Accuracy of Long Momentary Time-Sampling Intervals: Implications for Classroom Data Collection

Abstract

The accuracy of various momentary time-sampling (MTS) interval lengths in estimating continuous measures of behavior and the implications for classroom data collection procedures were examined. Continuous interval recording records were simulated to provide standards against which to assess MTS interval lengths of 30 seconds and 5, 10, and 20 minutes. Standards were constructed to simulate behavior that occurred during 20%, 40%, 60%, and 80% of the total intervals observed. Each MTS percent occurrence estimate was compared to the percent occurrence represented by the standard. The data revealed that short MTS interval lengths were more accurate and that level of percent occurrence did not differentially affect MTS estimates. The ability of MTS to reflect increasing and decreasing behavior trends and the interaction of MTS interval lengths with various percent occurrence levels also were examined.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alessi, G. J. , & Kaye, J. H. (1983). Behavioral assessment for school psychologists. Kent, OH: National Association of School Psychologists.

Brulle, A. , & Repp, A. (1984). An investigation of the accuracy of momentary time sampling procedure with time series data. British Journal of Psychology, 75, 481-485.

Deno, S. L. , & Mirkin, P. K. (1977). Data based program modification: A manual. Reston, VA: Council for Exceptional Children.

Dixon, J. D. (1981). A comparison of thirteen time sampling systems with continuous real time measures. (Doctoral dissertation, University of Tennessee, 1982). Dissertation Abstracts International, 43, 4205B.

Harrop, A. , & Daniels, M. (1985). Momentary time sampling with time series data: A commentary on the paper by Brulle & Repp. British Journal of Psychology, 76, 533-537.

Hildman, L. K. (1984). A random numbers generating program for the Osborne I computer. Unpublished manuscript, Hattiesburg, MS.

Kelly, M. B. (1977). A review of the observational data-collection and reliability procedures reported in the Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 10, 97-101.

Lentz, F. E. (19882). An empirical examination of the utility of partial interval and momentary time sampling as measurements of behavior. (Doctoral dissertation, University of Tennessee, 1982). Dissertation Abstracts International, 43, 4302B.

Mansell, J. (1985). Time sampling and measurement error: The effect of interval length and sampling pattern. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 16, 245-251.

10.

Powell, J. (1984). On the misrepresentation of realities by a widely practiced direct observation procedure: Partial interval (one-zero) sampling. Behavioral Assessment, 6, 209-219.

11.

Powell, J. , Martindale, A. , & Kulp, S. (1975). An evaluation of time-sampling measures of behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 8, 463-469.

12.

Powell, J. , Martindale B. , Kulp, S. , Martindale, A. , & Bauman, B. (1977). Taking a closer look: Time sampling and measurement error. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 10, 325-332.

13.

Simpson, M. J. , & Simpson, A. E. (1977). One-zero and scan methods for sampling behavior. Animal Behavior, 25, 726-731.

14.

Sulzer-Azaroff, B. , & Mayer, G. R. (1986). Achieving educational excellence using behavioral strategies. New York: CBS College.