This paper develops a model that provides an objective framework for evaluating the concerns often cited by members of nearby communities and other state residents when potential sites for solid waste landfills are evaluated. An empirical version of the model is estimated using preference data collected in a paired comparison survey of Rhode Island residents, in which participants identify a preferred site and location for a landfill among two alternatives. The estimated model is used to assign scores to each characteristic describing the natural resources present at a site and the characteristics of the nearby community. The model estimates the proportion of voters who would choose each candidate site in a referendum that includes the complete set of alternatives. This simulated voting mechanism can be used to reduce a long list of technically desirable sites to a shorter list of sites that rank highly according to public preferences regarding natural resources and local community impacts.
Addelman, S. (1962a) Orthogonal main-effect plans for asymmetrical factorial experiments. Technometrics4, 21-46.
2.
Addelman, S. (1962b) Symmetrical and asymmetrical fractional factorial plans. Technometrics4, 47-58.
3.
Addelman, S. & Kempthorne, O. (1961) Orthogonal main-effect plans , U.S. Air Force, Office of Aerospace Research, Aeronautical Research Laboratory, ARL Technical Report 79, November, 167 pages.
4.
Alter, H. (1991) The future course of solid waste management in the U.S, Waste Management & Research9(1), 3-20.
5.
Concern, Inc. (1988) Waste: choices for communities. (A. Knaus, ed,) Environmental Guide Series. Washington, DC, U.S.A.: Concern, Inc.30 pp.
6.
Contra Costa County (1990) East Contra Costa Sanitary Landfill Referendum, Measure B Election, Tuesday June 5, 1990, Martinez, California, U.S.A.
7.
Cummings, R.G., Brookshire, D.S. & Schulze, W.D. (1986) Valuing Environmental Goods. Savage, MA, U.S.A.: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers, Inc.
8.
David, H.A. (1988) The Method of Paired Comparisons (2nd edition). New York, U.S.A.: Oxford University Press. 188 pp.
9.
Desvousges, W.H. & Smith, V.K. (1988) Focus groups and risk communication: the 'science' of listening to data. Risk Analysis8, 479-484.
10.
Desvousges, W.H., Smith, V.K., Brown, D.H. & Kirk, D.K. (1984) The role of focus groups in designing a contingent valuation survey to measure the benefits of hazardous waste management regulations. Research Triangle Institute Report, Research Triangle Park, NC, U.S.A.: Research Triangle Institute.
11.
Edwards, S.F. (1988) Option prices of groundwater protection. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management15, 475-487.
12.
Hanemann, W.M. (1984) Welfare evaluations in contingent valuation experiments with discrete responses, American Journal of Agricultural Economics66, 332-341.
13.
Harrell, J.E., Jr (1986) The LOGIST procedure. In SUGI Supplement Library User's Guide, Versi )n 5 Edition. Cary, North Carolina: SAS Institute, Inc. U.S.A.
14.
Hausman, J.A. & Wise, D.A. (1978) A conditional probit model for qualitative choice: discrete decisions recognizing interdependence and heterogeneous preferences . Econometrica46, 403-426.
15.
Keeney, R.L. & Nair, K. (1977) Selecting nuclear power plant sites in the Pacific Northwest using decision analysis. In Conflicting Objectives in Decisions (D. E. Bell, R. L. Keeney & H. Raiffa , eds). New York, U.S.A.: John Wiley & Sons.
16.
Kennedy, P. (1979) A Guide to Econometrics. Cambridge, MA, U.S.A.: The MIT Press.
17.
Kleindorfer, P.R. & Kunreuther, H.C. (1986) Siting hazardous facilities: compensation, trust and legitimation. Working paper 86-12-06, Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Risk and Decision Process Center , Presented at AEA Meetings, New Orleans, December 1986. 24 pp.
18.
Kunreuther, H., Kleindorfer, P.R., Knez, P.J. & Yaksick, R. (1987) A compensation mechanism for siting noxious facilities: theory and experimental design. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management14, 371-383.
19.
Maddala, G.S. (1983) Limited-Dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics. New York, U.S.A.: Cambridge University Press.
20.
Magat, W.A., Viscusi, W.K. & Huber, J. (1988) Paired comparison and contingent valuation approaches to morbidity risk valuation. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management15, 395-411.
21.
McFadden, D. (1973) Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior. In Frontiers of Econometrics ( P. Zarembka, ed.). New York, U.S.A.: Academic Press.
22.
Mitchell, R.C. and Carson, R.T. (1989) Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: The Contingent Valuation Method. Washington, D.C., U.S.A.: Resources for the Future.
23.
O'Hare, M., Bacow, L. & Sanderson, D. (1983) Facility Siting and Public Opposition. New York, U.S.A.: Van Nostrand Reinhold Company.
24.
O'Leary, P.R., Canter, L. & Robinson, W.D. (1986) Land disposal. In The Solid Waste Handbook (W. D. Robinson, ed.). New York, U.S.A.: John Wiley & Sons.
25.
Richard A.Alaimo Engineering Company (1987) Somerset County interim/residue sanitary landfill siting study. Prepared for Somerset County Board of Chosen Freeholders. Mount Holly, NJ, U.S.A.: Richard A. Alaimo Engineering Company.
26.
Ristoratore, M. (1987) Siting toxic waste disposal facilities: best and worst cases in North America. In Land Rites and Wrongs: The Management Regulation, and Use of Land in Canada and the United States (E. J. Feldman & M. Goldberg, eds). Cambridge, MA, U.S.A.: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
27.
Scheffe, H. (1959) The Analysis of Variance. New York, U.S.A.: John Wiley & Sons.
28.
Stachelhaus, J., Michelman, T., Duhaime, R. & MacGlaughlin, A. (1991) The Rhode Island Solid Waste Management Corporation landfill siting project final report: the alternative site screening process. The University of Rhode Island, Rhode Island, U.S.A.: Kingston.
29.
Vetsch, J.L. (1988) Approaches to siting toxic and hazardous waste facilities: a comparison of procedures adopted by Ontario and Alberta. Environments20, 60-69.
30.
Viscusi, W.K., Magat, W.A. & Huber, J. (1991) Pricing environmental health risks: survey assessments of risk-risk and risk-dollar trade-offs for chronic bronchitis. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management21, 32-51.
31.
Wessells, C.W., Opaluch, J.J., Swallow, S.K., Weaver, T.F. & Wichelns, D. (1990) A landfill site evaluation model that addresses public preferences regarding impacts on natural resources and local communities . Technical report to the Rhode Island Solid Waste Management Corporation: Department of Resource Economics, University of Rhode Island , Rhode Island.
