydrogen and the Ni/ZSM-5 catalyst the highest yield, which could be linked with the surface area of the catalysts. In addition, Ni/Al₂O₃ and Ni/CeO₂ catalysts also showed significant amounts of carbon deposition. Inaba et al. (2006) investigated Ni/SiO₂, Ni/ZrO₂, Ni/CeO₂ and a series of zeolites for use as catalysts in hydrogen production from the gasification of cellulose. The highest hydrogen yield was with the Ni/SiO₂ catalyst. Srinakruang et al. (2005) investigated the gasification of tar using nickel catalysts supported on SiO₂–Al₂O₃, Al₂O₃ and dolomite. The nickel catalysts on SiO₂–Al₂O₃ and Al₂O₃ produced larger amounts of carbon deposition than the Ni-dolomite catalyst, which led to deactivation.

Alumina (Al₂O₃) is the most commonly used catalyst support for nickel for investigations of hydrogen production because of its effectiveness in hydrogen production and its chemical and physical stability and mechanical strength (Simell et al., 1997). However, the deactivation of the Ni/Al₂O₃ catalyst by carbon (coke) deposition and sintering are problematic (Sehested, 2006). Nickel catalysts with a SiO₂ support have also shown to be effective for hydrogen production (Blanco et al., 2014; Inaba et al., 2006; Sutton et al., 2001) and are also low cost. Mixed alumina–silica supports would generate surface acid groups, which could enhance the activity of supported Ni catalysts due to the bifunctional property. It is therefore interesting to compare Ni-based catalysts with different Al₂O₃/SiO₂ ratios for their effectiveness as a nickel catalyst support for hydrogen production and also in terms of detrimental catalyst coke deposition. Using waste tyres as feedstock for hydrogen production also extends the knowledge in relation to this lesser researched feedstock for hydrogen production.

In this paper, the effect of the Al₂O₃ to SiO₂ ratio in Ni-based catalysts for the production of hydrogen from waste tyres has been investigated. Ni/Al₂O₃/SiO₂ catalysts containing 20 wt.% nickel with four different Al₂O₃ to SiO₂ mole ratios of, 3:5, 1:1, 3:2 and 2:1 were investigated via pyrolysis-catalysis and pyrolysis-catalytic steam reforming of the waste tyre. The influence of different water injection rates introducing steam to the process was also examined to determine the effect on hydrogen production and catalyst coke deposition.

Material and methods

Materials

The waste tyre sample was prepared from shredded truck tyres by removing the metal and cutting into particles of ∼6 mm. A Carlo Erba Flash EA1112 elemental analyser was used to determine the elemental composition, which was 81.2 wt.% carbon, 7.2 wt.% hydrogen, 0.8 wt.% nitrogen, and 2.1 wt.% sulphur (Zhang et al., 2015).

The catalysts used in the experiments were 20 wt.% Ni/Al₂O₃/SiO₂ catalysts with four different Al₂O₃ to SiO₂ mole ratios (3:5, 1:1, 3:2, 2:1). The catalysts were synthesized by an incipient wetness method, where 20 wt.% of Ni was impregnated onto the alumina–silica mixture support that was prepared by a sol-gel method. Silica and aluminium isopropoxide were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich and were the precursors for the silica and alumina. The calculated amounts of SiO₂ powder and aluminium isopropoxide powder were mixed with distilled water, followed by filtering the solution with distilled water. The obtained Al(OH)₃-SiO₂ mixtures were aged in air overnight and kept in an oven at 40°C for 1 day. Finally, the dry solids were ground into fine powder as catalyst support for the impregnation preparation step. The 20 wt.% nickel was impregnated on the Al₂O₃ and SiO₂ matrix support via dissolution of the calculated amount of nickel nitrate in ethanol. The Al₂O₃ and SiO₂ catalyst support was then added with continuous stirring until the mixture became a slurry. The impregnation process ended with drying the slurry in an oven overnight to evaporate all of the moisture. The last step was to calcine the dry solids at 750°C in an air atmosphere with a heating rate of 2°C min^-1 and holding time of 3 hours.

Experimental system

The reactor for the pyrolysis-reforming of waste tyres consisted of a two-stage fixed bed reactor. Figure 1 shows the schematic diagram of the experimental system. After being pyrolysed in the first pyrolysis stage, the gas products from the tyres are passed directly to the second stage where either catalysis or catalytic reforming takes place (Elbaba and Williams, 2013; Elbaba et al., 2010; Zhang et al., 2015).

Figure 1.

Schematic diagram of the two-stage fixed bed reactor system.

The reactors for both stages were constructed of stainless steel with a diameter of 2.2 cm and a height of 16 cm. The two stages are heated separately by two external electrical heaters, which controlled the heating rate and the target temperature for the experiments. Both of the stages were purged with nitrogen gas continually. The real-time internal temperatures of the reactors were monitored by thermocouples near the catalyst and tyre sample (Elbaba and Williams, 2012).

The reforming and pyrolysis temperature was 800 and 600°C, respectively. In each of the experiments, 1.0 g tyre sample and 0.5 g catalyst were introduced. The heating rate of the pyrolysis stage was 10°C min^-1 to the final temperature of 600°C, and was held at that temperature for 20 minutes. No steam was introduced to the experiments with different SiO₂:Al₂O₃ ratios catalysts. Experiments with steam reforming were performed with different water injection rates where experiments were carried out with the catalyst which produced the highest hydrogen yield.

Analytical methods

X-ray diffraction was used to identify the composition of the freshly prepared catalysts. The gaseous products from the pyrolysis-reforming of the waste tyres were collected by a Tedlar™ gas sample bag, and further analysed by packed column gas chromatography (GC). Permanent gases which included H₂, CO, O₂, N₂ and CO₂ were analysed by a Varian 3380 GC/TCD with a 2 m long, 2 mm diameter and 60–80 mm mesh molecular sieve packed column. Hydrocarbons including C₁–C₄ were analysed by a Varian 3380 with a flame ionization detector with 80–100 mesh HayeSep column and nitrogen carrier gas. The gases are reported on a nitrogen-free basis.

Thermogravimetric analyser-temperature programmed oxidation (TGA-TPO) was used to analyse the reacted catalysts to investigate the types of carbon formed during the pyrolysis-catalytic/reforming of waste tyres. Raman spectroscopy was used to determine the degree of graphitization of the carbon productions. The results were obtained using a Renshaw Invia Raman spectrometer at a wavelength of 514 nm and Raman shifts between 100 and 3000 cm^-1. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and transmission microscopy (TEM) were used to observe the surface characteristics of the fresh and reacted catalysts to help determine the structure of the carbon deposition on the catalyst surface. The instruments used were a Hitachi SU8230 SEM and a FEI Tecnai TF20 TEM.

Results and discussion

Product yields and gas composition

Influence of different Al₂O₃ to SiO₂ ratios for the pyrolysis-catalysis of waste tyres

Table 1 shows the product yield from pyrolysis-catalysis of waste tyres with different 20 wt.% Ni/Al₂O₃/SiO₂ catalysts in relation to different Al₂O₃ to SiO₂ ratios. The solid residue left after pyrolysis, carbon on the catalyst and oil were measured by the weight difference before and after reaction. The gas yield was calculated by comparing the concentration of product gases and reference gas (nitrogen). The results produced a mass balance of between 94 and 95 wt.%, where errors could occur from condensation of heavy molecular weight hydrocarbons within the reactor, or variations in the flow rate of nitrogen carrier gas, etc.

Table 1.

Product yields and gas concentrations from the pyrolysis-catalysis of waste tyres with a 20 wt.% Ni/Al₂O₃/SiO₂ catalyst with different Al₂O₃ to SiO₂ ratios (3:5, 1:1, 3:2 and 2:1).

Al₂O₃:SiO₂ ratio	3:5	1:1	3:2	2:1
Gas yield (wt.%)	23.3	27.3	25.9	25.3
Liquid yield (wt.%)	14.0	13.0	15.0	17.0
Residue (wt.%)	39.0	36.0	39.0	39.0
Catalyst coke (wt.%)	18.0	19.0	14.0	13.0
Hydrogen production (mmol g^-1_tyre)	11.5	14.0	12.0	12.0
CO production (mmol g^-1_tyre)	2.4	3.3	2.6	2.3
Syngas production (mmol g^-1_tyre)	13.9	17.3	14.6	14.3
Gas concentrations (vol. %)
CO	11.6	13.3	11.9	10.7
H₂	55.1	56.1	54.9	55.0
CH₄	23.3	22.0	21.4	20.9
CO₂	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0
C₂–C₄	4.8	4.5	6.0	4.6
Calorific value (MJ m^-3)	20.0	19.5	20.7	18.7

From Table 1, the results show that as the Al₂O₃ to SiO₂ ratio was increased, the influence on hydrogen production was small, with the highest amount of 14.0 mmol g^-1 hydrogen produced at the Al₂O₃:SiO₂ ratio of 1:1. The calorific values of the produced gases did not change significantly by changing the Al₂O₃ to SiO₂ ratios, which were in the range of 18.7 to 20.7 MJ m^-3. There was no significant difference in liquid yield between the different catalysts with different Al₂O₃ to SiO₂ ratios. It can be concluded that the catalyst with an Al₂O₃:SiO₂ ratio 1:1 showed the best performance in terms of the gas yield and hydrogen production. Table 1 shows that the increased content of Al₂O₃ in the 20 wt.% Ni/Al₂O₃/SiO₂ catalyst at the higher Al₂O₃ to SiO₂ ratio produced reduced amounts of catalyst carbon deposition, decreasing from ~18/19 to ~13 wt.%.

Influence of different water injection rates

The 20 wt.% nickel catalyst at a Al₂O₃ to SiO₂ ratio of 1:1 produced the highest yield of hydrogen in the pyrolysis-catalysis experiments. Therefore, further work was carried out to increase the production of hydrogen from the waste tyres by introducing steam (injected water) to the second stage to produce a pyrolysis-catalytic steam reforming process. Table 2 shows the product yields and gas compositions from waste tyre pyrolysis-catalytic steam reforming with the 20 wt.% Ni/Al₂O₃/SiO₂ (1:1) catalyst at different water injection rates. The gas yields with water injection rate at 2 and 5 ml h^-1 were similar at 58.0 and 57.8 wt.%, respectively, which were much higher than the experiments without water at only 27.3 wt.%. The hydrogen production from the process showed a similar trend, at 14.0, 33.8 and 34.5 mmol g^-1 for the water injection rates of 0, 2 and 5 ml h^-1, respectively.

Table 2.

Product yields and gas concentrations from the pyrolysis-steam reforming of waste tyres with a 20 wt.% Ni/Al₂O₃/SiO₂ catalyst with an Al₂O₃:SiO₂ ratio of 1:1 at different water injection rates (No water, 2 and 5 ml h^-1).

Tyre + 20%Ni/Al₂O₃/SiO₂
In relation to sample & reacted water	No water	2ml h^-1	5ml h^-1
Gas yield (wt.%)	27.3	58.0	57.8
Oil yield (wt.%)	13.0	2.7	7.0
Residue (wt.%)	36.0	26.3	24.6
Catalyst coke (wt.%)	19.0	10.1	4.6
Mass balance (wt.%)	95.3	97.2	94.0
Hydrogen production (mmol g^-1_tyre)	14.0	33.8	34.5
CO production (mmol g^-1_tyre)	3.3	11.41	10.48
Syngas production (mmol g^-1_tyre)	17.3	45.22	45.00
Gas concentrations (vol. %)
CO	13.26	19.11	17.41
H₂	56.06	56.65	57.33
CH₄	22.01	8.43	8.52
CO₂	0.00	12.80	14.58
C₂–C₄	4.47	1.55	1.75
Reacted water (g)	None	0.48	0.50
In relation to sample only
Gas yield (wt.%)	27.34	85.90	87.03
Oil yield (wt.%)	13.00	4.04	10.46
Residue (wt.%)	36.00	39.00	37.00
Catalyst coke (wt.%)	19.00	15.00	7.00
Mass balance (wt.%)	95.34	143.94	141.49
Calorific value (MJ m^-3)	19.47	13.31	10.72

These increases in total gas yield and hydrogen production are attributed to the reacted water, since at a water injection rate of 5 ml h^-1 the reacted water was 0.5 g, whereas at 2 ml h^-1 the reacted water was 0.48 g. Table 2 also shows the calorific values of the gas product. The results show that as the water injection rate was increased from 0 to 5 ml h^-1, there was decrease in the calorific value of the product gases, from 19.47 to 10.72 MJ m^-3, due mainly to the decrease of the methane and C₂–C₄ hydrocarbons due to the catalytic steam reforming process of these hydrocarbons.

Table 2 shows that the product oil and carbon deposition on the catalyst decreased as the amount of water injected into the second stage reforming process was increased. Wu and Williams (2009b) reported that increasing water flow rate contributes to a significant decrease of carbon deposition on the catalyst in their experiments in relation to hydrogen production from the pyrolysis-catalytic reforming of polypropylene. The results show the oil yields were 13.0, 2.7 and 7.0 wt.% at water injection rates of 0, 2 and 5 ml h^-1, respectively. It should be noted that Table 2 shows data calculated in relation to the amount of injected water and reacted water, which shows that there was 36.00 wt.% of residue with no water added, with 2 and 5 ml h^-1 water injections, the pyrolysis residues decreased to 26.34 and 24.59 wt.%. However, determination of the pyrolysis residue in relation to tyre sample weight produced pyrolysis residue data that were very similar 37±2 wt.% (as was also shown in Table 1). Table 2 also shows that the CO concentration increased up to 19.11 and 17.41 vol.% from 13.26 vol.% with the introduction of water injection at the rates of 2 and 5 ml h^-1. The CO₂ concentration increased from 0 vol.% to 12.80 and 14.58 vol.% at water injection rates of 2 and 5 ml h^-1. The increase of water injection rate produced a reduction in CH₄ and C₂-C₄ hydrocarbons through steam reforming reactions. The CH₄ concentration was 22.01 vol.% without water in the experiment, but decreased to 8.43 and 8.52 vol.% at water injection rates of 2 and 5 ml h^-1, and C₂–C₄ concentrations decreased from 4.47 vol.% at no water addition to 1.55 and 1.75 vol.% at water injection rates of 2 and 5 ml h^-1, respectively.

Turn et al. (1998) found similar results in their experiments for biomass, where an increase of steam to biomass ratio produced an increase in H₂ and CO₂ yields. Further increasing steam to the process to high levels can saturate the catalyst surface and reduce hydrogen production; also, higher water inputs require more energy for steam generation (Wu and Williams, 2009b).

Characteristics of the produced carbon

Influences of different Al₂O₃ to SiO₂ ratios

The reacted Ni/Al₂O₃/SiO₂ catalysts with different Al₂O₃ to SiO₂ ratios were further analysed by TGA-TPO. For this analysis the weight loss is mainly due to the oxidation of carbon production on the catalyst surface. Figure 2 shows the TGA-TPO and differential thermogravimetric (DTG)-TPO results of the carbon oxidation for the reacted catalysts in relation to Al₂O₃ to SiO₂ ratio. It can be observed that there are two peaks for all the four different catalysts in the DTG-TPO figure. All of these four DTG-TPO curves show similar trends. There were no peaks below 600°C for any of the catalysts; this could be attributed to the lack of formation of amorphous carbon on the catalyst surface, since such carbons are known to oxidize at lower temperature. Musumeci et al. (2007) have suggested that the amorphous carbons are easily oxidized from the surface of the nickel-based catalyst.

Figure 2.

TPO and DTG-TPO results of different used 20 wt.% Ni/Al₂O₃/SiO₂ catalysts with different Al₂O₃ to SiO₂ ratios from pyrolysis-catalysis of waste tyres.

The oxidation peaks for all of the catalysts are present at similar temperatures, in which the first peak occurs at around 600°C and the second peak arises between 650°C and 675°C. The first peak could indicate the oxidization of filamentous carbon which has less graphitization and which is of smaller size. The second oxidization peak could indicate the oxidization of filamentous carbon of larger size and with a higher degree of graphitization. In addition, carbon nanotubes are reported to oxidize at a high temperature above 600°C (Wu and Williams, 2010); Musumeci et al. (2007) also suggested that the more graphitic filamentous carbon are more stable and oxidize at higher temperature with a sharp oxidation peak. Therefore, from the TPO results it can be suggested that the carbon produced in these experiments is mostly filamentous-type carbon with different degrees of graphitization. Examination of the corresponding SEM images, shown in Figure 3, also confirms that the carbon formed on the catalyst surface is mostly filamentous carbon. The corresponding TEM images, shown in Figure 4, also confirm that a large proportion of the filamentous carbon is multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs). The first oxidation peaks in the DTG-TPO curves for the Ni catalysts with Al₂O₃ to SiO₂ support ratios of 3:2 and 1:1 are produced at lower temperatures than the other two Al₂O₃ to SiO₂ ratios. This can be assigned to the diameters of the MWCNTs produced with Al₂O₃ to SiO₂ ratios at 3:2 and 1:1 catalysts, which are smaller than the MWCNTs produced with ratios at 3:5 and 2:1 catalyst from the waste tyre pyrolysis-catalysis process. The TEM images in Figure 4 confirm the difference in diameters of the MWCNTs. The inner diameters of the MWCNTs produced with catalysts with Al₂O₃ to SiO₂ ratios at 3:5, 1:1, 3:2 and 2:1 are approximately 36 nm, 18 nm, 11 nm (and 20 nm) and 25 nm, respectively.

Figure 3.

SEM images of carbon deposited on the different reacted 20 wt.% Ni/Al₂O₃/SiO₂ catalysts with different Al₂O₃ to SiO₂ ratios derived from pyrolysis-catalysis of waste tyres.

Figure 4.

TEM images of carbon deposited on different reacted 20 wt.% Ni/Al₂O₃/SiO₂ catalysts with different Al₂O₃ to SiO₂ ratios derived from pyrolysis-catalysis of waste tyres.

Fang et al. (2012) suggested that smaller NiO and CeO₂ particles of the catalysts contribute to higher reactivity of the smaller size of filamentous carbon. They reported that the oxidization peak of smaller-diameter filamentous carbons in TPO results is larger and shifted to lower temperature compared with the larger-sized filamentous carbon. The largest inner diameter of carbon nanotubes was produced with the highest SiO₂ content (Al₂O₃:SiO₂ is 3:5) 20 wt.% Ni/Al₂O₃/SiO₂ catalyst. Kukovecz et al. (2000) also found that increasing the amount of silica in the catalyst support slightly increased the thickness of the carbon nanotubes.

Raman spectroscopy analysis was used to determine the degree of graphitization of the carbon deposited on the different catalysts in the pyrolysis-catalysis of waste tyres. The D band, which occurs at the wavelength around 1350 cm^-1, indicates the presence of amorphous carbons or disordered carbons; the G band, which occurs at the wavelength around 1584 com^-1, indicates a graphite carbon structure. The ratio of the intensity of the D band to the intensity of the G band (I_D/I_G) can help to evaluate the graphitization level of the produced carbons (Zhang et al., 2015). Table 3 shows that the I_D/I_G ratios of catalysts with Al₂O₃ to SiO₂ ratios 3:5, 1:1, 3:2, 2:1 are 0.89, 0.93, 0.91, and 0.93, respectively. The lowest I_D/I_G ratio shows the highest graphitization of the carbon produced on the catalyst at Al₂O₃ to SiO₂ ratio was 3:5, suggesting that the carbons produced have the highest crystallinity.

Table 3.

Raman analysis of the catalyst coke from the pyrolysis-catalysis of waste tyres with a 20 wt.% Ni/Al₂O₃/SiO₂ catalyst with different Al₂O₃ to SiO₂ ratios and water injection rates.

A₂O₃:SiO₂ ratio and water injection rate	D(y)	G(y)	I_D/I_G(y/y)
3:5 without water	4160	4680	0.89
1:1 without water	2628	2819	0.93
3:2 without water	3426	3775	0.91
2:1 without water	7212	7729	0.93
1:1 with 2ml h^-1 water	12831	14774	0.87
1:1 with 5ml h^-1 water	6713	7467	0.90

The amounts of the different types of carbon produced on the catalysts are shown in Figure 5. The results show that as the Al₂O₃:SiO₂ ratio was increased from 3:5 to 2:1, the filamentous carbon production increased marginally from 171.68 mg g^-1 waste tyre to 179.12 mg g^-1 at the ratio 1:1 and then decreased to 124.40 mg g^-1.

Figure 5.

Proportion of amorphous and graphitic type carbons formed from the pyrolysis-catalysis of waste tyre with different Al₂O₃ to SiO₂ ratios (3:5, 1:1, 3:2 and 2:1) and different water injection rate (2 and 5 ml h^-1).

Influences of different water injection rates

Figure 6 shows the TPO and DTG-TPO results of the reacted catalysts from pyrolysis-catalytic steam reforming of waste tyres with the 20 wt.% Al₂O₃/SiO₂ catalyst with an Al₂O₃ to SiO₂ ratio of 1:1 at different water injection rates. The results show that the introduction of water leads to a significant decrease in the amount of carbon deposited on the catalyst. Filamentous carbons oxidized at high temperature were observed from the DTG-TPO results. SEM images in Figure 7 confirm filamentous carbon formation. Figure 8 shows the TEM analysis of the filamentous carbons formed with the 20 wt.% Al₂O₃/SiO₂ catalyst (1:1 ratio) and different water injection rates, showing that they are mostly solid carbon fibres. Figure 4 showed earlier that for the 1:1 ratio Al₂O₃/SiO₂ nickel catalyst in the absence of water (steam) input, the deposited carbons were MWCNTs. The Raman analysis of the carbons deposited on the catalysts in relation to input of steam (Table 2) shows that for the I_D/I_G ratios for the deposited carbons for the experiments with 2 and 5 ml h^-1 water injection rates are 0.87 and 0.90, which indicates the lower water injection rate contributes to higher graphitization of carbon formation.

Figure 6.

TPO and DTG-TPO results of used catalysts from pyrolysis-catalysis of waste tyres with 20 wt.% Al₂O₃/SiO₂ catalyst at Al₂O₃ to SiO₂ ratios of 1:1 and pyrolysis-catalytic steam reforming of tyres at different water injection rates (2 and 5 ml h^-1).

Figure 7.

SEM images of carbon deposited on the catalysts from pyrolysis-catalysis of waste tyres with 20 wt.% Al₂O₃/SiO₂ catalyst with Al₂O₃ to SiO₂ ratio of 1:1 at different water injection rates (2 and 5 ml h^-1).

Figure 8.

TEM images of carbon deposited on the catalysts from pyrolysis-catalytic reforming of waste tyres with 20 wt.% Al₂O₃/SiO₂ catalyst with Al₂O₃ to SiO₂ ratio of 1:1 and pyrolysis-catalytic steam reforming of tyres at different water injection rates (2 and 5 ml h^-1).

Figure 3 shows that when water was introduced into the waste tyre pyrolysis-catalytic steam reforming process, less filamentous carbon was produced and less amorphous carbon was produced. As the water injection rate was increased from 0 to 5 ml h^-1, the amount of filamentous carbon production decreased from 179.12 to 46.33 mg g^-1 of waste tyre. Also, the amorphous carbon production decreased simultaneously. Therefore, the water introduction inhibited the carbon production in the waste tyre pyrolysis-catalytic reforming process and also inhibited filamentous carbon production.

The production of MWCNTs identified in this work for certain process conditions might have benefits to the process of hydrogen production instead of causing a problem to catalyst activity. There has been great interest in the application of carbon nanotubes in a wide variety of industrial sectors (Nessim, 2010; de Volder et al., 2013). Carbon nanotubes are currently produced from pure hydrocarbon feedstocks such as methane, benzene, acetylene, etc.; however, there is current interest in the use of waste materials such as plastics as alternative hydrocarbon feedstocks (Acomb et al., 2014; Arena et al., 2006; Chung and Jou, 2005; Liu et al., 2011; Zhang et al., 2008). Waste tyres are produced in large tonnages throughout the world and are usually collected as a separate waste stream, thereby aiding feedstock acquisition. The production of carbon nanotubes in the form of MWCNTs represents a potential valuable by-product from the production of hydrogen from waste tyres.

Conclusions

In this paper, 20 wt.% Ni/Al₂O₃/SiO₂ catalysts with four different Al₂O₃ to SiO₂ mole ratios (3:5, 1:1, 3:2, 2:1) were studied for the pyrolysis-catalysis of waste tyres for hydrogen production and to determine the catalysts carbon deposition. The catalyst with an Al₂O₃ to SiO₂ mole ratio of 1:1 gave the highest gas yield (27.3 wt.%), highest hydrogen production (14.0 mmol/g tyre) and highest syngas production (17.3 mmol/g tyre) when no steam was introduced to the system. In addition, the Ni catalysts with Al₂O₃ to SiO₂ mole ratio 1:1 produced the highest deposition of carbon onto the catalyst at 164 mg g^-1 of waste tyre. The carbon deposits were of the filamentous type and consisted of a large proportion of MWCNTs which have the potential to be of commercial value.

The introduction of steam to the process to produce pyrolysis-catalytic steam reforming of the waste tyres at different water injection rates was also investigated to determine the influence on both hydrogen and catalyst carbon deposition. The results showed that water addition to the process promoted higher hydrogen production and markedly reduced carbon deposition. The maximum yield of hydrogen produced was 34.5 mmol g^-1_tyre at a water input rate of 5 ml h^-1.As the water injection rate was increased from 0 to 5 ml h^-1, the catalyst carbon deposition decreased from 19 to 4.6 wt.%.

Footnotes

Acknowledgements

The authors also gratefully acknowledge the support from Adrian Cunliffe, Hualun Zhu, Chunfei Wu and Jude Onwudili.

Declaration of conflicting interests

The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Funding

The authors disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Sklodowski-Curie grant agreement No. 643322 (FLEXI-PYROCAT). In addition, support from the Faculty’s Energy and Materials Clusters and MCR Scheme from the University of Sydney is acknowledged.

References

Acomb

Williams

(2014) Control of steam input to the pyrolysis-gasification of waste plastics for improved production of hydrogen or carbon nanotubes. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental 147: 571–584.

Arena

Mastellone

Camino

et al . (2006) An innovative process for mass production of multi-wall carbon nanotubes by means of low-cost pyrolysis of polyolefins. Polymer Degradation and Stability 91: 763–768.

Blanco

Onwudili

et al . (2014) Catalytic pyrolysis/gasification of refuse derived fuel for hydrogen production and tar reduction: Influence of nickel to citric acid ratio using Ni/SiO2 catalysts. Waste and Biomass Valorization 5: 625–636.

Chung

Y-H

Jou

(2005) Carbon nanotubes from catalytic pyrolysis of polypropylene. Materials Chemistry and Physics 92: 256–259.

Cunliffe

Williams

(1998) Influence of process conditions on the rate of activation of chars derived from the pyrolysis of used tyres. Energy and Fuels 13: 166–175.

de Volder

MFLD

Tawfick

Baughman

et al . (2013) Carbon nanotubes: Present and future commercial applications. Science 339: 535–539.

Elbaba

Williams

(2012) Two stage pyrolysis-catalytic gasification of waste tires: Influence of process parameters. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental 125: 136–143.

Elbaba

Williams

(2013) High yield hydrogen from the pyrolysis–catalytic gasification of waste tires with a nickel/dolomite catalyst. Fuel 106: 528–536.

Elbaba

Williams

(2010) Catalytic pyrolysis-gasification of waste tire and tire elastomers for hydrogen production. Energy & Fuels 24: 3928–3935.

10.

ETRMA (2015) European Tire & Rubber Manufacturers’ Association, The ETRMA Statistics Report 2015. European Tire & Rubber Manufacturers’ Association: Brussels.

11.

Fang

Pirez

Capron

et al . (2012) Ce-Ni mixed oxide as efficient catalyst for H₂ production and nanofibrous carbon material from ethanol in the presence of water. RSC Advances 2: 9626–9634.

12.

Inaba

Murata

Saito

et al . (2006) Hydrogen production by gasification of cellulose over Ni catalysts supported on Zeolites. Energy & Fuels 20: 432–438.

13.

Kukovecz

Konya

Nagaraju

et al . (2000) Catalytic synthesis of carbon nanotubes over Co, Fe and Ni containing conventional and sol–gel silica–aluminas. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics 2: 3071–3076.

14.

Lerner

Bratsev

Popov

et al . (2012) Production of hydrogen-containing gas using the process of steam-plasma gasification of used tires. Glass Physics and Chemistry 38: 511–516.

15.

Leung

DYC

Wang

(2003) Fluidized-bed gasification of waste tire powders. Fuel Processing Technology 84: 175–196.

16.

Liu

Jiang

et al . (2011) Catalytic pyrolysis of polypropylene to synthesize carbon nanotubes and hydrogen through a two-stage process. Polymer Degradation and Stability 96: 1711–1719.

17.

Miyazawa

Kimura

Nishikawa

et al . (2006) Catalytic performance of supported Ni catalysts in partial oxidation and steam reforming of tar derived from the pyrolysis of wood biomass. Catalysis Today 115: 254–262.

18.

Musumeci

Silva

Martens

et al . (2007) Thermal decomposition and electron microscopy studies of single-walled carbon nanotubes. Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry 88: 885–891.

19.

Nessim

(2010) Properties, synthesis, and growth mechanisms of carbon nanotubes with special focus on thermal chemical vapor deposition. Nanoscale 2: 1306–1323.

20.

Nunes

Perez

Loguercio

et al . (2011) Active carbon preparation from treads of tire waste for dye removal in waste water. Journal of the Brazilian Chemical Society 22: 2027–2035.

21.

Sehested

(2006) Four challenges for nickel steam-reforming catalysts. Catalysis Today 111: 103–110.

22.

Simell

Hepola

Krause

AOI

(1997) Effects of gasification gas components on tar and ammonia decomposition over hot gas cleanup catalysts. Fuel 76: 1117–1127.

23.

Srinakruang

Sato

Vitidsant

et al . (2005) A highly efficient catalyst for tar gasification with steam. Catalysis Communications 6: 437–440.

24.

Sutton

Kelleher

Ross

(2001) Review of literature on catalysts for biomass gasification. Fuel Processing Technology 73: 155–173.

25.

Turn

Kinoshita

Zhang

et al . (1998) An experimental investigation of hydrogen production from biomass gasification. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 23: 641–648.

26.

Wang

Cheng

You

et al . (2012) Hydrogen-rich gas production by steam gasification of municipal solid waste (MSW) using NiO supported on modified dolomite. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 37: 6503–6510.

27.

Williams

(2013) Pyrolysis of waste tires: A review. Waste Management 33: 1714–1728.

28.

Williams

Brindle

(2003) Aromatic chemicals from the catalytic pyrolysis of scrap tires. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis 67: 143–164.

29.

Williams

(2009a) Hydrogen production by steam gasification of polypropylene with various nickel catalysts. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental 87: 152–161.

30.

Williams

(2009b) Hydrogen production from the pyrolysis-gasification of polypropylene: Influence of steam flow rate, carrier gas flow rate and gasification temperature. Energy & Fuels 23: 5055–5061.

31.

Williams

(2010) Investigation of coke formation on Ni-Mg-Al catalyst for hydrogen production from the catalytic steam pyrolysis-gasification of polypropylene. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental 96: 198–207.

32.

Xiao

Chi

et al . (2008) Low-temperature gasification of waste tire in a fluidized bed. Energy Conversion and Management 49: 2078–2082.

33.

Zabaniotou

Madau

Oudenne

et al . (2004) Active carbon production from used tire in two-stage procedure: Industrial pyrolysis and bench scale activation with H₂O–CO₂ mixture. Journal of Analytical & Applied Pyrolysis 72: 289–297.

34.

Zhang

Cao

et al . (2008) Synthesis and characterization of larger diameter carbon nanotubes from catalytic pyrolysis of polypropylene. Materials Letters 62: 1839–1842.

35.

Zhang

Nahil

et al . (2015) Pyrolysis–catalytic reforming/gasification of waste tires for production of carbon nanotubes and hydrogen. Energy & Fuels 29: 3328–3334.

Influence of silica–alumina support ratio on H 2 production and catalyst carbon deposition from the Ni-catalytic pyrolysis/reforming of waste tyres

Abstract

Keywords

Introduction

Material and methods

Materials

Experimental system

Analytical methods

Results and discussion

Product yields and gas composition

Influence of different Al2O3 to SiO2 ratios for the pyrolysis-catalysis of waste tyres

Influence of different water injection rates

Characteristics of the produced carbon

Influences of different Al2O3 to SiO2 ratios

Influences of different water injection rates

Conclusions

Footnotes

Acknowledgements

Declaration of conflicting interests

Funding

References

Influence of different Al₂O₃ to SiO₂ ratios for the pyrolysis-catalysis of waste tyres

Influences of different Al₂O₃ to SiO₂ ratios