“When We Design for Adult Learners With Disabilities,Everyone Benefits”: Adaptable-Inclusive-Motivated (AIM) Model for Adult Educators to Include Adult Learners With Disabilities
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online November, 2025
“When We Design for Adult Learners With Disabilities,Everyone Benefits”: Adaptable-Inclusive-Motivated (AIM) Model for Adult Educators to Include Adult Learners With Disabilities
This study focuses on understanding how adult education faculty in higher education develop their knowledge and skills to accommodate adult learners with disabilities (ALDs). It explores how these educators learn about the accessibility needs of ALDs and their willingness to create inclusive learning environments. Adult education faculty were surveyed from various United States higher education institutions. Findings indicate that adult education faculty vary in accessibility knowledge and skills and are more willing to include ALDs when notified of their enrollment. Further, respondents desire greater institutional resources and training for developing inclusive practices. This study yielded an adaptable-inclusive-motivated (AIM) model for including adult learners with disabilities. The AIM model offers a comprehensive framework for understanding how adult education faculty navigate the interplay among institutional support, personal awareness, professional development, and proactive information-seeking. Findings contribute valuable insights for adult education faculty and higher education institutions to include ALDs more fully.
AjzenI. (2020). The theory of planned behavior: Frequently asked questions. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 2(4), 314–324. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbe2.195
3.
AlfredM. (2002). Linking the personal and the social for a more critical democratic adult education. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 2002(96), 89–96. https://doi.org/10.1002/ace.82
4.
BeckerS.PalladinoJ. (2016). Assessing faculty perspectives about teaching and working with students with disabilities. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 29(1), 65–82. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1107476.pdf
5.
BlackJ.MooreE. (2019). UDL navigators in higher education: A field guide. CAST Professional Publishing.
6.
Carr-ChellmanD. J.KrothM.Rogers-ShawC. (2022). Human flourishing and adult education. In Adult Education Research Conference Proceedings, Norman, OK. https://newprairiepress.org/aerc/2022/papers/2
7.
CaseD. O.GivenL. M. (2016). Looking for information: A survey of research on information seeking, needs, and behavior. Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
8.
CastrodaleM. A. (2016). Critical disability studies and mad studies: Enabling new pedagogies in practice. Canadian Journal for the Study of Adult Education, 29(1), 49–66. https://doi.org/10.56105/cjsae.v29i1.5357
9.
CastrodaleM. A. (2018). Teaching (with) dis/ability and madness. In JeffressM. S. (Ed.), International perspectives on teaching with disability: Overcoming obstacles and enriching lives (pp. 187–204). Routledge.
10.
ClarkM. A. (2006). Adult education and disability studies, an interdisciplinary relationship: Research implications for adult education. Adult Education Quarterly, 56(4), 308–322. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741713606289661
11.
DolmageJ. (2017). Academic ableism: Disability and higher education. University of Michigan Press.
12.
GerberP. J. (2012). The impact of learning disabilities on adulthood: A review of the evidenced-based literature for research and practice in adult education. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 45(1), 31–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219411426858
13.
GreggN. (2012). Increasing access to learning for the adult basic education learner with learning disabilities: Evidence-based accommodation research. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 45(1), 47–63. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219411426855
14.
HansenK. D.DawsonD. L. (2020). “We can do better”: Community college faculty preparedness for teaching students with learning disabilities. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 13(4), 309–319. https://doi.org/10.1037/dhe0000142
15.
HayesA. F. (2020). Statistical methods for communication science. Routledge.
16.
Irvine-SmithS. (2017). Information through the lens: Information research and the dynamics of practice. Information Research, 22(1). http://www.webcitation.org/6oJcSe4kO
17.
KlineP. (2014). An easy guide to factor analysis (1st ed.). Routledge.
18.
LewisBAliA., & Russell, J. (2025). Introducing mad studies. In B. Lewis, A. Ali, & J. Russell (Eds.), Mad studies reader (pp. 1–16). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003148456
19.
Libaque-SaenzC. F.ChangY.KimJ.ParkM.-C.RhoJ. J. (2016). The role of perceived information practices on consumers’ intention to authorize secondary use of personal data. Behavior & Information Technology, 35(5), 339–356. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2015.1128973
20.
Libaque-SaenzC. F.WongS. F.ChangY.BravoE. R. (2021). The effect of Fair information practices and data collection methods on privacy-related behaviors: A study of mobile apps. Information & Management, 58(1), 103284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2020.103284
21.
LindsayS.CagliostroE.AlbericiM.MorarjiN.KaronL. (2018). A systematic review of the benefits of hiring people with disabilities. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 28(1), 634–655. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-018-9756-z
22.
MamboleoG.DongS.AndersonS.MolderA. (2020). Accommodation experience: Challenges and facilitators of requesting and implementing accommodations among college students with disabilities. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 53(1), 43–54. https://doi.org/10.3233/JVR-201084
23.
McKenzieP. J. (2003). A model of information practices in accounts of everyday-life information seeking. Journal of Documentation, 59(1), 19–40. https://doi.org/10.1108/00220410310457993
24.
MeyerA.RoseD. H.GordonD. (2014). Universal design for learning: Theory and practice. CAST Professional Publishing.
25.
National Center for College Students with Disabilities. (2024). Adult learners. Retrieved October 2024 from https://nccsd.ici.umn.edu/clearinghouse/campus-life-and-identity/adult-learners
26.
NicoliniD. (2013). Practice theory, work, and organization: An introduction. Oxford University Press.
27.
OlivasM.GajdaA. (2016). The law and higher education: Cases and materials on colleges in court (4th ed.). Carolina Academic Press.
28.
OsborneJ. W. (2014). Best practices in exploratory factor analysis. CreateSpace.
29.
ParkT. W.MohneyK. D.MooreE. R.Rogers-ShawC. (2022). A model for becoming an inclusive adult educator: Designing for disability. In Proceedings of the Adult Education Research Conference (Virtual). https://newprairiepress.org/aerc/2022/roundtables/12
30.
ParkT. W.RobertsK.DeliseD. (2017). The effects of professional development on universal design for instruction on faculty perception and practice. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 30(2), 123–139. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1153546
31.
Rogers-ShawC.Carr-ChellmanD.ChoiJ. (2018). Universal design for learning: Guidelines for accessible online instruction. Adult Learning, 29(1), 20–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/1045159517735530
32.
Rogers-ShawC.KrothM.Carr-ChellmanD. (2022). Developing Profoundabilities: A new model for adult educators. In Adult Education Research Conference Proceedings, Norman, OK. https://newprairiepress.org/aerc/2022/roundtables/11
33.
Ross-GordonJ. M.ProcknowG. (2020). Adult education and disability. In RoccoT. S.SmithM. C.MizziR. C.MerriweatherL. R.HawleyJ. D. (Eds.), The handbook of adult and continuing education (1st ed., pp. 392–400). Stylus Publishing, LLC.
34.
SavolainenR. (2008). Everyday information practices: A social phenomenological perspective. Scarecrow Press.
35.
SavolainenR. (2017). Information sharing and knowledge sharing as communicative activities. Information Research, 22(3). http://www.webcitation.org/6tTRz0IcS
36.
ShanoudaF. (2019). The violent consequences of disclosure … and how disabled and mad students are pushing back. In WhitburnB.McMasterC. (Eds.), Disability and the university: A disabled students’ manifesto (pp. 1–29). Peter Lang US.
37.
ShewardK.Rogers-ShawC.ParkT. W. (2022). Creating connection by design: Supporting adult learners by building inclusive online academic communities. In Adult Education Research Conference Proceedings, Norman, OK. https://newprairiepress.org/aerc/2022/papers/27
38.
SmithS. A.WoodheadE.Chin-NewmanC. (2021). Disclosing accommodation needs: Exploring experiences of higher education students with disabilities. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 25(12), 1358–1374. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2019.1610087
39.
SniateckiJ. L.PerryH. B.SnellL. H. (2019). Faculty attitudes and knowledge regarding college students with disabilities. Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching & Learning, 14(2), 259–275. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1083837
StephensM. L.LowneyJ.YbarraC. M.StephensS. (2022). Adult learning facilitators in any setting, instructional designers’ roles as the adult learner and educator, and their perceived knowledge construction when preparing graduate faculty for teaching online: An interpretive study. New Horizons in Adult Education and Human Resource Development, 34(1), 3–15. https://doi.org/10.1002/nha3.20319
42.
United States Department of Justice. (1973). Rehabilitation Act of 1973.
43.
United States Department of Justice. (1990). Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990.
44.
United States Department of Justice. (2008). Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (Revised 2008).
45.
ZhongH.HanZ.HansenP. (2023). A systematic review of information practices research. Journal of Documentation, 79(1), 245–267. https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-02-2022-0044
