Many students have difficulty achieving reading fluency, and nearly half of fourth graders are not fluent readers in grade-level texts. Intensive and focused reading practice is recommended to help close the gap between students with poor fluency and their average reading peers. In this study, the Quick Reads fluency program was used as a supplemental fluency intervention for fourth and fifth graders with below-grade-level reading skills. Quick Reads prescribes a repeated reading procedure with short nonfiction texts written on grade-appropriate science and social science topics. Text characteristics are designed to promote word recognition skills. Students were randomly assigned to Quick Reads instruction that was implemented by trained paraeducator tutors with pairs of students for 30 minutes per day, 4 days per week, for 18 weeks. At posttest, Quick Reads students significantly outperformed classroom controls in vocabulary, word comprehension, and passage comprehension. Fluency rates for both treatment and control groups remained below grade level at posttest.
Agronin, M.E., Holahan, J.M., Shaywitz, B.A., & Shaywitz, S.E. (1992). The Multi-Grade Inventory for Teachers (MIT): Scale development, reliability, and validity of an instrument to assess children with attention deficits and learning disabilities. In S. E. Shaywitz & B. A. Shaywitz (Eds.), Attention deficit disorder comes of age: Toward the twenty-first century (pp. 89-116). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
2.
Baumann, J.F., & Kame'enui, E.J. (2004). Vocabulary instruction: Research to practice. New York: Guilford.
3.
Beck, I.L., & McKeown, M.G. (1985). Teaching vocabulary: Making the instruction fit the goal. Educational Perspectives, 23, 11-15.
4.
Beck, I.L., McKeown, M.G., & Kucan, L. (2002). Bringing words to life: Robust vocabulary instruction . New York: Guilford.
5.
Berninger, V.W. (1994). Reading and writing acquisition: A developmental neuropsychological perspective. Madison, WI: Brown and Benchmark.
6.
Berninger, V.W., & Abbott, R.D. (1994). Multiple orthographic and phonological codes in literacy acquisition: An evolving research program. In V. W. Berninger (Ed.), The varieties of orthographic knowledge I: Theoretical and developmental issues. Dordrecht , Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
7.
Berninger, V.W., Abbott, R.D., Billingsley, F., & Nagy, W. (2001). Processes underlying timing and fluency of reading: Efficiency, automaticity, coordination, and morphological awareness. In M. Wolf (Ed.), Dyslexia, fluency, and the brain (pp. 383-414). Baltimore: York.
8.
Biemiller, A. (2001). Teaching vocabulary: Early, direct, sequential . American Educator, 25, 24-28, 47.
9.
Bowers, P.G. (1995). Tracing symbol naming speed's unique contributions to reading disabilities over time. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 7, 189-216.
10.
Bowers, P.G., Golden, J.O., Kennedy, A., & Young, A. (1994). Limits upon orthographic knowledge due to processes indexed by naming speed. In V. W. Berninger (Ed.), The varieties of orthographic knowledge: Theoretical and developmental issues (pp. 173-218). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
11.
Bowers, P.G., & Wolf, M. (1993). Theoretical links between naming speed, precise timing mechanisms and orthographic skills in dyslexia. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 5, 69-85.
12.
Breznitz, Z. (2001). The determinants of reading fluency: A comparison of dyslexic and average readers. In M. Wolf (Ed.), Dyslexia, fluency, and the brain (pp. 245-276). Timonium, MD: York.
13.
Carver, R.P., & Hoffman, J.V. (1981). The effect of practice through repeated reading on gain in reading ability using a computer-based instructional system. Reading Research Quarterly, 16, 374-390.
14.
Chard, D.J., Vaughn, S., & Tyler, B. (2002). A synthesis of research on effective interventions for building reading fluency with elementary students with learning disabilities . Journal of Learning Disabilities, 35, 386-406.
15.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
16.
Dahl, P. (1974). An experimental program for teaching high speed word recognition and comprehension skills (Final Rep. Project No. 3-1154). Washington, DC: National Institute of Education.
17.
Dahl, P. (1979). An experimental program for teaching high speed word recognition and comprehension skills. In J. E. Button, T. Lovitt, & T. Rowland (Eds.), Communications research in learning disabilities and mental retardation (pp. 33-65). Baltimore : University Park.
18.
Ehri, L.C. (1995). Stages of reading development in learning to read words by sight. Journal of Research in Reading, 18, 116-125.
19.
Faulkner, H.J., & Levy, B.A. (1994). Fluent and nonfluent forms of transfer in reading: Words and their message. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 6, 111-116.
20.
Francis, D.J., Snow, C.E., August, D., Carlson, C.D., Miller, J., & Iglesias, A. (2006). Measures of reading comprehension: A latent variable analysis of the diagnostic assessment of reading comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading, 10, 301-322.
21.
Good, R.H., & Kaminski, R.A. (2002). Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills (DIBELS) (6th ed.). Eugene, OR: Institute for the Development of Educational Achievement.
22.
Graham, S., Harris, K.R., & Chorzempa, B.F. (2002). Contribution of spelling instruction to the spelling, writing, and reading of poor spellers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 669-686.
23.
Hasbrouck, J., & Tindal, G.A. (2006). ORF norms: A valuable assessment tool for reading teachers. Reading Teacher, 59, 636-644.
Hiebert, E.H. (2005). The effects of text difficulty on second graders' fluency development. Reading Psychology, 26, 183-209.
26.
Ho, C.S.-H., Chan, D., Tsang, S.-M., & Lee, S.-H. (2002). The cognitive profile and multiple-deficit hypothesis in Chinese developmental psychology. Developmental Psychology, 38, 543-553.
27.
Kame'enui, E.J., Simmons, D.C., Good, R.H., & Harn, B.A. (2001). The use of fluency-based measures in early identification and evaluation of intervention efficacy in schools. In M. Wolf (Ed.), Dyslexia, fluency, and the brain (pp. 307-332). Baltimore: York.
28.
Kuhn, M.R. & Stahl, S.A. (2003). Fluency: A review of developmental and remedial practices. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 3-21.
29.
LaBerge, D., & Samuels, S.J. (1974). Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 6, 293-323.
30.
Manis, F.R., & Freedman, L. (2001). The relationship of naming speed to multiple reading reassures in disabled and normal readers. In M. Wolf (Ed.), Dyslexia, fluency, and the brain (pp. 65-92). Timonium : York.
31.
Mathes, P.G., & Fuchs, L.S. (1993). Peer-mediated reading instruction in special education resource rooms. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice , 8, 233-243.
32.
Mercer, C.D., Campbell, K.U., Miller, M.D., Mercer, K.D., & Lane, H.B. (2000). Effects of a reading fluency intervention for middle schoolers with specific learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 15, 179-189.
33.
Meyer, M.S., & Felton, R.H. (1999). Repeated reading to enhance fluency: Old approaches and new directions. Annals of Dyslexia, 49, 283-306.
34.
Meyer, M.S., Wood, F.B., Hart, L.A., & Felton, R.H. (1998). The selective predictive values in rapid automatized naming within poor readers. Journal of Learning Disabilities , 31, 106-117.
35.
National Reading Panel. (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction . Washington, DC: National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.
36.
No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, Pub. L. No. 107-110, 115 Stat. 1425 (2002).
37.
O'Shea, L., Sindelar, P.T., & O'Shea, D.J. (1985). The effects of repeated readings and attentional cues on reading fluency and comprehension. Journal of Reading Behavior, 17, 129-142.
38.
Penno, J.F., Wilkinson, I.A.G., & Moore, D.W. (2002). Vocabulary acquisition from teacher explanation and repeated listening to stories: Do they overcome the Matthew effect? Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 23-33.
39.
Perfetti, C.A. (1985). Reading ability. New York: Oxford University Press.
40.
Perfetti, C.A. (1992). The representation problem in reading acquisition . In P. B. Gough, L. C. Ehri, & R. Treiman (Eds.), Reading acquisition (pp. 145-174). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
41.
Pikulski, J.J. (2006). Fluency: A developmental and language perspective . In S. J. Samuels & A. E. Farstrup (Eds.), What research has to say about fluency instruction (pp. 70-93). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
42.
Pikulski, J.J., & Chard, D.J. (2005). Fluency: Bridge between decoding and reading comprehension . Reading Teacher, 58, 510-519.
43.
Pinnell, G.S., Pikulski, J.J., Wixson, K.K., Campbell, J.R., Gough, P.B., & Beatty, A.S. (1995). Listening to children read aloud: Data from NAEP's integrated reading performance record (IRPR) at grade 4. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement.
44.
Rashotte, C.A., & Torgesen, J.K. (1985). Repeated reading and reading fluency in learning disabled children. Reading Research Quarterly , 50, 180-188.
Raudenbush, S.W., Bryk, A.S., & Congdon, R.T. (2004). HLM for Windows 6.0 [Computer software]. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International .
47.
Samuels, S.J. (1979). The method of repeated readings. Reading Teacher, 32, 403-408.
48.
Samuels, S.J. (1988). Decoding and automaticity: Helping poor readers become automatic at word recognition. Reading Teacher, 41, 756-760.
49.
Shaywitz, S.E. (1987). Multigrade Inventory for Teachers. New Haven, CT: Yale University School of Medicine.
50.
Shinn, M.R., Good, R.H., Knutson, N., Tilly, W.D., & Collins, V.L. (1992). Curriculum-based measurement of oral reading fluency: A confirmatory analysis of its relation to reading. School Psychology Review, 21, 459-479.
51.
Stahl, S.A., Heubach, K., & Cramond, B. (1997). Fluency-oriented reading instruction (Reading Research Report No. 79). Athens, GA, and College Park, MD: Universities of Georgia and Maryland, National Reading Research Center.
52.
Stanovich, K.E. (1980). Toward an interactive-compensatory model of individual differences in the development of reading fluency. Reading Research Quarterly, 16, 32-71.
53.
Tan, A., & Nicholson, T. (1997). Flashcards revisited: Training poor readers to read words faster improvise their comprehension of text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 276-288.
54.
Tindal, G., Marston, D., & Deno, S.L. (1983). The reliability of direct and repeated measurement (Research Report 109). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Institute for Research on Learning Disabilities.
55.
Torgesen, J.K., Alexander, A.W., Wagner, R.K., Rashotte, C.A., Voeller, K.S., & Conway, T. (2001). Intensive remedial instruction for children with severe reading disabilities: Immediate and long-term outcomes from two instructional approaches. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 34, 33-48, 78.
56.
Torgesen, J.K., Rashotte, C.A., & Alexander, A.W. (2001). Principles of fluency instruction in reading: Relationships with established empirical outcomes . In M. Wolf (Ed.), Dyslexia, fluency, and the brain (pp. 333-355). Baltimore: York .
57.
Torgesen, J.K., Wagner, R.K., & Rashotte, C.A. (1999). Test of Word Reading Efficiency . Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
58.
U.S. Department of Education. (2004). The nation's report card: Reading highlights 2003 (NCES 2004-452) . Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics. Retrieved January 8, 2008, from http://www.nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/pdf/main2003/2004452.pdf
59.
Wagner, R., Torgesen, J.K., & Rashotte, C.A. (1999). Comprehensive Test of Phonological Processing (CTOPP). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
60.
Weinstein, G., & Cooke, N.L. (1992). The effects of two repeated reading interventions on generalization of fluency. Learning Disability Quarterly , 15, 21-28.
61.
Wimmer, H., & Hummer, P. (1990). How German-speaking first graders read and spell: Doubts on the importance of the logographic stage. Applied Psycholinguistics, 11, 349-368.
62.
Wolf, M. (1991). Naming speed and reading: The contribution of the cognitive neurosciences. Reading Research Quarterly, 26, 123-141.
63.
Wolf, M. (2001). Dyslexia, fluency, and the brain. Timonium: York.
64.
Wolf, M., & Bowers, P. (1999). The "double-deficit hypothesis" for the developmental dyslexias. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 1-24.
65.
Wolf, M., & Katzir-Cohen, T. (2001). Reading fluency and its intervention. Scientific Studies of Reading, 5, 211-238.
66.
Wolf, M., Goldberg, A., Gidney, C., Cirino, P., Morris, R., & Lovett, M. (2002). The second deficit: An investigation of the independence of phonological and naming-speed deficits in developmental dyslexia. Reading and Writing, 15, 43-72.
67.
Woodcock, R. (1998). Woodcock Reading Mastery Test-Revised/ Normative Update. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
