Problematizing the Notion of Puerto Ricans as "Underclass": A Step Toward a Decolonizing Study of Poverty

Abstract

The article examines the social science concept of the underclass with respect to its historical origin, meaning and general usage during the past 3 decades and more specifically, in terms of its more recent use for Puerto Ricans. A critique is presented that not only challenges the use of the term "underclass" to describe the phenomenon of poverty in the Puerto Rican community today, but that also calls into question the interests of the political and ideological foundations that inform its general use as a social science construct. Central to the discussion is a critical analysis of the assymetrical power relations inherent in the act of labeling and hence, the potential colonizing impact of traditional social science language on populations who are members of subordinate cultures. In an effort to move toward a decolonizing study of poverty, social scientists are strongly urged to develop contextually oriented research methodologies and approaches that are firmly grounded in an emancipatory vision of community empowerment and transformation.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Auletta, K. (1982). The underclass. New York: Random House.

Blauner, R. (1987). Colonized and immigrant minorities. In R. Takaki (Ed.), From different shores (pp. 149-160). New York: Oxford Press.

Bonilla, F. (1989). Breaking out of the cycle of poverty. Washington, DC: National Puerto Rican Coalition.

Borjas, G. (1985). Public spending for the poor: Trends, prospects, and economic limits. In S. Danziger & D. Weinberg (Eds.), Fighting poverty: What works and what doesn't(pp. 151-164). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Bosmajian, J. (1990). The language of oppression. Lanham, MD: University of Press America.

Center on Budget and Policy Priorities . (1988). Shortchange: Recent developments in Hispanic poverty, income, and employment. Washington, DC.

Danziger, S. , & Gottshalk, P. (1987). Earning inequality, the spatial concentration of poverty and the underclass. American Economic Review, 77, 211-215.

Ellwood, D. (1988). Poor support. New York: Basic Books.

Fanon, F. (1967). Black skin White masks. New York: Grove Press.

10.

Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Seabury Press.

11.

Freire, P. , & Macedo, D. (1986). Literacy: Reading the word and the world. South Hadley, MA: Bergin & Garvey.

12.

Gans, H. (1990). Deconstructing the underclass: The term's dangers as a planning concept. Journal of The American Planning Association, 65, 271-277.

13.

Glasgow, D. (1981). The Black underclass. New York: Vintage.

14.

Hernandez, J. (1990). Latino alternatives to the underclass concept. Latino Studies Journal, 1, 95-105.

15.

Jencks, C. (1988, June 13). Deadly neighborhoods. The New Republic, pp. 23-32.

16.

Kasurda, J. (1983). Caught in the web of change. Society, 21, 41-47.

17.

Lakoff, G. , & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

18.

Lemann, N. (1986, June). The origins of the underclass. The Atlantic Monthly, 54-68.

19.

Lewis, D. (1963). The culture of poverty. Scientific American, 215, 19-25.

20.

Lewis, D. (1968). La Vida, A Puerto Ricani family in the culture of poverty in San Juan and New York. London: Panther Books.

21.

Memmi, A. (1965). The colonizer and the colonized. Boston: Beacon Press.

22.

Mincey, R. , Sawhill, I. , & Wolf, D. (1990). The underclass: Definition and measurement. Science, 248, 450-452.

23.

Murray, C. (1984). Losing ground:American socialpolicy, 1950-1980. New York: Basic Books.

24.

Myrdal, G. (1962). The challenge to affluence. New York: Pantheon.

25.

O'Neill, J. (1985). Decolonization and the ideal speech community: Some issues in the theory and practice of communicative competence. In J. Forrester (Ed.), Critical Theory and Public Life (pp. 57-76). Cambridge: M.I.T. Press.

26.

Ricketts, E. , & Sawhill, I. (1988). Defining and measuring the underclass. Journal of Policy Analysis and Measurement, 7, 316-325.

27.

Shor, I. , & Freire, P. (1987). A pedagogy of liberation. Lanham, MD: Bergin & Garvey.

28.

Smith, K. (1990). Notes from the epistemological corner: The role of projection in the creation of social science. Journal ofApplied Behavioral Science, 26, 119-127.

29.

Stafford, W. W. & Ladner, J. (1990). Political dimensions of the underclass concept. In H. Gans (Ed.), Sociology in America (pp. 138-155). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

30.

Tienda, M. (1989). Puerto Ricans and the underclass debate: Evidence for structural explanations of the labor market performance. Annals of The American Academy of Political and Social Science, 501, 105-119.

31.

Torres, A. , & Rodriguez, C. (in press). Latino policy: Problems, debates and prescriptions. In E. Melendez , C. Rodriguez , & B. Barry Figueroa (Eds.), Hispanics in the labor force. New York: Plenum.

32.

U.S. General Accounting Office . (1990). The urban class: Disturbing problems demanding attention (GAO/HRD-90-52). Maryland: Author.

33.

Wilson, W. J. (1978). The declining significance of race: Blacks and changing American institutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

34.

Wilson, W. J. (1987). The truly disadvantaged: The inner city, the underclass and public policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

35.

Zinn, M. B. (1989). Family, race, and poverty in the eighties. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 14, 856-874.