Strategic management literature supposes that strategic planning and implementation processes can improve public administrations performance. However, there is little empirical evidence about this linkage and it could prevail a bureaucratic approach in strategic planning. Therefore, using one of the strategic management levers (the quality of performance measurement systems), the paper examined whether strategic planning and implementation processes of public universities actually improve organizational performance levels.
At first, the performance measurement systems of n. 29 Italian public universities were analyzed from 2011 to 2014.
By way of statistical methodologies (multiple regression analysis) it was examined the impact (through outcome indicators) of performance measurement systems on public universities performance.
The results show a little improvement in the quality of performance measurement systems of public universities in the period considered and a positive impact of strategic management on public universities results.
AghionP., DewatripontM., HoxbyC., Mas-ColellA., & SapirA. (2010). The governance and performance of universities: evidence from Europe and the U.S. Economic Policy25(61): 7–59.
2.
AiroldiG., BrunettiG., & CodaV. (2005). Corso di Economia Aziendale. Bologna: Il Mulino.
3.
AngiolaN., & BianchiP. (2013). Public managers' skills development for effective performance management. Empirical evidence from Italian local governments. Public Management Review.
4.
AngiolaN., BianchiP., & MongelliG. (2016). Migliorare la performance delle amministrazioni pubbliche. Ariccia (RM): Aracne.
5.
AnthonyR.N. (1965). Planning and Control Systems. Division of Research Graduate School of Business Administration, Harvard University.
6.
BallR. & WilkinsonR. (1994). The use and abuse of performance indicators in UK higher education. Higher Education27(4): 417–27.
7.
BaretteJ., LemyreL., CorneilW. & BeauregardN. (2007). Organizational learning among senior public-service executives: An empirical investigation of culture, decisional latitude and supportive communication. Canadian Public Administration, 3: 333–53.
8.
BaretteJ., LemyreL., CorneilW. & BeauregardN. (2012). Organizational Learning Facilitators in the Canadian Public Sector. International Journal of Public Administration, 2: 137–149.
9.
BarnabèF. and RiccaboniA. (2007). Which Role for Performance Measurement Systems in Higher Education? Focus on Quality Assurance in Italy. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 33(4–5): 302–19.
BecketN. & BrookesM. (2006). Evaluating quality management in university departments. Quality Assurance in Education14(2): 123–42.
12.
BehnR.D. (2003). Why Measure Performance? Different Purposes Require Different Measures. Public Administration Review63(5): 586–06.
13.
BerendsH., BoersmaK. and WeggemanM. (2003), The structuration of organizational learning, Human Relations, 56(9): 1035–1056.
14.
BerryF.S., & WechslerB. (1995). State agencies' experience with strategic planning: Findings from a national survey. Public Administration Review, 55, 159–168.
15.
BolandT. & FowlerA. (2000). A systems perspective of performance management in public sector organisations. The International Journal of Public Sector Management13(5): 417–46.
BouckaertG. & HalliganJ. (2008). Managing Performance: International Comparisons. London: Routledge.
18.
BrattiM., McKnightA., NaylorR. & SmithJ. (2004). Higher Education Outcomes, Graduate Employment and University Performance Indicators. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society)167(3): 475–96.
19.
BreakwellG.M. & TytherleighM.Y. (2010). University leaders and university performance in the United Kingdom: Is it “who” leads, or “where” they lead that matters most?. Higher Education60 (5): 491–06.
20.
BroomC., JacksonM., HarrisJ. & Vogelsang-CoombsV. (1998). Performance measurement. Concepts and techniques. Washington, DC: ASPA's Center for Accountability and Performance.
21.
BrysonJ.M. (2004)(2011). Strategic planning for public and nonprofit organizations: A guide to strengthening and sustaining organizational achievement. Jossey-Bass publishers.
22.
BrysonJ.M., BerryF.S. & YangK. (2010). The State of Public Strategic Management Research: A Selective Literature Review and Set of Future Directions. The American Review of Public Administration40(5): 1–27.
23.
BrysonJ.M, EdwardsL.H. & SlykeD.M.V. (2018). Getting strategic about strategic planning research. Public Management Review, 20(3): 317–339.
24.
CodaV. (1988). L'orientamento strategico dell'impresa. UTET, Torino.
25.
CzarniawskaB. & GenellK. (2002). Gone shopping? Universities on their way to the market. Scandinavian Journal of Management18(4): 455–74.
26.
de Lancer JulnesP. & HolzerM. (2001). Promoting the Utilization of Performance Measures in Public Organizations: An Empirical Study of Factors Affecting Adoption and Implementation. Public Administration Review61(6): 693–08.
27.
GaitherG., NedwekB.P. & NealJ.E. (1994). Measuring Up: The Promise and Pitfalls of Performance Indicators in Higher Education. Washington DC: Association for the Study of Higher Education.
28.
GreilingD. & HalachmiA. (2013). Accountability and organizational learning in the public sector. Public Performance & Management Review, 3: 380–406.
29.
GroenB.A.C., WoutersM.J.F. & WilderomC.P.M. (2016). Employee participation, performance metrics, and job performance: A survey study based on self-determination theory. Management Accounting Research.
30.
HalachmiA., HardyW.P., & RhoadesB.L. (1993). Demographic data and strategic analysis. Public Administration Quarterly, 17.
31.
HallM. & HoltR. (2003). Developing a culture of performance learning in U.K. public sector project management. Public Performance & Management Review26(3): 263–75.
32.
HatryH.P. (1999, 2006). Performance Measurement: Getting Results. Washington DC: Urban Institute Press.
33.
HigginsJ.C. (1989). Performance measurement in universities. European Journal of Operational Research38(3): 358–68.
34.
HowellJ.M. & AvolioB.J. (1993), Transformational leadership, transactional leadership, locus of control and support for innovation: key predictors of consolidated business-unit performance, Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(6), pp. 891–902.
35.
HughesO. E. (2003). Public Management and Administration. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.
36.
IngrahamP.W., ThompsonJ.R. & SandersR.P. (1998), Transforming Government: Lessons from the Reinvention Laboratories, Jossey Bass, San Francisco, CA.
37.
JohnesJ. (1996). Performance assessment in higher education in Britain. European Journal of Operational Research89(1): 18–33.
38.
JohnesJ. & TaylorJ. (1990). Performance Indicators in Higher Education. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
39.
JohnsenA. (2010). What Does 25 Years of Experience Tell Us About the State of Performance Measurement in Public Policy and Management?. Public Money & Management25(1): 9–17.
40.
KaplanR.S. & NortonD.P. (1996). Translating Strategy into Action. The Balanced Scorecard. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
41.
LayzellD.T. (1999). Linking performance to funding outcomes at the state level for public institutions of higher education: Past, Present and Future. Research in Higher Education40(2): 233–46.
42.
LipshitzR., PopperM. & OzS. (1996). Building Learning Organizations: The Design and Implementation of Organizational Learning Mechanisms. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science32(3): 292–305.
43.
MessnerP.E. & RuhlM.L. (1998). Management by fact: a model application of performance indicators by an educational leadership department. International Journal of Educational Management12(1): 23–27.
44.
MillerL.S. (2005). Exploring High Academic Performance: The Case of Latinos in Higher Education. Journal of Hispanic Higher Education4(3): 252–71.
45.
MintzbergH. (1983). Power In and Around Organizations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice–Hall.
46.
MintzbergH. (1994). The Rise and Fall of Strategic Planning, reconceiving Roles for Planning, Plans, Planners. NY: Free Press.
47.
MoynihanD.P. & LanduytN. (2009). How do Public Organizations Learn? Bridging Cultural and Structural Perspectives. Public Administration Review69(6): 1097–105.
48.
MoynihanD.P., PandeyS.K. & WrightB.E. (2011). Setting the Table: How Transformational Leadership Fosters Performance Information Use. JPART22(1): 143–64.
49.
MoynihanD.P. & LavertuS. (2012). Does involvement in performance management routines encourage performance information use? Evaluating GPRA and PART. Public Administration Review, 4: 592–02.
50.
NuttP.C. and BackoffR.W. (1992). Strategic Management of Public and Third Sector Organisations: A Handbook for Leaders, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
51.
O'TooleL.J.Jr. & MeierK.J. (2015). Public Management, Context, and Performance: In Quest of a More General Theory. JPART25(1): 237–56.
52.
OlsenJ.B. & EadieD.C. (1982). The Game Plan: Governance with Foresight, Washington, DC: Council of State Planning Agencies.
53.
ParkS.M. & RaineyH.G. (2008). Leadership and Public Service Motivation in U.S. Federal Agencies. International Public Management Journal11: 109–42.
54.
PoisterT.H. (2003). Measuring performance in public and nonprofit organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
55.
PoisterT.H. & StreibG.D. (1999). Strategic Management in the Public Sector: Concepts, Models, and Processes. Public Productivity & Management Review22(3): 308–25.
56.
PoisterT.H., & StreibG. (2005). Elements of Strategic Planning and management in Municipal Government: Status after Two Decades. Public Administration Review, 65(1).
57.
PoisterT.H., PittsD.W. & EdwardsL.H. (2010). Strategic Management Research in the Public Sector: A Review, Synthesis, and Future Directions. The American Review of Public Administration40(5): 522–545.
58.
PollitC. & BouckaertG. (2000, 2004, 2011). Public Management Reform: A Comparative Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
59.
RabovskyT.M. (2014). Using Data to Manage for Performance at Public Universities. Public Administration Review74(2): 260–72.
60.
RaineyH.G and SteinbauerP.A. (1999), “Galloping elephants: developing elements of a theory of effective government organizations”, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory9(1), pp. 1–32.
61.
ReponenT. (1999). Is leadership possible at loosely coupled organizations such as universities?. Higher Education Policy, Vol. 12 No. 3: 237–44.
TavenasF. (2003). Quality assurance: a reference system for indicators and evaluation procedures. Brussels: European University Association.
64.
TaylorJ. (2001). The Impact of Performance Indicators on the Work of University Academics: Evidence from Australian Universities. Higher Education Quarterly55(1): 42–61.
65.
United States Government Accountability Office – GAO (2005), “Managing for results. Enhancing agency use of performance information for management decision making”, available at: www.gao.gov/assets/250/247701.pdf.
66.
Van DoorenW., BouckaertG. & HalliganJ. (2010). Performance management in the public sector. New York: Routledge.
67.
VinzantD.H., & VinzantJ. C. (1996). Strategy and Organizational Capacity: Finding a fit, Public Productivity and Management Review, 20(2).
68.
WeickK. H. (1995). Sensemaking in Organizations. Thousands Oaks: Sage.
