Introductions to research articles (RAs) have become an important site for the analysis of academic writing. However, analysts have apparently not considered whether RA introductions typically include statements of principal findings. In contrast, this issue is often addressed in the manuals and style guides surveyed, most advocating the desirability of announcing principal findings (APFs) in RA introductions. Therefore, a study of actual practice in two leading journals from two different fields (physics and educational psychology) was undertaken. In the Physical Review 45% of the introductions sampled contained APFs (with some increase in percentage over the last 40 years), while in the Journal of Educational Psychology the percentage fell to under 7%. These figures are at variance with the general trend of recommendations in primary and secondary sources. Thus preliminary evidence points to (a) a mismatch between descriptive practice and prescriptive advice and (b) diversity in this rhetorical feature between the two fields.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Adams Smith, D. E.
(1984). Medical discourse: Aspects of author's comment. The ESP Journal, 3(1), 25-36.
2.
American Institute of Physics
. (1978). Style manual (3rd ed.). New York: AIP.
3.
Bazerman, C.
(1981). What written knowledge does: Three examples of academic discourse. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 11, 361-388.
4.
Bley-Vroman, R.
, & Selinker, L. (1984). Research design in rhetorical/grammatical studies: A proposed optimal research strategy. English for Specific Purposes, 82-83, 1-4, & 84, 1-6.
5.
Calnan, J.
, & Barabas, A. (1973). Writing medical papers: A practical guide. London: Heinemann.
6.
Cremmins, E. T.
(1982). The art of abstracting. Philadelphia: ISI.
7.
Crookes, G.
(1986). Towards a validated analysis of scientific text structure. Applied Linguistics, 7(1), 57-70.
8.
Day, R. A.
(1983). How to write and publish a scientific paper (2nd ed.). Philadelphia: ISI.
9.
Dubois, R. L.
(1982). The construction of noun phrases in biomedical journal articles. In J. Hoedt, L. Lundquist, H. Picht, & J. Qvistgaard (Eds.), Pragmatics and LSP. Copenhagen: School of Economics.
10.
Dudley, H.
(1977). The presentation of original work in medicine and biology. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone.
11.
Gilbert, G. N.
, & Mulkay, M. (1984). Opening Pandora's box: A sociological analysis of scientists' discourse. Cambridge: CUP.
12.
Hoey, M.
(1979). Signalling in discourse. Birmingham, England: English Language Research.
13.
Huckin, T.
, & Olsen, L. (1984). On the use of informants in LSP discourse analysis. In A. Pugh & J. Ulijn (Eds.), Reading for professional purposes. London: Heinemann.
14.
Huth, E. J.
(1982). How to write and publish papers in the medical sciences. Philadelphia: ISI.
15.
Jones, W. P.
(1971). Writing scientific papers and reports (6th ed.). Dubuque, IA: William C Brown.
16.
Kinay, A.
, Muloshi, L., Musakabantu, M., & Swales, J. (1983). Pre-announcing results in article introductions (mimeo). Birmingham, England: Aston ESP Reference Collection.
17.
Knorr-Cetina, K. D.
(1981). The Manufacture of Knowledge. Oxford: Pergamon.
18.
Latour, B.
, & Woolgar, S. (1979). Laboratory life: The social construction of scientific facts. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
19.
Michaelson, H. B.
(1982). How to write and publish engineering papers and reports. Philadelphia: ISI.
20.
Mitchell, J. H.
(1968). Writing for professional and technical journals. New York: John Wiley.
21.
Mullins, C. J.
(1977). A guide to writing and publishing in the social and behavioral sciences. New York: John Wiley.
22.
Neelakantaswamy, P.
, & Hong, F. (1979). Dielectric hemisphere-loaded scalar horn as a Gaussian-beam launcher for microwave exposure studies. IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques. MTT-27, 797.
23.
O'Connor, M.
, & Woodford, F. P. (1976). Writing scientific papers in English. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
24.
Oster, S.
(1981). The use of tenses in “Reporting Past Literature” in EST. In L. Selinker, E. Tarone, & V. Hanzeli (Eds.), English for academic and technical purposes. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
25.
Peterson, M. S.
(1961). Scientific thinking and scientific writing. New York: Reinhold.
26.
The Royal Society
. (1965). General notes on the preparation of scientific papers. London: Royal Society.
27.
Selinker, L.
(1979). On the use of informants in discourse analysis and language for specialized purposes. IRAL, 17(3), 189-215.
28.
Swales, J.
(1981). Aspects of article introductions. Birmingham, England: University of Aston.
29.
Swales, J.
(1983). Developing materials for writing scholarly introductions. In R. Jordan (Ed.), Case studies in ELT. London: Collins.
30.
Swales, J.
(1984). Research into the structure of introductions to journal articles and its application to the teaching of academic writing. In R. Williams, J. Swales, & J. Kirkman (Eds.), Common ground: Shared interests in ESP and communication studies. Oxford: Pergamon.
31.
Tarone, E.
, Dwyer, S., Gillette, S., & Icke, V. (1981). On the use of the passive in two astrophysics journal papers. ESP Journal, 1(2), 123-140.
32.
Toulmin, S.
(1972). Human understanding: The collective use and evolution of concepts. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
33.
West, G. K.
(1980). That-nominal constructions in traditional rhetorical divisions of scientific research papers. TESOL Quarterly, 14(4), 483-489.
34.
Zappen, J. P.
(1983). A rhetoric for research in sciences and technologies. In P. V. Anderson, R. J. Brockman, & C. R. Miller (Eds.), New essays in technical and scientific communication. Farmingdale, NY: Baywood.
