Participants' Verbal and Nonverbal Behavior in Familiar and Unfamiliar Test Conditions: An Exploratory Analysis

Abstract

A microanalysis was conducted of the test-related behaviors of examiners and preschool speech- and language-handicapped children. Each child was videotaped during two sessions while tested on the same expressive language measure, once by a familiar examiner and once by an unfamiliar examiner. Preliminary analysis revealed that the children spoke significantly more often and with greater complexity when tested by familiar examiners. The purpose of the microanalysis was to describe test participants' behavior in an attempt to explore how this differential performance occurred. Results indicated that familiar examiners (a) exercised more frequent and longer intervals of silence than unfamiliar examiners, (b) often used eye contact with examinees as a crue in deciding when to speak whereas unfamiliar examiners rarely used this crue, (c) employed largely directive language, in contrast to unfamiliar examiners' speech which more frequently was participatory in nature, and (d) spoke for shorter durations than unfamiliar examiners. Implication for testing handicapped children are discussed.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Fuchs, D. , Featherstone, N. , Garwick, D.R. , & Fuchs, L.S. The importance of situational factors and task demands to handicapped children's test performance (Res. Rep. No. 54). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Institute for Research on Learning Disabilities, 1981.

Fuchs, D. , Fuchs, L.S. , Dailey, A.M. , & Power, M.H. Effects of pretest contact with experienced and inexperienced examiners on handicapped children's performance (Res. Rep. No. 110). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Institute for Research on Learning Disabilities, 1983.

Fuchs, D. , Fuchs, L.S. , Garwick, D.R. , & Featherstone, N. Test performance of language-handicapped children with familiar and unfamiliar examiners. Journal of Psychology , 1983, 114, 37-46.

Kinnie, E.J. , & Sternlof, R.E. The influence of nonintellective factors on the IQ scores of middle- and lower-class children. Child Development , 1971, 42, 1989-1995.

Masling, J. The influence of situational and interpersonal variables in projective testing . Psychological Bulletin, 1960, 57, 65-85.

Mehan, H. Structuring school structure. Harvard Educational Review, 1978, 48, 32-64.

Olswang, L.B. , & Carpenter, R.L. Elictor effects on the language obtained from young language-impaired children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 1978, 43, 76-88.

Sacks, E.L. Intelligence scores as a function of experimentally established social relationships between child and examiner. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1952, 47, 354-358.

Sattler, J.M. Assessment of children's intelligence and special abilities (2nd ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon, 1981.

10.

Sattler, J.M. , & Theye, F. Procedural, situational, and interpersonal variables in individual intelligence testing. Psychological Bulletin, 1967, 68, 347-360.

11.

Stoneman, Z. , & Gibson, S. Situational influences on assessment performance. Exceptional Children, 1978, 46, 166-169.

12.

Tester, S. Teaching pictures. Elgin, III.: David C. Cook, 1966.

13.

Walker, H. , & Lev, J. Statistical inference. New York: Holt , Rinehart, & Winston, 1953 .