Improvement in Academic Screening Instruments? A Concurrent Validity Investigation of the K-FAST,MBA,and WRAT-3

Abstract

The present study examined the extent to which the scores from the K-FAST, MBA, and WRAT-3 are comparable in degree of correlation and mean scores in a sample of university students (N = 62). Results generally provided concurrent validity evidence for the three academic screening tests, although several significant differences were found between measures. An examination of test intercorrelations and test content revealed that the reading and writing domains are not assessed similarly across batteries. The intercorrelations between reading scores were relatively low, ranging from .31 (K-FAST and WRAT-3) to .48 (MBA and WRAT-3). The MBA provides the broadest assessment of reading (word recognition, word comprehension, passage comprehension), followed by the K-FAST. The WRAT-3 Reading test assesses mainly word recognition, as demonstrated by a .68 correlation with the MBA Identification test. The MBA also provides the broadest assessment of writing (punctuation, capitalization, spelling, word usage), followed by the WRAT-3 (which assesses only spelling). The math scores from the three batteries were most consistently correlated (rs ranging from .52 to .54), a finding that supports the validity of the mathematics scores obtained from these instruments. Recommendations for the use and interpretation of the K-FAST, MBA, and WRAT-3 are offered, and avenues for future research are suggested.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Brown, W. R. , & McGuire, J. M. (1976). Current psychological assessment practices. Professional Psychology, 7, 475-484.

Carroll, J. B. (1993a). Human cognitive abilities: A survey of factor-analytic studies. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

Carroll, J. B. (1993b). What abilities are measured by the WISC-I1? [WISC-III Monograph] .Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 11, 134-143.

Gregory, R. J. (1996). Psychological testing: History, principles, and applications. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

Harrison, P. L. (1989). Review of the Wide Range Achievement Test-Revised. In J. C. Conoley & J. J. Kramer (Eds.), The tenth mental measurements yearbook (pp. 903-905). Lincoln, NE: Buros Institute.

Harrison, P. L. , Kaufman, A. S. , Hickman, J. A. , & Kaufman, N. L. (1988). A survey of tests used for adult assessment. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 6, 188-198.

Hutton, J. B. , Dubes, R. , & Muir, S. (1992). Assessment practices of school psychologists: Ten years later. School Psychology Review, 21, 271-284.

Jastak, J. , & Jastak, S. (1976). Wide Range Achievement Test. Wilmington, DE: Jastak Associates.

Jastak, S. , & Wilkinson, G. S. (1984). Wide Range Achievement Test - Revised Wilmington, DE: Jastak Associates.

10.

Kaufman, A. S. , & Kaufman, N. L. (1990). Kaufman Brief Intelligence Test. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.

11.

Kaufman, A. S. , & Kaufman, N. L. (1993). Kaufman Adolescent and Adult Intelligence Test manual. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.

12.

Kaufman, A. S. , & Kaufman, N. L. (1994a). The Functional Academic Skills Test. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.

13.

Kaufman, A. S. , & Kaufman, N. L. (1994b). Kaufman Short Neuropsychological Assessment Procedure. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.

14.

Mabry, L. (1995). Review of the Wide Range Achievement Test 3. In J. C. Conoley & J. C. Impara (Eds.), The twelfth mental measurements yearbook (pp. 1108-1110). Lincoln, NE: Buros Institute.

15.

McGrew, K. S. , Werder, J. , & Woodcock, R. (1991). VJ-R technical manual. Chicago: Riverside.

16.

Salvia, J. , & Ysseldyke, J. E. (1991). Assessment. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

17.

Shaw, S. R. , Swerdlik, M. E. , & Laurent, J. (1993). Review of the WISC-III. [WISC-III Monograph]. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 11, 151-160.

18.

Sternberg, R. J. (1993). Rocky's back again: A review of the WISC-III. [WISC-III Monograph]. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 11, 161-164.

19.

Ward, A. W. (1995). Review of the Wide Range Achievement Test 3. In J. C. Conoley & J. C. Impara (Eds.), The twelfth mental measurements yearbook (pp. 1110-1111). Lincoln, NE: Buros Institute.

20.

Wechsler, D. (1974). Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Revised. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.

21.

Wechsler, D. (1981). Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Revised. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.

22.

Willis, J. , Dumont, R. , & Cruse, C. (in press). Test review: Woodcock-McGrew-Werder Mini-Battery of Achievement. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment.

23.

Wilkinson, G. S. (1993). Wide Range Achievement Test 3. Wilmington, DE: Jastak Associates.

24.

Wilson, M. S. , & Reschly, D. J. (1996). Assessment in school psychology training and practice. School Psychology Review, 25, 9-23.

25.

Woodcock, R. W. , & Johnson, M. B. (1989). Woodcock-Johnson Psycho-Educational Battery-Revised. Chicago: Riverside.

26.

Woodcock, R. W. , McGrew, K. S. , & Werder, J. K. (1994). Woodcock-McGrew-Werder Mini-Battery of Achievement. Chicago: Riverside.