Biochar-based fertilizers from co-pyrolysis of algae and hazelnut shell with triple superphosphate: Physicochemical properties and slow release performance
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online July, 2025
Biochar-based fertilizers from co-pyrolysis of algae and hazelnut shell with triple superphosphate: Physicochemical properties and slow release performance
Phosphorus (P) is a vital nutrient for plant growth and food production. Excessive amounts of P fertilizers to a greater extent of crop P offtake are inevitably applied due to low utilization efficiency, causing environmental pollution. This study aimed to evaluate biochar-based fertilizers (BBFs) produced by co-pyrolyzing algae (A) and hazelnut shell (H) biomasses with triple superphosphate (TSP) at a ratio of 4:1 (w/w). The potential of the slow-release performance of BBFs was studied during kinetics experiments. The co-pyrolysis of biomasses with TSP yielded BBFs with significantly different properties, including electrical conductivity, pH, elemental ratios, functional groups, specific surface area and pore size characteristics. Phosphorus release from all biochars and BBFs followed the Elovich model, except for TSP and H+TSP. Kinetic studies revealed prolonged P-release times and slower release rates for BBFs compared to conventional TSP. So that, TSP released 100% of the total P, whereas H+TSP and A+TSP biochars released only 3.14% and 5.14% of the total P, respectively, during a 240-hour experiment. The slow-release performance of BBFs suggests their potential as promising alternatives to conventional phosphate fertilizers. BBFs have the potential to enhance P utilization efficiency, increase crop yield and mitigate the environmental impact of P fertilizer runoff.
AnXWuZYuJ, et al. (2020) High-efficiency reclaiming phosphate from an aqueous solution by Bentonite modified biochars: A slow release fertilizer with a precise rate regulation. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering8: 6090–6099.
2.
BekiarisGPeltreCJensenLS, et al. (2016) Using FTIR photoacoustic spectroscopy for phosphorus speciation analysis of biochars. Spectrochimica Acta. Part A, Molecular and Biomolecular Spectroscopy168: 29–36.
3.
BiswasBKumarAABishtY, et al. (2017a) Effects of temperature and solvent on hydrothermal liquefactionof Sargassum tenerrimum algae. Bioresource Technology242: 344–350.
4.
BiswasBPandeyNBishtY, et al. (2017b) Pyrolysis of agricultural biomass residues: Comparative study ofcorn cob, wheat straw, rice straw and rice husk. Bioresource Technology237: 57–63.
5.
CaoXHarrisW (2010) Properties of dairy-manure-derived biochar pertinent to its potential use in remediation. Bioresource Technology101: 5222–5228.
6.
CarneiroJSDSAndradeICRNardisBO, et al. (2021) Long-term effect of biochar-based fertilizers application in tropical soil: Agronomic efficiency and phosphorus availability. Science of the Total Environment760: 143955.
7.
CarneiroJSDSLustosa FilhoJFNardisBO, et al. (2018) Carbon stability of engineered biochar-based phosphate fertilizers. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering6: 14203–14212.
8.
De SouzaCHEReisRDARibeiroVGS, et al. (2020) Enhanced-efficiency phosphorous fertilizer impacts on corn and common bean crops and soil phosphorus diffusion. Journal of Agricultural Science12: 15.
9.
FanLZhangHLiJ, et al. (2020) Algal biorefnery to value-added products by using combined processes based on thermochemical conversion: A review. Algal Research47: 101819.
10.
FeiYHZhaoDCaoY, et al. (2019) Phosphorous retention and release by sludge-derived Hydrochar for potential use as a soil amendment. Journal of Environmental Quality48: 502–509.
11.
HinsingerPBetencourtEBernardL, et al. (2011) P for two, sharing a scarce resource: Soil phosphorus acquisition in the rhizosphere of intercropped species. Plant Physiology156: 1078–1086.
12.
International Biochar Initiative (2015) Standardized product definition and product testing guidelines for biochar that is used in soil. Version 2.1, 23 November. (Document Reference Code: IBI-STD-2.1).
13.
JungKWKimKJeongTU, et al. (2016) Influence of pyrolysis temperature on characteristics and phosphate adsorption capabilityof biochar derived from waste-marine macroalgae (Undaria pinnatifida roots). Bioresource Technology200: 1024–1028.
14.
KabiriSAndelkovicIBda SilvaRC, et al. (2020) Engineered phosphate fertilizers with dual-release properties. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research59: 5512–5524.
15.
KayaNYıldızZCeylanS (2018) Preparation and characterisation of biocharfrom hazelnut shell and its adsorptionproperties for methylene blue dye. Journal of Polytechnic21: 765–776.
16.
KeiluweitMNicoPSJohnsonMG, et al. (2010) Dynamic molecular structure of plant biomass-derived black carbon (biochar). Environmental Science & Technology44: 1247–1253.
17.
LiFCaoXZhaoL, et al. (2014) Effects of mineral additives on biochar formation: Carbon retention, stability, and properties. Environmental Science & Technology48: 11211–11217.
18.
LiangYCaoXZhaoL, et al. (2014) Phosphorus release from dairy manure, the manure-derived biochar, and their amended soil: Effects of phosphorus nature and soil property. Journal of Environmental Quality43: 1504–1509.
19.
LiuYHeZUchimiyaM (2015) Comparison of biochar formation from various agricultural by-products using FTIR spectroscopy. Modern Applied Science9: 246–253.
20.
Lustosa FilhoJFBarbosaCFCarneiroJS, et al. (2019) Diffusion and phosphorus solubility of biochar-based fertilizer: Visualization, chemical assessment and availability to plants. Soil and Tillage Research194: 104298.
21.
Lustosa FilhoJFPenidoESCastroPP, et al. (2017) Co-pyrolysis of poultry litter and phosphate and magnesium generates alternative slow-release fertilizer suitable for tropical soils. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering5: 9043–9052.
22.
McDowellRWPletnyakovPHaygarthPM (2024) Phosphorus applications adjusted to optimal crop yields can help sustain global phosphorus reserves. Nature Food5: 332–339.
23.
MichalakIBaśladyńskaSMokrzyckiJ, et al. (2019) Biochar from a freshwater macroalga as a potential biosorbent forwastewater treatment. Water11: 1390.
MurphyJRileyJP (1962) A modified single solution method for the determination of phosphate in natural waters. Analytica Chimica Acta27: 31–36.
26.
NardisBOFrancaJRCarneiroJSDS, et al. (2021) Production of engineered-biochar under different pyrolysisconditions for phosphorus removal from aqueous solution. Science of the Total Environment816: 151559.
27.
OhSGRodriguezNM (1993) In situ electron microscopy studies of the inhibition of graphite oxidation by phosphorus. Journal of Hazardous Materials8: 2879–2888.
28.
PanLLLiGYSuYC, et al. (2012) Fire retardant mechanism analysis between ammonium polyphosphate and triphenyl phosphate in unsaturated polyester resin. Polymer Degradation and Stability97: 1801–180.
29.
PenidoESMartinsGCMendesTBM, et al. (2019) Combining biochar and sewagesludge for immobilization of heavy metals in mining soils. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety172: 326–333.
30.
PereiraRCArbestainMCSueiroMV, et al. (2015) Assessment of the surface chemistryof wood-derived biochars using wet chemistry, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy and X-rayphotoelectron spectroscopy. Soil Research53: 753–762.
31.
PogorzelskiDFilhoJFLMatiasPC, et al. (2020) Biochar as composite of phosphate fertilizer: characterization and agro-nomic effectiveness. Science of the Total Environment743: 140604.
32.
RenNTangYLiM (2018) Mineral additive enhanced carbon retention and stabilization in sewage sludge-derived biochar. Process Safety and Environmental Protection115: 70–78.
33.
RosasJMRuiz-RosasRRodríguez-MirasolJ, et al. (2012) Kinetic study of the oxidation resistance of phosphorus-containing activated carbons. Carbon50: 1523–1537.
34.
SantoroVSchiavonMCeliL (2023) Role of soil abiotic processes on phosphorus availability and plant responses with a focus on strigolactones in tomato plants. Plant and Soil494: 1–49.
35.
ScholzRWUlrichAEEilittäM, et al. (2013) Sustainable use of phosphorus: A finite resource. Science of the Total Environment461–462: 799–803.
36.
ShiWJuYBianR, et al. (2020) Biochar bound urea boosts plant growth and reduces nitrogen leaching. Science of the Total Environment701: 134424.
37.
SinghASharmaRPantD, et al. (2021) Engineered algal biochar for contaminant remediation and electrochemical applications, Science of the Total Environment774: 145676.
38.
SpokasKA (2010) Review of the stability of biochar in soils: Predictability of O:C molar ratios. Carbon Manager1: 289–303.
39.
SteffensDSparksDL (1997) Kinetics of nonexchangeable ammonium release from soils. Soil Science Society of America Journal61: 455–462.
40.
SteinerCJ (2017) Biochar: A guide to analytical methods. Soil Use and Management34: 163–164.
41.
SunJMasekO (2021) A comprehensive review of algal biochar for soil improvement: bottlenecks and opportunities. EGU General Assembly2021: 21-3558.
42.
TaherymoosaviSVerheyenVMunroeP, et al. (2017) Characterization of organic compounds in biochars derived from municipal solid waste. Waste Management67: 131–142.
43.
TumbureABishopPBrethertonM, et al. (2020) Co-pyrolysis of maize stover and igneous phosphate rock to produce potential biochar-based phosphate fertilizer with improved carbon retention and liming value. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering8: 4178–4184.
44.
WithersPJARodriguesMSoltangheisiA, et al. (2018) Transitions to sustainable management of phosphorus in Brazilian agriculture. Scientific Reports8: 2537.
45.
XuJChenLQuH, et al. (2014) Preparation and characterization of activated carbon from reedy grass leaves by chemical activation with H3PO4. Applied Surface Science320: 674–680.
46.
YaoYGaoBChenJ, et al. (2013) Engineered carbon (biochar) prepared by direct pyrolysis of Mg-accumulated tomato tissues: Characterization and phosphate removal potential. Bioresource Technology138: 8–13.
47.
YeZZhangLHuangQ, et al. (2019) Development of a carbon-based slow release fertilizer treated by bio-oil coating and study on its feedback effect on farmland application. Journal of Cleaner Production239: 118085.
48.
YuHLuXMikiT, et al. (2022) Sustainable phosphorus supply by phosphorus recovery from steelmaking slag: a critical review. Resources, Conservation and Recycling180: 106203.
49.
ZanãoLAArfOReisRAJr, et al. (2020) Phosphorus fertilization with enhanced efficiency in soybean and corn crops. Australian Journal of Crop Science14: 78–84.
50.
ZhangZZhuZShenB, et al. (2019) Insights into biochar and hydrochar production and applications: A review. Energy171: 581–598.
51.
ZhaoBXuXXuS, et al. (2017) Surface characteristics and potential ecological risk evaluation of heavy metals in the bio-char produced by co-pyrolysis from municipal sewage sludge and hazelnut shell with zinc chloride. Bioresource Technology243: 375–383.
52.
ZhaoLCaoXZhengW, et al. (2014) Phosphorus-assisted biomass thermal conversion: reducing carbon loss and improving biochar stability. PLoS One9: e115373.
53.
ZhaoLCaoXZhengW, et al. (2016) Copyrolysis of biomass with phosphate fertilizers to improve biochar carbonretention, slow nutrient release, and stabilize heavy metals in soil. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering4: 1630–1636.
54.
ZhaoRJiangDColesN, et al. (2015) Effects of biochar on the acidity of a loamy clay soil under different incubation conditions. Journal of Soils and Sediments1: 1919−1926.
