In his sociology of the state, Bourdieu introduces the concept of “de-particularization” to spotlight processes through which those who dominate the state establish their particular lifestyle as a universal cultural norm. While Bourdieu did not elaborate on such processes, the article develops a specific mechanism of de-particularization in articulating his framework with postcolonial perspectives on analogies between race and class. Focusing on the German Empire and drawing on published and unpublished sources, it shows how the Verein für Sozialpolitik, a prominent social policy actor in the emerging welfare state, implicitly analogized the worker question and questions of racial degeneration in a study on European tropical settlement. As the principles of vision and division distinguishing workers from the educated bourgeoisie were transposed onto the difference of colonizers and natives, the ethos regarded as particularly bourgeois in previous investigations of the worker question came to be construed as universally German.
BallodKarl. 1916. “Review of ‘Schriften des Vereins für Sozialpolitik, Bd. 147: Die Ansiedelung von Europäern in den Tropen.’” Jahrbuch für Gesetzgebung, Verwaltung und Volkswirtschaft40:493–98.
3.
BlackbournDavidEleyGeoff. 1984. The Peculiarities of German History. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
4.
BoatcăManuelaCostaSérgio. 2010. “Postcolonial Sociology: A Research Agenda.” Pp. 13–31 in Decolonizing European Sociology, edited by BoatcăM.CostaS.Gutiérrez-RodriguezE.Farnham, UK: Ashgate.
5.
BoeseFranz. 1939. Geschichte des Vereins für Sozialpolitik 1872-1932. Berlin, Germany: Duncker & Humblot.
6.
BonhamGary. 1991. Ideology and Interests in the German State. New York, NY: Garland.
7.
BourdieuPierre. 1977. Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
8.
BourdieuPierre. 1984. Distinction. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
9.
BourdieuPierre. 1994. “Rethinking the State: Genesis and Structure of the Bureaucratic Field.” Sociological Theory12(1):1–18.
10.
BourdieuPierre. 1995. The Rules of Art. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
11.
BourdieuPierre. 1996. The State Nobility. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
12.
BourdieuPierre. 2000. Pascalian Meditations. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
13.
BourdieuPierre. 2014. On the State. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
14.
BourdieuPierre. 2022. Principles of Vision. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
15.
BrubakerRogers. 1996. “Nationalizing States in the Old ‘New Europe’ – and the New.” Ethnic and Racial Studies19:411–37.
16.
BrubakerRogers. 2011. “Nationalizing States Revisited: Projects and Processes of Nationalization in Post-Soviet States.” Ethnic and Racial Studies34:1785–814.
17.
ChickeringRoger. 1984. We Men Who Feel Most German. Boston, MA: Allen & Unwin.
18.
ComaroffJeanComaroffJohn. 1992. “Homemade Hegemony.” Pp. 265–95 in Ethnography and the Historical Imagination, edited by ComaroffJ.ComaroffJ.Boulder, CO: Westview.
19.
ConradSebastian. 2010. Globalisation and the Nation in Imperial Germany. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
20.
ConradSebastian. 2014. “Internal Colonialism in Germany: Culture Wars, Germanification of the Soil, and the Global Market Imaginary.” Pp. 246–64 in German Colonialism in a Global Age, edited by NaranchB.EleyG.Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
21.
CorriganDerekSayerPhilipp. 1985. The Great Arch: English State Formation as Cultural Revolution. London, UK: Blackwell.
22.
DejungChristof. 2019. “From Global Civilizing Missions to Racial Warfare: Class Conflicts and the Representation of the Colonial World in European Middle-Class Thought.” Pp. 251–71 in The Global Bourgeoisie, edited by DejungC.MotadelD.OsterhammelJ.Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
23.
EleyGeoff. 1980. Reshaping the German Right. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
24.
EvansMaurice. 1913. “Natal.” Pp. 1–46 in Die Ansiedelung von Europäern in den Tropen. Part 3, edited by the SozialpolitikVerein für. Leipzig, Germany: Duncker & Humblot.
25.
GoJulian. 2013a. “For a Postcolonial Sociology.” Theory and Society42(1):25–55.
GoJulian. 2016. Postcolonial Thought and Social Theory. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
28.
GorskiPhilip S.2013. “Nation-ization Struggles. A Bourdieusian Theory of Nationalism.” Pp. 242–65 in Bourdieu and Historical Analysis, edited by GorskiP. S.Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
29.
Grimmer-SolemErik. 2003. The Rise of Historical Economics and Social Reform in Germany, 1864–1894. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
30.
Grimmer-SolemErik. 2007. “The Professors’ Africa: Economists, the Elections of 1907, and the Legitimation of German Imperialism.” German History25:313–47.
31.
Grimmer-SolemErik. 2019. Learning Empire. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
32.
GrossePascal. 2000. Kolonialismus, Eugenik und bürgerliche Gesellschaft in Deutschland 1850-1918. Frankfurt, Germany: Campus.
33.
HallCatherine. 1992. White, Male and Middle Class. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
34.
HallCatherine. 2002. Civilising Subjects. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
35.
HallStuart. [1992] 2019. “The West and the Rest: Discourse and Power.” Pp. 141–84 in Essential Essays. Vol. 2, edited by MorleyD.Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
36.
HammerRicarda. 2020. “Decolonizing the Civil Sphere: The Politics of Difference, Imperial Erasures, and Theorizing from History.” Sociological Theory38(2):101–21.
37.
HardyH.1913. “Rhodesien.” Pp. 47–119 in Die Ansiedelung von Europäern in den Tropen. Part 3, edited by the SozialpolitikVerein für. Leipzig, Germany: Duncker & Humblot.
38.
HobsbawmEricRangerTerence. 1983. The Invention of Tradition. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
KarstedtOskar. 1913. “Die Bevölkerung Britisch-Ostafrikas und Ugandas.” Pp. 121–62 in Die Ansiedelung von Europäern in den Tropen. Part 3, edited by the SozialpolitikVerein für. Leipzig, Germany: Duncker & Humblot
42.
KimJaeeun. 2018. “Migration-Facilitating Capital: A Bourdieusian Theory of International Migration.” Sociological Theory36(3):262–88.
43.
KockaJürgen. 1993. “The European Pattern and the German Case.” Pp. 3–39 in Bourgeois Society in Nineteenth-Century Europe, edited by KockaJ.MitchellA.Oxford, UK: Berg.
44.
KundrusBirthe. 2003. Moderne Imperialisten. Köln, Germany: Böhlau.
45.
LermanKatherine Anne. 2015. “Imperial Governance.” Pp. 13–32 in The Ashgate Research Companion to Imperial Germany, edited by JefferiesM.Farnham, UK: Ashgate.
46.
LindenlaubDieter. 1967. Richtungskämpfe im Verein für Sozialpolitik. 2 vols. Wiesbaden, Germany: Steiner.
47.
LovemanMara. 2005. “The Modern State and the Primitive Accumulation of Symbolic Power.” American Journal of Sociology10(6):1651–83.
48.
LovemanMara. 2007. “Blinded like a State: The Revolt against Civil Registration in 19th Century Brazil.” Comparative Studies in Society and History49(1):5–39.
49.
LuftAlizaThomsonSue. 2021 “Race, Nation, and Resistance to State Symbolic Power in Rwanda since the 1994 Genocide.” Political Power and Social Theory38:105–34.
50.
MagubaneZine. 2004. Bringing the Empire Home: Race, Class, and Gender in Britain and Colonial South Africa. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
51.
MalinowskiStephan. 2011. “Their Favorite Enemy. German Social Historians and the Prussian Nobility.” Pp. 141–55 in Imperial Germany Revisited, edited by TorpC.MüllerS. O.New York, NY: Berghahn.
52.
McClintockAnne. 1995. Imperial Leather: Race, Gender and Sexuality in the Colonial Contest. New York, NY: Routledge.
53.
MommsenWolfgangAldenhoffRita. 1993. “Einleitung.” Pp. 1–68 in Max Weber Gesamtausgabe. Vol. I/4,1. Tübingen, Germany: Mohr.
54.
NelsonRobert. 2024. Frontiers of Empire: Max Sering, Inner Colonization, and the German East, 1871–1945. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
55.
NonnChristoph. 2017. Das Deutsche Kaiserreich. München, Germany: Beck.
56.
NortonMathew. 2014. “Classification and Coercion: The Destruction of Piracy in the English Maritime System.” American Journal of Sociology119(6):1537–75.
57.
OberschallAnthony. 1965. Empirical Social Research in Germany, 1848–1914. The Hague, Netherlands: Mouton.
58.
PetzkeMartin. 2023. “The Culture of Official Statistics. Symbolic Domination and ‘Bourgeois’ Assimilation in Quantitative Measurements of Immigrant Integration in Germany.” Theory & Society52(2):213–42.
59.
RathgenKarl. 1910. “Die Besiedelung der deutschen Kolonien.” Internationale Wochenschrift für Wissenschaft, Kunst und Technik4(46):1436–52.
60.
RatzUrsula. 1980. Sozialreform und Arbeiterschaft. Berlin, Germany: Colloquium.
61.
ReedIsaak Ariail. 2019. “Performative State-Formation in the Early American Republic.” American Sociological Review84(2):334–67.
62.
ReuleckeJürgen. 1981. “Pauperismus, ‘social learning’ und die Anfänge der Sozialstatistik in Deutschland.” Pp. 358–72 in Vom Elend der Handarbeit, edited by MommsenH.SchulzeW.Stuttgart, Germany: Klett-Cotta.
63.
RiesebrodtMartin. 1984. “Editorischer Bericht.” Pp. 18–47 in Max Weber Gesamtausgabe. Vol. I/4,1. Tübingen, Germany: Mohr.
64.
RingerFritz. 1969. The Decline of the German Mandarins. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
65.
RitterGerhard. 1998. Soziale Frage und Sozialpolitik in Deutschland seit Beginn des 19. Jahrhunderts. Opladen, Germany: Leske+Budrich.
66.
Rodríguez-MuñizMichael. 2017. “Cultivating Consent: Nonstate Leaders and the Orchestration of State Legibility.” American Journal of Sociology123(2):385–425.
67.
SaeedSadia. 2021. “Religion, Classification Struggles, and the State’s Exercise of Symbolic Power.” Theory and Society50(2):255–81.
68.
SaidEdward. 1978. Orientalism. New York, NY: Pantheon.
69.
SantosMaria-Fátima. 2022. “Modernizing Leviathan: Carceral Reform and the Struggle for Legitimacy in Brazil’s Espírito Santo State.” American Sociological Review87(5):889–918.
70.
SchafferSimonRobertsLissaRajKapilDelbourgoJames, eds. 2009. The Brokered World: Go-Betweens and Global Intelligence, 1770-1820. Sagamore Beach, MA: Watson.
SchmollerGustav. 1873. “Eröffnungsrede.” Pp. 1–6 in Verhandlungen der Eisenacher Versammlung zur Besprechung der socialen Frage am 6. und 7. Oktober 1872, edited by the SozialpolitikVerein für. Leipzig, Germany: Duncker & Humblot.
73.
ScottJames C.1998. Seeing like a State. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
74.
SpanuthJohannes. 1914. Britisch-Kaffraria und seine deutschen Siedlungen. (Die Ansiedelung von Europäern in den Tropen. Part 4.) Leipzig, Germany: Duncker & Humblot.
75.
StaatswissenschaftlicheGesellschaft, ed. 1983. Hundert Jahre Staatswissenschaftliche Gesellschaft zu Berlin. Berlin, Germany: Duncker & Humblot.
76.
SteinmetzGeorge. 1993. Regulating the Social. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
77.
SteinmetzGeorge, ed. 1999. State/Culture. State-Formation after the Cultural Turn. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
78.
SteinmetzGeorge. 2007. The Devil’s Handwriting. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
79.
SteinmetzGeorge. 2008. “The Colonial State as a Social Field: Ethnographic Capital and Native Policy in the German Overseas Empire before 1914.” American Sociological Review73(4):589–612.
80.
SteinmetzGeorge. 2014. “On Bourdieu, Sur l’État: Field Theory and the State, Colonies, and Empires”Sociologia3:1–14.
81.
SteinmetzGeorge. 2023. The Colonial Origins of Modern Social Thought. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
82.
StolerAnn Laura. 1995. Race and the Education of Desire. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
83.
Stuart BrundageJonah. 2023. “Representation and Recognition: State Sovereignty as Performative.” American Journal of Sociology128(5):1335–80.
84.
van BlomDurk. 1912. “Niederländisch-West-Indien.” Pp. 101–61 in Die Ansiedelung von Europäern in den Tropen. Part 2, edited by the SozialpolitikVerein für. Leipzig, Germany: Duncker & Humblot.
85.
Verein fürSozialpolitik. 1892. Die Verhältnisse der Landarbeiter in Deutschland. 3 vols. Leipzig, Germany: Duncker & Humblot.
86.
Verein fürSozialpolitik. 1912–1915. Die Ansiedelung der Europäer in den Tropen. 5 vols. Leipzig, Germany: Duncker & Humblot.
87.
vom BruchRüdiger. 1980. Wissenschaft, Politik und öffentliche Meinung. Gelehrtenpolitik im Wilhelminischen Deutschland. Husum, Germany: Matthiesen.
88.
vom BruchRüdiger. 1985. “Bürgerliche Sozialreform im deutschen Kaiserreich.” Pp. 61–179 in Weder Kommunismus noch Kapitalismus, edited by vom BruchR.Munich, Germany: Beck.
89.
von LindequistFriedrich. 1912. Britisch- und Deutsch-Ostafrika als Siedelungsgebiet für Europäer. (Die Ansiedelung von Europäern in den Tropen. Part 1). Leipzig, Germany: Duncker & Humblot.
90.
WacquantLoic. 2009. Punishing the Poor. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
91.
WagemannErnst. 1915. Die deutschen Kolonisten im brasilianischen Staate Espirito Santo. (Die Ansiedelung von Europäern in den Tropen. Part 5.). Leipzig, Germany: Duncker & Humblot.
92.
WagnerFlorian. 2022. Colonial Internationalism and the Governmentality of Empire, 1893-1982. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
93.
WalgenbachKatharina. 2005. “Die weiße Frau als Trägerin deutscher Kultur.” Koloniale Diskurse zu Geschlecht, “Rasse” und Klasse im Kaiserreich. Frankfurt, Germany: Campus.
94.
WeberEugen. 1976. Peasants into Frenchmen. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
95.
WeberMaxFowkesBen. [1895] 1980. “The National State and Economic Policy (Freiburg Address).” Economy & Society9(4):428–49.
96.
WeingartPeterKrollJürgenBayertzKurt. 1988. Rasse, Blut und Gene. Geschichte der Eugenik und Rassenhygiene in Deutschland. Frankfurt, Germany: Suhrkamp.
97.
WildenthalLora. 2001. German Women for Empire, 1884-1945. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
98.
ZantopSusanne. 1997. Colonial Fantasies. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
99.
ZhangYueran. 2020. “Political Competition and Two Modes of Taxing Private Homeownership: A Bourdieusian Analysis of the Contemporary Chinese State.” Theory and Society49(4):669–707.
ZimmermanAngela. 2010. Alabama in Africa. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
102.
ZimmermanAngela. 2013. “German Sociology and Empire. From Internal Colonization to Overseas Colonization and Back Again.” Pp. 166–87 in Sociology and Empire, edited by SteinmetzG.Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
