Experimental study on fire behaviors of flexible photovoltaic panels using a cone calorimeter

Abstract

Photovoltaic arrays are mounted on the surfaces of modern buildings to harness renewable energy. When a building catches fire, burning photovoltaic panels could worsen an already very hazardous environment. This work deals with the effect of building flame radiation on the fire behaviors of flexible photovoltaic panel installed in building-integrated photovoltaic systems. Cone calorimeter tests were conducted in air with a piloted ignition. The influence of heat flux on photovoltaic fire properties was studied. Several characteristic parameters are systematically determined or calculated, including ignition time, critical heat flux, mass loss rate, gasification heat, heat release rate, and effective heat of combustion. Thermogravimetry and differential scanning calorimetry test was conducted to identify the decomposition mechanism. The comparison of fire properties of photovoltaic and polyethylene terephthalate + tedlar-polyester-tedlar and thermogravimetry and differential scanning calorimetry analysis reveal that polyethylene terephthalate is the main component responsible for decomposition and burning of flexible photovoltaic panel.

Keywords

Flexible photovoltaic panel building-integrated photovoltaic heat flux cone calorimeter fire behaviors

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Kreis

. The impact of solar energy on firefighting. Fire Eng 2009; 162: 79–84.

Shipp

Holland

Crowder

et al . Fire safety and solar electric/photovoltaic systems. Int Fire Prof 2013; 6: 12–17.

Cancelliere

Liciotti

. Fire behaviour and performance of photovoltaic module backsheets. Fire Technol 2015; 52: 333–348.

Oleszkiewicz

. Fire exposure to exterior walls and flame spread on combustible cladding. Fire Technol 1990; 26: 357–375.

IEC 61730-2. Photovoltaic (PV) module safety qualification—part 2: requirements for testing.

UL 1703. Flat-plate photovoltaic modules and panels.

UL 1256. Fire test of roof deck constructions.

Mei

Infield

Gottschalg

et al . Equilibrium thermal characteristics of a building integrated photovoltaic roof. Sol Energy 2009; 83: 1893–1901.

Armijo

Johnson

Harrison

et al . Quantifying photovoltaic fire danger reduction with arc-fault circuit interrupters. Prog Photovoltaics 2016; 24: 507–516.

10.

Cancelliere

. PV electrical plants fire risk assessment and mitigation according to the Italian national fire services guidelines. Fire Mater 2016; 40: 355–367.

11.

Fthenakis

Fuhrmann

Heiser

et al . Experimental investigation of emissions and redistribution of elements in CdTe PV modules during fires. In: 19th European PV solar energy conference, Paris, 7–11 June 2004.

12.

Murata

Yagiura

Takeda

et al . New type of photovoltaic module integrated with roofing material (highly fire-resistant PV tile). Sol Energ Mat Sol C 2003; 75: 647–653.

13.

Yang

H-Y

Zhou

X-D

Yang

L-Z

et al . Experimental studies on the flammability and fires of photovoltaic modules. Materials 2015; 8: 4210–4225.

14.

Almand

. Request for proposals—PV installation best practices review and all hazard assessment. Fire Protection Research Foundation, 2012. Quincy, MA: National Fire Protection Association.

15.

Meacham

Poole

Echeverria

et al . Fire safety challenges of green buildings. New York: Springer, 2013.

16.

ISO 1716. Reaction to fire tests for products-determination of the gross heat of combustion (calorific value).

17.

ASTM E1354-14. Standard test method for heat and visible smoke release rates for materials and products using an oxygen consumption calorimeter.

18.

Tran

White

. Burning rate of solid wood measured in a heat release rate calorimeter. Fire Mater 1992; 16: 197–206.

19.

Babrauskas

. Ignition handbook: principles and applications to fire safety engineering, fire investigation, risk management and forensic science. Issaquah, WA: Fire Science Publishers, 2003.

20.

Quintiere

. A theoretical basis for flammability properties. Fire Mater 2006; 30: 175–214.

21.

Tewarson

. Generation of heat and chemical compounds in fires. In: DiNenno

(ed.) SFPE handbook of fire protection engineering. 3rd ed.Quincy, MA: National Fire Protection Association, 2002, pp. 179–199.

22.

Janssens

. Improved method of analysis for the LIFT apparatus, part I: ignition. In: Proceedings of the 2nd fire and materials conference, Arlington, VA, 23–24 September 1993, pp. 37–46. London: Interscience Communication.

23.

Hopkins

Quintiere

. Material fire properties and predictions for thermoplastics. Fire Safety J 1996; 26: 241–268.

24.

Rhodes

BQJ

. Burning rate and heat flux for PMMA in a cone calorimeter. Fire Safety J 1996; 26: 221–240.

25.

Babrauskas

Peacock

. Heat release rate: the single most important variable in fire hazard. Fire Safety J 1992; 18: 255–272.

26.

Petrella

. The assessment of full-scale fire hazards from cone calorimeter data. J Fire Sci 1994; 12: 14–43.

27.

Linteris

Gewuerz

McGrattan

et al . Modeling solid sample burning. In: Proceedings of the eight international symposium on fire safety science, Beijing, China, 18–23 September 2005.

28.

Spearpoint

Quintiere

. Predicting the burning of wood using an integral model. Combust Flame 2000; 123: 308–325.

29.

Spearpoint

Quintiere

. Predicting piloted ignition of wood in the cone calorimeter using an integral model-effect of species, grain orientation and heat flux. Fire Safety J 2001; 36: 391–415.

30.

Zhang

Chen

Zhao

. Effects of different kinds of clay and different vinyl acetate content on the morphology and properties of EVA/clay nanocomposites. Polymer 2003; 44: 7953–7961.

31.

Nomura

Kato

Nakagawa

et al . The effect of plastic addition on coal caking properties during carbonization. Fuel 2003; 82: 1775–1782.