Determination of the thermal protective performance of clothing during bench-scale fire test and flame engulfment test: Evidence from a new index

Abstract

The protective performance of heat- and flame-resistant materials can be studied using a bench-scale test or a full-scale instrumented manikin test. However, there are some limitations of these evaluation methods. The existing bench-scale test could not be applied entirely to assess the thermal protective performance of fabrics if the exposure duration is fixed, while the existing manikin test only provides limited information about the local difference in thermal insulation. This study developed a new index of maximum attenuation factor to second-degree burn injury (maximum attenuation factor) as an improved quantitative method of the thermal protective performance, and then investigated the use of maximum attenuation factor during the bench-scale test as well as the manikin test. It demonstrated that the calculations of maximum attenuation factor were highly repeatable. In both the bench-scale and the manikin test, strong correlations were found between the results derived from the proposed method and the measurements from the existing test method. The results between the bench-scale test and the manikin test can also be compared as a united index.

Keywords

Protective clothing thermal protective performance flame manikin maximum attenuation factor skin burn injury

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

ISO 17492:2003. Clothing for protection against heat and flame—determination of heat transmission on exposure to both flame and radiant heat.

ASTM F1930-13. Standard test method for evaluation of flame resistant clothing for protection against fire simulations using an instrumented manikin.

Lee

Barker

. Thermal protective performance of heat-resistance fabrics in various high intensity heat exposures. Text Res J 1987; 57(3): 123–132.

Song

Cao

Gholamreza

. Analyzing stored thermal energy and thermal protective performance of clothing. Text Res J 2011; 81: 1124–1138.

Crown

Ackerman

Dale

. Design and evaluation of thermal protective flightsuits. Part 2: instrumented mannequin evaluation. Cloth Text Res J 1998; 16(2): 79–87.

Torvi

Hadjisophocleous

. Research in protective clothing for firefighters: state of the art and future directions. Fire Technol 1999; 35: 111–130.

. The effect of air gaps in moist protective clothing on protection from heat and flame. J Fire Sci 2012; 31(2): 99–111.

Song

. Clothing air gap layers and thermal protective performance in single layer garment. J Ind Text 2007; 36: 193–205.

Mah

Song

. Investigation of the contribution of garment design to thermal protection. Part 1: characterizing air gaps using three-dimensional body scanning for women’s protective clothing. Text Res J 2010; 80: 1317–1329.

10.

Torvi

Dale

Ackerman

. A study of new and existing bench top tests for evaluating fabrics for flash fire protective clothing. In: Stull

Schwope

(eds) Performance of protective clothing (ASTM STP 1273), vol. 6. West Conshohocken, PA: American Society for Testing and Materials, 1997, pp. 108–125.

11.

Schoppee

Welsford

Abbott

. Protection offered by lightweight clothing materials to the heat of a fire. In: Barker

Coletta

(eds) Performance of protective clothing (ASTM STP 900). West Conshohocken, PA: American Society for Testing and Materials, 1986, pp. 340–357.

12.

Wang

. Effects of air gap entrapped in multilayer fabrics and moisture on thermal protective performance. Fiber Polym 2012; 13: 647–652.

13.

Camenzind

Dale

Rossi

. Manikin test for flame engulfment evaluation of protective clothing: historical review and development of a new ISO standard. Fire Mater 2007; 31: 285–295.

14.

Rossi

Schmid

Camenzind

. Thermal energy transfer through heat protective clothing during a flame engulfment test. Text Res J 2014; 84: 1451–1460.

15.

Stoll

Chianta

. Method and rating system for evaluation of thermal protection. Aerospace Med 1969; 40: 1232–1238.

16.

Henriques

Jr Moritz

. Studies of thermal injuries: the relative importance of time and surface temperature in the causation of cutaneous burns. Am J Pathol 1947; 23: 695–720.

17.

Song

Barker

Grimes

. Comparison of methods used to predict the burn injuries in tests of thermal protective fabrics. J ASTM Int 2005; 2: 1–11.

18.

Zhai

. Analyzing thermal shrinkage of fire-protective clothing exposed to flash fire. Fire Technol 2015; 51: 195–211.

19.

Torvi

Threlfall

. Heat transfer model of flame resistant fabrics during cooling after exposure to fire. Fire Technol 2006; 42: 27–48.

20.

Barker

Deaton

Ross

. Heat transmission and thermal energy storage in firefighter turnout suit materials. Fire Technol 2011; 47: 549–563.

21.

ASTM F2703-08. Standard test method for unsteady-state heat transfer evaluation of flame resistant materials for clothing with burn injury prediction.

22.

Mandal

Song

. Thermal sensors for performance evaluation of protective clothing against heat and fire: a review. Text Res J 2014; 85: 101–112.

23.

ASTM F2178-12. Standard test method for determining the arc rating and standard specification for eye or face protective products.

24.

Lawson

Crown

Ackerman

. Moisture effects in heat transfer through clothing systems for wildland firefighters. Int J Occup Saf Ergo 2004; 10: 227–238.

25.

Song

. Effect of an air gap on the heat transfer through protective materials upon hot liquid splashes. Text Res J 2013; 83: 1156–1168.

26.

Kim

Lee

. Investigation of air gaps entrapped in protective clothing systems. Fire Mater 2002; 26(3): 121–126.

27.

Mah

Song

. Investigation of the contribution of garment design to thermal protection. Part 2: instrumented female mannequin flash-fire evaluation system. Text Res J 2010; 80(14): 1473–1487.

28.

Lee

Kim

Wood

. Investigation and correlation of manikin and bench-scale fire testing of clothing systems. Fire Mater 2002; 26(6): 269–278.