This study investigated psychosocial and contextual predictors of self-efficacy beliefs about educational and occupational attainment among Hispanic adolescents living in the inner-city. Participants were 107 adolescents ages 10 to 13 (mean=11.3 years) recruited from two inner-city elementary schools in Los Angeles via active parental and student consent. Three psychosocial predictors (previous performance; vicarious experience; social persuasion), based on Bandura’s theory ofself-efficacy, and two contextual predictors (neighborhood resources and neighborhood safety) were hypothesized to predict self-efficacy beliefs. Results showed that social persuasion most strongly predicted both educational and occupational expectations. Previous academic performance, represented by reading score, was related to educational but not occupational expectations. Vicarious experience in the form of family attainment did not predict educational nor occupational expectations. Contextual predictors were also unrelated to both domains of expectations. Results suggest that self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents growing up in inner-city environments can be influenced by the messages they receive from significant others as well as by their prior experiences.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bandura, A.
(1979). Reflections on self-efficacy. Advanced Behavioral Research and Therapy, 1, 237-269.
2.
Bandura, A.
(1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 37, 122-147.
3.
Bandura, A.
(1989). Regulation of cognitive processes through perceived self-efficacy. Developmental Psychology, 25, 729-735.
4.
Bandura, A.
(1995). Exercise of personal and collective efficacy in changing societies. In A. Bandura (Ed.), Self-efficacy in changing societies (pp. 1-45). New York: Cambridge University Press.
5.
Bandura, A.
, & Adams, N. E. (1977). Analysis of self-efficacy theory of behavioral change. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 1, 287-308.
6.
Bandura, A.
, Adams, N. E., & Breyer, J. (1977). Cognitive processes mediating behavioral change. Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 125-139.
7.
Bandura, A.
, Adams, N. E., Hardy, A. B., & Howells, G. N. (1980). Tests of generality of self-efficacy theory. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 4, 39-66.
8.
Bandura, A.
, & Schunk, D. H. (1981). Cultivating competence, self-efficacy, and intrinsic interest through proximal self-motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 586-598.
9.
Bjorklund, D. F.
, & Green, B. L. (1992). The adaptive nature of cognitive immaturity. American Psychologist, 47, 46-54.
10.
Bouffard-Bouchard, T.
, Parent, S., & Larivee, S. (1991). Influence of self-efficacy on self-regulation andperformance among junior andsenior high-school agedstudents. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 14, 153-164.
11.
Boyd, W. L.
(1991). What makes ghetto school succeed or fail?Teachers College Record, 92(3), 331-362.
12.
Church, M. B.
, King, C., Cook, T. D., Shadish, W. R., & Cohen, R. (1991, August). The aspirations and expectations of youth from different socioeconomic/racial groups. Paper presented at the American Psychological Convention, San Francisco.
13.
Cohen, J.
(1987). Parents as educational models and definers. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 49, 339-351.
14.
Connell, J. P.
(1985). A new multidimensional measure of children’s perception of control. Child Development, 56, 1018-1041.
15.
Cook, T. D.
, & Curtin, T. R. (1987). The mainstream and the underclass: Why are the differences so salient andthe similarities so unobtrusive? In J. D. Masters & W. P. Smith (Eds.), Social comparison, social justice, and relative deprivation: Theoretical, empirical, and policy perspectives (pp. 218-263). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
16.
Farrell, A. D.
, Danish, S. J., & Howard, C. W. (1992). Risk factors for drug use in urban adolescents: Identification and cross-validation. American Journal of Community Psychology, 20, 263-286.
17.
Finkelstein, N. W.
, & Ramey, C. (1977). Learning to control the environment in infancy. Child Development, 48, 806-819.
18.
Flammer, A.
(1995). Developmental analysis of control beliefs. In A. Bandura (Ed.), Self-efficacy in changing societies (pp. 69-113). New York: Cambridge University Press.
19.
Furstenberg, F. F.
(1993). How families manage risk andopportunity in dangerous neighborhoods. In W. J. Wilson (Ed.), Sociology and the public agenda. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
20.
Garcia, M. E.
, Schmitz, J. M., & Doerfler, L. A. (1990). A fine-grained analysis of the role of self-efficacy in self-initiated attempts to quit smoking. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 58, 317-322.
21.
Garmezy, N.
(1981). Children under stress: Perspectives on antecedents and correlates of vulnerability andresistance to psychopathology. In A. I. Rabin, J. Aronoff, N. Barclay, & R. A. Tucker (Eds.), Further explorations in personality (pp. 196-269). New York: John Wiley.
22.
Haller, A. O.
, & Portes, A. (1973). Status attainment processes. Sociology of Education, 46, 51-91.
23.
Harter, S.
(1985). Manual for the Self-Perception Profile for Children. Denver: University of Denver.
24.
Hauser, R. M.
(1971). Socioeconomic background and educational performance. Washington, DC: American Sociological Association.
25.
Herriot, R. E.
(1968). Some social determinants of educational aspiration. In N. Y. Glazer & C. F. Creedon (Eds.), Children and poverty: Some sociological and psychological perspectives (pp. 216-230). Chicago: Rand McNally.
26.
Holland, A.
, & Andre, T. (1987). Participation in extra-curricular activities in secondary school: What is known, what needs to be known?Review of Educational Research, 57, 437-466.
27.
Keyser, V.
, & Barling, J. (1981). Determinants of children’s self-efficacy beliefs in an academic environment. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 5, 29-40.
28.
Kozol, J.
(1991). Savage inequalities. New York: Crown.
29.
Manning, M. M.
, & Wright, T. L. (1983). Self-efficacy expectancies, outcome expectancies, and the persistence of pain control in childbirth. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 421-431.
30.
Moe, K. O.
, & Zeiss, A. M. (1982). Measuring self-efficacy expectations skills: A methodological inquiry. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 6, 191-205.
31.
Nakao, K.
, & Treas, J. (1990). Computing 1989 Occupational Prestige Scores (General Social Survey Methodological Report Number 70). Chicago: National Opinion Research Center.
32.
Ogbu, J. V.
(1981). Origins of human competence: A cultural-ecological perspective. Child Development, 52, 413-429.
33.
Oyserman, D.
, & Markus, H. (1990). Possible selves in balance: Implications for delinquency. Journal of Social Issues, 46, 141-158.
34.
Pajares, F.
(1995). Self-efficacy beliefs in academic settings. In A. Bandura (Ed.), Self-efficacy in changing societies (pp. 543-578). New York: Cambridge University Press.
35.
Ramirez, O.
(1989). Mexican American children and adolescents. In J. T. Gibbs & L. N. Huang (Eds.), Children ofcolor: Psychological interventions with minority youth (pp. 224-250). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
36.
Rueschenberg, E.
, & Buriel, R. (1995). Mexican American family function and acculturation: A family systems perspective. In A. Padilla (Ed.), Hispanic psychology: Critical issues in theory and research (pp. 15-26). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
37.
Seidman, E.
(1991). Growing up the hard way: Pathways of urban adolescents. American Journal of Community Psychology, 19 (2), 173-205.
38.
Sewell, W. H.
, Haller, A. O., & Ohlendorf, G. W. (1970). The educational and early occupational attainment process: Replications andrevisions. American Sociological Review, 35, 1014-1027.
39.
Sewell, W. H.
, Haller, A. O., & Portes, A. (1969). The educational and early occupational attainment process. American Sociological Review, 34, 82-92.
40.
Skinner, E. A.
, & Connell, J. P. (1990). Understanding control: Suggestions for a developmental framework. In M. Baltes & P. B. Baltes (Eds.), The psychology ofaging and control (pp. 35-69). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
41.
Starr, P.
(1992, winter). Civil reconstruction: What to do without affirmative action. The American Prospect, pp. 7-14.
42.
Taylor, S. E.
, & Brown, J. D. (1988). Illusion andwell-being: A social psychological perspective on mental health. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 193-210.
43.
Weinstein, R. S.
, Soule, C. R., Collins, F., Cone, J., Mehlhorn, M., & Simontacchi, K. (1991). Expectations andhigh school change: Teacher-research collaboration to prevent school failure. American Journal of Community Psychology, 19, 333-364.
44.
Wilson, K. L.
, & Portes, A. (1973). The educational attainment process: Results from a national sample. American Journal of Sociology, 81, 343-363.
45.
Wilson, W. J.
(1991). Studying inner-city social dislocations: The challenge of public agenda research. American Sociological Review, 56, 1-14.
46.
Zimmerman, B. J.
(1995). Self-efficacy and educational development. In A. Bandura (Ed.), Self-efficacy in changing societies (pp. 202-231). New York: Cambridge University Press.
47.
Zimmerman, B. J.
, & Bandura, A. (1994). Impact of self-regulatory influences on writing course attainment. American Educational Research Journal, 31(4), 845-862.
48.
Zimmerman, B. J.
, Bandura, A., & Martinez-Pons, M. (1992). Self-motivation for academic attainment: The role of self-efficacy beliefs andpersonal goal setting. American Educational Research Journal, 29(3), 663-676.
49.
Zimmerman, M. A.
, & Rappaport, J. (1988). Citizen participation, perceived control, and psychological empowerment. American Journal of Community Psychology, 16, 725-750.
