This study investigated economic and demographic predictors of levels of inclusion of students with disabilities in 129 school districts. Multiple regression analysis was utilized to address the following research questions: (a) Is there a relationship between economic factors and percentage of highly included students with disabilities in general education when controlling for demographic factors? and (b) Is there a relationship between demographic factors and percentage of highly included students with disabilities in general education classrooms when controlling for economic factors? Results suggest a significant relationship between the economic variables of general education expenditure and special education expenditure, and the amount of time students with disabilities are included in general education classrooms. Implications for practice and future research are discussed.
ArtilesA. J.Harris-MurriN.RostenburgD. (2006). Inclusion as social justice: Critical notes on discourses, assumptions, and the road ahead. Theory Into Practice, 45(3), 260–268.
2.
ArtilesA. J.KozleskiE. B. (2007). Beyond convictions: Interrogating culture, history, and power in inclusive education. Language Arts, 84(4), 357–364.
3.
BakerJ.ZigmondN. (1995). The meaning and practice of inclusion for students with learning disabilities: Themes and implications from five case studies. Journal of Special Education, 29(2), 163–180.
4.
BeloinK.PetersonM. (2000). For richer or poorer: Building inclusive schools in poor urban and rural communities. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 47(1), 15–24.
5.
BrantlingerE. (1997). Using ideology: Cases of nonrecognition of the politics of research and practice in special education. Review of Educational Research, 67(4), 425–459.
6.
Causton-TheoharisJ.TheoharisG. (2008). Creating inclusive schools for all students. School Administrator, 65(8), 24–28.
7.
ChamberlainS. P. (2005). Recognizing and responding to cultural differences in the education of culturally and linguistically diverse learners. Intervention in School and Clinic, 40(4), 195–211.
8.
CohenJ.CohenP.WestS. G.AikenL. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/ correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
9.
ConnorD. J.GabelS. L.GallagherD. J.MortonM. (2008). Disability studies in inclusive education—implications for theory, research, and practice. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 12(5), 441–457.
10.
CoutinhoM. J.OswaldD. P.BestA. M. (2002). The influence of sociodemographics and gender on the disproportionate identification of minority students as having learning disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 23(1), 49–59.
11.
Daniel R. R. v. State Bd. of Educ.,874 F 2d. 1036, 1045 (5th Cir. 1989).
12.
De ValenzuelaJ. S.CopelandS. R.QiC. H.ParkH. (2006). Examining educational equity: Revisiting the disproportionate representation of minority students in special education. Exceptional Children, 72(4), 425–441.
13.
DonovanM. S.CrossC. T. (Eds.). (2002). Minority students in special and gifted education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
14.
FarrellP.DysonA.PolatF.HutchesonG.GallannaughF. (2007). The relationship between inclusion and academic achievement in English mainstream schools. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 18(3), 335–352.
15.
FerriB. A. (2005). In the shadow of Brown: Special education and overrepresentation of students of color. Remedial and Special Education, 26(2), 93–100.
16.
FierrosE. G.ConroyJ. W. (2002). Double jeopardy: An exploration of restrictiveness and race in special education. In LosenD. J.OrfieldG. (Eds.), Racial inequity in special education (pp. 39–70). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Educational Press.
17.
ForeC.IIIBurkeM. D.MartinC. (2006). Curriculum based measurement: An emerging alternative to traditional assessment for African American children. The Journal of Negro Education, 75(1), 16–24.
18.
FratturaE. M.CapperC. A. (2006). Segregated programs versus integrated service delivery for all learners: Assessing the difference. Remedial and Special Education, 27(6), 355–364.
19.
FratturaE. M.CapperC. A. (2007). Leading for social justice. Transforming schools for all learners. New York: Corwin Press.
20.
FriendM.PopeK. L. (2005). Creating schools in which all students can succeed. Kappa Delta Pi Record, 41(2), 56–61.
21.
FuchsD.FuchsL. (1994). Inclusive schools movement and the radicalizations of special education reform. Exceptional Children, 60(4), 294–309.
22.
GabelS. L. (2007). Applying disability theory in educational policy: NIDRR’s “new paradigm of disability” as a cautionary tale. In DanforthS.GabelS. L. (Eds.), Vital questions facing disability studies in education (pp. 179–200). New York: Peter Lang.
23.
HospJ. L.ReschlyD. J. (2002). Predictors of restrictiveness of placement for African-American and Caucasian students. Exceptional Children, 68(2), 225–238.
24.
HospJ. L.ReschlyD. J. (2004). Disproportionate representation of minority students in special education: Academic, demographic, and economic predictors. Exceptional Children, 70(2), 185–199.
25.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004, 20 U. S. C. § 1401 et seq. (2004). (Reauthorization of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act of 1990.)
26.
KauffmanJ. M. (1993). How we might achieve radical reform in special education. Exceptional Children, 60(1), 6–16.
27.
KeithT. Z. (2006). Multiple regression and beyond. Boston: Pearson Education.
28.
LeechN. L.BarrettK. C.MorganG. A. (2008). SPSS for intermediate statistics (3rd ed.). New York: Taylor & Francis.
29.
McLaughlinM. J.WarrenS. H. (1994, November). The cost of inclusion: Reallocating financial and human resources to include students with disabilities. The School Administrator, 51, 8-19.
30.
McLeskeyJ. (2007). Is there a pragmatic middle ground? In McLeskeyJ. (Ed.), Reflections on inclusion: Classic articles that shaped our thinking (pp. 111–123). Arlington, VA: Council for Exceptional Children.
31.
McLeskeyJ.HenryD.HodgesD. (1999). Inclusion: What progress is being made across disability categories?Teaching Exceptional Children, 31(3), 60–64.
32.
MellardD. F.DeshlerD. D.BarthA. (2004). LD identification: It’s simply not a matter of building a better mouse trap. Learning Disability Quarterly, 27(4), 229–242.
33.
National Center for Educational Statistics. (2006). Common core of data (CCD): School years 2005–2006. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
34.
New York State Education Department. (2005). A report to the governor and the legislature on the educational status of the state’s schools. Albany, NY: Author.
35.
No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, Pub. L. No. 107-110, 115 Stat. 1425 (2002).
36.
O’ConnorC. C.Deluca FernandezS. (2006). Race, class, and disproportionality: Reevaluating the relationship between poverty and special education placement. Educational Researcher, 35(6), 6–11.
37.
OdomS. L.HansonM. J.LieberJ.MarquartJ.SandallS.WoleryR.HornE.. . . ChambersJ. (2001). The costs of preschool inclusion. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 21(2), 46–55.
38.
OswaldD. P.CoutinhoM. J.BestA. M. (2002). Community and school predictors of overrepresentation of minority children in special education. In LosenD. J.OrfieldG. (Eds.), Racial inequity in special education (pp. 1–13). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
39.
OswaldD. P.CoutinhoM. J.BestA. M.SinghN. (1999). Ethnic representation in special education: The influence of school-related economic and demographic variables. The Journal of Special Education, 32(4), 194–206.
40.
PattonM. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
41.
PruslowJ. T. (2001). A comparative cost and utility analysis of three models of service delivery for special needs. Journal of Education Finance, 27, 535–566.
42.
ReynoldsM.WangM.WalbergH. (1987). The necessary restructuring of special education. Exceptional Children, 53(5), 391–398.
43.
StainbackW.StainbackS. (1984). A rationale for the merger of special and regular education. Exceptional Children, 51(2), 102–111.
44.
StainbackS.StainbackW. (1992). Schools as inclusive communities. In StainbackW.StainbackS. (Eds.), Controversial issues confronting special education: Divergent perspectives (pp.31–43). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
45.
U.S. Department of Agriculture (2008, January). Eligibility manual for school meals: Federal policy for determining and verifying eligibility. Washington, DC: Author.
46.
U.S. Department of Education. (2007, September). Twenty-seventh annual report to Congress on the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, 2005 (Vol. 1). Washington, DC: Author.
47.
Woodside-JironH. (2004). Language, power, and participation: Using critical discourse analysis to make sense of public policy. In RogersR. (Ed.), An introduction to critical discourse analysis in education (pp. 173–207). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
