The relationships between cognitive and reading measures in third and fourth grade children were analyzed using path modeling. Third graders were tested in word identification, pseudo word reading, orthographic speed, rapid naming, and oral vocabulary knowledge. In third and fourth grades, the students were tested in oral reading fluency and in reading comprehension with a statewide reading test. Path modeling using word identification, oral reading fluency, and reading comprehension as dependent variables indicated a very good fit (normed fit index of .99 for both third and fourth grades). The pattern of predictors differed depending on the reading outcome variable. The independent predictors of oral reading fluency were oral vocabulary knowledge, pseudo word reading, rapid naming, and a novel test of orthographic speed. The test of orthographic speed also made a unique contribution to word identification. Oral vocabulary knowledge was a unique predictor of reading comprehension for both models.
Bentler, P.M., & Bonnett, D. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin , 88, 588-606.
2.
Berninger, V. W. (Ed.). (1994). The varieties of orthographic knowledge I: Theoretical and developmental issues . Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
3.
Berninger, V.W., Abbott, R.D., Billingsley, F., & Nagy, W. (2001). Processes underlying timing and fluency of reading: Efficiency, automaticity, coordination, and morphological awareness. In M. Wolf (Ed.), Dyslexia, fluency, and the brain (pp. 383-414). Timonium, MD: York Press.
4.
Besner, D. (1999). Basic processes in reading: Multiple routines in localist and connectionist models. In R. Klein & P. McMullen (Eds.), Converging methods for understanding reading and dyslexia (pp. 413-458). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
5.
Biemiller, A. (2006, August 10). Vocabulary: The missing link between reading and literacy. Lecture given at the World Congress on Literacy, Budapest, Hungary.
6.
Breznitz, Z. (2002). Asynchrony of visual-orthographic and auditory-phonological word recognition processes: An underlying factor in dyslexia. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 15, 15-42.
7.
Byrne, B. (1998). The foundation of literacy: The child's acquisition of the alphabetic principle. East Sussex, UK: Psychology Press.
8.
Carver, R., & David, A. (2001). Investigating reading achievement using a causal model. Scientific Studies of Reading, 5, 107-140.
9.
Chall, J.S. (1996). Stages of reading development (2nd ed.). Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt-Brace .
10.
Colorado Department of Education. (2004). Colorado student assessment program. Available from www.cde.state.co.us
11.
Coltheart, M., Rastle, K., Perry, C., Langdon, R., & Ziegler, J. (2001). DRC: A dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review, 108, 204-256.
12.
Compton, D.L. (2000). Modeling the response of normally achieving and at-risk first grade children to word reading instruction. Annals of Dyslexia, 50, 53-84.
13.
Cunningham, A.E., Perry, K.E., & Stanovich, K.E. (2001). Converging evidence for the concept of orthographic processing. Reading and Writing , 14, 549-568.
14.
Fletcher, J.M., Foorman, B.R., Boudousquie, A., Barnes, M.A., Schatschneider, C., & Francis, D.J. (2002). Assessment of reading and learning disabilities: A research based intervention oriented approach. Journal of School Psychology, 40, 27-63.
Good, R.H., Gruba, J., & Kaminski, R.A. (2001). Best practices in using dynamic indicators of basic early literacy skills (DIBELS) in an outcomes-driven model. In A. Thomas & J. Grimes (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology IV (pp. 679-700). Washington, DC: National Association of School Psychologists.
17.
Hoover, W.A., & Gough, P.B. (1990). The simple view of reading. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 2, 127-160.
18.
Jöreskog, K., & Sorbom, D. (1993). LISREL 8: Structural equation modeling. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International .
19.
Kame'enui, E., & Simmons, D. (2001). Introduction to this special issue: The DNA of reading fluency. Scientific Studies of Reading, 5, 203-210.
20.
Levy, B.A. (1999). Whole words, segments, and meaning: Approaches to reading education. In R. M. Klein & P. McMullen (Eds.), Converging methods for understanding reading and dyslexia (pp. 77-110). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
21.
Muthen, B. (1994). Latent variable modeling of longitudinal and multilevel data. Los Angeles: National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing (CRESST) .
22.
National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. (2000). Report of the National reading panel. Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction (NIH Publication No. 00-4754). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
23.
Olson, R.K., Forsberg, H., Wise, B., & Rack, J. (1994) Measurement of word recognition, orthographic, and phonological skills. In G. R. Lyon (Ed.), Frames of reference for the assessment of learning disabilities (pp. 243-277). Baltimore: Brookes .
24.
Ouellette, G.P. (2006). What's meaning got to do with it: The role of vocabulary in word reading and reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 554-566.
25.
Perfetti, C.A. (1985). Reading ability. New York: Oxford University Press.
26.
Plaut, D. (1999). Computational modeling of word reading, acquired dyslexia, and remediation. In R. Klein & P. McMullen (Eds.), Converging methods for understanding reading and dyslexia (pp. 339-372). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
27.
Raykov, T., & Marcoulides, G. (2006). A first course in structural equation modeling. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
28.
Roth, F.P., Speece, D.L., & Cooper, D.H. (2002). A longitudinal analysis of the connection between oral language and early reading. Journal of Educational Research , 95, 259-272.
29.
Thissen, D. (1982). Marginal maximum likelihood estimation for the one-parameter logistic model. Psychometrika, 47, 175-186.
30.
Torgesen, J.K., Rashotte, C.A., & Alexander, A.W. (2001). Principles of fluency instruction in reading: Relationships with established empirical outcomes. In M. Wolf (Ed.), Dyslexia, fluency, and the brain (pp. 333-355). Timonium, MD: York Press.
31.
Torgesen, J.K., Wagner, R.K., Rashotte, C.A., Burgess, S., & Hecht, S. (1997). Contributions of phonological awareness and rapid automatic naming ability to the growth of word-reading skills in second to fifth grade children. Scientific Studies of Reading, 1, 161-185.
32.
University of Oregon (2003). Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills (DIBELS). Available from http://dibels.uoregon.edu
33.
Wagner, R.K., Torgesen, J.K., & Rashotte, C.A. (1999). Comprehensive test of phonological processing. Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
34.
Wechsler, D. (2003). Wechsler intelligence scale for children (4th ed.). San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.
35.
Wood, D.E. (2006). Modeling the relationship between oral reading fluency and performance on a statewide reading test. Educational Assessment, 11(2), 85-104.
36.
Woodcock, R., McGrew, K., & Mather, N. (2001). Woodcock Johnson III test of achievement. Rolling Meadows, IL: Riverside.
