College-Sample Psychometric and Normative Data on a Short Form of the Raven Advanced Progressive Matrices Test

Abstract

The Raven Advanced Progressive Matrices Test (APM) is a popular measure of higher-order general mental ability (g). Its use in both basic research and applied settings is partially attributable to its apparent low level of culture-loading. However, one disadvantage curtailing its more widespread use may be its protracted administration time. Arthur and Day addressed this issue by creating an APM short form. The present study provides college-sample normative data on this 12-item short form of the APM that demonstrates psychometric properties similar to those of the long form, but with a substantially shorter administration time. These data will facilitate the use and interpretation of short form test scores in research settings where administration time is a major concern.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ablard, K. E. , & Mills, C. J. (1996). Evaluating abridged versions of the Raven's Advanced Progressive Matrices for identifying students with academic talent. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 14, 54-64.

Alderton, D. L. , & Larson, G. E. (1990). Dimensionality of Raven's Advanced Progressive Matrices items. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 50, 887-900.

Arthur, W., Jr. , & Day, D. V. (1994). Development of a short form for the Raven Advanced Progressive Matrices Test. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 54, 394-403.

Arthur, W., Jr. , & Woehr, D. J. (1993). A confirmatory factor analytic study examining the dimensionality of the Raven's Advanced Progressive Matrices. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53, 471-478.

Bender, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indices in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 239-246.

Bentler, P. M. , & Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness-of-fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 588-600.

Bors, D. A. , & Forrin, B. (1995). Age, speed of information processing, recall, and fluid intelligence. Intelligence, 20, 229-248.

Bors, D. A. , & Stokes, T. L. (1998). Raven's Advanced Progressive Matrices: Norms for first-year university students and the development of a short form. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 58, 382-398.

Browne, M. W. , & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136-162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

10.

Carpenter, P. A. , Just, M. A. , & Snell, P. (1990). What one intelligence test measures: A theoretical account of the processing in the Raven Progressive Matrices test. Psychological Review, 97, 404-431.

11.

Forbes, A. R. (1964). An item analysis of the Advanced Matrices. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 34, 223-236.

12.

Humphreys, L. G. (1984). General intelligence. In C. R. Reynolds and R. T. Brown (Eds.), Perspectives on bias in mental testing (pp. 221-247). New York: Plenum.

13.

Jensen, A. R. (1980). Bias in mental testing. New York: Free Press.

14.

Jöreskog, K. G. , & Sörbom, D. (1996). LISREL VIII user's reference guide. Chicago, IL: Scientific Software.

15.

Kim,J. O. , & Mueller, C. W. (1978). Factor analysis: Statistical methods and practical issues. Beverly Hill, CA: Sage Publications.

16.

Raven, J. (1989). The Raven Progressive Matrices: A review of national forming studies and ethnic and socioeconomic variation within the United States. Journal of Educational Measurement, 26, 1-16.

17.

Raven, J. C. , Raven, J. , & Court, J. H. (1994). A manual for Raven's Progressive Matrices and Vocabulary Scales. London: H. K Lewis.

18.

Wesman, A. G. (1965). Manual for Wesman Personnel Classification Test. New York: The Psychological Corporation.