The demand for evidence-based research (EBR) in education has evoked considerable debate regarding the nature of knowledge practitioners hold, how they come to know, and the sociopolitical contexts in which that knowledge is generated. Proponents of EBR such as Michael Feuer stress the need for research that validly identifies solutions to important problems of educational practice. Critics such as Elizabeth St.Pierre decry such approaches to research on practice as epistemologically inappropriate and oblivious to their political and moral implications. Both positions illuminate important dimensions of improving practice, but what works seems to get lost in the rhetoric. In this article, the author suggests that we in adult education take seriously the question of what works in practice by developing a knowledge base grounded in research methods and strategies that give voice to the particularities of practice contexts, what he refers to as the “insider perspective.”
Anderson, G. L., & Herr, K. (1999). The new paradigm wars: Is there room for rigorous practitioner knowledge in schools and universities?Educational Researcher, 28, 12-21, 40-40.
2.
Argyris, C. (1974). Theory in practice: Increasing professional effectiveness. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
3.
Balint, M. (1964). The doctor, his patient, and the illness. New York: International Universities Press.
4.
Bobbitt, J. F. (1918). The curriculum. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
5.
Brookfield, S. D. (2005). The power of critical theory: Liberating adult learning and teaching. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
6.
Brooks, A., & Watkins, K. E. (Eds.). (1994). The emerging power of action inquiry technologies. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
7.
Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. New York: Routledge.
8.
Campbell, A., McNamara, O., & Gilroy, P. (2004). Practitioner research and professional development in education. London: Paul Chapman.
9.
Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (1963). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Chicago: Rand McNally.
10.
Carr, W., & Kemmis, S. (1986). Becoming critical: Education, knowledge, and action research. London: Falmer.
11.
Cervero, R. M. (1988). Effective continuing education for the professions. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
12.
Cervero, R. M., & Wilson, A. L. (1994). Planning responsibly for adult education: A guide to negotiating power and interests. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
13.
Cervero, R. M., & Wilson, A. L. (Eds.). (1996). What really matters in adult education program planning: Lessons in negotiating power and interests (New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, No. 69). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
14.
Cervero, R. M., Wilson, A. L., & Associates. (2001). Power in practice: Adult education and the struggle for knowledge and power in society. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
15.
Cherryholmes, C. H. (1992). Notes on pragmatism and scientific realism. Educational Researcher, 21, 13-17.
16.
Clandinin, J., & Connelly, M. (1995). Teachers’ professional knowledge landscapes. New York: Teachers College Press.
17.
Colin, S. A., III, & Guy, T. A. (1998). An Africentric interpretive model of curriculum orientations for course development in graduate programs in adult education. PAACE Journal of Lifelong Learning, 7, 43-55.
18.
Comings, J. P., Beder, H., Bingman, B., Reder, S., & Smith, C. (2003). Establishing an evidence-based adult education system (Occasional paper 2003-09-00). Boston: National Center for the Study of Adult Learning and Literacy. (ERIC Documentation Reproduction Service No. ED 481 828)
19.
Cunningham, P. M. (2000). A sociology of adult education. In A. Wilson & E. R. Hayes (Eds.), Handbook of adult and continuing education (new ed., pp. 573-591). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
20.
Daley, B. (2001). Learning and professional practice: A study of four professions. Adult EducationQuarterly, 52, 39-54.
21.
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2003). Introduction: The discipline and practice of qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The landscape of qualitative research: Theories and issues (2nd ed., pp. 1-35). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
22.
Dirkx, J. M. (1986). The tacit dimension of practical knowledge and the utilization of research in adult education. Proceedings of Midwest research-to-practice conference in adult, community and continuing education. Muncie, IN: Ball State University.
23.
Dirkx, J. M. (2005). “To develop a firm persuasion”: Workplace learning and the problem of meaning. In C. Elliott & S. Turnbill (Eds.), Critical thinking in human resource development (pp. 155-174). London: Routledge.
24.
Dirkx, J. M., Amey, M., & Haston, L. (1998). Boundaries and beliefs among teachers of adults: A case study of curricular transformation. In J. Fleming (Ed.), Proceedings of the 1998 Midwest research-to-practice conference in adult, continuing, and community education (pp. 69-74). Muncie, IN: Ball State University.
25.
Dirkx, J. M., Fonfara, T., & Flaska, K. (1993). Self and not-self in the practitioner-learner relationship: The problem of boundary awareness in ABE practice. Adult Basic Education: An Interdisciplinary Journal for Adult Literacy Educators, 3, 51-68.
26.
Dirkx, J. M., & Jha, L. R. (1994). Predicting rapid completion, persistence, and attrition in adult basic education. Adult Education Quarterly, 45, 269-285.
27.
Dirkx, J. M., & Prenger, S. (1994). A living amoeba or a textbook topic? Conceptions of integrated, theme-based instruction in adult education. In L. Martin (Ed.), Proceedings of the thirteenth Midwest annual research-to-practice conference in adult, continuing, and community education (pp. 42-47). Milwaukee: University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee.
28.
Dirkx, J. M., & Prenger, S. M. (1997). A guide to planning and implementing instruction for adults: A theme-based approach. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
29.
Dirkx, J. M., & Smith, R. O. (2003). Thinking out of a bowl of spaghetti: Learning to learn in online collaborative groups. In T. S. Roberts (Ed.), Online collaborative learning: Theory and practice (pp. 132-159). Hershey, PA: Idea Group Publishing.
30.
Dirkx, J. M., & Spurgin, M. (1992). Implicit theories of adult basic education teachers: How they think about their students. Adult Basic Education: An Interdisciplinary Journal for Adult Literacy Educators, 2, 20-41.
31.
English, L. M. (2006). A Foucauldian reading of feminist learning in feminist, nonprofit organizations. Adult Education Quarterly, 56, 85-101.
32.
Fenwick, T. J. (2000). Putting meaning into workplace learning. In A. Wilson & E. R. Hayes (Eds.), Handbook of adult and continuing education (new ed., pp. 294-311). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
33.
Feuer, M. J. (2006). Response to Bettie St.Pierre’s “Scientifically based research in education: Epistemology and ethics.”Adult Education Quarterly, 56(4), 267-272.
34.
Flexner, A. (1910). Medical education in the United States and Canada. Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching. Boston: Merrymount Press.
35.
Forester, J. (1989). Planning in the face of power. Berkeley: University of California Press.
36.
Freire, P. (1990). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Continuum.
37.
Freud, S. (1955). The interpretation of dreams. New York: Basic Books.
38.
Hayes, E., & Flannery, D. (with Brooke, A. K., Tisdell, E. J., & Hugo, J. M.). (2000). Women as learners: The significance of gender in adult learning. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
39.
Haymes, S. (1995). Race, culture and the city: A pedagogy for Black urban struggle. Albany: State University of New York Press.
40.
hooks, b. (2000). Feminism is for everybody: Passionate politics. Cambridge, MA: South End Press.
41.
Jensen, N., & Dirkx, J. M. (1989). A curriculum for primary care internal medicine: The Wisconsin experience. Philadelphia: American College of Physicians.
42.
Johnson-Bailey, J. (2006). African Americans in adult education: The Harlem Renaissance revisited. Adult Education Quarterly, 56, 102-118.
43.
Jung, C. J. (1963). Memories, dreams, reflections. New York: Vintage.
44.
Kirsch, I. S., Jungeblut, A., Jenkins, L., & Kolstad, A. (1993). Adult literacy in America: A first look at the results of the National Adult Literacy Survey. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.
45.
Mager, R. F. (1975). Preparing instructional objectives. Belmont, CA: Fearon.
46.
Mizrahi, T. (1986). Getting rid of patients. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
47.
National Assessment of Adult Literacy. (2003). A first look at the literacy of American adults in the 21st century. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.
48.
Nowlen, P. M. (1988). A new approach to continuing education for business and the professions: A performance model. New York: American Council on Education and Macmillan.
49.
Olson, D. L. (2003). Principles, impracticality, and passion. Phi Delta Kappan, 85, 307-309.
50.
Polanyi, M. (1998). Personal knowledge: Towards a post-critical philosophy. London: Routledge.
51.
Redfield, D. (2004). A closer look at scientifically based research: How to evaluate educational research. T.H.E. Journal, 31, 24-25.
52.
Richardson, V. (1994). Conducting research on practice. Educational Researcher, 23, 5-10.
53.
Robinson, V. M., & Lai, M. K. (2006). Practitioner research for educators: A guide to improving classrooms and schools. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
54.
Ryan, A. B. (2001). Feminist ways of knowing: Towards theorizing the person for radical adult education. Leicester, UK: National Institute for Adult Education.
55.
St. Pierre, E. A. (2006). Scientifically based research in education: Epistemology and ethics. Adult Education Quarterly, 56(4), 239-266.
56.
Schoenfeld, A. H. (2006). What doesn’t work: The challenge and the failure of the What Works Clearinghouse to conduct meaningful reviews of studies of mathematics curricula. Educational Researcher, 35, 13-21.
57.
Schön, D. (1983). The reflective practitioner. New York: Basic Books.
58.
Schön, D. (1995). The new scholarship requires a new epistemology. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 27(6), 27-34.
59.
Sheared, V. (1994). Giving voice: An inclusive model of instruction—A womanist perspective. In E. Hayes & S. A. J. Colin, III (Eds.), Confronting racism and sexism in adult education (pp. 27-37). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
60.
Tisdell, E. J. (1998). Poststructural feminist pedagogies: The possibilities and limitations of a feminist emancipatory adult learning theory and practice. Adult Education Quarterly, 48, 139-156.
61.
Tyler, R. W. (1950). Basic principles of curriculum and instruction. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
62.
Usher, R., Bryant, I, & Johnson, R. (1997). Adult education and the postmodern challenge: Learning beyond the limits. London: Routledge.
63.
Vella, J. (2002). Learning to listen, learning to teach: The power of dialogue in educating adults. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
64.
Watkins, K. E., & Marsick, V. J. (1993). Sculpting the learning organization: Lessons in the art and science of systemic change. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
65.
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
66.
West, L. (2001). Doctors on the edge: General practitioners, health and learning in the inner city. London: Free Association Books.
67.
Wilson, A. L., & Cervero, R. M. (1996). Learning from practice: Learning to see what matters in program planning. In R. M. Cervero & A. L. Wilson (Eds.), What really matters in adult education program planning: Lessons in negotiating power and interests (pp. 91-99, New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, No. 69). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
