Administration and Scoring Errors on the WISC-IV Among Graduate Student Examiners

Abstract

A total of 51 Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children, Fourth Edition (WISC-IV) protocols, administered by graduate students in training, were examined to obtain data describing the frequency of examiner errors and the impact of errors on resultant test scores. Present results were generally consistent with previous research examining graduate students' errors on the previous two editions of the WISC. Students committed errors on 98% of the protocols examined and averaged 25.8 errors per protocol. The most common errors were failure to query verbal responses, assigning too many points to an answer, and failure to record an examinee's response on the test protocol. Errors resulted in inaccurate test composite scores, with the Full Scale IQ and Verbal Comprehension Index most frequently affected. Error rates did not improve significantly over the course of three practice administrations.

Keywords

WISC-IV error practice reliability cognitive assessment instruction examiner error test reliability

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alfonso, V.C. , Johnson, A. , Patinella, L. , & Rader, D.E. (1998). Common WISC-III examiner errors: Evidence from graduate students in training. Psychology in the Schools, 35(2), 119-125.

Alfonso, V.C. , Oakland, T.D. , LaRocca, R. , & Spanakos, A. (2000). The course on individual cognitive assessment . School Psychology Review, 29(1), 52-64.

Belk, M.S. , LoBello, S.G. , Ray, G.E. , & Zachar, P. (2002). WISC-III administration, clerical, and scoring errors made by student examiners. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 20, 290-300.

Cody, M.S. , & Prieto, L.R. (2000). Teaching intelligence testing in APA-accredited programs: A national survey. Teaching of Psychology, 27(3), 190-194.

Conner, R. , & Woodall, F.E. (1983). The effects of experience and structured feedback on WISC-R error rates made by student-examiners. Psychology in the Schools, 20, 376-379.

Flanagan, D.P. , & Kaufman, A.S. (2004). Essentials of WISC-IV assessment. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.

Hall, C.W. (1999). Computer assisted instruction in reducing errors in scoring of the WISC-III. Psychological Reports, 85, 825-833.

Levenson, R.L. , Golden-Scaduto, C.J. , Aiosa-Karpas, C.J. , & Ward, A.W. (1988). Effects of examiners' education and sex on presence and type of clerical errors made on WISC-R protocols. Psychological Reports, 62, 659-664.

McGrew, K.S. (2005). The Cattell-Horn Carroll (CHC) theory of cognitive abilities: Past present and future. In D. P. Flanagan and P. L. Harrison (Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment: Theories, tests, and issues (2nd ed., pp. 136-182). New York: Guilford.

10.

Oakland, T.D. , & Zimmerman, S.A. (1986). The course on individual mental assessment: A national survey of course instructors. Professional School Psychology, 1(1), 51-59.

11.

Sherrets, S. , Gard, G. , & Langner, H. (1979). Frequency of clerical errors on WISC protocols . Psychology in the Schools, 16, 495-496.

12.

Slate, J.R. , & Chick, D. (1989). WISC-R examiner errors: Cause for concern. Psychology in the Schools, 26, 78-84.

13.

Slate, J.R. , & Hunnicutt, L.C. , Jr. (1988). Examiner errors on the Wechsler scales. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment , 6, 280-288.

14.

Slate, J.R. , & Jones, C.H. (1990). Student error in administering the WISC-R: Identifying problem areas. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 23(3), 137-141.

15.

Slate, J.R. , Jones, C.H. , Coulter, C. , & Covert, T.L. (1992). Practitioners' administration and scoring of the WISC-R: Evidence that we do err. Journal of School Psychology , 30, 77-82.

16.

Slate, J.R. , Jones, C.H. , & Murray, R.A. (1991). Teaching administration and scoring of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Revised: An empirical evaluation of practice administrations . Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 22(5), 375-379.

17.

Wechsler, D. (2003). Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children (4th ed.). San Antonio, TX: Harcourt Assessment.