Scholarship in Public Administration has extensively examined how frontline workers cope with workload. However, most studies focus on public services where employees have significant discretion, leaving standardized services – where service time is a critical measure of customer satisfaction – relatively unexplored. This article investigates the relationship between workload and service time across various standardized government services, emphasizing the influence of job design variables. Drawing on data from 41 government service centers in Hungary, encompassing 3,406,152 worker-customer interactions across 36 services delivered by 947 frontline workers, the analysis reveals that increased workload prompts workers to accelerate service times, highlighting a predominant coping strategy regardless of service knowledge requirements. The relation between workload and service time is shaped by factors such as task specialization, task variety, operational volume, and on-the-job breaks. These findings offer valuable insights for managing government services under high workload conditions.
AltmannE. M.TraftonJ. G.HambrickD. Z. (2014). Momentary interruptions can derail the train of thought. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143(1), 215–226.
2.
AncaraniA.ArcidiaconoF.Di MauroC.GiammancoM. D. (2021). Promoting work engagement in public administrations: The role of middle managers’ leadership. Public Management Review, 23(8), 1234–1263.
3.
AndersenS. C.GuulT. S. (2019). Reducing minority discrimination at the front line—combined survey and field experimental evidence. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 29(3), 429–444.
AskimJ.FimreiteA. L.MoseleyA.PedersenL. H. (2011). One-stop shops for social welfare: The adaptation of an organizational form in three countries. Public Administration, 89(4), 1451–1468.
6.
BakkerA. B. (2015). A job demands–resources approach to public service motivation. Public Administration Review, 75(5), 723–732.
7.
BakkerA. B.DemeroutiE. (2017). Job demands–resources theory: Taking stock and looking forward. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 22(3), 273–285.
8.
BakkerA. B.DemeroutiE.EuwemaM. C. (2005). Job resources buffer the impact of job demands on burnout. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 10(2), 170–180.
9.
BakkerA. B.DemeroutiE.Sanz-VergelA. (2023). Job demands–resources theory: Ten years later. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 10(1), 25–53.
10.
BakkerA. B.DemeroutiE.VerbekeW. (2004). Using the job demands-resources model to predict burnout and performance. Human Resource Management, 43(1), 83–104.
11.
BaltesB. B.BriggsT. E.HuffJ. W.WrightJ. A.NeumanG. A. (1999). Flexible and compressed workweek schedules: A meta-analysis of their effects on work-related criteria. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84(4), 496–513.
12.
BeckJ. W.ScholerA. A.SchmidtA. M. (2017). Workload, risks, and goal framing as antecedents of shortcut behaviors. Journal of Business and Psychology, 32, 421–440.
13.
BellE.MeyerK. (2024). Does reducing street-level bureaucrats’ workload enhance equity in program access? Evidence from burdensome college financial aid programs. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 34(1), 16–38.
14.
BoivinD. B.BoudreauP. (2014). Impacts of shift work on sleep and circadian rhythms. Pathologie Biologie, 62(5), 292–301.
15.
BoselieP.Van HartenJ.VeldM. (2021). A human resource management review on public management and public administration research: Stop right there. . . before we go any further. . .. Public Management Review, 23(4), 483–500.
16.
BosseJ.BurnettM.EpsaE.Møller NielsenS.RongioneC.ScholtensH. (2015). The public sector as partner for a better society. European Institute of Public Administration.
17.
CantarelliP.BelardinelliP.KolstadeN. (2016). A meta-analysis of job satisfaction correlates in the public administration literature. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 36(2), 115–144.
18.
DawsonJ. F. (2014). Moderation in management research: What, why, when, and how. Journal of Business and Psychology, 29(1), 1–19.
19.
de la Riva AgüeroR. (2022). Do cogovernance and CSOs supplement municipal capacity for service delivery? An assessment of differences in simple versus complex services. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 32(1), 1–22.
20.
DelasayM.IngolfssonA.KolfalB.SchultzK. (2019). Load effect on service times. European Journal of Operational Research, 279(3), 673–686.
21.
DemeroutiE.BakkerA. B.NachreinerF.SchaufeliW. B. (2001). The job demands-resources model of burnout. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), 499–512.
22.
DemeroutiE.BakkerA. B.SonnentagS.FullagarC. J. (2012). Work-related flow and energy at work and at home: A study on the role of daily recovery. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33(2), 276–295.
23.
DeoS.JainA. (2019). Slow first, fast later: Temporal speed-up in service episodes of finite duration. Production and Operations Management, 28(5), 1061–1081.
24.
Edri-PeerO.CohenN. (2025). Revisiting coping mechanisms on the street-level: A systematic literature review. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 35(4), 397–421.
25.
EsteveM.SchusterC.AlbaredaA.LosadaC. (2017). The effects of doing more with less in the public sector: Evidence from a large-scale survey. Public Administration Review, 77(4), 544–553.
26.
EyrolleH.CellierJ. M. (2000). The effects of interruptions in work activity: Field and laboratory results. Applied Ergonomics, 31(5), 537–543.
27.
Fernández-i-MarínX.HinterleitnerM.KnillC.SteinebachY. (2024). Bureaucratic overburdening in advanced democracies. Public Administration Review, 84(4), 696–709.
28.
FredrikssonA. (2020). One stop shops for public services: Evidence from citizen service centers in Brazil. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 39(4), 1133–1165.
29.
GieskeH.GeorgeB.van MeerkerkI.van BuurenA. (2020). Innovating and optimizing in public organizations: Does more become less?Public Management Review, 22(4), 475–497.
30.
Gould-WilliamsJ. S.BottomleyP.RedmanT. O. M.SnapeE. D.BishopD. J.LimpanitgulT.MostafaA. M. S. (2014). Civic duty and employee outcomes: Do high commitment human resource practices and work overload matter?Public Administration, 92(4), 937–953.
31.
HajnalG.RostaM. (2019). A new doctrine in the making? Doctrinal foundations of sub-national governance reforms in Hungary (2010-2014). Administration & Society, 51(3), 404–430.
32.
HallingA.PetersenN. B. G. (2024). Frontline employees’ responses to citizens’ communication of administrative burdens. Public Administration Review, 84(6), 1017–1037.
33.
HobfollS. E.HalbeslebenJ.NeveuJ. P.WestmanM. (2018). Conservation of resources in the organizational context: The reality of resources and their consequences. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 5(1), 103–128.
34.
HowardC. (2017). Putting one-stop-shops into practice: A systematic review of the drivers of government service integration. Evidence Base: A Journal of Evidence Reviews in Key Policy Areas, 2017(2), 1–14.
35.
HumphreyS. E.NahrgangJ. D.MorgesonF. P. (2007). Integrating motivational, social, and contextual work design features: A meta-analytic summary and theoretical extension of the work design literature. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(5), 1332–1356.
36.
ImT. (2009). An exploratory study of time stress and its causes among government employees. Public Administration Review, 69(1), 104–115.
37.
JakobsenM.JacobsenC. B.SerritzlewS. (2019). Managing the behavior of public frontline employees through change-oriented training: Evidence from a randomized field experiment. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 29(4), 556–571.
38.
JeffersonD.AndiolaL. M.HurleyP. J. (2024). Surviving busy season in a remote work environment: Using the job demands-resources model to investigate coping mechanisms. Northeastern U. D’Amore-McKim School of Business Research Paper 4120679. http://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4120679
39.
KaplanerC.SteinebachY. (2024). Coping practices and the spatial dimension of authority design. Public Administration Review, 84(1), 86–99.
40.
KcD. S.TerwieschC. (2009). Impact of workload on service time and patient safety: An econometric analysis of hospital operations. Management Science, 55(9), 1486–1498.
41.
KcD. S.StaatsB. R.KouchakiM.GinoF. (2020). Task selection and workload: A focus on completing easy tasks hurts performance. Management Science, 66(10), 4397–4416.
42.
KilroyS.FloodP. C.BosakJ.ChênevertD. (2017). Perceptions of high-involvement work practices, person-organization fit, and burnout: A time-lagged study of health care employees. Human Resource Management, 56(5), 821–835.
43.
KimS.ParkY.HeadrickL. (2018). Daily micro-breaks and job performance: General work engagement as a cross-level moderator. Journal of Applied Psychology, 103(7), 772–786.
44.
KimS.ParkY.NiuQ. (2017). Micro-break activities at work to recover from daily work demands. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 38(1), 28–44.
45.
KolstadK. L. (2026). Overburdened bureaucrats: Providing equal access to public services during COVID-19. The Journal of Politics, 88(1), 250–266.
46.
KovácsÉ.HajnalG. (2014). ‘Government Windows’: One-stop shops for administrative services in Hungary. In LægreidP.SarapuuK.RykkjaL. H.Randma-LiivT. (Eds.), Organizing for coordination in the public sector (pp. 237–247). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137359636_20
47.
LeroyS.SchmidtA. M.MadjarN. (2020). Interruptions and task transitions: Understanding their characteristics, processes, and consequences. Academy of Management Annals, 14(2), 661–694.
48.
LipskyM. (1980). Street-level bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the individual in public service. Russell Sage Foundation.
49.
LyubykhZ.GulserenD.PremjiZ.WingateT. G.DengC.BélangerL. J.TurnerN. (2022). Role of work breaks in well-being and performance: A systematic review and future research agenda. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 27(5), 470–487.
50.
Maynard-MoodyS.MushenoM. (2000). State agent or citizen agent: Two narratives of discretion. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10(2), 329–358.
51.
MikkelsenK. S.MadsenJ. K.BaekgaardM. (2024). Is stress among street-level bureaucrats associated with experiences of administrative burden among clients? A multilevel study of the Danish unemployment sector. Public Administration Review, 84(2), 248–260.
52.
MoynihanD. P.PandeyS. K. (2007). The role of organizations in fostering public service motivation. Public Administration Review, 67(1), 40–53.
53.
NandaR.BrowneJ. J. (1977). Hours of work, job satisfaction and productivity. Public Productivity Review, 2(3), 46–56.
54.
NguyenN. T. H.TuanL. T. (2022). Creating reasonable workload to enhance public employee job satisfaction: The role of supervisor support, co-worker support, and tangible job resources. Public Performance & Management Review, 45(1), 131–162.
55.
NobletA.TeoS. T.McWilliamsJ.RodwellJ. J. (2005). Which work characteristics predict employee outcomes for the public-sector employee? An examination of generic and occupation-specific characteristics. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 16(8), 1415–1430.
56.
OldhamG. R.FriedY. (2016). Job design research and theory: Past, present and future. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 136, 20–35.
57.
PerryJ. L. (2000). Bringing society in: Toward a theory of public-service motivation. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10(2), 471–488.
58.
PhanV.NishiokaM.BeckJ. W.ScholerA. A. (2023). Goal progress velocity as a determinant of shortcut behaviors. Journal of Applied Psychology, 108(4), 553–570.
59.
RaudlaR.DouglasJ. W.Randma-LiivT.SaviR. (2015). The impact of fiscal crisis on decision-making processes in European governments: Dynamics of a centralization cascade. Public Administration Review, 75(6), 842–852.
60.
SchaufeliW. B.BakkerA. B. (2004). Job demands, job resources, and their relationship with burnout and engagement: A multi-sample study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25(3), 293–315.
61.
StaatsB. R.GinoF. (2012). Specialization and variety in repetitive tasks: Evidence from a Japanese bank. Management Science, 58(6), 1141–1159.
62.
SteenT.SchottC. (2019). Public sector employees in a challenging work environment. Public Administration, 97(1), 3–10.
63.
TanT. F.NetessineS. (2014). When does the devil make work? An empirical study of the impact of workload on worker productivity. Management Science, 60(6), 1574–1593.
64.
TaoL.LiuN.WenB. (2024). Exploring the impact of public service motivation on public employee’s coping strategy with clients: Nuanced insights from varied contexts. Review of Public Personnel Administration. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371X241304024
65.
TummersL. L.BekkersV.VinkE.MushenoM. (2015). Coping during public service delivery: A conceptualization and systematic review of the literature. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 25(4), 1099–1126.
66.
Van LoonN. M.JakobsenM. L. (2018). Connecting governance and the front lines: How work pressure and autonomy matter for coping in different performance regimes. Public Administration, 96(3), 435–451.
67.
Van VeldhovenM.Van den BroeckA.DanielsK.BakkerA. B.TavaresS. M.OgbonnayaC. (2020). Challenging the universality of job resources: Why, when, and for whom are they beneficial?Applied Psychology, 69(1), 5–29.
68.
Van YperenN. W.HagedoornM. (2003). Do high job demands increase intrinsic motivation or fatigue or both? The role of job control and job social support. Academy of Management Journal, 46(3), 339–348.
69.
VastagG.JeneiÁ. (2019). Mapping improvement options of government services: Illustration of ‘concept-mapping’. Hungarian Statistical Review, 2(1), 24–39.
70.
VermeerenB.KuipersB.SteijnB. (2011). Two faces of the satisfaction mirror: A study of work environment, job satisfaction, and customer satisfaction in Dutch municipalities. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 31(2), 171–189.
71.
XanthopoulouD.BakkerA. B.DemeroutiE.SchaufeliW. B. (2007). The role of personal resources in the job demands-resources model. International Journal of Stress Management, 14(2), 121–141.
72.
WooldridgeJ. M. (2010). Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. MIT Press.
