This paper explores the relationship between domestic legal systems and the design of commitments to the International Court of Justice (ICJ). Empirical analyses demonstrate that civil law states are more willing to recognize the compulsory and compromissory jurisdiction of the World Court than common law or Islamic law states. Common law states place the highest number of reservations on their optional clause declarations, with the majority of those restrictions relating to specific areas of international law. Civil law states typically embed compromissory clauses in multilateral treaties, while common and Islamic law states prefer recognition of the ICJ's jurisdiction through bilateral treaties.
Al-Azmeh, A.1988. Islamic law: Social and historical contexts. New York: Routledge.
2.
Alexandrov, S.A.1995. Reservations in unilateral declarations accepting the compulsory jurisdiction of the International Court of Justice. The Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff.
3.
Arabi, O.1998. Contract stipulations (Shurut) in Islamic law: The Ottoman Majalla and Ibn Taymiyya. International Journal of Middle East Studies30(1): 29-50.
4.
Bederman, D.J.2001. International law frameworks. New York : Foundation.
5.
Bennett, D.S., and A. Stam.2000. A universal test of an expected utility theory of war. International Studies Quarterly44(3): 451-480.
6.
Bilder, R.B.1998. International dispute settlement and the role of international adjudication. In International law: Classic and contemporary readings. C. Ku and P. F. Diehl, eds. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
7.
Briggs, H.W.1958. Reservations to the acceptance of compulsory jurisdiction of the International Court of Justice. Recueil des cours93(I): 223-367.
8.
Catechism of the Catholic Church. 2000. 2nd edn. United States Conference of Catholic Bishops.
9.
David, R., and J.E. Brierley.1985. Major legal systems in the world today . London: Stevens.
10.
Dixon, W.J.1994. Democracy and the peaceful settlement of international conflict. American Political Science Review88(1): 14-32.
11.
Djankov, S.,R. La Porta, and F. Lopez-de-Silanes .2002. Courts:The Lex Mundi project . NBER Working Paper Series.
12.
El-Hassan, A.E.A.1985. Freedom of contract, the doctrine of frustration, and sanctity of contracts in Sudan law and Islamic law. Arab Law Quarterly1(1): 51-59.
13.
Gamble, J.K., Jr., and D.D. Fischer.1976. The International Court of Justice: An analysis of a failure. Lexington, MA: Lexington.
14.
Garrett, Geoffrey, and Barry R.Weingast .1993. Ideas, interests, and institutions: Constructing the European Community's internal market. In Ideas and foreign policy: Beliefs, institutions, and political change, eds Judith Goldstein and Robert O. Keohane.Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
15.
Gaubatz, K.T.1996. Democratic states and commitment in international relations . International Organization50(1): 109-139.
16.
Ginsberg,Tom, and Richard H. McAdams .2004. Adjudicating in anarchy:An expressive theory of international dispute resolution. William and Mary Law Review45(4): 1229-1339.
17.
Glenn, P.H.2004. Legal traditions of the world: Sustainable diversity in law. Oxford: Oxford University Press .
18.
Glendon, M.A., M.W. Gordon, and C. Osakwe.1994. Comparative legal traditions: Text, materials and cases on the civil and common law traditions, with special reference to French, German, English and European law. St. Paul, MN: West.
19.
Habachy, S.1962. Property, right, and contract in Muslim law. Columbia Law Review62(3): 450-473.
20.
Jaggers, K. and T.R. Gurr.1995. Tracking democracy's third wave with the polity III data. Journal of Peace Research32(4): 469-82.
21.
Joireman, S.F.2001. Inherited legal systems and effective rule of law. Journal of Modern African Studies39(4): 571-596.
22.
Joireman, S.F.2004. Colonization and the rule of law: Comparing the effectiveness of common law and civil law countries. Constitutional Political Economy15(4): 315-338.
23.
Khadduri, M.1956. Islam and the modern law of nations. American Journal of International Law50(2): 358-372.
24.
King, Gary, MichaelTomz, and Jason Wittenberg .2000. Making the most of statistical analyses: Improving interpretation and presentation. American Journal of Political Science44(2): 347-361.
25.
Kritzer, Herbert M. (ed.) 2002. Legal systems of the world. A political, social, and cultural encyclopedia . Santa Barbara, CA: ABC-CLIO.
26.
La Porta, R., F. Lopez-de-Silanes, A. Schleifer, and R.W. Vishny.1999. The quality of government. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization15(1): 222-279.
27.
Leeds, Brett Ashley.1999. Domestic political institutions, credible commitments, and international cooperation. American Journal of Political Science43(4): 979-1002.
28.
Lippman, M., S. McConville, and M. Yerushalmi.1988. Islamic criminal law and procedure. New York: Praeger.
29.
McAdams, R.H.2005. The expressive power of adjudication. University of Illinois Law Review5: 1043-1121.
30.
Moss, G.C.2007. Harmonised contract clauses in different business cultures .In T. Wilhelmsson, E. Paunio, and A. Poholainen, eds, Private law and the many cultures of Europe. The Netherlands: Kluwer Law International.
31.
Mourisi Badr, G.1978. Islamic law: Its relation to other legal systems. American Journal of Comparative Law26(2): 187-198.
32.
Nassar, N.1995. Sanctity of contracts revisited: A study in the theory and practice of long-term international commercial transactions. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff.
33.
Opolot, J.S.E.1980. An analysis of world legal traditions. Jonesboro, TN: Pilgrimage.
34.
Pejovic, C.2001. Civil law and common law: Two different paths leading to the same goal. Victoria University Wellington Law Review32: 817-841.
35.
Powell, E.J.2006. Conflict, cooperation, and legal systems of the world. Ph.D. dissertation, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL.
36.
Powell, E.J. and S.M. Mitchell.2007.The International Court of Justice and the world's three legal systems. Journal of Politics69(2): 397-415.
37.
Raymond, G.A.1994. Democracies, disputes, and third-party intermediaries . Journal of Conflict Resolution38(1): 24-42.
38.
Rayner S.E.1991. The theory of contracts in Islamic law: A comparative analysis with particular reference to the modern legislation in Kuwait, Bahrain and the United Arab Emirates. London: Graham & Trotman.
39.
Schlesinger, R., H. Baade, M. Damaska, and P. Herzog.1998. Comparative law: Case-text-materials . New York: Foundation.
40.
Scott, G.L. and C.L. Carr.1987. The ICJ and compulsory jurisdiction: The case for closing the clause. American Journal of International Law81(1): 57-76.
41.
Simmons, Beth A.2000. International law and state behavior: Commitment and compliance in international monetary affairs. American Political Science Review94(4): 819-835.
42.
Simmons, B.A., and L.L. Martin.2005. International organizations and institutions . In W. Carlsnaes, T. Risse, and B. A. Simmons, eds, Handbook of international relations. Beverly Hills, CA : Sage.
43.
Singer, J.D., S. Bremer, and J. Stuckey.1972. Capability distribution, uncertainty, and major power war, 1820-1965. In B. Russett , ed., Peace, war, and numbers. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
44.
Summerst, R.S.1982. The general duty of good faith: Its recognition and conceptualization in the new restatement of contracts. Cornell Law Review67: 810-840.
45.
Szafarz, R.1993. The compulsory jurisdiction of the International Court of Justice. The Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff.
46.
Teubner, G.1998. Legal irritants: Good faith in British law or how unifying law ends up in new divergences. Modern Law Review61(1): 11-32.
47.
Tomz, M., J. Wittenberg, and G. King.2001. CLARIFY: Software for interpreting and presenting statistical results. Version 2.0. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University, June 1. (http://gking.harvard.edu)
48.
Vago, S.2000. Law and society. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
49.
Whincup, M.H.1992. Contract law and practice: The English system and continental comparisons. The Netherlands: Kluwer Law.
50.
Zimmermann, R. and S. Whittaker.2000. Good faith in European contract law . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
