One privilege enjoyed by new-media authors is the opportunity to realize representations of Self that are rich textual worlds in themselves and also to engage the wider world, with a voice, a smile, imagery, and sound. Still, closer investigation of multimedia composition practices reveals levels of complexity with which the verbal virtuoso is unconcerned. This article argues that while technology-afforded multimedia tools make it comparatively easy to author a vivid text, it is a multiplicatively more complicated matter to vividly realize and publicize an authorial intention. Based on analysis of the digital story creation process of a youth named “Steven,” the authors attempt to demonstrate the operation of two forces upon which the successful multimodal realization of the author's intention may hinge: “fixity” and “fluidity.” The authors show how, within the process of digital self-representation, these forces can intersect to influence multimodal meaning making, and an author's life, in consequential ways.
Appadurai, A. (1996). Modernity at large. Minneapolis : University of Minnesota Press.
2.
Bakhtin, M. (1981). The dialogic imagination. Austin: University of Texas Press.
3.
Baldry, A., & Thibault, P.J. (2006). Multimodal transcription and text analysis. London: Equinox .
4.
Blumer, H. (1969). Symbolic interactionism: Perspective and method . Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
5.
Bogdan, R.C., & Biklen, S.K. (1992). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theory and methods (2nd ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
6.
Bolter, J.D., & Grusin, R. (1999). Remediation: Understanding new media. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
7.
Bruner, J. (1990). Acts of meaning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
8.
Buckingham, D. (2003). Media education: Literacy, learning and contemporary culture. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
9.
Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. London: Continuum.
10.
Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. Garden City, NY: Doubleday Anchor.
11.
Gombrich, E.H. (1972). The mask and the face: The perception of physiognomic likeness in life and art. In E. H. Gombrich , J. Hochberg, & M. Black (Eds.), Art, perception and reality (pp. 1-46). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
12.
Haas, C. (1996). Writing technology: Studies on the materiality of literacy. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
13.
Halliday, M.A.K. (1994). Introduction to functional grammar (2nd ed.). London: Arnold .
14.
Harris, R. (2001). Rethinking writing. London : Continuum.
15.
Hull, G., Kenney, N., Marple, S., & Forsman-Schneider, A. (2006). Many versions of masculine: Explorations of boys' identity formation through multimodal composing in an after-school program (The Robert Bowne Foundation's Occasional Papers Series) . New York: Robert Bowne Foundation .
16.
Hull, G., & Nelson, M.E. (2005). Locating the semiotic power of multimodality. Written Communication, 22, 224-262.
17.
Hull, G., & Schultz, K. (2004, April). Out-of-school literacies: Promises and challenges. Keynote address for the Special Interest Group on Writing and Literacies at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA.
18.
Kress, G. (2003). Literacy in the new media age. London: Routledge.
19.
Kress, G. (2005). Gains and losses: New forms of text, knowledge and learning. Computers and Composition, 22, 5-22.
20.
Lemke, J. (2002). Travels in hypermodality. Visual Communication, 1, 299-325.
21.
Levine, P., & Scollon, R. (2004). Discourse & technology: Multimodal discourse analysis. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
22.
Linde, C. (1993). Life stories: The creation of coherence. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
23.
Malinowski, D., & Nelson, M.E. (2007, April). Intention, control, and the multimodal author. Paper presented at the biannual conference of the International Society for Language Studies, Honolulu, HI.
24.
Manovich, L. (2001). The language of new media. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
25.
McLuhan, M. (1964). Understanding media: The extensions of man. New York: McGraw-Hill.
26.
Miles, M., & Huberman, A. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA : Sage.
27.
Mitchell, W.J.T. (1996). Picture theory: Essays on verbal and visual representation . Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
28.
Mitchell, W.J.T. (2005). What do pictures want?Chicago : University of Chicago Press.
29.
Nelson, M.E. (2006). Mode, meaning, and synaesthesia in multimedia L2 writing. Language Learning and Technology, 10(2), 56-76.
30.
Nelson, M.E., & Hull, G.A. (in press). Self-presentation through multimedia: A Bakhtinian perspective on digital storytelling. In K. Lundby (Ed.), Digital storytelling, mediatized stories: Self-representations in new media. New York: Peter Lang .
31.
Nelson M. E., & Malinowski, D. (2007). Hegemony, identity, and authorship in multimodal discourse. In M. Mantero (Ed.), Identity in second language learning: Culture, inquiry, and dialogic activity in educational contexts (pp. 159-187). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
32.
Norris, S. (2004). Analyzing multimodal interaction. New York: Routledge.
33.
Ochs, E., & Capps, L. (1996). Narrating the self. Annual Review of Anthropology, 25, 19-43.
