Six kindergarten students at risk for reading difficulties were taught to tutor each other and provide accurate feedback with the use of a prerecorded sight word model. Students were taught the components of reciprocal peer tutoring and were asked to tutor each other on unknown, phonetically irregular sight words. An A-B-A-B reversal design embedded within a multiple baseline design showed that prerecorded sight words increased students' accurate feedback during peer tutoring and testing. In addition, most students' word identification scores increased from pre- to posttests.
Armbruster, B.B., Lehr, F., & Osborn, J. (2001). Put reading first: The research building blocks for teaching children to read. Washington, DC: National Institute for Literacy.
2.
Barbetta, P.M., Heron, T.E., & Heward, W.L. (1993). Effects of active student response during error correction on the acquisition, maintenance, and generalization of sight words by students with developmental disabilities. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 26(1), 111-119.
Carnine, D.W., Silbert, J., Kameenui, E.J., Tarver, S.G., & Jungjohann, K. (2006). Teaching struggling and at-risk readers: A direct instruction approach. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill/ Prentice Hall.
5.
Chin, C.A., Waggoner, M.A., Anderson, R.C., Schommer, M., & Wilkinson, I.A.G. (1993). Situated actions during reading lessons: A microanalysis of oral reading error episodes. American Educational Research Journal, 30(2), 361-392.
6.
Cooke, N.L., Heron, T.E., & Heward, W.L. (1983). Peer tutoring: Implementing classwide programs in primary grades. Columbus, OH: Special Press.
7.
Coyne, M.D., Kameenui, E.J., & Carnine, D.W. (2007). Effective teaching strategies that accommodate diverse learners (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill/ Prentice Hall.
8.
Engelmann, S. & Bruner, E. (1995). Reading Mastery I (Rainbow ed). Worthington, OH: SRA/McGraw-Hill.
9.
Fry, E.B., Kress, J.E., & Fountoukidis, D.L. (1993). The reading teachers book of lists (3rd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
10.
Good, R.H., & Kaminski, R.A. (2002). DIBELS oral reading fluency passages for first through third grades (Technical Report No. 10). Eugene: University of Oregon.
11.
Greenwood, C.R. (1991). Classwide peer tutoring: Longitudinal effects on reading, language, and mathematics achievement of at-risk students. Journal of Reading, Writing, and Learning Disabilities International, 7(2), 105-123.
12.
Heron, T.E., Heward.,W.L., Cooke, N.L., & Hill, D.S. (1983). Evaluation of a classwide peer tutoring system: First graders teach each other sight words. Education and Treatment of Children, 6, 137-152.
13.
Heron, T.E., Villareal, D.M., Yao, M., Christianson, R.J., Heron, K.M. (2006). Peer tutoring systems: Applications in classroom and specialized environments. Reading and Writing Quarterly , 22(1), 27-45.
14.
Heron, T.E., Welsch, R.G., & Goddard, Y.L. (2003). Applications of tutoring systems in specialized subject areas: An analysis of skills, methodologies, and results. Remedial and Special Education, 24, 288-300.
15.
Heward, W.L. (2006). Exceptional children: An introduction to special education (8th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill/Prentice Hall.
16.
Lo, Y., & Cartledge, G. (2004). Total class peer tutoring and interdependent group oriented contingency: Improving the academic and task related behaviors of fourth-grade urban students. Education and Treatment of Children , 27(3), 235-262.
17.
Maheady, L., Mallette, B., & Harper, G.F. (2006). Four classwide peer tutoring models: Similarities, differences, and implications for research and practice. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 22(1), 65-89.
18.
Mathes, P.G., & Torgeson, P.G. (1998). All children can learn to read: Critical care for the prevention of reading failure. Peabody Journal of Education, 73(3), 317-340.
19.
Miller, A.D., Barbetta, P.M., & Heron, T.E., (1994). START tutoring: Designing, training, implementing, adapting, and evaluating tutoring program for school and home settings. In R. Gardner et al. (Eds.), Behavior analysis in education: Focus on measurably superior instruction (pp. 265-282). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
20.
National Center for Education Statistics. ( 1999). The NAEP 1998 reading report card for the nation and the statesWashington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
21.
National Reading Panel. (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction . Washington, DC: National Institute of Child Heath and Human Development.
22.
Torgesen, J.K., Wagner, R.K., Rashotte, C.A., Alexander, A.W., & Conway, T. (1997). Preventative and remedial interventions for children with severe reading disabilities. Learning Disabilities: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 8, 51-62.
23.
Van Houten, R. (1980). Learning through feedback: A systematic approach for improving academic performance. New York: Human Sciences.
24.
Vaughn, S., Moody, S.W., & Schumm, J.S. (1998). Broken promises: Reading instruction in the resource room. Exceptional Children, 64, 211-225.
25.
Wagner, R.K., Torgesen, J.K., Rashotte, C.A., Hecht, S.A., Barker, T.A., Burgess, S.R., et al. (1997). Changing causal relations between phonological processing abilities and word-level reading as children develop from beginning fluent readers: A five-year longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology, 33, 468-479.
