There is growing dissatisfaction with the DSM-III definition of Attention Deficit Disorder (ADD) and considerable debate among researchers as to whether ADD is a distinct disorder. Additionally, clinicians have relied on nonobjective behavioral observation to diagnose ADD. The present study attempted to find commonly used tests that could discriminate between an ADD sample and a control group with no DSM-III diagnosis. Subjects were 88 children, 7 to 10 years of age, who had received a battery of psychological tests. Discriminant analysis confirmed that hypothesized attention tests from the WISC-R, ITPA, Detroit, plus the GFW Auditory Selective Attention Test, significantly differentiated between the two groups and classified 74% of the cases correctly. It was concluded that use of these tests might add objective evidence to ADD screening and that the overall results lent support to ADD as a valid diagnostic classification.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
American Psychiatric Association. (1980). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (3rd ed.). Washington: Author.
2.
Baker, H. J., & Leland, B. (1967). Detroit Tests of Learning Aptitude. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.
3.
Brown, R. T. (1982a). A developmental analysis of visual and auditory sustained attention and reflection-impulsivity in hyperactive and normal children. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 15, 615-618.
4.
Brown, R. T. (1982b). Hyperactivity: Assessment and evaluation of rating instruments. Journal of Psychiatric Treatment and Evaluation, 4, 359-369.
5.
Conners, C. (1969). A teacher rating scale for use in drug studies with children. American Journal of Psychiatry, 126, 884-888.
6.
Conners, C. K. (1973). Rating scales for use in drug studies with children. Psychopharmacology Bulletin, (Special Issue - Pharmacotherapy of Children), 24-84.
7.
Domascus, E. (1980). Teacher ratings of children with attentional disorders. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
8.
Douglas, V. I. (1972). Stop, look and listen: The problem of sustained attention and impulse control in hyperactive and normal children. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science, 4, 250-282.
9.
Douglas, V. I. (1974). Sustained attention and impulse control: Implications for the handicapped child. In J. A. Swets & L. L. Elliott (Eds.), Psychology and the handicapped child. Washington: U. S. Office of Education.
10.
Douglas, V. I. (1975). Are drugs enough? To train or to treat the hyperactive child. International Journal of Mental Health, 5, 199-212.
11.
Goldman, R., Fristoe, M., & Woodcock, R. W. (1 974). GFW Auditory Selective Attention Test. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
12.
Gordon, M., & McClure, F. D. (1983). The objective assessment of attention deficit disorder. Paper presented at the 91st annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, Anaheim.
13.
Hartman, F. R. (1961). Single and multiple-channel communication: A review of research on a proposed model. Audio-Visual Communication Review, 9, 235-262.
14.
Homatidis, S., & Konstantreas, M. (1981). Assessment of hyperactivity: Isolating measures of high discriminant ability. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 49, 533-541.
15.
Kagan, J. (1966). Reflection-impulsivity: The generality and dynamics of conceptual tempo. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 71, 17-24.
16.
Kagan, J., Rosman, B., Day, D., Albert, J., & Phillips, W. (1964). Information processing in the child: Significance of analytic and reflective attitudes. Psychological Monographs, 78 (578).
17.
Kaufman, A. S. (1975). Factor analysis of the WISC-R at 11 age levels between 6 Y2 and 16 Y2 years. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 43, 135-147.
18.
Kirk, S. A., McCarthy, J. J., & Kirk, W. D. (1968). Illinois Test of Psycholinguistic Abilities - Revised. Champaign: University of Illinois.
19.
Klee, S. H., & Garfinkel, B. D. (1983). The computerized continuous performance task: A new measure of inattention. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 11, 487-495.
20.
LaGrow, S. J., & Prochnow-LaGrow, J. E. (1982). Technical adequacy of the most popular tests selected by responding school psychologists in Illinois. Psychology in the Schools, 19, 186-189.
21.
Loney, J. (1980). Hyperkinesis comes of age: What do we know and where should we go?American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 50, 28-42.
22.
Margolis, J. (1972). Academic correlates of sustained attention. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California at Los Angeles.
23.
Mungas, D. (1983). Differential clinical sensitivity of specific parameters of the Rey Auditory-Verbal Learning Test. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 51, 848-855.
24.
Nie, N. H., Hull, C. H., Jenkins, J. G., Steinbrenner, K., & Bent, D. H. (1975). Statistical package for the social sciences (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
25.
Ozawa, J. P., & Michael, W. B. (1983). The concurrent validity of a behavioral rating scale for assessing attention deficit disorder. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 43, 623-632.
26.
Perelle, I. B. (1972). Effects of auditory and written-visual stimuli on learning and retention. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 1, 235-241.
27.
Perelle, I. B. (1975). Difference in attention to stimulus presentation mode with regard to age. Developmental Psychology, 11, 403-404.
28.
Quay, H. C. (1979). Chapter 1, Classification. In H. C. Quay & J. S. Werry, Psychopathological disorders of childhood (2nd ed.). New York: John Wiley.
29.
Quay, H. C., & Weld, G. L. (1980). Visual and auditory selective attention and reflection impulsivity in normal and learning disabled boys at two age levels. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 8, 117-125.
30.
Routh, D. K., & Schroeder, C. S. (1976). Standardized playroom measures as indices of hyperactivity. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 4, 199-207.
31.
Rubinstein, R. A., & Brown, R. T. (1984). An evaluation of the validity of the diagnostic category of attention deficit disorder. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 54, 398-414.
32.
Sandoval, J. (1977). The measurement of the hyperactive syndrome in children. Review of Educational Research, 47, 293-318.
33.
Sattler, J. M. (1982). Assessment of children's intelligence and special abilities (2nd ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
34.
Sutter, E., Bishop, P., & Battin, R. (1986). Factor similarities between traditional psychoeducational and neuropsychological test batteries. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 4, 73-82.
35.
Wallace, G., & McLoughlin, J. A. (1979). Learning disabilities: Concepts and characteristics (2nd ed.). Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill.
36.
Wechsler, D. (1974). Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children - Revised. New York: Psychological Corporation.
37.
Werry, J. S. (1968). Developmental hyperactivity. Pediatric Clinics of North America, 15, 581-599.
38.
Werry, J. S., Sprague, R. L., & Cohen, M. N. (1975). Conners' Teacher Rating Scale for use in drug studies with children - An empirical study. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 3, 217-229.
39.
Witkin, H. S., Oltman, P., Raskin, E., & Karps, S. (1971). Manual for the Children's Embedded Figures Test. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
40.
Wynne, M. E. (1979). Time estimation as a measure of impulsivity in emotionally disturbed adolescent females. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
41.
Wynne, M. E., & Brown, R. T. (1984). Assessment of high incidence learning disorders: Isolating measures with high discriminant ability. School Psychology Review, 13, 231-237.
