Commentary: Ranking Planning Journals in the Australian Research Assessment Exercise,2008-2010

Australian Government. 2006. Research Quality Framework: Assessing the quality and impact of research in Australia. The Recommended RQF. Canberra , Australia: Department of Education, Science and Training .

Australian Government. 2008. Excellence in Research for Australia (ERA) Initiative: Consultation paper . Canberra: Australian Research Council.

Goldstein, H. , and G. Maier. 2010. The use and valuation of journals in planning scholarship: Peer assessment versus impact factors. Journal of Planning Education and Research 30:66-75.

Hussey, T. , and P. Smith. 2009. The trouble with higher education: A critical examination of our universities. London: Routledge.

Morgan, J. 2010. Audit overload. The Times Higher Education Supplement, March 4. http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk .

Punter, J. , and H. Campbell. 2009. Reflections on the 2008 United Kingdom Research Assessment Exercise for Town and Country Planning and Closely Associated Disciplines. Town Planning Review 80:31-55.

Rowbotham, J. 2010a. Journal rankings praised amid criticism. The Australian, November 17, p. 28.

Rowbotham, J. 2010b. Journal rankings rankle academics. The Australian, November 10, p. 39.

Salmi, J. , and A. Saroyan. 2007. League tables as policy instruments: Uses and misuses. Higher Education Management and Policy 19:31-68.

Stiftel, B. , A. Forsyth , L. Dalton , and F. Steiner. 2009. Assessing planning school performance multiple paths, multiple measures. Journal of Planning Education and Research 28: 323-35.

Stiftel, B. , and C. Mukhopadhyay . 2007. Thoughts on Anglo-American hegemony in planning scholarship: Do we read each other’s work? Town Planning Review 78:545-72.

Webster, C. 2006. Ranking planning journals. Environment and Planning B 33:485-90.