Recent interest in integrating mobile apps into teaching will continue growing. There remains, however, a pressing need to develop methods and resources to support and educate preservice teachers about the use of these technologies. This case study aimed to examine preservice teachers’ criteria for evaluating educational mobile apps. Nineteen fourth-year preservice teachers, who studied math, science, English, and computer education at a public university, participated in the research. During the usability tests, the preservice teachers were asked to evaluate the affordances and limitations of selected educational mobile apps from their particular subject domains. Their interactions with and evaluations of the mobile apps were collected through think-aloud sessions and interviews. Qualitative analysis revealed preservice teachers’ evaluation criteria in five categories such as pedagogy, technical usability, content, connectivity, and contextuality. The results point to recommendations for future research on evaluating the capabilities of existing mobile apps with key players such as in-service and preservice teachers.
AngeliC.ValanidesN. (2005) Preservice teachers as ICT designers: An instructional design model based on an expanded view of pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Computer-Assisted Learning21(4): 292–302.
2.
AvivR. (2001) Educational performance of ALN via content analysis. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks4(2): 53–72.
3.
BaranE. (2014) A review of research on mobile learning in teacher education. Journal of Educational Technology & Society17(4): 17–32.
4.
BaranE.KhanS. (2014) Going mobile—Science teacher candidates evaluating mobile apps. In: MillerC.DoeringA. (eds) The new landscape of mobile learning: Redesigning education in an app-based world, New York, NY: Routledge, pp. 258–275.
5.
Brown, E., Brner, D., Sharples, M., Glahn, C., de Jong, T., & Specht, M. (2010). Location-based and contextual mobile learning. A STELLAR small-scale study. STELLAR European Network of Excellence in TEL (EU).
6.
BurtonE.FrazierW.AnnettaL.LambR.ChengR.ChmielM. (2011) Modeling augmented reality games with preservice elementary and secondary science teachers. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education19(3): 303–329.
7.
CavusN.Al-MomaniM. M. (2011) Mobile system for flexible education. Procedia Computer Science3: 1475–1479. doi:10.1016/j.procs.2011.01.034.
8.
ChangC.-H.ChatterjeaK.GohD. H.-L.ThengY. L.LimE.SunA.NguyenQ. M. (2012) Lessons from learner experiences in a field-based inquiry in geography using mobile devices. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education21(1): 41–58.
9.
CharitonosK.BlakeC.ScanlonE.JonesA. (2012) Museum learning via social and mobile technologies: (How) can online interactions enhance the visitor experience?British Journal of Educational Technology43(5): 802–819.
EbnerM. (2009) Interactive lecturing by integrating mobile devices and micro-blogging in higher education. Journal of Computing and Information Technology17(4): 371–381.
12.
EconomidesA. A.NikolaouN. (2008) Evaluation of handheld devices for mobile learning. International Journal of Engineering Education24(1): 3–23.
13.
GreenL. S.HechterR. P.TysingerP. D.ChassereauK. D. (2014) Mobile app selection for 5th through 12th grade science: The development of the MASS rubric. Computers & Education75: 65–71.
14.
HuangY.KuoY.LinY.ChengS. (2008) Toward interactive mobile synchronous learning environment with context-awareness service. Computers & Education51(3): 1205–1226.
15.
HusbyeN. E.ElsenerA. E. (2013) To move forward, we must be mobile: Practical uses of mobile technology in literacy education courses. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education30(2): 46–51.
16.
HussainZ.LechnerM.MilchrahmH.ShahzadS.SlanyW.UmgeherM.WolkerstorferP. (2008) Agile user-centered design applied to a mobile multimedia streaming application. In: HolzingerA. (ed.) HCI and usability for education and work, Berlin, Germany: Springer, pp. 313–330.
17.
JärveläS.NäykkiP.LaruJ.LuokkanenT. (2007) Structuring and regulating collaborative learning in higher education with wireless networks and mobile tools. Educational Technology & Society10(4): 71–79.
18.
JohnsonL.Adams BeckerS.EstradaV.FreemanA. (2015) NMC Horizon report: 2015 K-12 edition, Austin, TX: The New Media Consortium.
19.
KearneyM.MaherD. (2013) Mobile learning in maths teacher education: Using iPads to support pre-service teachers’ professional development. Australian Educational Computing27(3): 76–84.
20.
KearneyM.SchuckS.BurdenK.AubussonP. (2012) Viewing mobile learning from a pedagogical perspective. Research in Learning Technology20: 14406.
21.
KlopferE.SquireK.JenkinsH. (2002) Environmental detectives: PDAs as a window into a virtual simulated world. In: MilradM.HoppeU.Kinshuk (eds) Proceedings of the IEEE International Workshop on Wireless and Mobile Technologies in Education, Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society, pp. 95–98.
22.
KressG.PachlerN. (2007) Thinking about the ‘m’ in m-learning. In: PachlerN. (ed.) Mobile learning: Towards a research agenda, London, England: WLE Centre, pp. 7–32.
23.
Kukulska-HulmeA. (2007) Mobile usability in educational contexts: What have we learnt?International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning8(2): 1–16.
24.
LamP.LamS.LamJ.McNaughtC. (2009) Usability and usefulness of eBooks on PPCs: How students’ opinions vary over time. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology25(1): 30–44.
25.
LaurillardD. (2007) Pedagogical forms for mobile learning: Framing research questions. In: PachlerN. (ed.) Mobile learning: Towards a research agenda, London, England: WLE Centre, pp. 153–175.
26.
LincolnY. S.GubaE. G. (1985) Naturalistic inquiry, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
27.
LincolnY.GubaE. (2002) The only generalization is: There is no generalization. In: GommR.HammersleyM.FosterP. (eds) Case study method, London, England: Sage, pp. 27–44.
28.
MartinS.DiazG.SancristobalE.GillR.CastroM.PeireJ. (2011) New technology trends in education: Seven years of forecasts and convergence. Computers & Education57(3): 1893–1906.
29.
MartinF.ErtzbergerJ. (2013) Here and now mobile learning: An experimental study on the use of mobile technology. Computers & Education68: 76–85.
30.
McCaughtryN.DillonS. R. (2008) Learning to use PDAs to enhance teaching: The perspectives of preservice physical educators. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education16(4): 433–459.
31.
McKnightL.CassidyB. (2010) Children’s interaction with mobile touch-screen devices: Experiences and guidelines for design. International Journal of Mobile Human Computer Interaction2(2): 1–18.
32.
McLoughlinC.LeeM. J. W. (2008) The three p’s of pedagogy for the networked society: Personalization, participation, and productivity. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education20(1): 10–27.
33.
MilesM. B.HubermanA. M. (1994) Qualitative data analysis, 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
34.
MishraP.KoehlerM. J. (2006) Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record108(6): 1017–1054.
35.
MüllerJ.CheverstK.FittonD.TaylorN.PaczkowskiO.KrügerA. (2009) Experiences of supporting local and remote mobile phone interaction in situated public display deployments. International Journal of Mobile Human Computer Interaction1(2): 1–21.
PachlerN.CookJ.BachmairB. (2010) Appropriation of mobile cultural resources for learning. International Journal of Mobile and Blended Learning2(1): 1–21.
38.
ParsonsD.RyuH. (2006) A framework for assessing the quality of mobile learning. In: DawsonR.GeorgiadouE.LincarP.RossM.StaplesG. (eds) Learning and teaching issues in software quality: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference for Process Improvement, Research and Education, Southampton, UK: The British Computer Society, pp. 17–27.
39.
RubinJ.ChisnellD. (2008) Handbook of usability testing: How to plan, design, and conduct effective tests, 2nd ed. Indianapolis, IN: Wiley.
40.
SaccolA. Z.BarbosaJ. L. V.SchlemmerE.ReinhardN. (2011) Mobile learning in organizations: Lessons learned from two case studies. International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Education7(3): 11–24.
SharplesM. (2013) Mobile learning: Research, practice and challenges. Distance Education in China3(5): 5–11.
43.
SharplesM.TaylorJ.VavoulaG. (2007) A theory of learning for the mobile age. In: AndrewsR.HaythornthwaiteC. (eds) The Sage handbook of e-learning research, London, England: Sage, pp. 221–247.
44.
SongK.ParkJ.KimJ. K. (2011) Systematic design of context awareness mobile learning environment. International Journal of Control and Automation4(4): 157–162.
45.
StantonG.OphoffJ. (2013) Towards a method for mobile learning design. Issues in Informing Science and Information Technology10: 501–523.
46.
TraxlerJ. (2007) Defining, discussing and evaluating mobile learning: The moving finger writes and having writ…. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning8(2): 1–8.
47.
UdenL.HwangG. (2013) Activity theory approach to developing context-aware mobile learning systems for understanding scientific phenomenon and theories. International Journal of Distance Education Technologies11(4): 30–44.
48.
VavoulaG.SharplesM. (2009) Meeting the challenges in evaluating mobile learning: A 3-level evaluation framework. International Journal of Mobile and Blended Learning1(2): 54–75.
49.
WalkerH. (2011) Evaluating the effectiveness of apps for mobile devices. Journal of Special Education Technology26(4): 59–63.
50.
YinR. (2003) Case study research: Design and methods, 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
