(In)Credibly Inclusive? A Panel Study on Inclusive Leadership,Leader Credibility,and Inclusive Climate

Abstract

Cultivating an inclusive climate is an important concern for many public organizations, and it can be approached through various means. Research suggests that by exercising inclusive leadership, public managers may be able to support an inclusive climate. However, we still know little about the extent to which and under what conditions inclusive leadership is effective in promoting an inclusive climate. This study contributes to the existing research by examining the importance of inclusive leadership on inclusive climate utilizing a representative panel of 705 Danish high school teachers. Additionally, the study argues that leader credibility may be an important moderator. Testing the preregistered hypotheses, the study finds support for a statistically significant effect of changes in inclusive leadership on changes in inclusive climate. Contrary to expectations, leader credibility does not appear to moderate the relationship. The study suggests that inclusive leadership is relevant to promote inclusive climates across different contexts.

Keywords

inclusive leadership inclusive climate leader credibility diversity panel data

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Allison

P. D.

(2009). Fixed effects regression models. Sage Publications.

Andersen

L. B.

Boye

Laursen

(2018). Building support? The importance of verbal rewards for employee perceptions of governance initiatives. International Public Management Journal, 21(1), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/10967494.2017.1329761

Angrist

J. D.

Pischke

J.-S.

(2009). Mostly harmless econometrics: An empiricist’s companion. Princeton University Press.

Ashikali

(2018). Leadership and inclusiveness in public organizations. Leiden University.

Ashikali

(2023). Unraveling determinants of inclusive leadership in public organizations. Public Personnel Management, 52(4), 650–681. https://doi.org/10.1177/00910260231180286

Ashikali

Groeneveld

(2015). Diversity management in public organizations and its effect on employees’ affective commitment: The role of transformational leadership and the inclusiveness of the organizational culture. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 35(2), 146–168. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371X13511088

Ashikali

Groeneveld

Kuipers

(2021). The role of inclusive leadership in supporting an inclusive climate in diverse public sector teams. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 41(3), 497–519. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371X19899722

Ashikali

van Luttervelt

M. P.

(2024, July 7–9). Promoting inclusive workplaces: Conceptualizing and measuring inclusive leadership in public organizations [Paper presentation]. Global Leadership Centre Roundtable Conference 2024.

Baumeister

R. F.

Landau

M. J.

(2018). Finding the meaning of meaning: Emerging insights on four grand questions. Review of General Psychology, 22(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1037/gpr0000145

10.

Blackhart

G. C.

Nelson

B. C.

Knowles

M. L.

Baumeister

R. F.

(2009). Rejection elicits emotional reactions but neither causes immediate distress nor lowers self-esteem: A meta-analytic review of 192 studies on social exclusion. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 13(4), 269–309. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868309346065

11.

Boekhorst

J. A.

(2015). The role of authentic leadership in fostering workplace inclusion: A social information processing perspective. Human Resource Management, 54(2), 241–264. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.21669

12.

Boye

(2021). Managerial autonomy in public organisations [PhD dissertation]. Politica.

13.

Brewer

(1991). The social self: On being the same and different at the same time. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17(5), 475–482. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167291175001

14.

Caldwell

L. A. H.

Long

D. T.

(2010). Leadership, Trustworthiness, and Ethical Stewardship. Journal of Business Ethics, 96(4), 497–512. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0489-y

15.

Carmeli

Reiter-Palmon

Ziv

(2010). Inclusive leadership and employee involvement in creative tasks in the workplace: The mediating role of psychological safety. Creativity Research Journal, 22(3), 250–260. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2010.504654

16.

Cho

Y. J.

Ringquist

E. J.

(2011). Managerial trustworthiness and organizational outcomes. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21(1), 53–86. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muq015

17.

Choi

(2009). Diversity in the US Federal Government: Diversity management and employee turnover in federal agencies. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 19(3), 603–630. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mun010

18.

Choi

Rainey

H. G.

(2010). Managing Diversity in U.S. Federal Agencies: Effects of diversity and diversity management on employee perceptions of organizational performance. Public Administration Review, 70(1), 109–121. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2009.02115.x

19.

Choi

(2015). Career success factors of women in the public sector: An empirical analysis of the Korean central government. Asian Social Science, 11(9), Article 9. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v11n9p300

20.

Ding

Riccucci

N. M.

(2023). How does diversity affect public organizational performance? A meta-analysis. Public Administration, 101, 1367–1393. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12885

21.

Dixit

A. K.

Nalebuff

B. J.

(1991). Thinking strategically: The competitive edge in business, politics, and everyday life. (4th printing.). Norton.

22.

Dull

(2009). Results-model reform leadership: Questions of credible commitment. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 19(2), 255–284. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum043

23.

Ely

R. J.

Thomas

D. A.

(2001). Cultural diversity at work: The effects of diversity perspectives on work group processes and outcomes. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46(2), 229–273. https://doi.org/10.2307/2667087

24.

Favero

Bullock

J. B.

(2015). How (not) to solve the problem: An evaluation of scholarly responses to common source bias. Journal of Public Administration Research & Theory, 25(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muu020

25.

Feeney

M. K.

Camarena

(2021). Gender, race, and diversity values among local government leaders. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 41(1), 105–131. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371X19865009

26.

Fleenor

J. W.

Smither

J. W.

Atwater

L. E.

Braddy

P. W.

Sturm

R. E.

(2010). Self-other rating agreement in leadership: A review. The Leadership Quarterly, 21(6), 1005–1034. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2010.10.006

27.

Fornell

Larcker

D. F.

(1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50.

28.

Groeneveld

S. M.

Andrews

Meier

K. J.

Schröter

(2015). Representative Bureaucracy and Public Service Performance: Where, Why and How Does Representativeness Work? (SSRN Scholarly Paper 3982606). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3982606

29.

Groeneveld

Van de Walle

(2010). A contingency approach to representative bureaucracy: Power, equal opportunities and diversity. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 76(2), 239–258. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852309365670

30.

Hainmueller

Mummolo

(2019). How much should we trust estimates from multiplicative interaction models? Simple tools to improve empirical practice. Political Analysis, 27(2), 163–192. https://doi.org/10.1017/pan.2018.46

31.

Hernandez

Long

C. P.

Sitkin

S. B.

(2014). Cultivating follower trust: Are all leader behaviors equally influential? Organization Studies, 35(12), 1867–1892. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840614546152

32.

Holmes

W. T.

Parker

M. A.

(2017). Communication: Empirically testing behavioral integrity and credibility as antecedents for the effective implementation of motivating language. International Journal of Business Communication, 54(1), 70–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/2329488416675450

33.

Jacobsen

C. B.

Andersen

L. B.

(2015). Is leadership in the eye of the beholder? A study of intended and perceived. . .: EBSCOhost. Public, 75(5), 829–841. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12380.Is

34.

Jacobsen

C. B.

Andersen

L. B.

Bøllingtoft

Eriksen

T. L. M.

(2022). Can leadership training improve organizational effectiveness? Evidence from a randomized field experiment on transformational and transactional leadership. Public Administration Review, 82(1), 117–131. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13356

35.

Jakobsen

Jensen

(2015). Common method bias in public management studies. International Public Management Journal, 18(1), 3–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/10967494.2014.997906

36.

Jakobsen

M. L.

(2020). Buy-in to a credible vision! Why leaders make prospector responses to learning-oriented performance reform. Public Organization Review, 20, 277–299. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-019-00438-4

37.

Jakobsen

M. L. F.

Andersen

L. B.

van Luttervelt

M. P.

(2022). Theorizing leadership credibility: The concept and causes of the perceived credibility of leadership initiatives. Perspectives on Public Management and Governance, 5(3), 243–254. https://doi.org/10.1093/ppmgov/gvac009

38.

Jan

(2003). A perspective on the analysis of credible commitment and myopia in health sector decision making. Health Policy, 63(3), 269–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-8510(02)00119-7

39.

Jensen

U. T.

Andersen

L. B.

Bro

L. L.

Bøllingtoft

Eriksen

T. L. M.

Holten

A. L.

Jacobsen

C. B.

Ladenburg

Nielsen

P. A.

Salomonsen

H. H.

Westergård-Nielsen

Würtz

(2019). Conceptualizing and measuring transformational and transactional leadership. Administration and Society, 51(1), 3–33. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399716667157

40.

Khan

Jaafar

Javed

Mubarak

Saudagar

(2020). Does inclusive leadership affect project success? The mediating role of perceived psychological empowerment and psychological safety. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 13(5), 1077–1096. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMPB-10-2019-0267

41.

Kouzes

J. M.

Posner

B. Z.

(2017). The leadership challenge: How to make extraordinary things happen in organizations (6th ed.). John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

42.

Kramer

R. M.

(1999). Trust and distrust in organizations: Emerging perspectives, enduring questions. Annual Review of Psychology, 50(1), 569–598. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.50.1.569

43.

Miller

G. J.

Whitford

A. B.

(2016). Above politics: Bureaucratic discretion and credible commitment. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139017688

44.

Moon

K.-K.

(2018). Examining the relationships between diversity and work behaviors in U.S. federal agencies: Does inclusive management make a difference? Review of Public Personnel Administration, 38(2), 218–247. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371X16660157

45.

Moon

K.-K.

Christensen

R. K.

(2022). Moderating diversity, collective commitment, and discrimination: The role of ethical leaders in the public sector. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 32(2), 380–397. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muab035

46.

Moorman

R. H.

Darnold

T. C.

Priesemuth

(2013). Perceived leader integrity: Supporting the construct validity and utility of a multi-dimensional measure in two samples. Leadership Quarterly, 24(3), 427–444. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2013.02.003

47.

Mor Barak

M. E.

Lizano

E. L.

Kim

Duan

Rhee

M.-K.

Hsiao

H.-Y.

Brimhall

K. C.

(2016). The promise of diversity management for climate of inclusion: A state-of-the-art review and meta-analysis. Human Service Organizations: Management, Leadership & Governance, 40(4), 305–333. https://doi.org/10.1080/23303131.2016.1138915

48.

Nielsen

P. A.

Boye

Holten

A.-L.

Jacobsen

C. B.

Andersen

L. B.

(2019). Are transformational and transactional types of leadership compatible? A two-wave study of employee motivation. Public Administration, 97(2), 413–428. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12574

49.

Nishii

L. H.

(2013). The benefits of climate for inclusion for gender-diverse groups. The Academy of Management Journal, 56(6), 1754–1774.

50.

Nishii

L. H.

Leroy

(2022). A multi-level framework of inclusive leadership in organizations. Group & Organization Management, 47(4), 683–722. https://doi.org/10.1177/10596011221111505

51.

Oberfield

Z. W.

(2014). Accounting for time: Comparing temporal and atemporal analyses of the business case for diversity management. Public Administration Review, 74(6), 777–789. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12278

52.

Oberfield

Z. W.

(2016). Why are some agencies perceived as more committed to diversity than others? An analysis of public-sector diversity climates. Public Management Review, 18(5), 763–790. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2015.1045017

53.

Orekoya

I. O.

(2023). Inclusive leadership and team climate: The role of team power distance and trust in leadership. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 45(1), 94–115. https://doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-03-2023-0142

54.

Randel

A. E.

Galvin

B. M.

Shore

L. M.

Ehrhart

K. H.

Chung

B. G.

Dean

M. A.

Kedharnath

(2018). Inclusive leadership: Realizing positive outcomes through belongingness and being valued for uniqueness. Human Resource Management Review, 28(2), 190–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2017.07.002

55.

Riccucci

N. M.

(2009). The pursuit of social equity in the federal government: A road less traveled? Public Administration Review, 69(3), 373–382.

56.

Shore

L. M.

Chung

B. G.

(2022). Inclusive leadership: How leaders sustain or discourage work group inclusion. Group & Organization Management, 47(4), 723–754. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601121999580

57.

Shore

L. M.

Randel

A. E.

Chung

B. G.

Dean

M. A.

Holcombe Ehrhart

Singh

(2011). Inclusion and diversity in work groups: A review and model for future research. Journal of Management, 37(4), 1262–1289. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310385943

58.

Simons

(2002). Behavioral integrity: The perceived alignment between managers’ words and deeds as a research focus. Organization Science, 13(1), 18–35.

59.

Stock

J. H.

Watson

M. W.

(2020). Introduction to econometrics (4th ed., global edition.). Pearson.

60.

van Knippenberg

De Dreu

C. K. W.

Homan

A. C.

(2004). Work group diversity and group performance: An integrative model and research agenda. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(6), 1008–1022. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.89.6.1008

61.

van Knippenberg

Schippers

M. C.

(2007). Work group diversity. Annual Review of Psychology, 58(1), 515–541. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085546

62.

van Knippenberg

Sitkin

S. B

. (2013). A critical assessment of charismatic: Transformational leadership research: Back to the drawing board? The Academy of Management Annals, 7(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.1080/19416520.2013.759433

63.

van Knippenberg

van Ginkel

W. P

. (2010). The categorization-elaboration model of work group diversity: Wielding the double-edged sword. In Crisp

R. J.

(Ed.), The psychology of social and cultural diversity (pp. 255–280). John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444325447.ch11

64.

van Knippenberg

van Ginkel

W. P

. (2022). A diversity mindset perspective on inclusive leadership. Group & Organization Management, 47(4), 779–797. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601121997229

65.

van Knippenberg

De Cremer

Hogg

M. A.

(2004). Leadership, self, and identity: A review and research agenda. The Leadership Quarterly, 15(6), 825–856. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2004.09.002

66.

van Luttervelt

M. P.

(2022, September 7–9). Separating and integrating personal and positional leader credibility: Concept and scale development [Conference session]. Conference Paper Prepared for the EGPA 2022, Lisbon.

67.

van Luttervelt

M. P

. (2024). The (In)Credibles: On Leader Credibility of Public Managers. [PhD dissertation]. Politica.

68.

van Luttervelt

M. P.

Barslund Grøn

Benthem

M. S.

(2024). Deviating from the course: How presentational strategies and leadership investments affect leader credibility and collaborative engagement. International Public Management Journal. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/10967494.2024.2344544

69.

van Luttervelt

M. P.

Jacobsen

C. B.

Andersen

L. B.

Benthem

M. S.

Rasmussen

J. K

(2021). Som sagt så gjort? Betydningen af lederens personlige troværdighed for medarbejdermotivation, når der bedrives transformationsledelse. Politica, 53(4), Article 4. https://doi.org/10.7146/politica.v53i4.130513

70.

Veli Korkmaz

van Engen

M. L.

Knappert

Schalk

(2022). About and beyond leading uniqueness and belongingness: A systematic review of inclusive leadership research. Human Resource Management Review, 32(4), 100894. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2022.100894

71.

Wright

P. M.

Nishii

L. H.

(2007). Strategic HRM and organizational behavior: Integrating multiple levels of analysis. CAHRS Working Paper Series, January, 468–468.

72.

Yukl

(2012). Effective leadership behavior: What we know and what questions need more attention. Academy of Management Perspectives, 26(4), 66–85. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2012.0088

73.

Yukl

G. A.

(2013). Leadership in organizations (8th ed.). Pearson.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.04 MB

0.00 MB