This study investigated the performance of three kinds of transition metal ions (Mn2+, Cu2+, and Zn2+) modified zeolite 4A particles in suppressing methane/air coflowing flames on cup burner. Ion-exchange method was employed to incorporate different amount of transition metal ions into parent zeolite 4A. Fire suppression effectiveness of zeolites containing varied molar percentage of metal ions was tested by cup-burner method. Results showed that transition metal ions modified zeolites outperformed the parent zeolite 4A with a ranking order of Mn2+ > Cu2+ > Zn2+. Performance of the zeolite particles was affected by the percentage of transition ions loaded, which dominated the number of active sites and Brunauer–Emmett–Teller surface area of the particles. Increasing molar percentage of metal ions loading increased the capacity to scavenge flame radicals, but decreased Brunauer–Emmett–Teller surface area of the particles. There existed an optimized molar percentage of transition metal ions loading where the best fire-suppressing effectiveness was exhibited.
GannRG. A millennia view of fire suppression. In: Proceedings of Halon options technical working conference (HOTWC), Albuquerque, NM, 2–4 May 2000, pp. xi–xvii.
2.
BabushokVTsangW. Inhibitor rankings for alkane combustion. Combust Flame2000; 123(4): 488–506.
3.
HaminsAGmurczykGGrosshandlerW. Flame Suppression Effectiveness. In: Evaluation of alternative in-flight fire suppressants for full-scale testing in simulated aircraft engine nacelles and dry bays. NIST SP 861, April1994, pp. 345–465. Gaithersburg, MD: National Institute of Standard and Technology.
4.
KuangKQHuangXLiaoGX. A comparison between superfine magnesium hydroxide powders and commercial dry powders on fire suppression Effectiveness. Process Saf Environ2008; 86(3): 182–188.
5.
NiXMKuangKQJinX. Large scale synthesis of porous microspheres of Mg-Al-layered double hydroxide with improved fire suppression effectiveness. Solid State Sci2010; 12(4): 546–551.
6.
GurchumeliaLBezarashviliGChikhradzeM. Investigation of performance properties of novel composite fire-extinguishing powders based on mineral raw materials. In: Proceedings of 4th international conference on computation methods and experiments in materials characterization, New Forest, 17–19June2009.
7.
BreckDW. Zeolite molecular sieves: structure, chemistry and use. New York: Wiley, 1974.
8.
SerranoDPEscolaJMPizarroP. Synthesis strategies in the search for hierarchical zeolites. Chem Soc Rev2013; 42(9): 4004–4035.
9.
KrasnyanskyM. Studies of fundamental physical-chemical mechanisms and processes of flame extinguishing by powder aerosols. Fire Mater2008; 32(1): 27–47.
10.
IyaKSWollowitzSKaskanWE. The mechanism of flame inhibition by sodium salts. In: Proceedings of 15th symposium (international) on combustion, 25–31 August 1974, The Combustion Institute, Pittsburgh, PA, Vol. 15, pp. 329–336.
11.
RosserWAJrInamiSHWiseH. The effect of metal salts on premixed hydrocarbon-air flames. Combust Flame1963; 7: 107–119.
12.
BirchallJD. On the mechanism of flame inhibition by alkali metal salts. Combust Flame1970; 14(1): 85–96.
13.
ReineltDLinterisGT. Experimental study of the inhibition of premixed and diffusion flames by iron pentacarbonyl. In: Proceedings of 26th international symposium on combustion, Napoli, 28 July–2 August 1996, vol. 26, pp. 1421–1428. Gaithersburg, MD: National Institute of Standard and Technology.
14.
LinterisGTKnyazevVDBabushokVI. Inhibition of premixed methane flames by manganese and tin compounds. Combust Flame2002; 129: 221–238.
15.
YuSJonesADChangDPY. The transformation of chromium in a laminar premixed hydrogen–air flame. In: Proceedings of the 27th international symposium on combustion, Boulder, CO, 2–7 August 1998, vol. 27, issue no. 2, pp. 1639–1645.
16.
LinterisGTRummingerMDBabushokVI. Catalytic inhibition of laminar flames by transition metal compounds. Prog Energ Combust2008; 34(3): 288–329.
17.
JiangZChowWKLiSF. Review on the additives on new clean fire suppressants. Environ Eng Sci2007; 24(5): 663–674.
18.
LiuJCongBLiaoG. 1F03: Experimental study on CH4/air fire suppression effectiveness of water mist with metal chloride additives. In: Proceedings of 32nd international symposium on combustion: book of abstracts, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada, 3–8 August 2008.
19.
JosephPNicholsENovozhilovV. A comparative study of the effects of chemical additives on the suppression efficiency of water mist. Fire Safety J2013; 58: 221–225.
20.
KorobeinichevOPShmakovAGChernovAA. Fire suppression by aerosols of aqueous solutions of salts. Combust Explo Shock+2010; 46(1): 16–20.
21.
FlanigenEM. Zeolites and molecular sieves: an historical perspective. Stud Surf Sci Catal2001; 137: 11–35.
22.
ChelliahHKWanigarathnePCLentatiAM. Effect of sodium bicarbonate particle size on the extinction condition of non-premixed counterflow flames. Combust Flame2003; 134: 261–272.
23.
HaminsA. Flame extinction by sodium bicarbonate powder in a cup burner. In: Proceedings of 27th international symposium on combustion, Boulder, CO, 2–7 August 1998, pp. 2857–2864. Gaithersburg, MD: National Institute of Standard and Technology.
24.
HuiKSChaoCYHKotSC. Removal of mixed heavy metal ions in wastewater by zeolite 4A and residual products from recycled coal fly ash. J Hazard Mater2005; 127(1–3): 89–101.
25.
HuiKSChaoCYHKwongCK. Use of multi-transition-metal-ion-exchanged zeolite 13X catalysts in methane emission abatement. Combust Flame2008; 153: 119–129.
26.
CullityBDStockSR. Elements of X-ray diffraction. 3rd ed.Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 2001.
27.
KoshibaYTakahashiYOhtaniH. Flame suppression ability of metallocenes (nickelocene, cobaltcene, ferrocene, manganocene, and chromocene). Fire Safety J2012; 51: 10–17.
28.
CharlesJKDouglasD. Solid particulate aerosol fire suppressants. Fire Technology1994; 30(4): 387–399.
29.
WanigarathnePCKraussRHChelliahRJ. Fire suppression by particulates containing metallic compounds. In: Proceedings of Halon options technical working conference (HOTWC), Albuquerque, NM, 2–4 May 2000, pp. 393–402. Gaithersburg, MD: National Institute of Standard and Technology.
30.
TakahashiFLinterisGTKattaVR. Extinguishment mechanisms of coflow diffusion flames in a cup-burner apparatus. P Combust Inst2007; 31(2): 2721–2729.
31.
KattaVRTakahashiFLinterisGT. Suppression of cup-burner flames using carbon dioxide in microgravity. Combust Flame2004; 137(4): 506–522.
32.
TakahashiFLinterisGTKattaVR. Physical and chemical aspects of cup-burner flame extinguishment. In: Proceedings of the 13th annual Halon options technical working conference (HOTWC), Albuquerque, NM, 24–26 May 2005.
33.
TakahashiFKattaVR. A reaction kernel hypothesis for the stability limit of methane jet diffusion flames. P Combust Inst2000; 28(2): 2071–2078.
34.
TakahashiFLinterisGTKattaVR. Vortex-coupled oscillations of edge diffusion flames in coflowing air with dilution. P Combust Inst2007; 31(1): 1575–1582.
35.
LinterisGTTakahashiFKattaVR. Cup-burner flame extinguishment by CF3Br and Br2. Combust Flame2007; 149(1–2): 91–103.
